Yep, just a few of them:

1. Full node stores the whole DAG data which means it isn't that much more scalable in comparison to blockchain without blocksize limit (e.g. Monero). It has the same limitation related to hardware storage capacity and bandwidth.

2. Witnesses control the network. And they are only 12 of them. If they form a cartel they can start censor the network or do other malicious behavior. Getting rid of witnesses cartel is hard - the network needs to split which is called "schism". Read the whitepaper for more info.

3. Blackbyte are not fully anonymous. When you send them you reveal your IP to hub. TOR implementation is work on to mitigate the problem. Eventually (if implemented) blackbyte would be as anonymous as TOR is anonymous which is not 100%. Monero is much more anonymous.

4. Whitebyte are fully transparent just as bitcoin blockchain. You can check the senders holdings just by going to DAG explorer. There are no plans to make them less susceptible to analysis and therefore more fungible.

5. Data storing feature is very limited due to cost. It's basically just a little text storing feature. Take a look at my calculations to see why.

Do all existing byteball addresses will be granted bytes in the second round or we have to register them somewhere?

This tread is for speculation not whining about distribution.

We just reached 2 mln USD market cap.
Happy New Year!
The price is doing well today. 0.021 BTC/GBYTE.
HODL!

If this is the case you should be happy because it means cheap byteballs were available and were bought by other people and the distribution is now even less concentrated in a few whales hands.

What the history tab in your wallet says?

Now it's down to 0.01.
100 GB for grab for that price.

Thanks. I think it's gonna collapse further. I will wait until all byteballs are distributed before considering buying any.

I don't see Byteball on coinmarketcap.com - where do you see it?

No, these two networks are incompatible.

You're right. My mistake. My point is that it was just a few ours ago at 0.0275 which is nearly 50% drop.

The price already collapsed to 0.0015 BTC. This is so miniscule market at the moment that wild swings are to be expected.

Then it should say "untraceable if you use Tor or other service to effectively hide your IP". But that doesn't sound appealing.

The title of this topic contains the word "untraceable". How the hell is it untraceable if everybody is scattering around their ips whenever they pay. Cmon. It's just word twisting promising something that is not here. Get back to RingCT and Monero for privacy. Trumpeting your ip to whoever you pay is as private as a credit card with your name on it.

Yeah, try CTRL+F "schism". When witnesses form a cartel and start to censor the chain or conduct other self interest behaviour the only way out of this is for the rest of the network to create other coin. Sounds like a fork. Nobody is talking about it because nobody has read the white paper.

I have no idea. The whole witness thing is a mystery to me. It actually looks like a potential vulnurability - have you seen the "schism" idea in the white paper? It's scary.

I can run Bitcoin through Tor - does it make Bitcoin anonymous payment system? If that's really the case that you have to run Byteball throught Tor to make blackball anonymous it should be clarified. There's not a single word about it in the whitepaper.

Obviously but that doesn't sound like anonymous payments if I have to hide behind Tor to make it anonymous.

I wondered about this too To make a private transaction you need to first pair your device with your counterparty. Doesn't it reveal your ip?

No, the list of witnesses can't differ more than 1 from the rest of the network. (the White Paper - page 11)