UNIX - Linux: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.24, not stripped No engines detected this file SHA-256 67f48fdd6e92358047a911a2a03156d4c50d5e67f52206d9fa67ba357b5e9384 File name bitcoinstake-qt File size 10.51 MB Last analysis 2017-10-02 02:41:35 UTC Status: 2/unconfirmed
Date: 10/1/17 23:09
From: unknown
To: BTMudJUmFwVodVov24qzSUvDePbs3bhedY (own address)
Credit: 10000.00 BCS
Net amount: +10000.00 BCS
Transaction ID: 3d6e1f95c63fafa117388e912b83d4981cea296c19b97dc0f7db21cda227621e // thanks for the airdrop, looking forward to testing the staking equation of the coin & git a feel for IT to become stabilized  p.s. should have been Legendary spots #2 years ago with well over 3000 hours on the forum  |
|
|
|
With electronics, people with hacking skills can uncover encrypted passes to your "storage". How about a time capsule in your garden?
Time Capsule in the Garden of Eden +/-, many steps in offline nTIMELOCK process & only a few have the right knowledge of hardware & software around BTC IT to complete a perfect cold storage. IT be said that you can acquire almost any knowledge of any process online via search engines, just have to read & follow good /directions  |
|
|
|
I really hope to see a few more tabs in the debug console, there have been several improvements in alts & really helps determine how smooth the app drives down the road or flies in the sky (looks don't make it work better).
The GoldCoin (GLD) client tested 10 times better than many others, as many are built on a broken framework & have catchy graphics. GoldCoin has a solid back-end, can't wait to see an updated front-end for the users Wink
The dashboard is the most interesting development over the years, seeing how it runs (while utilizing & also sitting in idle) is what most look for in a test drive Wink Many don't care what the ride is or how smooth it is, but that it works & that is a flaw of all these applications. Is it the get from point A to B theory for some, when others look at the entire outlook & it's functionality.
hmmm, the quote above looks really close to the a machine post of the past "in your own words" & the meme of seeing many quotes over the years via the bitcointalk forum "every once in a while, you will see satoshi quotes of the past" Blink Blink // easy to ignore many post on this forum over the years, but this one seems realY ODD & or I should say thanks for using my exact words as yours? Must be 88 mph to come from beyond, 256 volts to make a bITcoin past half time & 512 amps to break the barrier in space Blink Blink |
|
|
|
4 active peers right away
The block explorer looks down too, so many coins going defunct & or being abandoned over the years. The same thing you see all over the world (start ups fail more than they make IT), when you can create new & abandon projects so easily in the start.
Only 1 connection for me now. @Testing Crypto: Do you know how to host a fullnode from an Ubuntu server? I tried with CKS but not working. The port 10123 is open. I tried to connect my home wallet (normal ubuntu) with "connect=<ipserver>:10123" to my server wallet and not working. The opposite works by con ( but have to use the -upnp option). The upnp option doesn't work for ubuntu server. IT might take me an hour to give a edited reply (you need a .conf file with the right settings), but do have the Linux node up & 4 nodes right away (6 after a minute or two). .chicks folder will be in your hidden files & you need a chicks.conf file with the right settings server=1 listen=1 rescan=1 rpcuser=yourusernamehere@edit rpcpassword=youruserpasswordhere@edit rpcport=10124 port=10123 maxconnections=100 //-upnp Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 1 when listening) |
|
|
|
0 active peers (Nova, Tradesatoshi, Yobit).  4 active peers right away The block explorer looks down too, so many coins going defunct & or being abandoned over the years. The same thing you see all over the world (start ups fail more than they make IT), when you can create new & abandon projects so easily in the start. |
|
|
|
is this coin Defunct? been searching all over internet for some new news but i have found none.
6 active peers right off the .bat  // 1000's of test over the years & Ziftr had IT all in the start (looked like they had all the right steps anyway with all IT takes to create a coin), the first one with TOR actually built-in (not some gimmick or fake talk about IT). |
|
|
|
|
IT would be great if block explorers & market capital sites had pools as well, can't remember the site that has all that extra info. Messaged the Dev to help with the original post coding last week, would greatly help with the layout of all the info & finding what the user needs. Thought about IT a few time today, but always like to wait till IT has most of the sites (takes many hours to code IT) & after adding all the code makes it tough to make simple edits unless the BBcode has many extra emtpy lines of code.
// there was a 3 pool, lpool.name & am sure I even seen one that never made it to the OP or had a post from the pool operator
|
|
|
|
Just sent 0.005 BTC for the explorer, not a main holder or a Dev like GrinZ posted earlier (would be happy to give the keys of OP & Twitter to any trusted party @ anytime) & mainly stuck out all these years for the coined term FIRE (safety mostly). Same as I have done with TECH, see a lot of mockery in the background over the years (many impersonation accounts, keybase was not fully tested or that might have been solved by now) & have been dealt quite a rough hand in life (not as most on this forum, but if all humans compared life stories & the H//errors they have encounter in all the wonders of life??) Still holding on to a few of the coined terms to make an actual use, not just marketing & more of something that could make the world a better place. All the coding world has just started to get past all the closed source applications, so a fresh start with the right team could actually make all the fire safety tools into one application that would help everyone from the basic user to the gauges on all gadgets type app? Just a stupid idea to most I'm sure, but kind of what I had pictured with many of these. Anyway, block explorer up for another month {if} anyone has use for IT a little* bit of help would be nicehttps://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/8bd5a9a3b1ed08bd84c5d549aba0805ed43ee8671103cb9bd03e51ed76df18e7/ |
|
|
|
|
Was going to pull some FIRE off YoBit to try to keep the staking network from forking, but am now seeing a Transfer from cold storage for a few days now & am not able to help the network staking if I can't get the FIRE off the exchange. Might be why there seem to be a lot of FIRE sold in the last days?
Pending Withdrawals:
2017.08.02 20:26:22 FIRE 8.96443002 0 Transfer from cold storage
|
|
|
|
1 Week update: | | Block Chain PoS Extraction Overview ____________________________________________________
Staking Addresses
Rank Address Last 100 Last 1000
1 TKsCScQt... (Rich #5) 45 % 38.9 %
2 TBATUPzU... (Rich #3) 30 % 23.9 %
3 TY8RA5TM... (Rich #59) 5 % 2.7 %
4 TDbWoiw5... (Rich #79) 4 % 1.6 %
5 TQaihznY... (Rich #22) 3 % 12.0 %
6 TA2wBhqT... (Rich #96) 3 % 1.8 %
7 TQtxq8vc... (Rich #38) 2 % 4.0 %
8 TBi3ZLfz... (Rich #89) 1 % 2.4 %
9 TBi8EEtG... (Rich #86) 1 % 1.6 %
10 TEA4cNRY... (Rich #99) 1 % 1.6 %
11 TFVXaJeL... (Rich #103) 1 % 1.6 %
12 TZB1EXpG... (Rich #142) 1 % 0.8 %
13 THzzPt85... (Rich #94) 1 % 0.3 %
14 TWMppYDR... (Rich #302) 1 % 0.2 %
15 TLXWAhQ7... (Rich #627) 1 % 0.1 %
16 TEFjVeER... (Rich #29) 0 % 1.0 %
17 TQrow812... (Rich #146) 0 % 0.9 %
18 TAA9wwKV... (Rich #136) 0 % 0.8 %
19 TVX9ko3y... (Rich #128) 0 % 0.7 %
20 TY3YNvJQ... (Rich #127) 0 % 0.6 %
21 TD9LerxA... (Rich #21) 0 % 0.5 %
22 TAWAJido... (Rich #227) 0 % 0.4 %
23 TH5zqLW1... (Rich #95) 0 % 0.3 %
24 TJquWgHD... (Rich #74) 0 % 0.2 %
25 TPCMauxr... (Rich #69) 0 % 0.2 %
26 TLkA1UXF... (Rich #83) 0 % 0.2 %
27 TKKmakC9... (Rich #75) 0 % 0.2 %
28 TX3e3tA9... (Rich #48) 0 % 0.2 %
29 TP9medX9... (Rich #73) 0 % 0.1 %
30 TUzCschF... (Rich #912) 0 % 0.1 %
31 TJHAyfaM... (Rich #659) 0 % 0.1 %
| Block Chain Explorer Overview _______________________________________________________________________________
Date/Time | Blocks | Height | Interval | Transactions | Value Out | Difficulty | Generated+Fees
2017-08-06 Sun 46 187294 - 0 11,411.248 TECH 0.0007 ± 63% 0.54490891
2017-08-05 Sat 168 187248 514.3 1 26,499.542 TECH 0.0017 ± 86% 3.99232837
2017-08-04 Fri 143 187080 604.2 0 25,228.602 TECH 0.0011 ± 77% 1.2678691
2017-08-03 Thu 189 186937 457.1 0 53,490.36 TECH 0.0019 ± 87% 2.32569731
2017-08-02 Wed 147 186748 587.8 0 45,192.101 TECH 0.0011 ± 78% 2.53861634
2017-08-01 Tue 144 186601 600.0 2 41,219.377 TECH 0.0008 ± 68% 2.68249667
2017-07-31 Mon 172 186457 502.3 6 41,478.174 TECH 0.0014 ± 83% 2.88137978
2017-07-30 Sun 141 186285 612.8 5 70,375.861 TECH 0.0077 ± 97% 18.74893912
2017-07-29 Sat 27 186144 3200.0 1 15,400.937 TECH 0.0021 ± 88% 12.36695778
2017-07-28 Fri 13 186117 6646.2 2 8,777.095 TECH 0.0004 ± 39% 2.77430338
2017-07-27 Thu 2 186104 43200.0 0 77.697 TECH 0.0005 ± 51% 0.01133165
| |
// Just like Ethereum network, PoS uses the fees (like gas spending & gas limit stats of Ethereum) to move the network & if most user don't pay a transaction fee above the bare minimum (in theory). The chain will start to get stuck & or fork for some, will try to continue to cover the networks transaction fees & hope in the future the rest of the TECH users decide to change their Options "Pay transactions fee" of 0.01 for those who are staking or sending large amounts of TECH | | Block Chain PoS Extraction Overview ______________________________________________ Staking Addresses Rank Address Last 100 Last 1000 1 TKsCScQt... (Rich #5) 30 % 53.7 % 2 TQaihznY... (Rich #19) 12 % 21.8 % 3 TA2wBhqT... (Rich #94) 7 % 2.9 % 4 TEFjVeER... (Rich #30) 7 % 0.7 % 5 TY8RA5TM... (Rich #59) 6 % 3.9 % 6 TVX9ko3y... (Rich #122) 5 % 2.0 % 7 TD9LerxA... (Rich #23) 4 % 0.4 % 8 TP9medX9... (Rich #72) 4 % 0.4 % 9 TX3e3tA9... (Rich #48) 4 % 0.4 % 10 TQtxq8vc... (Rich #39) 3 % 7.3 % 11 TZB1EXpG... (Rich #135) 3 % 1.4 % 12 TLKAxBfM... (Rich #11) 3 % 0.3 % 13 TRXXnbAS... (Rich #206) 2 % 0.9 % 14 TJquWgHD... (Rich #74) 2 % 0.2 % 15 TPCMauxr... (Rich #69) 2 % 0.2 % 16 TLkA1UXF... (Rich #83) 2 % 0.2 % 17 TLXWAhQ7... (Rich #618) 1 % 0.5 % 18 TPmWBSmv... (Rich #46) 1 % 0.1 % 19 TH5zqLW1... (Rich #92) 1 % 0.1 % 20 TKKmakC9... (Rich #73) 1 % 0.1 % 21 TDbWoiw5... (Rich #78) 0 % 2.5 % | Block Chain PoS Extraction Overview _________________________________________________ Staking Addresses Rank Address Last 100 Last 1000 1 TKsCScQt... (Rich #5) 31 % 55.4 % 2 TA2wBhqT... (Rich #94) 13 % 2.8 % 3 TQaihznY... (Rich #19) 11 % 22.5 % 4 TVX9ko3y... (Rich #122) 11 % 2.0 % 5 TZB1EXpG... (Rich #135) 10 % 1.5 % 6 TQtxq8vc... (Rich #39) 7 % 7.7 % 7 TY8RA5TM... (Rich #59) 7 % 3.7 % 8 TLKAxBfM... (Rich #11) 3 % 0.3 % 9 TDbWoiw5... (Rich #78) 2 % 2.7 % 10 TRXXnbAS... (Rich #206) 2 % 0.9 % 11 TLXWAhQ7... (Rich #618) 2 % 0.4 % 12 TPmWBSmv... (Rich #46) 1 % 0.1 % | |
| | Block Chain Explorer Overview _______________________________________________________________________________ Date/Time | Blocks | Height | Interval | Transactions | Value Out | Difficulty | Generated+Fees 2017-07-30 Sun 41 186185 ------ 0 20,536.993 TECH 0.0006 ± 56% 0.72215281 2017-07-29 Sat 27 186144 3200.0 1 15,400.937 TECH 0.0021 ± 88% 12.36695778 2017-07-28 Fri 13 186117 6646.2 2 8,777.0950 TECH 0.0004 ± 39% 2.77430338 2017-07-27 Thu 2 186104 43200.0 0 77.697000 TECH 0.0005 ± 51% 0.01133165 2017-07-26 Wed 14 186102 6171.4 0 9,816.002 TECH 0.0009 ± 73% 2.4722735 | Block Chain Explorer Overview _______________________________________________________________________________ Date/Time | Blocks | Height | Interval | Transactions | Value Out | Difficulty | Generated+Fees 2017-07-26 Wed 0 000000 ------ 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-25 Tue 9 186088 9600.0 0 6,186.629 TECH 0.0005 ± 51% 2.29949857 2017-07-24 Mon 0 000000 ------ 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-23 Sun 0 000000 ------ 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-22 Sat 18 186079 4800.0 1 9,178.98 TECH 0.0005 ± 55% 1.97955794 2017-07-21 Fri 11 186061 7854.5 0 5,253.326 TECH 0.0003 ± 12% 0.44487762 2017-07-20 Thu 18 186050 4800.0 0 10,300.998 TECH 0.0006 ± 57% 2.26825703 2017-07-19 Wed 4 186032 21600.0 0 524.667 TECH 0.0002 ± 0% 0.11620248 2017-07-18 Tue 6 186028 14400.0 1 1,475.335 TECH 0.0002 ± 0% 0.05843146 2017-07-17 Mon 93 186022 929.0 3 27,497.018 TECH 0.0005 ± 54% 1.25403158 2017-07-16 Sun 149 185929 579.9 1 25,963.225 TECH 0.0006 ± 58% 1.21110428 2017-07-15 Sat 145 185780 595.9 0 24,293.408 TECH 0.0007 ± 63% 1.07816142 | |
|
|
|
|
// Just like Ethereum network, PoS uses the fees (like gas spending & gas limit stats of Ethereum) to move the network & if most user don't pay a transaction fee above the bare minimum (in theory). The chain will start to get stuck & or fork for some, will try to continue to cover the networks transaction fees & hope in the future the rest of the TECH users decide to change their Options "Pay transactions fee" of 0.01 for those who are staking or sending large amounts of TECH | | Block Chain PoS Extraction Overview ______________________________________________ Staking Addresses Rank Address Last 100 Last 1000 1 TKsCScQt... (Rich #5) 30 % 53.7 % 2 TQaihznY... (Rich #19) 12 % 21.8 % 3 TA2wBhqT... (Rich #94) 7 % 2.9 % 4 TEFjVeER... (Rich #30) 7 % 0.7 % 5 TY8RA5TM... (Rich #59) 6 % 3.9 % 6 TVX9ko3y... (Rich #122) 5 % 2.0 % 7 TD9LerxA... (Rich #23) 4 % 0.4 % 8 TP9medX9... (Rich #72) 4 % 0.4 % 9 TX3e3tA9... (Rich #48) 4 % 0.4 % 10 TQtxq8vc... (Rich #39) 3 % 7.3 % 11 TZB1EXpG... (Rich #135) 3 % 1.4 % 12 TLKAxBfM... (Rich #11) 3 % 0.3 % 13 TRXXnbAS... (Rich #206) 2 % 0.9 % 14 TJquWgHD... (Rich #74) 2 % 0.2 % 15 TPCMauxr... (Rich #69) 2 % 0.2 % 16 TLkA1UXF... (Rich #83) 2 % 0.2 % 17 TLXWAhQ7... (Rich #618) 1 % 0.5 % 18 TPmWBSmv... (Rich #46) 1 % 0.1 % 19 TH5zqLW1... (Rich #92) 1 % 0.1 % 20 TKKmakC9... (Rich #73) 1 % 0.1 % 21 TDbWoiw5... (Rich #78) 0 % 2.5 % | Block Chain PoS Extraction Overview _________________________________________________ Staking Addresses Rank Address Last 100 Last 1000 1 TKsCScQt... (Rich #5) 31 % 55.4 % 2 TA2wBhqT... (Rich #94) 13 % 2.8 % 3 TQaihznY... (Rich #19) 11 % 22.5 % 4 TVX9ko3y... (Rich #122) 11 % 2.0 % 5 TZB1EXpG... (Rich #135) 10 % 1.5 % 6 TQtxq8vc... (Rich #39) 7 % 7.7 % 7 TY8RA5TM... (Rich #59) 7 % 3.7 % 8 TLKAxBfM... (Rich #11) 3 % 0.3 % 9 TDbWoiw5... (Rich #78) 2 % 2.7 % 10 TRXXnbAS... (Rich #206) 2 % 0.9 % 11 TLXWAhQ7... (Rich #618) 2 % 0.4 % 12 TPmWBSmv... (Rich #46) 1 % 0.1 % | |
| | Block Chain Explorer Overview _______________________________________________________________________________ Date/Time | Blocks | Height | Interval | Transactions | Value Out | Difficulty | Generated+Fees 2017-07-30 Sun 41 186185 ------ 0 20,536.993 TECH 0.0006 ± 56% 0.72215281 2017-07-29 Sat 27 186144 3200.0 1 15,400.937 TECH 0.0021 ± 88% 12.36695778 2017-07-28 Fri 13 186117 6646.2 2 8,777.0950 TECH 0.0004 ± 39% 2.77430338 2017-07-27 Thu 2 186104 43200.0 0 77.697000 TECH 0.0005 ± 51% 0.01133165 2017-07-26 Wed 14 186102 6171.4 0 9,816.002 TECH 0.0009 ± 73% 2.4722735 | Block Chain Explorer Overview _______________________________________________________________________________ Date/Time | Blocks | Height | Interval | Transactions | Value Out | Difficulty | Generated+Fees 2017-07-26 Wed 0 000000 ------ 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-25 Tue 9 186088 9600.0 0 6,186.629 TECH 0.0005 ± 51% 2.29949857 2017-07-24 Mon 0 000000 ------ 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-23 Sun 0 000000 ------ 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-22 Sat 18 186079 4800.0 1 9,178.98 TECH 0.0005 ± 55% 1.97955794 2017-07-21 Fri 11 186061 7854.5 0 5,253.326 TECH 0.0003 ± 12% 0.44487762 2017-07-20 Thu 18 186050 4800.0 0 10,300.998 TECH 0.0006 ± 57% 2.26825703 2017-07-19 Wed 4 186032 21600.0 0 524.667 TECH 0.0002 ± 0% 0.11620248 2017-07-18 Tue 6 186028 14400.0 1 1,475.335 TECH 0.0002 ± 0% 0.05843146 2017-07-17 Mon 93 186022 929.0 3 27,497.018 TECH 0.0005 ± 54% 1.25403158 2017-07-16 Sun 149 185929 579.9 1 25,963.225 TECH 0.0006 ± 58% 1.21110428 2017-07-15 Sat 145 185780 595.9 0 24,293.408 TECH 0.0007 ± 63% 1.07816142 | |
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what that means. Like I've always told you, I do not understand any of this.
About 3 months ago I said that I was not supporting TECH. But I still have not got it. So I urge you to tell us what we need to do to resolve this issue.
I am not sure what to say for you not understanding (wish I could help you), Google or BING & learn like everyone else does. Telling people to buy when you don't understand, really not recommended & or a bad idea. I have watched these applications for a long time, still don't understand fully myself & am not able to resolve anything alone (PoS can only be resolved by multiple users staking online). Other than the fact that these applications are as stated "experimental", bitcoin has advanced in many other simple formats (still not understandable by most) & really user simplified 3rd party layers. There are over 5000+ altcoins now, but most have random access names  |
|
|
|
I would not recommend anyone buying TECH right now, the main wallet moving the network is just forking over & over? The network staking weight @ only 156 which is the lowest it has ever been (3+ years) & surely a sign of going defunct if not fixed soon. Even the faucet claims could move the chain right now, but only having PoS (1 gear moving the chain, unlike PoW & others with many gears moving blocks) to move the chain could be a major problem & or leave a gummed up blockchain  Date / Time Blocks Height Interval Transactions Value Out Difficulty Generated+Fees 2017-07-26 Wed 0 0 - 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-25 Tue 9 186088 9600.0 0 6,186.629 TECH 0.0005 ± 51% 2.29949857 2017-07-24 Mon 0 0 - 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-23 Sun 0 0 - 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-22 Sat 18 186079 4800.0 1 9,178.98 TECH 0.0005 ± 55% 1.97955794 2017-07-21 Fri 11 186061 7854.5 0 5,253.326 TECH 0.0003 ± 12% 0.44487762 2017-07-20 Thu 18 186050 4800.0 0 10,300.998 TECH 0.0006 ± 57% 2.26825703 2017-07-19 Wed 4 186032 21600.0 0 524.667 TECH 0.0002 ± 0% 0.11620248 2017-07-18 Tue 6 186028 14400.0 1 1,475.335 TECH 0.0002 ± 0% 0.05843146 2017-07-17 Mon 93 186022 929.0 3 27,497.018 TECH 0.0005 ± 54% 1.25403158 2017-07-16 Sun 149 185929 579.9 1 25,963.225 TECH 0.0006 ± 58% 1.21110428 2017-07-15 Sat 145 185780 595.9 0 24,293.408 TECH 0.0007 ± 63% 1.07816142 |
|
|
|
For 2 months my wallet does not synchronize on the network.
TechCoin version v1.1.4.1
Which nodes are working?
rescan=1
addnode=188.163.104.86
addnode=162.220.166.125
addnode=149.202.121.129
addnode=96.54.68.100
addnode=148.251.8.18
addnode=[2a01:4f8:201:6211::2101]
addnode=37.187.153.6
addnode=179.154.32.124  [ { "addr" : "188.163.104.86:49594", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500596543, "lastrecv" : 1500596542, "conntime" : 1500594741, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.1.4.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 186032, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "162.220.166.125:57697", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500596546, "lastrecv" : 1500596546, "conntime" : 1500594742, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0.1/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 181700, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "149.202.121.129:57697", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500596548, "lastrecv" : 1500596548, "conntime" : 1500594743, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0.1/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 186032, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "148.251.8.18:36027", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500596545, "lastrecv" : 1500596545, "conntime" : 1500594743, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 186032, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "96.54.68.100:62730", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500596562, "lastrecv" : 1500596562, "conntime" : 1500594761, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.1.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 186032, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "[2a01:4f8:201:6211::2101]:57697", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500596575, "lastrecv" : 1500596574, "conntime" : 1500594773, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0.1/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 186032, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "37.187.153.6:41638", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500596699, "lastrecv" : 1500596699, "conntime" : 1500594898, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 186032, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "179.154.32.124:63599", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500596647, "lastrecv" : 1500596647, "conntime" : 1500596646, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.1.4.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 173420, "banscore" : 0 } ] |
|
|
|
'Premium' status for the block explorer has expired also & am unable to cover the cost again for the FIRE community at this time, the network as of now @ "netstakeweight" : 32870.35573740, (over 100x what it was) // the jump in network staking weight might lead to a fork or stalled chain, be cautious with unlocking PoS after months on a chain with only a few nodes update: "netstakeweight" : 1365.27692263, @ around normal again on Fri Jul 21 10:02:26 2017  [ { "addr" : "104.236.167.70:49697", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500595452, "lastrecv" : 1500595453, "conntime" : 1500573130, "version" : 70013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.1/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 165212, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "162.220.166.125:49697", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500595576, "lastrecv" : 1500595576, "conntime" : 1500573131, "version" : 70013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.1/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 162212, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "162.220.166.125:52735", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500595696, "lastrecv" : 1500595696, "conntime" : 1500573134, "version" : 70013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.1/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 162212, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "188.113.229.244:64647", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1500595453, "lastrecv" : 1500595453, "conntime" : 1500595310, "version" : 70013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 165292, "banscore" : 0 } ] |
|
|
|
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/tech/#!overview Date / Time Blocks Height Interval Transactions Value Out Difficulty Generated+Fees 2017-07-20 Thu 0 0 - 0 0.0 TECH - 0.0 2017-07-19 Wed 4 186032 21600.0 0 524.667 TECH 0.0002 ± 0% 0.11620248 2017-07-18 Tue 6 186028 14400.0 1 1,475.335 TECH 0.0002 ± 0% 0.05843146 2017-07-17 Mon 93 186022 929.0 3 27,497.018 TECH 0.0005 ± 54% 1.25403158 2017-07-16 Sun 149 185929 579.9 1 25,963.225 TECH 0.0006 ± 58% 1.21110428 2017-07-15 Sat 145 185780 595.9 0 24,293.408 TECH 0.0007 ± 63% 1.07816142 // looks like the TECH chain has started to stall, need some nodes staking online to move the chain @ a normal rate again
|
|
|
|
|
watched & reserved for airdrop
|
|
|
|
Just checked the block explorer, blocks & diff now shows: Blocks in database: 164936/164936 Synchronisation speed: 118 blocks/day (up from 49 blocks/day in just a few hours) Chain Age: 1110.8 days AVG Block Time: 582 sec. // looks like the blocks & diff are climbing again, stats from the difficulty chart on the BE show some good points on when more PoS wallets are staking http://cryptoguru.tk/Charts/index.php?Currency=FIRE |
|
|
|
Happy birthday, FIRE! We love you! Sorry, I am a bit late.  Yeah I actually thought about posting on the 3 year mark for FIRE && TECH, time flew right by & missed the chance to post @ the time stamp of the 3 year mark. Going to have to try to make a post right on the time stamp for year 4, hope for a good year & maybe FIRE will git a chance to improve. I have been looking into website domains .fire, so many are available & not quite as popular as the .tech ones. I do really think that the .fire ones will be way more of a city value (fire station#.fire for example) or other things that involve fire to come to the "lite" with the online presence being quantum leaped through the next few years. The stats & uses of applications are still new to most of the world, but they are advanced year by year in the possible amount of things they solve (time being the #1). Dream to Dream, think Big & Small |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
