Minexcoin will remain a bigger project than Monaco.

Minexcoin has a better team of developers and will be doing well for many years.

Monaco has been saying regularly over the past 12 months their cards were being sent out in a few weeks but in the end they have nothing. Their investors are so upset.

In business many things happen but Minexcoin and their team are at least kind and courteous, they are polite and try to help. Their product will challenge any other similar product out there but give them a little time.

Keep going Minexcoin. The team and the project deserve all the support and back up. They have worked hard to get to this point and we appreciate all their hard work.

So close to the finish line now. I want to hear from card recipients as soon as they receive them

The silence is broken by bits of information and videos posted showing progress but Monaco have let this situation get to this point. Not impressed.

As far as I know there are no terminals in existing shops but the deal they signed in the Middle East will allow them to be installed in shops

Bitcoin is king, simple.

Bitcoin Cash is Wu and Ver therefore can never be king, simple

It was stated that there were 100 million Betking tokens created. 70 million tokens were supposed to be distributed for ICO investors and Dean Nolan was supposed to keep 30 million for marketing, promotions and "website development". What investors were not told was that those 30 million tokens were going to be part of the "profit" distribution so ICO investors who were getting very little profit anyway were now getting even less because Dean Nolan was claiming profits on the 30 million tokens that were in his possession. On top of that nobody seems to know how many tokens were "given" in exchnage for the "website development" and who the alleged "developer" was.

People are saying that the website was virtually identical to the one Dean Nolan closed in order to run the ICO so people believe Dean Nolan pocketed that tokens for himself under the guise of paying a "developer" but again because there is no accountability that he has provided means that information cannot be checked and verified. Those allegations and suspicions are still following him around and most people believe tehm to be true because of the screenshots of the Betking website he used to show potential investors when asking for funds in the ICO.

A very strange set-up in the first place and then to have the nerve to write that people should have had due-diligence before investing just does not cut it with me. That is one of the reasons so many people are calling this Betking website a scam.

You are correct when you disagree with what Dean Nolan has stated. There are many of us who share the same view.

The fact he tried and failed to sell the site twice (as has been mentioned before by other users here) strengthens my opinion that this "project" and ICO has all the hallmarks of an investment campaign that was created with the sole purpose of making Dean Nolan wealthy.

He shutdown a moderately successful Betking website returning investors money and then re-launched the same website and same platform using an ICO with terms that basically guaranteed he will become a millionaire overnight and at the same time the structure ensured investors will get back next to nothing in profit and will lose large portions of their original investment.

What is more, the recent increase in activities by Dean Nolan by launching a couple of games and sponorships of various threads in this forum to try to improve the damaged image of both Betking and of himself looks extremely desperate. His activities are coinciding with the increase in people questioning Dean Nolan asking for proof that investors that lost money are happy.

I understand what you say. To be clear several of us have pointed that out already and cannot understand why an ICO was needed even though we heard the reasons given.

The only purpose that can be found for an ICO seems to be a way for which Dean Nolan to have raised money. Dean Nolan stated he has given a step by step breakdown to all investors about the expenditure which is clear. I have not yet sent a PM to any investor to ask for that information but I will try to do it within a couple of days. Once I have that information it will become easier to understand where the funds went IF he has it listed and broken down. I am convinced the ICO money that went to pay for "development" went directly to the pockets of Dean Nolan because he already had a working fully functional betting website of which he gave screenshots when trying to raise ICO funds.

From what I read there has been no statement from Dean Nolan that has shown any sign of remorse for the failed Betking token valuation and buy-back facility. If Dean Nolan has tried to make amends by now holding 70 million of the 100 million Betking tokens then that is a step forward but without knowing the key information about how much an individual paid for the tokens, how much profit (if any) they made and when they sold their tokens what was the net loss investors made. Effectively for every net loss that the investors made it is clear it was always a win-win situation for Dean Nolan who made millions without even investing anything himself and using an already existing betting website to raise ICO funds under the guise of development and bankroll.

If Dean Nolan releases information about where the funds were spent and all can be verified I will be the first to thank and congratulate him if investors are shown to be making a profit and those that sold their Betking tokens ended up with a net gain instead of a net loss. I doubt he will do it but hopefully he will prove me wrong. The Betking telegram is more of an announcement channel with little or no information of substance, it does not allow live chat where investors and users can talk to each other. Dean Nolan has locked and unlocked the Betking thread at Bitcointalk when he felt he needed to try to silence those questioning his business ethics (or lack of).

Hopefully he will make public that information after all what is there to hide?

What was the back story about the team split? This is news to me.

Agreed. Patience will be essential. Bitcore will be have a great future.

I think all information is available on the website.

Bitcoin is king no doubt about that. It will be around far longer than Bitcoin Cash.

Many retails outlets based in Asia and Europe will follow the news from the Middle East. Without doubt Pundi X will be massive news

I never heard anything of the sort. Where are you getting your information from? Bitcoin is a work in progress and many changes will occur as time goes by.

You cannot provide any credible evidence to back up and support what you say.

Monaco make promises and never fulfill them. They have been telling the world since August 2017 that cards were to be shipped out within weeks but a year later nothing happened.

Elaborate please. What changes and modifications are needed to make Ethereum better? Or what features should the next innovaative coin have?

No news about this. All quiet on the Telegram too.

I am not giving any more than that. Any search engine will throw up information about Kris and Ensogo

Thank you for the information you provided in the message. I will get back to you in a day or two after trying to verify that information. I suppose I appreciate you mentioning some of the things you did mention because maybe you did not have to but if that information is readily available to ICO investors and there is some sort of way to cross-reference the information then I will try to get hold of the very last or most recent sheet you made available, after that I will get back to you.

Yes in ICOs not all investors will ever be happy and many will make a profit and many a loss. Personally I feel the lack of (as you refer to it) people who didn't do due diligence and read the details of the ico before they bought tokens does not make it plain and simple the fault of the investors. In fairness to them the bounty participants were trying to shut down, shout down and silence any voice that asked questions about the way the token system was valued. And yes you made everything clear (except some people thought they were buying a portion of the casino and some thought they were buying a portion of profits) and you also made it clear that you would no longer answer any questions because they doubted your motives.

I raised many concerns with you at the time about why a millionaire would shut down and re-open a betting website. I raised many concerns and questions and was not really happy with the response or the eagerness of the bounty participants to drown out my voice along with others that questioned the process but we tried to get clarity.

If what you say is true about owning 70% of the tokens out there then to be fair to investors you should not be claiming your 'profits' on those tokens. The profits should be distributed between the ICO investors and most definitely not on the 30 million tokens that were not released to the ICO investors and not on any that you personally held or any that Betking purchased in the buy back. My personal belief is you did not spend all of the 30 million retained tokens on marketing and development and you are still claiming 'profits' on those when the 'profits' should be going to the ICO and other token investors. If you say the investors have clarity on exactly what the state of play was and is regarding the tokens you held then, hold now and also sold then that is great news. I will try to get hold of that information, check it and get back to you.

Having said all that I thank you again for making a bold statement about you owning 70% of the Betking tokens. I just hope that you stop selling tokens now because the formula is flawed and helps only you while ensuring the investor loses out. If you must continue to sell the tokens then please consider raising the 10% buy-back to at least 25% and please consider defining another formula to sell future tokens so that investors can at least be in a position to make something more in 'profit' and ROI wise.

About the signature, as a gesture of goodwill I will be removing the comments about you and Betking. Thank you.