|
Haha! I said the Fud storm would be back hard today!
So desperate!
|
|
|
|
Are you suggesting that I'm a part of a smear campaign? If the answer is yes then could you please help me understand your reasoning? Thanks. Ursay... I should probably field your question, because that part of the article was mine. Arlyn did a copy and paste from my last post. It was intended to show the absurdity of the amount of threads dedicated to XC, BN, and Dan. I included your thread because it was filled with anti-Dan sentiment. It was in no way intended to smear your name. I have nothing but respect for you, and your inquisitive approach to ask tough questions. I apologize if this has caused you any harm. It was intended to be a parody... nothing more. As an objective observer and someone that monitors this thread and those whom would choose to do harm, I would say there have been times where his comments irritated me, but only because I aligned this to the smear that was trying to be laid down. In retrospect, his comments are earnest and with value in order to get a clearer picture of the events unfolding. Unfortunately he was standing in front of the tank... Agreed. Also think the thread posted has been tidied up a fair bit since the way it was originally. (from memory) |
|
|
|
...rabble rabble rabble... ...and guys WOW i am seeing how half the key little string pullers in this scene are named Dan.. WTF ? LOL same guy or many guys named Dan ? Says the guy who thought Prom = Dan, and now thinks there is too many dans. lol. |
|
|
|
I thought it was pretty obvious he wrote it anyway. Still shows all the "evidence" posted originally, and the rebuttals and answers that came after. Come on, the forum went mental at the time and whats posted in that article shows what happened. Pretty obvious? Would have been pretty obvious if he had put his name on it like an honest person. Are you writing this kind of thing because you bought blocknet tokens? Not trying to be rude, just you seem so keen to down play or pretend it doesn't matter when he is being dishonest like this. I could understand though if you have a lot of money in it. Got stuck in some bad ones myself with crypto Nope. Wasn't a big fan of the idea originally, was expecting to maybe get some on the cheap after the ITO. Holding some XC though so was pissed with the fudfest and what its tried to do to Dans reputation. Do you not think the article at least proves it very likely it was orchestrated? p.s. I thought it was obvious from the first paragraph. Its basically a copy paste of something he wrote previously. Plus the fact when the article was first posted it was this - See bold text. Nothing underhand by Synechist. |
|
|
|
I thought it was pretty obvious he wrote it anyway. Still shows all the "evidence" posted originally, and the rebuttals and answers that came after. Come on, the forum went mental at the time and whats posted in that article shows what happened. |
|
|
|
Try reading it. Shows the whole story in order, hence the title. Both sides. |
|
|
|
That article was not written by jdebunt btw. He stated it was supposed submitted via email as an official response. Notice the guest author. Irrelevant though It's a decent balanced article that tells the whole story and shows all evidence of both sides. People can read it and make their own mind up. |
|
|
|
Blocknet's Wiki is starting to take shape and with that I am glad to announce that coingateway.net will be holding the ITO's btc in escrow.
Dan
Sweet.  |
|
|
|
Bump for Dan.
He answered these questions in his "Q&A" yesterday. No he didn't. What’s your history with coding? Dan: I started coding in 1980. I wrote BBS software, email s/w and instant messaging software for BBS systems Kamora (Community Member): Name every coin that you made Dan: XC and Blocknet edit: that answers one and indirectly the other was answered, he helped with the annon tech. |
|
|
|
Bump for Dan.
He answered these questions in his "Q&A" yesterday. |
|
|
|
Great article! It's funny, I was just reading through the original chatlogs with a more balanced, less panicked outlook, before you posted this. I had also missed prom's official statement. I hope blocknet gets at least its minimum funding and things can get to how they were before the attack. Thanks for posting. |
|
|
|
i know the team needs to be prepared but the rest should just think positiv . Arlyn when will the xc thread be up again. guess you wanna restart with some news. I think it is safe to reopen the BTC talk thread again. The fud storm is over. +1 though I have a funny feeling the fudstorm may return briefly tommorrow. (if so, not hard to close it again) Just seen Synechists post, good plan for an Updates only thread. |
|
|
|
Refund of ito buyer on bittrex  I have bought few thousands I don't want refund I want blocknet to success We all want Blocknet Success  Refund is optional. |
|
|
|
|
When can the XC thread re open Syn/Teka/Dan/Anyone?
|
|
|
|
We got any details on the escrow yet? Need to get that sorted before the bittrex refund I'd say.
Morning G-Bert! Yes it is our number one priority right now, and getting it sorted before the end of the ITO is the goal. I'm awaiting details. As far as I know the arrangement is largely in place. Cheers Syn. I'm only thinking about how it would look if this isn't sorted beforehand, that's all. |
|
|
|
We got any details on the escrow yet? Need to get that sorted before the bittrex refund I'd say.
Not yet
We'll be releasing details about the escrow arrangement very soon. Things are progressing and we are close to be able to announce the details.
Is it going to be before the refund? |
|
|
|
|
We got any details on the escrow yet? Need to get that sorted before the bittrex refund I'd say.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
