Bisq is an example of an exchange platform that does not require users to do KYC or personal information.

Identity verification requirements come when the platform manages or interacts with bank accounts. To do this, the platform needs a commercial license, along with an anti-money laundering procedure. it requires users to comply with those rules, which differ according to the country from which the platform obtained a license.
Therefore, all central exchanges that do not require identity verification are required to do so according to conditions such as withdrawal or deposit from a bank account or exceeding a certain amount according to the license in that country.

You can create a platform without the need to do KYC by making it decentralized or centrally listed in a country while banning any users from countries that have laws related to crypto.

It is not a game to choose who you encourage, just as you are not a judge to decide who will win in the end, so your encouragement to one of the parties will harm you because you put a lot of feelings in something that you cannot control.

SEC investigations began in earnest more than a year ago, and you will find in media reports that they almost made a lot of notes on most of the platforms they reviewed, where they found, in one way or another, that they did not comply with regulatory standards.

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/

Therefore, if you are upset, they will not stop soon, and crypto exchanges have the choice to either comply or refrain from providing services to US citizens.

The book is usually described as a book because there is a writer who lists the information according to a specific order, so that the outcome is to benefit from the most correct information with an attractive arrangement that attracts the reader. you rarely find a book that is scraps of ideas or was composed of many narrators.

Your effort is appreciated and it is good that it is open source, so why not make it in the form of Blogger? Or a website? Or comics (cartoon stories) or any form that helps others to develop with you, and there is no link or link between its pages.

In the book, it is more difficult because you need to re-divide it into sections, reformulate each section, and delete a lot of things before adding something new, not to mention the wording and intellectual property rights, because your content is from the Internet.

Your use of the hardware wallet depends on trust. If you lose this trust, it is better to buy another hardware wallet. You can consider any open source alternatives or DIY hardware wallet, and if you wait, you will get better recommendations, since I prefer cold storage using Electrum.

Here is a good list for more than 30 HW https://wallets.thebitcoinhole.com


According to what I read, you are safe if you do not update the firmware, but after several months you will reach a point where you have to update the firmware, and then you can fear, until that thing happens, start thinking about a suitable alternative instead of worrying.

Where there are bankruptcy rumors, you will find Binance.

On May 25, Binance suspended deposits that depend on the Multichain protocol, which will force users to the best alternative, which is Gate.io, which was noted in the Blockchain data https://etherscan.io/address/0x3a7937851d67ee2f51c959663749093dc87d9c9a#tokentxns, which proves A lot of FTM transfer from an unknown user (may be Binance) to the Gate.io platform Now then we heard rumors that the Gate.io platform might go bankrupt, which is almost a similar scenario to what happened with FTX.

I explained above that high trading volumes prevent any bankruptcy rumors, but it seems that some are still trying to play the same game that happened with FTX.


I've connected the dots from the link above https://cointelegraph.com/news/gate-io-denies-liquidity-problems-after-multichain-ceo-goes-missing

Lending in general involves a double risk, one of which is the fixed payment term with a guarantee, if you do not pay within the payment term, the guarantee will be liquidated at less than its value, and the second is the interest, which is rising in our current days due to inflation and because of the increase in interest rates.

These risks increase in Bitcoin as the value is very volatile and volatile, and therefore you add another dimension to the factors that currently exist. It is an option that I do not recommend to anyone because you want to borrow in a high-risk investment with slow returns in the short term and the results are not guaranteed in the long term. DCA is the best strategy, it allows you to grow slowly but after a few years you will notice that your assets have increased well.

The good thing is that they put the notice about no withdrawals on the home page, but the lack of suspension of deposits is very confusing.
I sent a message to the support team, and let's see what their response is. If the site is under police investigations, this does not mean that the platform is frozen, otherwise it means that the platform has been sized, and therefore all depositors' funds are frozen.
If users cannot withdraw it is an exit scam, they may not have enough liquidity and therefore everything may suddenly disappear.

it is more likely to an exit scam than police investigations

what It worked for me and you can check the link above, you will find another comment.
Yes, at the end of my reply I mentioned



What is the difference, if you generated new seeds for the same closed source wallet, you did not enhance your privacy or security, all that is required of this step is to check your balance before withdrawing your coins.

I agree.

I faced the same problem several weeks ago and found the solution in updating the wallet with a complete deletion of the previous data, which necessarily requires that you save your seeds before you take any step.
I can't figure out why this is happening, but because the wallet is closed source, there may have been a problem with the code with a particular IP, so stopping using it is the best option.

So ...


Source https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_market_cap#:~:text=Bitcoin%20Market%20Cap%20is%20at,8.70%25%20from%20one%20year%20ago.

Relying on market cap will not give you a good result, because the quantity supplied increases, and therefore the price must decrease to maintain the same market cap. saying that the market cap a year ago and today is the same or increased or decreased is not a measure to predict the price, but rather to clarify the standard of demand against supply and its reflection That's on the price.

We can use moving averages and technical analysis to measure how bad the price is at the current level, which shows that we have not moved much, as we are still in the same level between $25.4k Bitcoin as a bottom and $28.8k as a top, and we may stabilize in this range for a while.

By taking the historical data into the scale, the month of June is not considered a happy month, so I do not expect that we will reach $28.8k during this month.


Source fxstreet

The wallet is a software that manages your private keys, so recommending an open source wallet is the best option because there are many people who have reviewed the code and verified that it is safe, so the fact that the wallet is open source is meaningless if there are not enough developers who have reviewed the code.

using an open source wallet is not only about security, but many open source wallets outperform closed source ones in features such as the ability to integrate the Lightning Network, enhanced privacy by connecting to your own node/tor, address control feature, better fee estimation, and cheaper fees option compared to closed source wallets. Most of the closed source wallets are weakly programming and very poor privacy, the only reason to use them is that they support a lot of currency pairs and attractive interfaces.

by swapping your coins from closed source to widely reviewed open source wallet will reduce your risks (Electrum or Sparrow.)

for multi-coins wallet i think the open source option as unstoppable wallet is not ideal so hardware wallets are the best.

What scares me the most is the misuse of clients’ money because if any problem occurs, random FUD started and money withdrawals start, suddenly we will discover that the platform owns only less than 10% of the depositors’ money as liquidity, and more liquidity as BNB that are printed to cover the money that was withdrawn. This reminds me of what happened with FTX.

Those affected in these incidents will only be the users and the reputation of the cryptocurrency, so everyone who has money on that platform is better to withdraw it from that platform, and stay away from BNB pairs for a bit (unless you trust the platform)



edit

SEC Complaint Aims to Unilaterally Define Crypto Market Structure Binance reply https://www.binance.com/en/blog/ecosystem/sec-complaint-aims-to-unilaterally-define-crypto-market-structure-8707489117122437402


fast reading


They are promises and claims that they have tried to do anything to avoid litigation and we will do everything we can to defend ourselves, emotional talk without evidence, I bet they will leave the US market soon.

At least you can read the code related to paper wallets and check every line in it, which is impossible for a wallet like Electrum. My talk if you don't want to trust any developer, I know a lot of skeptical people who like to check everything themselves.
Setting up and managing paper wallets is not difficult for someone who can read every line, perhaps it is not the best option in terms of privacy and dynamism, but everything has a cost.



Without making the wallet open source, I don't think anyone would be stupid enough to use them.

Sorry for the stupid question, but how did they manage to determine that this money went to the blender? I remember when I read about the reason for the confiscation of Khaled, they had told that money went to that mixer, but how could they determine the mixer to which those money went?

There is a lawsuit against Blender due to which that mixer stopped and Sanctioned Mixer Blender Re-Launched as Sinbad so we will see that soon.
If they are from North Korea, the United States will not be able to sized the domain, and therefore whenever suspicions revolve around them, all they will do is move to a new domain name.

I've read their report here and can't find solid evidence on how to know the coins were sent to that mixer.

https://hub.elliptic.co/analysis/has-a-sanctioned-bitcoin-mixer-been-resurrected-to-aid-north-korea-s-lazarus-group/

But I found this

As I said earlier, the manipulation of terminology is what gave many users a false sense of security. Custodial walle and Non-Custodial walle have no meaning, but the real difference is whether that software is a wallet or not. In the sense that all closed source wallets are not a wallet because we do not know how the private key is generated and whether the code is safe or not. The fact that a third party may know your private key means that you do not own your money.

If you do not know how to read the code, it is best to start with a paper wallet that generates private keys in a simple way or trusts individuals or a community to review the code.

Rushing to present your idea will not be useful to you, just as this is not the appropriate section for such discussions, especially since your site is not an open source and is not directed primarily to serve and develop Bitcoin. At this stage, you can receive suggestions, but we cannot provide you with more,  it is better to lock this topic or change to Proposals.

According to the LFBI report, the number of domains that chipmixer managed is three, and all of them have been seized.
this domain is fake clones of CM, and in any case it cannot enjoy the same trust that the original site enjoyed.
So chipmixer .be is a scammer trying to win over users trusting CM name.

If buying gold was the right choice made by the rich during the past months, this does not mean that it is the ideal solution for the coming months. When you look at the economy today, you will find that the rate of interest rate hikes will slow down, and economies have begun to adapt to the conditions of war. There are no electoral campaigns this year, and therefore countries will be less strict in their policies, not to mention the oil and energy prices that will start to decline, all of which may make the dollar stronger, and we know the inverse relationship. between the dollar and gold.

This will require countries to start moving to accelerate production instead of saving money and drying up liquidity.

Their inactivity on Twitter is weird. latest tweeted from a long time ago, not to mention that they plan to sell Available for Pre-Sale: 30,000,000 FIX Tokens which is a lot for 0.15 price.


It was found that the Collaborations page does not contain links, and the chart indicates that they started the site during this year, although the site was registered from last year.
They are scammers.

You got it wrong, if this is proven to be an alternative account to a banned account, your signature will disappear and thus you will be removed from your signature campaign, not to mention the possibility that the previous account will be unbanned, which seems slim.