Roobet kampanja opet se vraća na stari režim (svi privremeni sudionici napuštaju kampanju) i ima slobodnih mjesta za nove Full Member članove.

Kampanja traje već tri godine i uvjeti su dobro poznati. Minimalno 15 postova tjedno, postovi u lokalnim sekcijama se broje i nema zahtjeva za pisanjem u gambling sekciji.

Payouts & Positions

Full Members - $40/Week.

---

Da, whirlwind.money je trenutno jedina kampanja koja plaća $5 po postu za Hero/Legendary članove, što iznosi $125 za maksimalnih 25 postova tjedno + $25 ako nosite i avatar.

I'm not sure how many people actually believed it, the rates seemed too high for this kind of service. However, most probably didn't want to miss out just in case it was true. Fortunately, Royse didn't play the ultimate prank of making it mandatory for all candidates to wear a signature before applying to the campaign.

That would've been the prank of the decade! Plus, Hhampuz and other managers would have had their hands full trying to fill their campaigns with new participants. 

Kao što se i očekivalo, Royse777 je danas potvrdio da Sinbad.io kampanja i nove tarife u Yo!Mix kampanji nisu ništa više od prvoaprilske šale. Ipak je bilo predobro da bi bilo istinito.

I was able to beat the game, but it took me a while to get the hang of it. It's definitely a nostalgic experience, like you said. Overall, I think it was a great April Fool's joke. It brought some fun and excitement to the forum, and I'm sure people will be talking about it for a while.

Hey! Where is the burd? I want my burd back! 

Not everyone here is a spammer! Some of us are genuinely interested in cultivating a positive reputation and contributing to constructive discussions. 

Hello and welcome to the forum! We're glad to have you here.


Relax, my friend. A lot of us are being accused of spamming today. It's just a harmless prank for April Fool's Day!

Ah, it seems like the age-old Bitcointalk forum is about to get a much-needed upgrade! Well, let's hope our new main developer doesn't develop a case of crypto-amnesia and accidentally loses all of our precious forum data. We don't want to be left with a bitcointalk-less blockchain!

I think it really depends on how severe the flaw is and how quickly it is addressed. If it's a small issue that can be fixed easily, it might not have a huge impact. But if it's a major flaw that can't be fixed easily, it could be a disaster. But, the chances of that happening are pretty slim. The fact that the blockchain technology is trusted by millions of people and is already being used in many different systems is a testament to its security. And, the good thing about Bitcoin is that we have a community of developers who are constantly working to improve the technology and address any potential issues.

That's really unethical of the Duckdice to offer you money to post fake reviews for them. It's not only dishonest, but it's also against the terms and conditions of Trustpilot. I'm sorry to hear that you got scammed out of your payment, but honestly, you didn't deserve better. Fake reviews can really mislead people who rely on them to make informed decisions. While I understand that you may have been tempted by the offer, it's not ethical to accept such a deal.

I'm from Croatia, and I wanted to mention the card game "Bela" (Belot). It's a very popular game here, and it's played with a deck of 32 cards, and it's often played at social gatherings and family events. It's a trick-taking game, similar to Bridge or Spades, but with some different rules. Despite its popularity, I haven't seen it in any crypto casino yet, and I think it would be great to have it as an option for players who enjoy card games.

Most online casinos pay their influencers through commissions based on the number of people who sign up and deposit money using the influencer's referral link. As for their earnings, I believe they come from the money that players lose when they gamble on their platform.


It's important to do your research and choose a reputable online casino. Look for licenses and certifications, as well as reviews from other players. Another thing to watch out for is bonuses that seem too good to be true. Some online casinos offer huge bonuses, but they come with impossible wagering requirements or other hidden terms and conditions that make it nearly impossible to actually cash out any winnings.

One of the core principles of Bitcoin is decentralization, which means it's not controlled by any single entity or government. This decentralization is what makes it resistant to censorship, corruption, and other forms of oppression. CBDCs are not necessarily designed to compete with Bitcoin. It's a digital version of a country's fiat currency, and its main purpose is to provide a more efficient payment system, while still being controlled by a central authority such as a government or central bank.

While CBDCs may offer some advantages compared to card payments, they are still subject to government control and potentially vulnerable to censorship or manipulation. In contrast, Bitcoin's decentralization allows it to operate independently of government influence. It's important to note that Bitcoin and CBDCs serve different purposes and will probably coexist in the digital currency landscape. Furthermore, Bitcoin operates on a fixed supply schedule and is not subject to inflationary pressures that can impact fiat currencies. In contrast, CBDCs may still be subject to inflationary policies set by the central authority.

In short, CBDCs might be useful for some situations, but Bitcoin's decentralized nature and special features still make it a great choice for people who want more control and freedom in their financial transactions.

Hmm, a ti kao da nikada nisi čuo za obrnutu psihologiju?!

Personally, I think it depends on the situation. If the discussion is public and not sensitive in nature, then I don't see anything wrong with printing it out for personal use. It can be helpful to have a physical copy of a discussion, especially if it contains valuable information that you may need to reference later.

For example, I often print out threads related to my work, or research for a project, that I find particularly informative or useful. This helps me to have a record of the discussion that I can refer back to in the future, even if the thread is later deleted or becomes difficult to find online.

Let's hope you're wrong. It's not that I don't like the forum, but sometimes a little change can be refreshing. Maybe we could add some new features or update the layout?

Imagine waking up to a forum that looks like this - wouldn't that be nice? 

No doubt about it, all three accounts are managed by the same user.

Thank you for addressing these questions, but I find it concerning that you are so lightly making such inaccurate (false) statements. Can you please clarify what you meant by saying "until recently we didn't have a KYC policy or asked for KYC checks"?

It's clear that you did have a KYC policy from the beginning, as several forum members have pointed out the false "No KYC" claim in the title of this topic. For example, joeperry asked you about your KYC policy the day you posted this announcement, which you can read here.



My suggestion would be to prioritize honesty and fairness with your players as the most important aspect. Although your start may have been rocky, it's not too late to make things right.

This is assuming Bitcoin goes down again. What if it doesn't?

If Bitcoin doesn't experience a significant drop in value, then waiting for the reward to increase may not be the most effective strategy. It's important to keep in mind that the market is unpredictable, and there's no guarantee that the value of Bitcoin will behave in a particular way.

To be honest, I had no idea what the game "Ludo" was until I searched for it on Google. It turns out it's an ancient board game that originated from India, and it's related to a game called Pachisi. Interestingly, we have a similar game in my country called "Čovječe, ne ljuti se," which was introduced in the last century from Germany. The original name of the game is "Mensch ärgere Dich nicht."

In my opinion, board games like Ludo are not well-suited for online casinos for several reasons. Firstly, board games are traditionally played in a physical setting, with players sitting around a table and interacting with each other in person. Some board games have been adapted for online play and have gained a following, however, these games are the exception rather than the rule, and they often require significant modifications to make them work in an online environment. Finally, board games tend to be slower-paced than traditional casino games like roulette, poker or blackjack, and may not offer the same level of excitement or fast-paced action that many gamblers are looking for.

While there may be some digital versions of Ludo available online, I believe that the experience of playing the game in person is far more engaging and enjoyable.