Best these days is not even the best, yet, we can have a clue if the person labelling the casino the best is so constructive enough and can prove "the best" remark with practical experience. Many casinos are doing good and when we have the opportunity to play with one or two of them, it's better to stick with them. But people are greedy, they always believe that there will still be better ones out there, but truly, there is nothing like that unless the casino you are playing with is not just good. By this, you are justified not to remain there but to look for a better one.

But I do not agree with you that the low-budget casino can ever be the best, it can't even try because the low-budget remark alone has stained the casino, and nothing can change that. You can imagine how the security of the low-budget casino will be. What about the interface and the overall UI? If they can't spend money, or better stated as not having enough money, it is an issue, and not an appraisal. No one should tell you that they could have liquidity issues when it comes to the payment of winnings, they can be greedy with time as well, so one has to think it through before risking their money in such casinos.

I've always been passing by here without checking the content of the topic for so long, I don't just know the reason but until today. This is so pathetic, a very bad and unprofessional representation. I can only call this thread a deliberate way to lure people into the scheme because I do not see these guys as those who are ready for the business, not to mention the sincerity expected of them. No one should be surprised about this though, it's all about marketing, it is we who should be careful about what we are subscribing to so that we are not just negatively affected by them.

It's all about the money for many of them, and not the quality, and by what the topic states, one can decipher that it's purposeful and is for the purpose of attracting customers, just as they always do with offers. This kind of means of attracting customers like bonuses, RTP and many more are the most dubious ways especially when the casinos have not stood properly. They can do and undo, and they can just disappear into the thin air as well. Though this one is relatively not new, their reviews are poor too on all my review sites, one has to be careful. Also, the $17,000 allegation request by @SammyGambler may overwhelm the representative here, so you can't expect less.

It could matter if it's another forum and management, but the fact that Bitcointalk is so liberal, it doesn't care about what you do in this regard. This is even worth more kudos and that is why some people are so emboldened with it and still be doing double standards. By the double standard, I do not mean you can't participate in the two forums or more as you like, but the way some will speak of one when they are there and still speak of the other when they are there without the loyalty strictly sticking to one is my plight here.

Besides, I knew that the tension would douse over time. When the issue of teleporting was made known to me, some people even believed that was the end of Bitcointalk, but I smiled because I saw things differently, it will take more than an alternative to pull BTCt down. It's always like that when an issue just happened, but with time, the natural demand and supply will always play out as we see now. If not all of them, those who teleported are still here, also, there is a higher fraction that didn't even bother to waste their time to teleport. You can do the arithmetic.

You might have written something right ignorantly which many supposed professional traders here might not even know because someone has tackled me before about it but couldn't furnish me with his own strategy which makes it funny. If you may know, it is the remark that the breach of the current all-time high will be the indication for the overall continuation of the bullish trend in Bitcoin. As simple as this is, it is powerful to denote the overall trend continuation in the market and it is valid for all assets/markets. This is not about the way many are saying it but about how the market principles and dynamics work even as simple as it is.

And yes, the bull run has begun in my opinion because it can't be a mistake for the market to move from about $15,500 to about $53,000. That's huge. The ETF saga made it start earlier than expected, but I hope this will not negatively affect the main expected bullishness during the post-halving period that people are more anticipating. If enough people have already committed their money to Bitcoin right before the bull-run period, there might be a little remaining to commit their money when the time eventually comes.

I am just saying, nothing is rigid here, but as far as the technical analysis of Bitcoin is concerned, I support the bullish trend of the market in both the short and long-term dispositions.

I was like you in trading and investment some time ago, but today, I am a better trader/investor. At that time, I was so envious of the analyses I read online by professionals (not random online traders we see these days) as to how they got their lines/prices. Needless to say, they called it with confidence. And when the market gets to those levels, it gets to respect them with the way they behave. So, I believe that there was an approach to this, and due to curiosity, I began to learn and over some time, I actually know how the experts do it.

I also challenge you to go for the learning so that you can understand. You can do this except you do not want to do it. However, the hint I would give you is to learn the support and resistance strategies. There are many of them, you may learn Trendline, Fibonacci, Wave theory and MA's S/R. Knowing all these alone means that you will be able to know when the market is bullish, correcting, ranging/channelling, or trending/reversing. You will also know the magnitude at which the trend/reversal would be. I hope you can give it a try, and you will always know the thing you term the "setback" and how you know when the market will launch higher or plunge.

Yes, ignorant! He could be.

But this way, I think you didn't get the gist. Before I wrote it then, I knew ignorance wasn't an excuse in law, but you seem not to get the context I used it for all the same.

For clarity's sake, it is ignorance in the sense that the guy was fighting for something and still claiming he used a VPN which is not allowed by the casino (guilty). This means that he mustn't have known he violated their terms and conditions through that, if not, he wouldn't have boldly stated it and still believed he committed no offence. Hence, I see it as ignorance on his part, a mere newbie who found himself in this mess. How many gamblers even read Ts&Cs?

Regardless, in such a situation, if investigated to be true, can still be resolved in his favour. That's if the casino is lenient. But the case here is beyond that, which is the issue.

I've heard enough about the so-called professional gamblers, this makes me take my time to study them very well but I do not see anything spectacular about them in most cases. Most of these people are forecasting certain aspects of casinos and sports betting. Now, let me explain them one after the other. For the casino side, I always see their rubbish predictions. We all know how casino betting works, no amount of analyses by experts can make you win, you need to be lucky in most cases to be winning. The time I followed two of the experts through their website and social media handles, I discovered that they were only making mouth, it was never replicated in the results. No wonder they can only cajole/tempt people for a while, but with time, those people will get discouraged and abandon them. What's worse in this regard are the ones who are paying experts for gambling signals/advice. This is to no avail, not even in trading and investment will I pay someone for such a service.

For the second part which is the sportsbook, I won't tell a lie, they are better in this aspect. They can still have about 75% winning in their top sports bettings, which include, football, boxing and basketball. These aspects of gambling are easy to predict by anyone who is conversant with them too, so I see no big deal here. Except if there is no money involved, I can still compare their analysis with mine. This will be for filtering. That is the highest I can do because I can't ever be independent of anyone in my sports betting this way, it will only degrade me.

The guy in the OP is just addicted and that has made him senseless in his dealings. Someone who is working so hard all day and will only waste everything on gambling, this is pathetic and I believe that his whole orientation about gambling has to change. He needs to find a way to heal himself, and the fact that he has been talking about something telling him to always gamble when he didn't want to do it calls for extra concern. I advise the guy to take a break from gambling, his issue is more than a mere addition, this is deeply rooted in him and makes him look so stupid as he gambles. He positions his mind towards the money he would make from it, but instead continues to lose money.

That is enough reason to talk sense to this guy, he needs to change that mindset. I don't believe anyone who is not so budgetary and disciplined towards gambling can be doing a thing like that. This is what he should first realize, and the moment he accepts that something is wrong with him, he will be able to change the narrative to his advantage. He should take a long break from gambling and return later. But if the issue persists after that, he might consider quitting for a long time period of time. But in this case, finding other earning purposes that are not about gambling is good. This might solve the issue since money is the main motive of his gambling. By securing another means to make the money, he could be cured.

I don't think is right. It is your name and identity that are attached to the account, it's impersonation if it's being used by another person other than you whether you grant the permission or not. The law will treat it otherwise, and you are liable to conspire.

I think they have. You can confirm that with their Ts&Cs. Even if it is not such that is directly stated, they can never encourage that. And if caught, the account would be banned immediately.

I like to build afresh. Gambling is not a must-do for me. Also, there's nothing special about VIP or special status for me to warrant such desperation.

No, I can't sell my gambling account even if I am not gambling again. This is risky and could be criminal as well. What if the account you completed your KYC with is now used for fraudulent acts, what would you do if it escalated? By then, the money you collected for the account sale will no longer be worth it.

No. This can never be legitimate, it's even criminal if the law is to be interpreted to it. As for the second part of the question, I don't think it is necessary. You might be encouraging illegality by that, and since you created the thread, there is no way you can exonerate yourself entirely.

It's a free world, bro.

Let me say I like your friend, after all, he is such that has his mind, and I like him for that. Mind you, it is not everybody that will fall for a new casino's promos, incentives, perks and others. It is not worth it in the consideration of some people. Many gamblers like me need good service in their casinos, and when we've already discovered one or two of them, why still look for more casinos? Is it for decoration? Like me, I do not care about the bonuses casinos give to me, all I care about are good services and the promptness of receiving my money when I withdraw. So why would I be wasting myself to be searching for casinos everywhere when I already have one or those who offer that?

I believe that all these have answered your questions, and let me tell you, leave the guy alone, you should not continue to pester him, he has his own life to live. What if you pestered him to the point that he obliged and tried the new casino for your sake and the casino now swindles him? Do you think such is not possible? That's more reason why you should let him be and save yourself. You can continue with the way you gamble and let him continue with the way he gambles as it's all about a good gambling experience. Peradventure he is already enjoying it elsewhere, there's no need to be jumping on casinos all around.

Of course, the 1% can't be a gauge to measure for all gamblers and gambling activities, some would play more and some might even play less, it all depends on many factors which include, the stability of earnings of the gambler, the purpose of gambling itself, the gambler's plans/budget towards gambling, their affinity to gamble and take risks, the net worth of the gambler among many others. Gmabling is not what anyone can generally attribute a certain way of doing it, there are many ways of gambling and this should fit the purpose and individuality of the gambler in terms of reasons and preferences.

Take me for instance, I can never gamble with 1% of my money, it looks like a waste of time, and even when I invest more money, I still can't cope with that low wagering percentage. But I wouldn't know for the rich people because as little as 1% could mean over $50,000 in some cases. This is why it is not good to generalise this or make it a yardstick that gamblers will now be using as a reference. It has to do with individual situation and purpose.

Do not judge people entirely even as I agree with most of what you stated here. The final verdict as far as I'm concerned is that altcoins are not dead and are very much alive and will remain so as long as the cryptocurrency industry is alive. Many ascribe too much importance to Bitcoin alone, but to those who don't conclude based on that, it might be that they are just frustrated about how the altcoins are behaving at times. I respect their fear because altcoins could be so discouraging to the extent that some people might regret ever investing their money in them.

Imagine investing a big amount in altcoins in 2021 and you saw some of your assets depreciating more than 20 times. How would you feel? And this time when Bitcoin is almost hitting back it's ATH while most altcoins are still nowhere to be found, what do you think, again? That's why people's arguments could be very valid in some schools of thought. But nevertheless, altcoins are not dead, only that investors must fully understand them first before investing in them, and they must be very careful to know the time they will liquidate their portfolio because they are too volatile. So, during the bearish season, one shouldn't slack in doing the needful, or else, it will amount to significant losses.

Congratulations to you Mr Tron!

But be sure that you will not be able to make enough money with Tron, it will continue to be sluggish. As much as I respect your opinion because it is not all about the money you can make from a crypto asset but also about the belief in the project and its stability (of which, the ease, speed and fees of the transaction we make through it could all be the means of attractions). I've used Tron quite well and I know that it is a very good coin. Though the developers are lagging behind in the improvements of it, yet, the project is good and can't change.

But for me, I look before the project itself, the speed and fees of transactions, I also look at the way and manner in which the crypto asset could earn me money. If you carefully follow Tron and know the way it works, it's a bad choice to invest your money. Do not say I didn't tell you this in case you are new to the crypto world and merely being excited about the one you are used to.

Also, please, DYOR!

Well, this advice can only be valid if you do not know what you are doing. Till today, I do not think there is an investment advice that states contrary to diversification. Investment diversification is so unique and has helped a lot of people in the past. You can't just throw that away simply because of Bitcoin. And when you label coins "shitcoins," you should always know that it is relative, it doesn't apply to all coins. As a matter of fact, if it could be counted well, you will still count more than 100 altcoins that are not shitcoins, so the shitcoin tag is so relative. Talking about the investment opportunities and return as well, altcoins have it, it is all about what you want and how you are trying to get it. I wonder the person that will love Bitcoin all for the context alone, and not for the money.

If such fellows say that, they are liars, they love Bitcoin for the money. And for the fact that it is the same money you want in Bitcoin and altcoins, why not maximize your earnings through altcoins that is more promising if you are smart? This doesn't stop you from investing in Bitcoin as well, but for the more money-making sakes, you will diversify your portfolio and you will make more money. Even diversification can save you, anything bad can happen, and not even Bitcoin is 100% immune from issues, so we should always plan our safety and not only have one single asset when others are there and can hand us more returns. I've seen enough good altcoins, once you can invest in them at the right time and liquidate them at the right time as well, then you get to be successful more than when you deal with Bitcoin alone.

Do you mean you wanted to solve the problem of transferring the ownership of your coin in case of unforeseen circumstances? This is not new here and is never a big deal as well. Many have lost their cryptocurrencies due to unforeseen circumstances, and their family members are not even able to have access to them. If it is your plan to avoid it, you can plan more on it, you should just come up with a cogent idea and you will be fine. But you have to still be very careful in this regard, it is not every family member you can trust. In some cases, not one's wife, children and relatives you can fully trust, so extreme caution is involved here. This is also the gist the OP is trying to pass across in this thread, it is not limited to your friends alone.

There have been cases where spouses and family members are the devils and betrayals, and there are situations where it is the friends. It can be any of them in anyone's cause, and that is why they call it "betrayal," something you least expect. So be wise. I've resolved to always update my assets in my Will, the crypto asset is included as well, and it is in such ways that some access will be with my lawyer in the Will document, while the other access to make it completely accessible will be with my spouse/children. By that, if anything happens, they can solve the puzzle together instead of revealing my assets to them carelessly.

Perhaps, that's the way you let everyone gain access to your bank account with huge money or your life savings?

It's nice to read your picks based on the factors stated above. But mine are so different from yours, and I've seen nothing so significantly changed in this context to what we experienced in 2023. It's obvious that you are a reviewing site and also the need to be biased, so I will not take this so seriously. It's all for the pay, and we've said this times without a number regarding reviewers to trust. Besides, I don't know how your suggested casinos can beat Stake.com, they may compete though but will never beat it. Not to mention the reputation of withdrawing customers' money without issues or many issues.

Even if you enjoy the best features in casinos but are still unable to withdraw your money which is common in one of your recommended casinos. It's still pointless.

What would that be that would make gamblers need help aside from addiction?

While I wait for your response on that, I think that what calls for concerns among gamblers still revolves around addiction. Something is bringing the gambler to gamble every time, and if it is not for fun, it will be for the money. And in the aspect of the fun, one can get entangled with it in the name of a hobby, and if care is not taken, it will just overwhelm the person, and hence an addiction. Also, with respect to the area of desperation for the money, the revenge for the initial losses and the greed, or the senseless belief that gambling is the avenue that will make them rich are often the causes of their repeated gambling.

This will always push them to gamble, and before you know it, they are already addicted. As you can see, all are centred around addiction which might call for help. Notwithstanding, if the gambler is making money consistently, such will continue to move closer to gambling so that he can make the money without a stop. I believe that such will still never need your help even though they could be addicted to gambling. But the fact that they are positive regarding it makes it no issue. For these, you can see that nothing about gambling calls for helping the gambler if not for addiction.

Well, I hope you are being sincere about this and not only using our collective heads for your own good where applicable. Or perhaps, you are launching a new casino or know the person launching it and want to use the survey to be better than others. This is fine by me, but it's only good in the beginning when they are looking for customers, but when their customer base is higher, the pride begins.

Notwithstanding, I don't think I have one particular question for casino owners that I do not know the answer to. I also know what to expect as they will answer; 1) some rightly and plainly, 2) some by dodging it stylishly, 3) and by being diplomatic about it.

Still, if a casino owner could tell me why VPN is being allowed and also causes issues for gamblers in the pretence that they have multiple accounts despite knowing that VPN could cause users to have the same IP, I would appreciate it.

I like the way you balanced the two together, unlike many others who will just be calling luck all the time as if expertise is not part of what helps gamblers to win in gambling. Without mincing words, there are some aspects of gambling that you do not need much of expertise to win, even though you will have an understanding of what you are doing, it is luck that will ever make you win in such games. This is rampant in the casino aspect of gambling, and this is also why you may win big in casinos despite playing with a small amount of money. This calls for us to be fully informed of what we want in our gambling and the level of risk must be known so that our account can be properly managed

However, we must know that the chance of winning will be so low with the aspect of gambling that has to do with luck, this is why I often play it for fun since I am such a person who faces reality instead of deceiving myself. But in some aspects like betting on sports, you need your unwavering expertise and instincts working rather than luck. Luck is equally important here but the probability that the right instincts and analysis (expertise) would work for you is so high, and not a function of reliance on luck. This is what I love the most in betting, I will never be at the mercy of luck for any reason while I gamble.

I like this advice, but I only agree with some certain points and not all. You should know that there are limited opportunities during an economic downturn, they call it downturns/meltdowns for reasons and that is because a whole lot is going wrong, which includes the ease of doing business and investor confidence. Fine, the local production idea is good, nevertheless, no country should wait for the economic problems before they produce locally, and during that bad time, it will not even be easy to achieve it as you believed because things will not be booming at that time unless the government can intervene with divers social intervention schemes, which is not all of them that even works.

Besides I see this as a way to tackle some of the issues, but it is unless the country exports more before the situation will subside. Before they can export, you know they would have had enough to go around the nations, so it is not an easy task as you think, and might take years before it would be effectively planned and realised. But I see no reason why taxes should be an issue too, if the domestic production plan is successful, a reasonable government will not kill it with tax, especially during an economic crisis. Even if they tax it because it is successful, tax is not an automatic way to kill a productive business.

Above all, in my understanding, government policies are so key to tackling economic downturns even as local production is also a plus.