So they hacked simplecoin, a pool that doesnt host solidcoin in order to get solidcoin accounts?
Do you not see how retarded this looks?
Some of them will crossref and yes they had a Solidcoin operation in the first go round. https://solidcoin.simplecoin.us/lostpassword.phpEven after as many as I have cracked, I am still shocked at the number of people who will use the same PW over and over and over.... Someone is building a pretty lengthy case on you somewhere. Keep admitting more and more criminal behavior.  |
|
|
|
Who is included in this "community" and what does one have to do, or what things should one avoid, to be a 'follower'? Please be specific as possible with links as reference. Thanks.
We are all part of this "community" like it or not. It is our responsibility to regulate, and much has not been done on that front. We haven't regulated on the main client, we haven't advanced on the priorities of the community, and we haven't disowned clowns like BCX. This community has NO STRUCTURE, and the really sad part is that NO ONE lets anyone lead, therefore nothing ever gets done. It's a sad reality that I am slowly starting to want no part of... |
|
|
|
He locked a thread that had gone way off-topic, and half of the thread had degenerated into personal attacks. Locking off-topic threads reduces clutter.
This topic needs to be in Meta.
Exactly, so start your own thread as you did here and continue. Once again have a good night and all this is in fun and spirited debate, don't take any of it personal. ;-) BCX I want this fun and spirited debate to continue BCX. This gets us closer to the truth, which is what I am most ultimately after. You unfortunately bring many LIES, which is why its hard to trust ANYTHING you say. Open the thread back up, lets have this debate. |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48975.0This is typical of him, we start having a nice little discussion where MANY questions are being answered, and many of the SMEARS he's been pushing down everyone's throats are being refuted, and what does he do folks? He LOCKS the thread... Typical BCX... And the community follows this guy? http://bitcoinwatch.com Take a look at the price everyone, take a hard look at this clown, and then please I beg of you take a hard look at yourselves. This a problem within our own community, and it needs to be solved. If not I can promise that progress will be hindered my friends..
|
|
|
|
Also if someone could tell me the 'why' of mining in SC 2.0 - if protection has already been achieved with the 'trusted nodes', why have 'the public' waste all that electricity mining? Why is distribution still through mining?
That decision is up to the public, if they would rather buy the coins instead of mine them, then they are free to do so. I'm asking the rational of the protocol. Why mining as a means of distribution? Because it controls inflation/deflation of the currency. The more people that sign on to the network, the less the currency inflates. This form a hypothetical 'economic equilibrium" that humanity has never seen before. If 1000 people sign off, the hyper fast algo follows thus allowing the currency to inflate, and make it psychologically attractive again to "mine". This whole idea that "Deflation is GOOD, or INFLATION is BAD, or vice-versa are just 2 parts to the greater truth. The fact is you need both to run a successful economy, and what could be the best regulator to that test than difficulty itself? So SC detects the number of users (1000 people sign off), and not just the hash? If it goes by 'users' (and thats who has to use money - people), then why is it distributed to who has the biggest rig? Edit: I mean, if 50% of the SC user base leaves, but one guy puts up a rig that equals those peoples lost hashrate, how is hashrate an indicator of economic deflation/inflation? I meant to say "hash" sorry  . Again, honest question: If CH figured out how to negate the 51% attack, shouldn't a more reasonable means of distribution be cake? Hashrate as an indicator of inflation/deflation seems extremely inefficient, prone-to-manipulation, and a waste of electricity (on the miners part). Just to make sure I have this straight: Mining in SC is more about monitoring inflation/deflation, and less about distribution. Would that be correct? Technically no "electric bill" is required to mine SC. You are obviously not using your imagination and thinking of the millions of servers that already use WIND and SOLAR to power the majority of their operations. You obviously have never used the client either, mining in SC is MUCH more efficient than Bitcoin... Why don't you just try the client out and see for yourself? If you don't trust it download a VM. If you don't know how to do so I can help you. EDIT:I do all my daily operations, and mine SC on all cores and I honestly cannot believe that this thing is even running in the background. I have Core 2 Duo extreme on my gaming laptop, I also put this on my girlfriends laptop and shes generating a nice sum of SC already with her Intel I3. She beats my core 2 duo hands down. I also mine SC on all my BTC mining rigs, I put those CPUS to VERY good use . |
|
|
|
@Ahimoth,
I take it the answer is you DO NOT know that the 10 trusted nodes coins cannot be spent, all you have is Coinhunter's word.
Is that correct and as an "IT Professional" this sits well with you?
Well, I assumed you had already decompiled the binaries. Apparently, this is a bad assumption on my part. If you had, you would probably find 10 addresses listed. If you knew anything at all about decompiling, you would know it is a messy process and is tedious. It doesn't produce clean code, and even in my advanced novice NOOB level of coding know the address aren't hardcoded. I am not a coder by no means, but I have quite afew engineers that work for me. Don't worry with or without CH's release, we will get the source and develop a lethal SC killer. FIXED What ever you want to call me, I never said I was an elite coder, I have tremendous resources though. If you have "tremendous resources" why the hell aren't you paying your team to just Build something better than SC? WTH are you doing on here TROLLING if you have "tremendous resources". Shit man you have some work to do lets get going! What's Bitcoincloset, I see you take Paypal, why not SC exclusively? You don't even accept SC. There is no easy way for me to take SC at the moment. In the future hopefully my company will solve that problem (or RS and SC community).. For now I take BTC and Paypal . |
|
|
|
@Ahimoth,
I take it the answer is you DO NOT know that the 10 trusted nodes coins cannot be spent, all you have is Coinhunter's word.
Is that correct and as an "IT Professional" this sits well with you?
Well, I assumed you had already decompiled the binaries. Apparently, this is a bad assumption on my part. If you had, you would probably find 10 addresses listed. If you knew anything at all about decompiling, you would know it is a messy process and is tedious. It doesn't produce clean code, and even in my advanced novice NOOB level of coding know the address aren't hardcoded. I am not a coder by no means, but I have quite afew engineers that work for me. Don't worry with or without CH's release, we will get the source and develop a lethal SC killer. FIXED What ever you want to call me, I never said I was an elite coder, I have tremendous resources though. If you have "tremendous resources" why the hell aren't you paying your team to just Build something better than SC? WTH are you doing on here TROLLING if you have "tremendous resources". Shit man you have some work to do lets get going! |
|
|
|
@Ahimoth,
I take it the answer is you DO NOT know that the 10 trusted nodes coins cannot be spent, all you have is Coinhunter's word.
Is that correct and as an "IT Professional" this sits well with you?
Well, I assumed you had already decompiled the binaries. Apparently, this is a bad assumption on my part. If you had, you would probably find 10 addresses listed. Don't worry with or without CH's release, we will get the source and develop a lethal SC killer. Atleast you are admitting that the source is valuable to you. |
|
|
|
@Ahimoth,
I take it the answer is you DO NOT know that the 10 trusted nodes coins cannot be spent, all you have is Coinhunter's word.
Is that correct and as an "IT Professional" this sits well with you?
Well, I assumed you had already decompiled the binaries. Apparently, this is a bad assumption on my part. If you had, you would probably find 10 addresses listed. If you knew anything at all about decompiling, you would know it is a messy process and is tedious. It doesn't produce clean code, and even in my advanced novice NOOB level of coding know the address aren't hardcoded. I am not a coder by no means, but I have quite afew engineers that work for me. Don't worry with or without CH's release, we will get the source and develop a lethal SC killer. FIXED |
|
|
|
Also if someone could tell me the 'why' of mining in SC 2.0 - if protection has already been achieved with the 'trusted nodes', why have 'the public' waste all that electricity mining? Why is distribution still through mining?
That decision is up to the public, if they would rather buy the coins instead of mine them, then they are free to do so. I'm asking the rational of the protocol. Why mining as a means of distribution? Because it controls inflation/deflation of the currency. The more people that sign on to the network, the less the currency inflates. This form a hypothetical 'economic equilibrium" that humanity has never seen before. If 1000 people sign off, the hyper fast algo follows thus allowing the currency to inflate, and make it psychologically attractive again to "mine". This whole idea that "Deflation is GOOD, or INFLATION is BAD, or vice-versa are just 2 parts to the greater truth. The fact is you need both to run a successful economy, and what could be the best regulator to that test than difficulty itself? So SC detects the number of users (1000 people sign off), and not just the hash? If it goes by 'users' (and thats who has to use money - people), then why is it distributed to who has the biggest rig? Edit: I mean, if 50% of the SC user base leaves, but one guy puts up a rig that equals those peoples lost hashrate, how is hashrate an indicator of economic deflation/inflation? I meant to say "hash" sorry . |
|
|
|
Also if someone could tell me the 'why' of mining in SC 2.0 - if protection has already been achieved with the 'trusted nodes', why have 'the public' waste all that electricity mining? Why is distribution still through mining?
That decision is up to the public, if they would rather buy the coins instead of mine them, then they are free to do so. I'm asking the rational of the protocol. Why mining as a means of distribution? Because mining controls inflation/deflation of the currency. The more people that sign on to the network, the less the currency inflates. This is a hypothetical 'economic equilibrium" that humanity has never seen before. If 1000 people sign off, the hyper fast algo follows thus allowing the currency to inflate, and makes it psychologically attractive again to "mine". This whole idea that "Deflation is GOOD, or INFLATION is BAD, or vice-versa are just 2 parts to the greater truth. The fact is you need both to run a successful economy, and what could be the best regulator to that test than difficulty itself? |
|
|
|
@Ahimoth,
I take it the answer is you DO NOT know that the 10 trusted nodes coins cannot be spent, all you have is Coinhunter's word.
Is that correct and as an "IT Professional" this sits well with you?
Don't you think CoinHunter has alot more to loose by not pre-coding that clause into the code, and proving people like you wrong? |
|
|
|
Also if someone could tell me the 'why' of mining in SC 2.0 - if protection has already been achieved with the 'trusted nodes', why have 'the public' waste all that electricity mining? Why is distribution still through mining?
That decision is up to the public, if they would rather buy the coins instead of mine them, then they are free to do so. Remember these trusted nodes also MINE as well . If no one else is mining the difficulty stays low and they eat a bigger chunk of the pie. |
|
|
|
So let me get this straight.
Anyone can be a trusted node. All they have to do is accumulate 1 Million SC and become a node. Coinhunter specifically said Trusted Nodes cannot spend the 1Million coins because he had hard coded the chain against them. Are we really to believe to that anyone would donate a million SC just to be a Trusted Node?
It doesn't add up, seriously.
He has hardcoded the addresses of the premined trusted nodes... These can't be spent, but every other address with 1mio+ can act as a trusted node if they want and also spend their coins. Yes and to add to this point if you go under 1,000,000 you automatically loose super-node status. |
|
|
|
Edit:If you don't think that a network where the richest people protect the network with their OWN MONEY, isn't the one that has the least points of failures then I don't know what is. This system prevents 51% attacks, and insures that the people with the most money to loose never attack the network. And even if they did attack the network, they would only be one part of a greater decentralized authority.
The psychology of 'protecting the network with their own money' (which is another discussion) is not apart of the protocol. I'm asking about the protocol. The protocol says "If you fuck this handful of trusted nodes, the network freezes" - does that not bother anyone? Right now we have 10 but in the future there will obviously be more. One interesting fact to note is that only the people at the top are the ones who pay the CPF.This CPF is part of the "fee" for being a trusted node and being that essential part of the network. I mention this because a common misconception here BTCtalk is that everyone on the network pays the CPF. That is simply not true.. |
|
|
|
Genuine question:
Given that the 'trusted nodes' are very critical points of failure in the SC system, why doesn't this bother SC supporters?
No because anyone can become a "trusted node" after they have 1,000,000 Solidcoins, however I am waiting for the source like many others,before we begin to fight back some of the smear campaigning that has been going on... The process of which one becomes a point-of-failure is irrelevant - it's the danger that points-of-failure bring. Like the many points-of-failures in Bitcoin? Edit:If you don't think that a network where the richest people protect the network with their OWN MONEY, isn't the one that has the least points of failures then I don't know what is. This system prevents 51% attacks, and insures that the people with the most money to loose never attack the network. And even if they did attack the network, they would only be one part of a greater decentralized authority. |
|
|
|
Genuine question:
Given that the 'trusted nodes' are very critical points of failure in the SC system, why doesn't this bother SC supporters?
No because anyone can become a "trusted node" after they have 1,000,000 Solidcoins, thus keeping the system fully "decentralized".However I am waiting for the source like many others,before we begin to fight back some of the smear campaigning that has been going on... |
|
|
|
|
BitcoinExpress why the fuck are you posting peoples houses on a Public forum. What does this prove you moron? Obviously he wasn't trying to hide the fact that his office was from home, like many professionals do their work during these tough economic times. But you wouldn't know anything about real work would you?
|
|
|
|
|
We are now at block 33522 on SC. Did I miss anything here folks?
|
|
|
|
JoelKatz, Evorhees, and Gavin,
You got mad Bitcoin smarts. There are a bunch of rtards on this forum (anyone reading this is of course wicked brilliant, and beautiful if you are a lady, which you aren't...) so I'm glad to hear your well thought out and level-headed responses.
Aren't "THE SKY IS FALLING!" people annoying the crap out of you?
Have some sympathy for people who lost ALOT of their hard earned money. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
