Indeed it is this one. We just posted the v0 without further information so we could have a "Birth Date". A date and time of when we went out to the "Internet". We will be posting more information soon. Thank you for the answer @_Act_ and everybody else. Very helpful. Could you please direct me to where should I move it and how should I proceed for it to NOT be deleted? I'm hoping I can revive that post once we go with all the information so we can keep that birth date. Best and thank you all! If it is indeed an exchange then it belongs HERE on the exchanges board. Good luck!! |
|
|
|
|
I am not saying I do or don't believe you, but I have noticed that your whole post history is basically scam accusations. I'm curious as to why you only play these small unknown or barely known sites? Seems curious that you aren't gambling on the bigger well known sites and are taking chances on these smaller books.
|
|
|
|
It will be a very hard task for Knicks to beat Pacers without OG and Brunson not only because of the home court advantage of Pacers but also they are already in close match when Knicks has strong line-up with the 2 players is active. I doubt that the current Knicks without Brunson can beat a solid Pacers.
I think Knicks will still face a difficulty beating Pacers in home court even with OG and Brunson in the court so I think they might use game 3 and 4 for regrouping then focus on the remaining games until their starters come back.
Let's wait until the actual game starts. Because I am not sure with all of these reports become a tactic for these teams to make their rival confident that if one of their stars aren't going to play, they will have an advantage. I am not really sure but it seems that it's sort of a mind game to me until the game starts and with that rumored player won't be playing actually entered to the first five.  OG is definitely out tonight but Jalen Brunson is definitely playing tonight. He finished the game 2 nights ago with 24 points in the 2nd half he is fine. NBA requires teams to list all questionable and probably due to injuries but this is the playoffs, if you can take the court you are playing. No way the Knicks sell these 2 games in Indiana to bring it back tied up. You put your foot on the pedal full bore in the playoffs. JB will likely see 40-44 minutes tonight if it's close. That's great to hear, if they're going to play without OG and then Brunson, that's going to be a cute giveaway for the Pacers. Since they're already in the possible third streak of win against the Pacers, they don't just want to give any kind of momentum that might built from the Pacers side. Despite missing OG and Jalen Brunson playing at not close to 70% fitness, it was still far from a giveaway for the Indiana Pacer as they had to fight for every single point today, and were close to losing it as well after the Knicks took a 9 points lead around midway into the 4th Quarter, but Andrew Nembhard answered the call when the game was on the line and he had no choice but to take a very deep 3 which he hit, and Pacers were finally able to bank on that opportunity to bring themselves back into the series, but they've still got a shit load of work to do towards game 4. Was a hard fought win for the Pacers. I don't think they can win the series, but this at least saved them from a little embarrassment and a sweep. That Nembhard 3 at the last second of the shot clock was beautiful, guy was shocked he made it lol. Pacers came into this game 7.5 point favorites and in the 1st half it looked like they had a shot at covering, but NY showed they got plenty of fight in them and took that 9 point lead in the 3rd. I don't think either team can blow the other out and if any line is more than 5, take the points. |
|
|
|
I am too poor right now for copper unfortunately.
This line right here would concern me if I was to consider using your site. If you cannot afford a copper membership, how will you pay someone from your own pocket if you cannot prove a bet lost? |
|
|
|
Here comes the first plot twist to the Celtics vs Cavaliers Eastern Conference semi final series, Cavaliers have even the series, taking 118-94 win for game 2 in Boston. Just like me, I guess that's what a lot of us didn't see coming right ? I thought the Cavaliers best chance would be when the series head back to Ohio, but it maybe the dreadful Celtics aren't invisible after all... It's still a best of 7 series, and there is no result ascertained yet, but the Cavaliers first step towards a major upset have been taken tonight, and huge test of defending home court in game 3 and 4 is what awaits!
I guess most of the viewers are not expecting that outcome, it was a close game during the first half but then Cavs dominated the 2nd half and there's no answer from Boston, seems that they don't have any answer with Cavs executed game play, not a good sign for Boston to allow their opponents to win a game in their own court. But, I guess there's always a good adjustments that Boston will do in order to bring back the lead in this series, just one game at a time and we will see them working to try winning this series. On the other side, Cavs got this good oppotunity bringing the series at home with a tie standing, they just need to duplicate the outcome and try harder to take both games at home to have a comfortable lead and hopefully win the series against Boston. Same thing happened with OKC, Dallas took control of the game early and kept their foot on the pedal. Both games tonight were pretty unexpected results for most bettors as both Boston and OKC have been pretty dominant this whole playoffs, but this does show everyone that no team is out of the playoffs if they show some heart. |
|
|
|
I've observed similar instances of winnings not being credited in the original Blackjack game, but support would often claim that everything was in order.
Does this mean that even the Bet IDs for the bets you made in this case are still missing to this date? Yup, even I thought the same. They remove certain bet ids of black jack originals, I never had a concentrate evidence but this time I have proof on pragmatic end and they are caught. Hopefully I am wrong, lets see the outcome, I will update the post.
Think about it for a second. Stake probably spends 5k a week on their signature campaign, they give away 100k a week in raffles, and they give away multiple thousands weekly on bonus drops and the Saturday stream. Seems plausible they'd take $190 from you lmao. Honestly man, errors happen on websites from time to time and support gave you a timeline. I understand you might want your money faster, but this isn't the way to get it. If 7 days has passed and you're still waiting then I would say come back here. |
|
|
|
why start with so high stakes? The final target is so high (x30) but playing so heavy is not the solution... Moreover why not minimize the risk of the single loss?
Likewise adding live playing or just use cashout option...
if you have not strong experience in gambling and sport bets these kind of experiments are really hard if not impossible to be achieved...
My thoughts exactly. Slow and steady wins the race @OP. No need for parlays and prayers, single bets and slow profit. You don't have to pay for medical school in 1 day ya know. |
|
|
|
They have plenty of money to pay participants, not sure why you care? A change was made due to the transaction fees and unstable bitcoin price. It's not a big deal and likely will save them a ton of money over the course of the campaign. Since they moved payments to USDT, the thread had to be moved to the altcoin section.
Oh man, you are wearing stake signature, please dont tell me you also started working with them now and you have to defend them now?  Most of the members who are active in gambling board are not considering stake is doing a good job with campaign and some say it is campaign full of spammers. I have been with stake for quite awhile now, they have never asked me to defend them in any situation. If I am commenting on a situation involving them I would like to think I am not biased and give a fair opinion. I don't think anything is wrong with them changing payment methods, there are pros and cons with the situation and they're allowed to pay how they wish right? I also do not feel like I am anything near a spammer. |
|
|
|
I have just noticed this thread therefore am only replying now after I noticed my name is mentioned. I cannot recall when I last created a thread and locked it, therefore this is not a systematic pattern of conduct on my part and my name should not be attributed to those that might/are doing this type of conduct on a regular basis (including if they are known trolls). The thread I created was not locked immediately, to my knowledge it was locked several hours later and at that point there were no replies were made but I decided to lock it however I copied the content of that post in another post in a different thread and even linked the post in the locked thread which was already part of the discussion. Maybe I reacted and turned the tables on that narcissist because he created several threads asking for members to exclude someone else and it was he that received a lot of exclusions. We are human after all, infallibility is something we cannot possess. And no, there should not be a rule in the Reputation board or anywhere else in the forum where creating and locking a thread is prohibited. Each thread that has been created and locked immediately (or even later if no replies were made) should be assessed on an individual basis and members can come to their own conclusions. Here are a few examples. It might be ok at times I suppose, but really comes off as kind of cowardly to not allow someone to defend themselves doesn't it.
As for creating a thread and it being automatically considered cowardly by virtue of not allowing someone to defend themselves, that also is a matter of perspective and also should be based on the context of the locked thread. On that thinking, yes it is acceptable sometimes depending on the situation. Your thread was posted as it looked like the same thing that JPR was doing, but you are correct and you posted the info and allowed for the point to be argued. With that being said, I cannot really group you into the same category as the other guy. If you're allowing the point to be argued then you're not being a coward either. The question is more directed towards people like JPR that are not allowing a point to be argued. Yes I know someone can make another thread and argue their point, but they shouldn't have to. People don't wanna rule change and that's fine just seems silly to have the ability to lock a thread in reputation period. |
|
|
|
As everyone expected the Boston Celtics got a dominant win over the Cavaliers. They're just too much better of a team. I was a bit surprised to see Dallas get beaten by so much by the Thunder. I’ve underestimated the Thunder along with everyone else all year, but I thought this would be as far as they go. If they get to round 3 I might have to start paying attention. OCK just showed the entire NBA fans why they were No. 1 seed of their conference, it was no fluke! Yeah, I didn't anticipate such a terrific offense from Oklahoma City Thunder, and they also limited Doncic efficiency and Dallas to a joint lowest point scored for this playoffs. Luka hasn't at any point been 100% fit, and I really do hope he has aggravated his injury because for Dallas to stand a chance here Luka Doncic is a must have for this series. Celtics players are more high quality contender compare to current Cavs roster that's why somehow its expected that they lose but still its good to see those young guys reaching this far and can able to provide some good performance against Celtics but they just came up short and defeated by great plays executed by Celtics. Also what happen to OKC and Mavs is quiet unexpected. A lot of people got surprise on how the defense of OKC make Doncic and Irving struggle. They didn't perform so well in game one and the one who lift hem is their role players so I guess that's the reason why they got defeated by fast moving phase by OKC. Its really terrific since whatever Dallas do there's an answer coming from OKC and Luka seems not in really good shape today so maybe next time they should comeback more stronger and correct each mistakes they made on game one. OKC has been dominating the whole playoffs so far. Dallas is an ok team and not out of it as this was only 1 game, but if they don't wake up they'll be out quick. It wouldn't really shock me to see OKC vs the Timberwolves in the conference finals. Whomever wins that series vs Boston in the NBA Finals. I don't think anyone can compete with Boston in the East. |
|
|
|
They have plenty of money to pay participants, not sure why you care? A change was made due to the transaction fees and unstable bitcoin price. It's not a big deal and likely will save them a ton of money over the course of the campaign. Since they moved payments to USDT, the thread had to be moved to the altcoin section.
They have plenty of money but I do not really like how they are managing their campaign. I can remember when I was in your campaign in the past, we can be paid on the gambling site in bitcoin but we can withdraw in altcoins, that kept the campaigns on bitcoin service board. But Stake and some gambling sites are not working like that. Yes gambling sites are different from each other, but there are options that the money can be paid directly into campaign participants bitcoin wallet where they will have nothing more than the deposit fee which all other campaign are paying. There are still many gambling site campaigns on this forum but all of them stayed as bitcoin signature campaigns. Every manager does things their way and every site is different. If everything was the exact same, there would be the need for only 1 manager and 1 gambling site in the world. You have to let them do their thing. If they are happy with the payment method, who are we to complain? |
|
|
|
|
They have plenty of money to pay participants, not sure why you care? A change was made due to the transaction fees and unstable bitcoin price. It's not a big deal and likely will save them a ton of money over the course of the campaign. Since they moved payments to USDT, the thread had to be moved to the altcoin section.
|
|
|
|
|
Women in general seem to be the ones who are more responsible with money. Men will wager $1000 on a game for example, and a woman will be thinking about what that $1000 could have paid in bills. Of course there are responsible gamblers in both genders, but overall women have more sense.
|
|
|
|
Most casinos nowadays don't let you do the KYC process until they request it, this means you will not get KYCed unless a lot of money or fraud is involved, but it would be nice if users could do the KYC process before deciding if to deposit or not.
Well, this time i have 3 questions for the community, i want to see what people think about how gambling works nowadays.
If you could do KYC process before making a deposit, would you do it?
When a user wins a huge amount the real nightmare starts, the users have to complete the worst KYC process he will see in his life, so, should users be afraid of getting a Max Win?
Casinos ask for KYC to avoid money laundering, but if the gambler isn't able to give the requested data then the casino keeps the money. If the casino keeps the money isn't that Money laundering?
I am not a fan of KYC period and have only completed KYC for 1 casino. I have always felt that sites can take KYC too far and a player can end up screwed in some way. So to answer question 1, no. If they haven't completed kyc and the casino is 1 known for asking for kyc, then they're asking to be disappointed if they hit a big win. Question 3 is a tough 1. I don't think that the casino keeping the money would be money laundering, but could be considered theft. Then, the casinos could argue fraud on the players part and void any winnings. It's a mess to say the least and what's right or wrong is subjective. |
|
|
|
Thanks...
I didn't understand ban evasion, I'm using my this I'd with my own Facebook & Twitter accounts.
I didn't buy my these accounts from someone.
So you haven't made a post in 5 years and you pop in now to ask how to remove the neg trust? Very unlikely but either way only owlcats can remove the trust and you'll have to convince him. Ban evasion, this should be fun. |
|
|
|
Denver Nuggets - Minnesota Timberwolves - Denver Nuggets (-3.5) The Nuggets cannot give one more at their home. Force a win.
Good luck everyone. Have a great day. Denver Nuggets are in a very deep and tough scenario right now, they are trailing by 26 points at halftime... That's a very huge deficit to cover in 24 minutes against the Minnesota Timberwolves defense that looks highly impregnable even with one of their big and best defensive asset in Rudy Gobert out, going 0-2 on home court is the biggest recipe for disaster here and this series might as well be considered over, if they can't find a way to get back into the game right now. They're only down 19 right now with 11 mins left in the 4th. They could come back but the way the defense has been for the Timberwolves it would seem very unlikely. They gave a stat earlier that both these teams went 2-2 during the regular season and each team won both games on the road, so maybe the Nuggests don't feel any pressure so far. |
|
|
|
|
You can check the results of the rolls on stake and verify they are not manipulating your rolls. 51% chance does not mean every other roll should be a winner. You will see streaks of green and streaks of red, but will only remember the red streaks.
I would suggest maybe take a break and find the meaning of terms such as probably fair, gamblers fallacy, and learn how to use the verifier that stake offers and how to verify a roll. Once you have a better understanding, maybe take another shot.
|
|
|
|
Hello all member I apologize for not responding, but you have the evidence https://talkimg.com/images/2024/05/05/r4dyo.pngI close my account after winning at roulette. If you see a complaint at Casino Guro, you will find that I sent them evidence and have been waiting for a response for a week. The fire is unfortunate and ridiculous. Scam site while I cannot say trust dice is or isn't a scam site I can say that they probably aren't accusing you without a reason. You think they just randomly chose you over a small amount of winnings? |
|
|
|
It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting.
...
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.
I turned $5-$10 to $50-$100.. but after a good winning streak, I faced a losing streak. The strategy works for a while and brings profit, but at one point everything seems to turn around, and the same strategy starts to fail and every bet falls into the water. So as far as sports betting is concerned, there is no guarantee, but as you say, all we can do is try, so if it works, it works. My only recommendation is to combine different bets, don't chase the same teams and the same bets, the more diverse we are the higher the chance for us to succeed in being profitable in the long run. It's just like any strategy that anyone has, they're all doomed to daily in the long run. If there was a guaranteed winning strategy then casinos and sportsbooks would be out of business. Basically from what I read, you're just hoping that the 1st team to score holds. Unfortunately, sports are super unpredictable and even a game with 1.01 odds can lose. |
|
|
|
Sites don't allow bots but they also don't seem to find them very well. Every few months it seems like people are getting a refund from WPN because they finally busted a players bot account. If it wasn't profittable then players wouldn't be trying to abuse the system by using them.
As for anyone thinking of buying this, you will be caught at some point and a few bucks isn't worth losing your account. Be smart and pass.
I never understood Poker, may be I never was interested that's the reason. So my understanding of Poker and the entire industry is very poor. Reading your response it seems there are indeed a market for these bots and players are using it which felt strange to me LOL. This ask me a question, is online Poker are popular at all? If there are bots instead of players then the real excitement for the game is not there. In a real Poker table the player plays for money and excitements but the audience enjoys it because they feel the emotion of their players. For a bot there will be no support at all :-D It's online poker so there's not really a huge audience unless they are watching a streamer, obviously the streamer isn't using a bot. They're trying to make money and showcasing the site, advertising as you know. The bots are players trying to rob the real players. The bots are programmed and are playing top GTO poker, making calls and plays that most of us wouldn't dream of. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
