I was reading about some cases of people who had many BTC at a time when it has low or no value at all, and didn't care about it, so they eventually lost their security phrases, or hard wallets and now it is lost probably forever.
I've read that the amount that is considered lost can be up to 5 million BTC. That is about 1/4 of the total amount available.
Knowing that BTC has a limit, and we're getting there soon, isn't it possible to have some compensation for those lost BTC?
Something like adding more BTC in an equivalent amount for those lost BTC, or something similar.
Would it be positive for the currency or could bring some caos?
Bitcoin system does not work like that, it is either you keep your coin very well and have access to it in your wallet(s) or you lose it forever. However, that's if you are using the self-custody arrangements. But if you are using the custodial arrangement, you may have no issues, you can reset certain passcodes, or contact their support for guidance on how to retrieve your coin. The choice is ours in either case. Also, unless Satoshi is not a man of his word, no one will revisit anything when it comes to the capped 21 million market supply. This is one of what makes Bitcoin unique and not the lost coins can change this. Bitcoin is a different blockchain mechanism that is so different from other cryptocurrencies, but the moment they start altering it for whatever reason, the worse it will become. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin is a very good option in cases like this, but not that it is just a good option because it is Bitcoin but it is a very good option because it is an asset that people can invest their money in and earn a return. This return can be a very good means to cover up for us during times of inflation when our country's currency will be getting useless in worth gradually. But this still depends on the country we are talking about. In my country, though Bitcoin will help, but it can't still measure up for the huge inflation that has happened and that is still happening. Bitcoin is trying, yet, the inflation is bitting so deeper than it.
And for you to know the gist, within a few years now, we are now talking about 5-10 times higher in price. This year alone (as new as it is), some goods and services have tripled in price, though some could still be doubled or almost doubled depending on what we are talking about. So, it is that bad. I just hope that things will be fine with time even as we use Bitcoin and another possible assets to try to hedge this nonesense inflation that is frustrating people daily.
|
|
|
|
Some strategies are also game selective, they can work perfectly on us depending on the kind of game we are using them for, how experienced we are also go a long way in determining which they were, gambling is something we have to realize that we cannot enjoy the best in it without developing for ourselves a particular strategy for ourselves, this will also help towards achieving the maximum satisfaction we could wanted while playing any bets of it's kind while gambling.
Exactly, not all the strategies that work for all the games and what works for you might not work for another gambler because everyone has different luck to play gamble therefore different games go with different techniques. And another thing is that your participation on gambling with different games will also tell you which technique can be used in that particular game. And I think every game has a different strategy to play and it is only some that might have the same technique to play the game. What the OP stated is peculiar to sports betting and not all aspects of gambling, and I think reading it must have pointed to that easily. But I blame the OP for not including that plainly in his writeup and I know that it might confuse some people especially if they are relating it to casinos and some other aspect of sports betting that do not even relate to that. I like what he explained though and I know that the points above are some of what many of us betting on football and others would have been conversant with. It is practical to have our filtering means to speculate the best teams we will go for. However, I prefer to use this strategy to bet on the matches that are still not played, not the live matches as it might give wrong signals/instinct if one is using it in such a condition, even as emotion could dilute with the resolve of the gambler. Besides, luck is good in betting but I like people to relate that with casino betting and not sports betting. The luck of a thing is very common among gamblers sayings these days but I do not see it that way unless in slots and all that which are mainly the casino side of betting. But what I will not so rely upon in sports betting is luck and I do not like people to be emphasizing it too much. You have to use more of your brain and experience with the past and current happenings to know the team that might win in football, for instance, not that you will be relying on luck and be doing the guesswork and expect a miracle to happen in the name of luck. - To this day, it is not clear to me what sports betting games this OP is talking about in this topic. Though I don't often play sports bets because I'm not that familiar with the sports that can be bet on, it is difficult for me to predict who will win the two teams, right? That's why I often only play gambling in slot games because there is no hustle, and it's really easy to play gambling in this category of slot games as well. I understand you quite well and it's the fault of the OP in this regard. It is not so good to have a good write-up like his but not label it well, many will be confused about it and you are not the first person that would say this. Well, since you do not play sports betting, you may not understand it, which makes matters worse. The way he constructed it is even confusing for those who are betting sports, it only took me more time to be able to understand fully what he was even talking about sports betting. And if you must know, he is referring to virtually all aspects of sports betting, the strategy should be helpful in all of them. After all, you will have to select the team(s) at least to win, and if you are playing the win or lose game, then his advice is very valid. |
|
|
|
Personally, I don't like this and am also disheartened by them. They look one-sided and it shows the lack of regulation of the red trust. I've always known that any power/freedom given without regulation can be misused, and what I just read are examples of that. I can only see excesses.
I wasn't privileged to know what transpired in the second one and I didn't read it still yet, but for the first one, I was able to read what happened and even replied there a while ago. My take is that for a company representative to come out to state their own side of the story without proof doesn't make the person alleging them guilty.
The accuser even admitted to using a VPN service to access the site with already is a breach of ToS. Why was he even using a VPN service in the first place, very well knowing it could get his account blocked? Secondly, when one uses a VPN service to access a casino, one must know that very many other bonus abusers also use VPNs to do the same. So the system can easily flag one's account as an alt of other abusing accounts if the IP address is the same. If you are a casino owner and possible alt accounts are flagged, what do you do? I would love to hear your opinion. Let me clear you better on this matter, I am not on any side, I am neutral. All I know is that justice is not served with the way some people are taking it here. This is a peripheral media trial, it doesn't hold any water, yet, I like to only take a side when either of them could prove it without any reasonable doubt. None has done that, they are just saying. So, I remain neutral.Besides, VPN is not illegal in casinos, though, it is good to avoid it to avoid issues (that's if you know). You will contact many of them (casinos), and they will say they allow it. What if the guy never knew but used it? Don't you think he could be ignorant? I believe he was even ignorant to have stated it on that thread, and if it breaches their terms and conditions which I didn't read, then he is guilty. Nevertheless, cases are treated separately by a fair institution in case of ignorance. Many had used a VPN that breached Ts&Cs and was still fully settled when they traced that the gaming activities were entirely different. So, VPN usage is not the "right" to confiscate your money by any fair establishment, they will investigate further. Regardless, never did I read it was even because of VPN over there, but because of many accounts that acted alike. Many accounts that acted alike, what's the proof? Anyone can say anything. Should we now believe everything? Why? Because a certain person we don't even know personally said it? I'm still neutral on this. I just don't like people taking sides without valid proof. I hope you get me now. |
|
|
|
From the look out of things there is no doubt that $60k is sure before the end of this month February reason being that bitcoin has surpasses the price of 50k and headed to $52k if I am not mistakenly and you can correct me if I am wrong.
Also does this proves the idea of most people saying that bitcoin could hit half a million dollars after the halving by 2025, does this sign proves it right?
Let us discuss.
Bitcoin has done it again, the bullish comeback was much anticipated, but it is worth giving kudos because it did not fail our expectations to say the least. But now, as usual, you will hear people calling various prices due to what is happening, but to me, I do not see them as mostly professional, they will just randomise the calling which makes it inconsistent. Especially the round figure levels and psychological prices that they often call. As for me, I see that Bitcoin is bullish for now, and the main target is at the ATH of the coin, I see nothing so important to call a target again except that, at least for now. But this level is still higher than what can be hit any time soon, we will have to be so patient enough for it. It might however be hit before the halving if the market is so determined to move higher, or it might hit it shortly after halving which was against what people expected initially. Thinking that it would take a month after halving for this to be achievable. Lastly, the $60,000 level you called is achievable as well, but I do not see it happening in February. Bitcoin can't move higher without having its own bearish challenges as well no matter how little it is. |
|
|
|
I think People can easily use the P2P platform available on Binance and other centralized exchanges. Why do they need other sites like localbitcoins etc for this purpose?
Also, I think that these sites have been losing business ever since the biggest exchange Binance has launched their P2P platform and that is very secure too.
Not everyone can legally access Binance and not all are fan of centralized exchanges that asks KYC. Besides localbitcoins are famous p2p platform on its prime years not until it asked KYC requirements which started its dooms day. Nevertheless, the advice of @BitcoinsGreat is very much valid as Binance is a better alternative to Localbitcoins and services like it actually killed the business of Localbitcoins. Also, if there are countries that ban Binance, and not cryptocurrency generally, such will be so few. I can only read of Singapore and a tiny fractional part of Canada. I didn't dig deeper but I know that Binance offers its service to almost every part of the world. But it is a different ballgame if you want to use DEX, the Ts&Cs must be obeyed including the KYC. Besides, KYC is not what killed Localbitcoin, it's the too-hot competition in the industry that killed it. I can't have Binance and still think of Localbitcoin, this is obvious in all services you may think of. |
|
|
|
It is very difficult to predict the market accurately. But I see that the price of Bitcoin will not fall too deeply again, but maybe only a small correction on the way to an even higher rise. Therefore, the decision to buy now or not depends on your beliefs and decisions. If you believe this is the right time to buy then do it.
You are on point, Bitcoin has completed the needed correction that scared people in January, and it has moved up to confirm this. By the action of breaching above the former 2024's ATH at about $49,100, it shows that the overall bullish trend of the market has resumed, and the target is now the ATH of the market which is around $69,000. I am extremely bullish on Bitcoin now, there were a lot of issues on its way, but now, it has overcome all of them. For it now standing above the resistance-turned-support at $43,600, it can conveniently be bought with little challenges from the Bears. I expect the market to be strongly bullish every day that it has a bullish price action on the daily chart or even a candlestick that is bullish will do the work. It would be a better confimation that the market is on the bullish path without a sign of a change yet. Mind you, all the higher chart analysis confirms a bullish trend, so no one buying the asset for the long-term plan will ever regret their actions. |
|
|
|
|
Personally, I don't like this and am also disheartened by them. They look one-sided and it shows the lack of regulation of the red trust. I've always known that any power/freedom given without regulation can be misused, and what I just read are examples of that. I can only see excesses.
I wasn't privileged to know what transpired in the second one and I didn't read it still yet, but for the first one, I was able to read what happened and even replied there a while ago. My take is that for a company representative to come out to state their own side of the story without proof doesn't make the person alleging them guilty.
Or is that the way justice works? I'm just confused about this.
Maybe I am missing something, but in the absence of any proof on either side, is it not best to stay neutral?
|
|
|
|
Whats your take on this matter?
Bitcoin is not new and we've been saying the same thing about it for a long time now and this will never change. It is an asset with a very good prospect, it will continue to rise because history has always vindicated it and most people are buying the scope of what history has done n terms of tradition. In addition to that. Bitcoin has been inculcated into the mainstream of the financial market and it is such an asset that people love to own since it has a very good future. But aside from all these, it is such an asset that is so analyzeable on the chart and has been so lovely to be bought especially when it is in its bullish season. Also, as you can see all around the coin, Bitcoin is in its bullish season, no one should think otherwise even as the technical analysis is favouring the coin as well. It is long-term in the bullish disposition when it comes to the technical chart's predictions, so I expect it to rise even more this year and part of next year. After which it might not be safe to continue to buy it for a while. It might at that time enter another bearish season which calls fr caution. Just be well-informed of this and let your trading chart be your guide. |
|
|
|
Made mistakes with your Bitcoin in the past...that you still regret or at least considered to be a wrong move especially considering the price of BTC these days? Three years ago, I got bored with the movement of Bitcoin so I look for other good alternatives which I can use to replace...unfortunately I decided to go for BTCV all in. And it was a big horror because two months after the price of BTCV dropped to just 30% to when I bought them...got no choice but to cut loss.
Sorry about your loss, but still, if you didn't risk at all, you may not be able to gain. But this is just due to your wrong choice of investment, you may be happier with other alternatives. Although you didn't explain it well to let us know the time you made the investment, whether or not it was during the mini-bull run season or the last major bullish or bearish season. Either way, you have learned in a way, and even if you would invest in altcoins, you should not be emboldened to the extent of investing all your money in just one, the risk is too much. Unless you are so lucky, it's either it will not move up so much or you will lose some of your investment money. But as it is now, there is still hope. You may try as much as possible to wait for it to reverse in your favour. It could still dust off the 30% loss, and you might gain back your money with ease. Thankfully, we are entering the major bull run season soon, so you may even gain back your money in multiples, and the gaining could be speedy too. |
|
|
|
Maybe you know already: we have good coin and we have bad coin. While Bitcoin is very good coin, TRON is bad coin and here is why:
- TRON didn't achieve any additional technological advance compared to existing coin
- TRON is only launched because Justin Sun hates Vitalik Buterin and Ethereum
- Justin Sun failed to compete against Ethereum. Ethereum is much better, has much better technology and better developers
- Justin Sun just SHILLS his shitcoin TRON instead of implementing a better technology
Everyone should know, how fraudulent TRON really is.
Avoid bad coin like TRON.
As much as I like to agree with a few of your points, you still painted them so obviously that it shows you just didn't like TRON. But I will not allow that to cloud my judgment and whatever you have against TRON is yours to deal with. So I will be plain with my reference. Fine, the upgrade/improvements on TRON just like Ethereum, SOL and others make it score so poor in this regard. Yet, it is the project that beat Ethereum in other ways, especially the fees associated with the transfer of the asset and the speed of receiving your asset. Also, when it comes to the reliability of cryptocurrencies during the major bearish season, TRON has it. It is rare not to see a cryptocurrency that will not drop more than 3 times from its all-time high. TRON is one of them who did that. I can't take it for granted, even though it may be rising slowly during the bullish season just the same way it falls slowly during the bearish season, as if it is a snail. That's the issue I have with it presently, and if they can improve on it to be more scalable, it will be fine. |
|
|
|
All coins we are going to invest is too risky and it will become too risky if we don't have little knowledge about that coins we are going to invest but even though it's too risky but still we can find a good way to handle it. Cause we all know that we can make more profits. But as what i said we need to study first the coin if it will make us satisfied in the future or it will fail us. Research is the most effective way for investment so without hisitation we must conduct a research first.
Even with researching the project, we can't avoid the rug pull, scam, or abandoned project. I agree that investing in altcoins is very risky that's why we should prepare for the worst when investing in cryptocurrency especially altcoins, we need to be aware that coins with unhealthy gains could become a rugpull and end up becoming scams also don't forget to use money that we can afford to lose. We should not deceive ourselves, if the investment in altcoins can be risky, then in that sense, the investment in the entire crypto space is risky without removing anyone of them. That's the fact, we should stop holding the thing of the financial market with kid gloves, and if you are not the type that has the huge mind to take risks, I think you should back off from investments. It is never by force, and with the little I've ever seen, if not for trading, cryptocurrency is still the best market I've seen in all the market industries I've had dealings with. I can say that I've had dealings with virtually all aspects of the financial market, but when it comes to more certainty and confidence in the investment, I think that cryptocurrency has it. It is not going to be entirely easy though, but still, so long as we give it all it takes, we will always prevail. There are times you buy your Bitcoin or altcoins, and there are times you liquidate them ASAP, just let your analyses be your guide, especially the technical chart. Moreso, you have to only invest in the best projects, which are the ones you have so much trust and believe in based on the community and the good projects they link them with. I do not think you can make mistakes doing this if done well. |
|
|
|
I am new here few days ago I read post about bull market here. And I read everyone's replies and understood a lot and didn't fully understand. Tell me exactly what is the matter?
You will need to learn extensively about the crypto market or any asset whatsoever before you can use the understanding to fully know what people are saying here. If not, you might just guess most of what you read but it will not land you any where good. Well, in summary, if you are dealing with any asset like Bitcoin, be sure that the asset's price can either go up or down, which traders/investors would call Buy or Sell. The market players often relate the buying and selling to some other names to better denotes it, that's why they call the buying market a bullish market and the selling market a bearish market. And this bullish and bearish are derived from the animals, which are Bulls and Bears, they are such that they relate to the players in the market. However, those who are associated with the buying of the market are called the Bulls, and the condition of the market at that time could be bullish. While those who are associated with the selling of the market are called the Bears, and the condition of the market could be bearish at that time. So if you hear of the bull market or bull run, then you should know that it is a buying market where the market is appreciating in value. Nevertheless, I still advice you to learn more about the market trading and investment for better understanding. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is as safe as investing in gold and land, especially when investing in gold and land is virtually risk-free. But in the context of my country, if I invest in gold and land than keeping money in the bank, then I will get much more profit and due to the unbridled increase in inflation, if I keep money in the bank, the value of that money will decrease day by day. But investing in bitcoin and land or gold will not have any effect of inflation because natural resources especially gold and land are limited in supply and day by day increasing demand for these will gradually increase in price. will be
You are getting a whole lot of these wrong. First, there is no investment that is risk-free, be it Bitcoin, Gold, or even land, they have their degree of risk, only that they might be less risky than some investments. But that doesn't mean they are outrightly out of risk. Permit me also to say that I invest in all three, so I can say of them even as anyone could have access to the same information even if they've never invested in them, they are all over the internet for our consumption. Contrary to what you said, if you buy the land, your money has been converted to it, so there is no need to keep anything in that bank anymore. You don't even have the money again with you. Or do you think you still hold the liquid money or cash even as you hold the land which is now your asset? That's not possible. The same thing goes for Gold and Bitcoin, you've already used your fiat money to purchase them, you can't store their value in the bank again, you can only own them as the store of the value. And when they appreciate more, you get, but if they depreciate, you lose. It's as simple as that. |
|
|
|
The super rich don't just gamble to make money but in some cases they do it for fun and to pass the time. But middle class people are more attracted to gambling and they aim for easy get rich quick tricks. When you go to a casino you will realize that some rich people are there to have fun but most people are there to make money. Moreover online gambling is more popular these days and it has popularity in more or less all countries, so they are constantly gambling as a way to fulfill their needs and earn enough money. Naturally it is foolish to engage in arguments because people are connected to different activities according to their needs.
Poor and rich people go to casinos for different reasons. The poor go to solve their financial problems, they want to get something that cannot be obtained by hard work in a regular job, because such things are very expensive. And the rich go to the casino for emotions. They do not need to think about whether they will lose or win, they want sensations, and in principle this is the right approach to gambling in a casino, so the rich are unlikely to develop an addiction to gambling. And for the poor, this is more common. Well, I like to avoid judging anyone, they can be the ones to actually tell the reason why they do some things. Being poor doesn't mean you are desperate, and there are some supposed poor people who are living better lives than rich people. They might not lack the daily bread and are comfortable with the good life they live even as they do not have as much money as the rich. You can imagine such a poor fellow gambling, it may not necessarily mean that he wants to be rich there, it might be what he loves doing it and he might even be calculative about it also. The same thing goes for rich people too, they can have their reasons for gambling, it is either for fun or for the money. We should not be exonerating the rich people that they can never gamble for money, they can. Even though some of them have money, they may want more money through greed or any other reason. In some cases too, they may think that gambling can earn them more money if they are good at it. And by this, committing big money consistently to it. So, it depends on the individual and, not the financial class, they could gamble only for the fun or for the money, it doesn't matter, only that we trust/praise the rich more than necessary even though they are also human beings. |
|
|
|
There two are major fact, this is how gamblers makes mistakes and makes loss in gambling more than expected. Responsible gambler select a game for stake, after done analysis and measuring loss. But when they keep winning continuely then Over Confidence comes in gamblers personality and thus they don't rethink and recalculate anything. As they already have good money due to his previous continues winnings, they don't hesitate to stake higher. And thus they loss big money at once. Even greed is the most significant factor. When a gamble become responsible,they just keep placing bets without measuring losses or the results. which is the main reason behind gamblers keep losing continuely and become addicted as they have to recover what they lost in gambling
I was confused with the last part of your statement. When a gambler becomes responsible, there will be a big difference, and contrary to what you said, he will start measuring his losses and try to keep himself in calmly manner so that the losses won't swell up. Bro, you should know that the guy merely made a mistake judging by what he has been narrating from the beginning and even after the typo mistake he made. He actually wanted to write "irresponsible" and not responsible." From what I've read through what he wrote, he is 100% right, and what he wrote is such that gamblers should read and change their ways for the good. We should always know that greed and revenge are so bad in gambling, and if care is not taken, they will continue to push us until we become addicted, and no one who is addicted to gambling can be responsible. It is either it takes your time from you, or your energy or your money, and in most cases, it will take all of them from you at the same time. This calls for caution in this regard so that we will not just be a puppet of gambling. We need our own mind in action in this regard, and this is what will help us to stop/pause, or quit/ continue whenever we want. Anyone who can actualise these will surely be a responsible gambler |
|
|
|
Then the casino and other online bet platforms was introduced in time. This was how I was exposed and my begining of gambling life!
Yes, all of us must have experienced experiences in the gambling arena, whether it started illegally or legally, the point is that everyone has a life story of first being involved in gambling. I also have a long life history in gambling, where I got to know online gambling through a friend, he taught me everything so that I could master gambling like now, but basically gambling has made me happy and difficult, while I was still learning, especially online crypto gambling, however, I always hoped that gambling could make me better in all aspects. Yes, we all have our experience with gambling which includes the first day of our gambling and what caused us to make that move. But in my experience, it is not in the regular way that people narrate theirs, and maybe that's why I engage in gambling more politely than most people do. I've seen offline casinos since I was young, and I was in secondary school then. I've always been curious about how they go about it. They call it "Pool" then. It was after this that other ideas came in this regard (at least in my locality) and more were seen but I never gambled it for us. I was able to avoid it until my university days, so I was mature enough to engage in it. This is all by myself without the interference of any friend, so it has been easy for me to play when I want to play and stay off it if that is what I want since no influence. This is a good mindset to gamble as well, and am proud to have earned more than what I've lost. Even though the difference is so small in comparison, it's still worth the kudos. |
|
|
|
I guess the only way to know is to try it himself. And don't worry because he can always practice first without or with a small bet involved. If the results turned out to be great, then that should answer your question in which his predicting skills do also work in gambling. After that, maybe he will just open up a prediction service. I'm referring to those person who use a crystal ball and tarot cards.
This should generate him more money. Most people who does this has a lesser accuracy but they still can get a tip for their effort. But I think there are consequences with it, just in case he gets famous, like someone will threaten him for this. So sometimes it's better to just make our special talent a secret.
I wish most betting sites have a demo account which a gambler can use to learn how to gamble, when yo cash out and when to stake just like the way some trading apps are, but since bets are not like that a gambler who's ready to risk his or her money have to deposit real money in other to win real money. The lack of demos in gambling is not encouraging but I understand the plight of casinos too. It is going to discourage a lot of people if they are not making money through demo gambling, and this will not even make them deposit their money. They would rather use the money for other purposes instead of wasting it. Because you cannot see danger in front of you and you will still force yourself into it. But when you start directly with live gambling, you get to take the risk immediately, and if you are not sensitive, you might just continue to lose the money and keep depositing all the same until you get addicted if care is not taken. But for those gamblers who are sensitive and wise, they should limit the risk because there was no demo to practice gamble with care. They can be gambling with just $1, while some may even go lower than that if their casinos allow it. This is another means of testing the platform you are playing with, the options they have, the game itself and your gambling expertise. You can have the time to manage and improve in yourself as well before it becomes better. By doing this also, I do not believe that the gambler who is sensitive and such that has created good expertise, budget and plans towards gambling can regret it so much. |
|
|
|
It is impossible for someone to have fun in watching a match that he has bets on, such person will have anxiety and one sided in support, at this point what he cares about is his bet depend on his options, so, it is very much true that people can have fun in a game that they place bet on, football is a game of fun though, but having fun and beating at this same time can ruin your fun, when you are gambling supporting a team as a fan is not obtainable unless you make a strict decision not bet on your favourite team but if you do, there is no way you can enjoy such game, if you notice very well people don't openly support team that much again because of gambling.
The gambler mostly like to watch the games of the other gamblers with their experience.Because the gamblers who had a sufficient knowledge alone not a successful gamblers in the gambling site.It was more essential one for the gambler to increase the game by watching the matches of the others because every one had their own style of the game.So the game can be learned by the gamblers who play in the future game.So the gambling was based on the player experiences and their skills will give their more money by playing more interesting. I am surprised about what you just said here, or maybe you didn't explain well for me to fully understand. Did you mean such a gambler is not sure of himself or what? I can't seriously comprehend this because we should not be relying on other people for our gambling activity. Good, we can learn from others to know how they do it if we know they are good or better than us, but being dependent on them is not what I like, it could also cause issues like confusion and regret at times. This is particularly true if we've already had our games set but because we peep at what the supposed better gamblers were doing, we now change our options and might be the wrong options we changed to, which hurts. I believe that gamblers should have their own minds and expertise, this will make them lose proudly and not that some certain people will cause the loss of their money for them. This is what pains me most, and ever in my gambling life, I've never played based on other people's advice. If the worst comes to be worst, I would rather give them the money to play on my behalf. I've done the latter times without a number and those who I'd given the money have always lost the game. This is why I do my thing by myself and it has been fine with me. |
|
|
|
|
With what is happening around football in relation to VAR, well, it is not inappropriate to say that VAR is doing a good job, but with errors. These errors are not much, nevertheless, it could be so painful at times. Regardless, VAR has been a very good assistance to the referees and I do not think that abolishing it totally is the right decision as some people are glamorous but to improve on it. Nothing is perfect in life, which is why in the case of VAR as well, it can't be perfect, it is the human beings behind the screen and also privileged to be watching the match live on the pitch
that should make some corrective decisions almost immediately to better help the VAR.
And if it is to give it more time before a decision is made, they should, not that they will leave everything to VAR to do. VAR is a computer program, itself will not make that mistake, it is humans that are judging it wrong, and based on the programs in it and the way they conclude on its advice. This is what I believe they should work on, but it seems that FIFA is lagging behind in this regard.
No one can say that VAR is still at a testing stage, that can't just be with the years it has lived, since 2016. They should have perfected it better by now instead of letting it cause a daylight robbery in football.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
