I'm also having problems. Most threads take a long time to load, and sometimes give a connection error. Is the forum under attack?  This took about 2 minutes to post. |
|
|
|
If miners stopped mining it would be great for everyone else.
Are you sure about that? I still have much to learn about bitcoin but wouldn't it fail since there would be no one securing the transactions? |
|
|
|
..Less rewards means less supply of bitcoins so maybe higher price in the end.
Context seems to be off on this one. The hard coded supply of all bitcoins is 21000000 (20999999.7 afaik) and it wouldn't go lower than that. The only thing that's gonna be decreased are the rewards per block but not the supply. Rewards per block != supply. Right. Maybe I shouldn't have said supply. I wasn't talking about the total supply of bitcoins. I meant that at the time of the reward halving there would be less bitcoins being mined and so less being sold by miners and flooding the market. |
|
|
|
No reply whatsoever to my post, so I suppose I'm out. Would have been nice to get some response though. Even if a we're not interested.
Oh, sorry. I must've missed you. I can accept for 0.005 BTC/month, lmk if that'll do it Thanks for the reply. I was hoping for 0.02 btc/month but alright, I'll take the 0.005 for now. It's not like I'm using the avatar or the PM anyway. |
|
|
|
^ and less bitcoins being mined overall, so even greater price per bitcoin. That's a great incentive.
According to the bitcoin clock bitcoin will drop to 12.5 btc per block in late July of 2016.
How will miners react to this?
What will it take to keep miners mining?
What if miners in large numbers decide not to mine?
I doubt miners will stop in large numbers. Less rewards means less supply of bitcoins so maybe higher price in the end. |
|
|
|
|
username: reyhiesa
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
No reply whatsoever to my post, so I suppose I'm out. Would have been nice to get some response though. Even if a we're not interested.
|
|
|
|
|
username: reyhiesa
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Are there any spots left? I would like to join this campaign. My Moneypot username is the same: reyhiesa. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
username: reyhiesa
Thanks for this promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
username: reyhiesa
Thanks for this promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
username: reyhiesa
Thanks for this promotion.
|
|
|
|
To be honest, the only people making good money with faucets are the faucet owners and faucet rotator operators. I've heard that owners get some good ad revenue, and faucet rotators obviously get money since they don't invest any money into their rotators. They're really just taking advantage of the peeps who enjoy wasting their time.
Faucets have some low profit margins AFAIK. A friend of mine ran a faucet for a few months. He said that he was unable to keep the faucet running since so many people were visiting that their ad revenue just wasn't enough to keep the faucet going. No matter how many visitors you have in your faucet site if no one is clicking ads you will never generate any revenue because page impressions doesn't count. Doesn't that depend on the type of ads? I don't know if a faucet can get ads that count page impressions, but maybe if the site had more than just the faucet, like a blog or something like that, it could be accepted. Has anyone tried that? |
|
|
|
|
username: reyhiesa
Thanks for this promotion.
|
|
|
|
Do you guys count untrusted negative ratings?
What if there's 4 untrusted positives and 2 untrusted negatives?
NO, the negative trust is considered when it is rewarded by a default trust member, untrusted can be fake. You're right, but trust from someone in default trust can also be fake or exaggerated. I don't know if that happens here but when I was searching for a new campaign I read of some that don't automatically refuse you because you have trusted negative. They look to see if it is really because of scams or not. |
|
|
|
That's fear mongering. 120 million Mexicans versus 10 million Americans with Mexican ancestry maybe? Doesn't seem likely that there will be more Mexicans in the United States than in Mexico in a few years. Many of them are going back to Mexico, and many others move from the countryside to the cities within Mexico instead of going to the United States. That's the trend reversal I mentioned before. The United States aren't the attractive destination they once were anymore.
As per the 2010 Census of the United Sates, there are a total of 50,477,594 Hispanics residing legally in the United States. Add in the 13 million or so illegal immigrants, the figure will cross 20% of the total population. This is much higher than the 10 million figure which you had quoted. Also, there is no strong evidence to prove that more Mexicans are going back to their home country, than those who migrate to the United States. The immigration influx from Latin America seems to be growing day by day. You're right, Americans with Mexican ancestry are more than 10 million. About 35 million legally, and maybe the 13 million you mentioned illegally. But do you have anything to back up the idea that emigration from Mexico is increasing? The Pew research seems to contradict it. Has anything dramatically changed since the study, or anything that shows it wrong? Especially in the scale needed for there to be more Mexicans in the United States than in Mexico in a few years like you were pushing? http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/net-migration-from-mexico-falls-to-zero-and-perhaps-less |
|
|
|
|
Username: reyhiesa
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
The united states i think. They have nukes, cmon.
I don't think that the Americans will fire nukes against their own citizens. A large part of the Mexicans do have American citizenship, and in a matter of few years, there will be more Mexicans in the United States, than in Mexico itself. Do you really believe that the US is going to nuke major metros such as Los Angeles and San Francisco? That's fear mongering. 120 million Mexicans versus 10 million Americans with Mexican ancestry maybe? Doesn't seem likely that there will be more Mexicans in the United States than in Mexico in a few years. Many of them are going back to Mexico, and many others move from the countryside to the cities within Mexico instead of going to the United States. That's the trend reversal I mentioned before. The United States aren't the attractive destination they once were anymore. |
|
|
|
|
Username: reyhiesa
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
