Jaerky,
I have been complimented on my dedication to this coin and my enthusiasm.
I like you Bitbobb, but someone who's gunning to be the treasurer so badly is a bit suspicious imo. Also, I think people who are so quick to criticize in incredible detail, such as ToadKing and others, should step up to the plate and volunteer to take on some responsibility. And honestly, holding a large amount of Trumps doesn't count; especially when they're always shoving it in everyone's faces saying "I'll definitely sell if X happens." That's not being a team player at all. It's an unacceptable attitude to have, especially when others are trying to push the project forward. I agree with 100% of what you said. If I may explain why I am so gunning for this job in Trumpcoin. It is because I am worried that the full potential of this coin will not be realized. And so to prevent failure is my motivation. I hope this helps you understand. And you are right to be suspicious of someone who wants a political office in this I agree 100%. G. Washington did not want to be president at all. He had to be begged. But he knew if he did not do it then it might get screwed up, fast. Now you know why I am willing to check here so often. Also I did not offer to run, I was nominated. Thank you |
|
|
|
If Dread is out, the only choice for treasurer if it cant be Signal is Bitnator.
Depredation:
90% of his posts are fluff. Goes along to get a long, easily swayed. Never called out chicken on his shit. Defends Bitbob. He just seems prominent because he posts a lot. Based on his /Biz/ posts I think he is college age at best. Possibly even high school.
Paraphrasing:
"Do you ever sleep Dep?"
"Fuck you its summer I can do whatever I want."
Also definition of his name: (an act of attacking or plundering.)
I don't believe he would, but its a bad omen, and a bad image. Even if he changes it.
I like him, but he should not be treasurer.
Bitbob:
I've picked on him enough. I don't like reading his posts. I'll be getting away from TC quickly if he's given any official position.
Bitnator:
Seems stable, can string together a sentence, doesn't post pictures of rape sheds.
As I've said before, I'd prefer for Signal to just hold it. If he bails the coins done anyway. I want him to be able to move quickly and do what he wants. No more time for voting or a someone getting big britches once they hold the fund.
I agree, It's either Bitnator or Signal7. BitBobb is seems a bit too...err...emotionally invested in the project. Sorry, he's not stable enough to hold the fund when he can't deal with trolls. Just telling it how it is. Dep, yeah, definition of his name - not good at all. It's slim pickins when it comes to the dev team, from what it looks like. I would rather have a Trump fan (Like CantStump) hold the coins. If not, I agree that Signal should hold it, and the coin dies indeed if Signal drops. We really dont have much of a choice here, and we're wasting time. Actually, it might be best for Signal to hold it at least temporarily, and then when the coin has more exposure, another Trump fan can hold the coins. Regardless, I dont feel comfortable with either Bitbobb or Dep holding it. So it is better to let trolls slander and impersonate me as treasurer and not care about the coin in order to be qualified? Interesting concept. Yes. It's better if you just let them be. But its not only that, its the fact that you post constantly. Like, all the time, you respond all the time. I know you are passionate about the coin, sure, but its too much. It's kind of weird. Sorry if I am blunt. It's just odd. Maybe not to you, but to the rest of us, it's out of place. Both of you and seige et al have taken up pages and pages. It's crazy. Yes, you should care about the coin, sure, but there is a "too much of a good thing." You have that going on. I think your talents would be better suited elsewhere to be honest. You definitely have a place in the project, just not as treasurer. I removed 85% of my posts from the last 24 hour fiasco. However it took that many posts to finally get Perryl to admit that she or he missed my proof I offered after she/he had said for several pages that I did not offer proof or that it was not good enough. I do not know how much court room experience you have especially with liars. But the only way to deal with them is to keep them talking so you can find the holes. Perryl is high level and it took ten pages. Then I took down my posts which amounted to 2 pages. In the end we walked away friendly and the issue is now moot. HOWEVER, had I stood down when asked by others because of the amount of posts on the thread then as of now she would still be here posting that I never offered proof, etc. If I am the only one here yeah I will defend this coin. If I am treasurer then I have already told Signal7 I will not need to post anymore since I will report to the leadership directly. You are right to not feed trolls. But I would like to see you do that when they are impersonating you as treasurer and making statements about this coin. So the lesser of the 2 evils was to post and defend myself and this coin. And then I can always take down the posts. I hope you can appreciate that. I never though caring about something or being excited about a project or defending it could be viewed as a bad thing. Kinda shocked. But no need to be sorry I can take you criticisms. And yes I do thank you for your post. I too wish to get going. And I agree no need to squabble, we have all had enough. I just wished to respond to the substance of your post because you did have some there and you deserve a response. But I will not go on at length. And I can take these posts down tonight or tomorrow morning. Until then it may prevent others from needing the same question answered twice |
|
|
|
|
Jaerky,
I have been complimented on my dedication to this coin and my enthusiasm.
|
|
|
|
If Dread is out, the only choice for treasurer if it cant be Signal is Bitnator.
Depredation:
90% of his posts are fluff. Goes along to get a long, easily swayed. Never called out chicken on his shit. Defends Bitbob. He just seems prominent because he posts a lot. Based on his /Biz/ posts I think he is college age at best. Possibly even high school.
Paraphrasing:
"Do you ever sleep Dep?"
"Fuck you its summer I can do whatever I want."
Also definition of his name: (an act of attacking or plundering.)
I don't believe he would, but its a bad omen, and a bad image. Even if he changes it.
I like him, but he should not be treasurer.
Bitbob:
I've picked on him enough. I don't like reading his posts. I'll be getting away from TC quickly if he's given any official position.
Bitnator:
Seems stable, can string together a sentence, doesn't post pictures of rape sheds.
As I've said before, I'd prefer for Signal to just hold it. If he bails the coins done anyway. I want him to be able to move quickly and do what he wants. No more time for voting or a someone getting big britches once they hold the fund.
I agree, It's either Bitnator or Signal7. BitBobb is seems a bit too...err...emotionally invested in the project. Sorry, he's not stable enough to hold the fund when he can't deal with trolls. Just telling it how it is. Dep, yeah, definition of his name - not good at all. It's slim pickins when it comes to the dev team, from what it looks like. I would rather have a Trump fan (Like CantStump) hold the coins. If not, I agree that Signal should hold it, and the coin dies indeed if Signal drops. We really dont have much of a choice here, and we're wasting time. Actually, it might be best for Signal to hold it at least temporarily, and then when the coin has more exposure, another Trump fan can hold the coins. Regardless, I dont feel comfortable with either Bitbobb or Dep holding it. So it is better to let trolls slander and impersonate me as treasurer and not care about the coin in order to be qualified? Interesting concept. |
|
|
|
doesn't post pictures of rape sheds.
Okay, that was good. I laughed. Why don't you run for treasurer? Because someone would have to nominate him and no one did. Depredation offered to run and he was nominated by another member then he accepted Bitinator offered to run and was nominated by Depredation since it would make the election better then he accepted the terms And I was nominated and accepted the terms for the job. |
|
|
|
If Dread is out, the only choice for treasurer if it cant be Signal is Bitnator.
Depredation:
90% of his posts are fluff. Goes along to get a long, easily swayed. Never called out chicken on his shit. Defends Bitbob. He just seems prominent because he posts a lot. Based on his /Biz/ posts I think he is college age at best. Possibly even high school.
Paraphrasing:
"Do you ever sleep Dep?"
"Fuck you its summer I can do whatever I want."
Also definition of his name: (an act of attacking or plundering.)
I don't believe he would, but its a bad omen, and a bad image. Even if he changes it.
I like him, but he should not be treasurer.
Bitbob:
I've picked on him enough. I don't like reading his posts. I'll be getting away from TC quickly if he's given any official position.
Bitnator:
Seems stable, can string together a sentence, doesn't post pictures of rape sheds.
As I've said before, I'd prefer for Signal to just hold it. If he bails the coins done anyway. I want him to be able to move quickly and do what he wants. No more time for voting or a someone getting big britches once they hold the fund.
Toadking, Too bad there is nothing I can respond too since you offer no concrete criticism of me. So in other words you are here investing when there is no treasurer but once there is one if it is me you will leave? So I am worse than nothing in your mind yet you cannot offer a reason other than you do not like reading my posts. You points against me seem paper thin, just like the threat to leave. Do not be scared you opinion matters you do not have to take it easy on me. I can take your criticisms assuming you have at least one. Remember last week when you told me my posts were not to you liking and I removed them and then you said I did not have to do that for you? I do value you opinion. Thanks for posting |
|
|
|
Treasury nominees. Why should you get the vote? Are you more than competent?
I believe I am more than competent to be the Treasurer for any organization especially one where the product is a "currency". While the block chain and the code control the issue of the coins, the treasurer performs the remaining duties traditionally involved. As Treasurer I will provide internal and allow external audits for open accounting to demonstrate to each investor where this money is going, how and when. As your treasurer we will have the transparency needed to ensure that not one penny or one crypto token is ever unaccounted for. This will allow each of us to be sure of one thing when we speak to potential investors: we know where the money will be spent! With a project like this that has had trust issues transparency is key to regaining trust and increasing our market share. This is an absolute requirement! I believe a vote for me is a vote for transparency. And I look forward to serving this community of very special people! Thank you Bitbobb July 18th, 2016 |
|
|
|
http://185.117.72.185:3001Trumpcoin Explorer Explorer is programmed with a database conflict. Purge everything (mongos). Start again with the new source. Better still, spin a new droplet because mongod leaves itself in all sorts of places and it is a hassle to completely remove its old database. How helpful am I? Here you go Signal7 |
|
|
|
That was a fun read  Not if you are Bitbobb |
|
|
|
Bitbobb you panic a lot, you can't deal with situations in the right manner. You go in a bitchfit when you get accused
And with all your above lack of skills, I'm sure you'll take this coin where it belongs  Screenshot of my bitchfit since you have this all captured? Or is this accusation the only proof you have? Can you post a link to my comments you are referring to please? What skills do I lack? Please list them since I can admit my weak areas and I may agree with you. |
|
|
|
Having read through all the new pages, here's my analysis:
Perryl, I believe that your intentions here are sincere and you are looking to disseminate and receive the most up to date and accurate information possible. However, I'm not sure anymore exactly what it is you would like to see - you have repeatedly asked Bitbobb for proof you yourself say he cannot provide (can't prove a negative). Can you please, for my sake and others, sum up what it is specifically you would like to see, what your concerns are, and how you would prefer to see them addressed? I know you've asked people to just go back and read, but the truth is your posts are mixed in with a lot of controversy and FUD that makes it difficult to tease out your place in all this.
Thank you, my original intention was to let people know, from my perspective, because I was the person siege heard the flirting thing from. It was a comment about someone else in passing, but it seriously shouldn't affect his qualifications. Missing meetings, well, that's another thing entirely. Anyways. I've never asked for proof, he's offered it yet not provided it. There is definitely a difference. I don't care what he proves. I don't care if he really is that Bitbobb, but I can see why Trumpcoin would/should. Does he need to prove anything to me? No. Not at all. I have said that multiple times too. He's running for a position, he claims someone is impersonating him, I have done nothing but play devil's advocate. Call it fud if you wish, but it makes no difference to me either way. I may buy Trumps, and I am still on this thread because I am asking specific questions about the coin itself. This issue, is behind me, and is honestly a waste of my time. Which is actually quite valuable. Not just to me, but to hundreds of other people. So, to sum it up. I don't need proof. He offered it and didn't fulfill his own offer. Even though I have said several times that I don't need proof, don't want proof, don't care, and everything in between. I think I only asked someone to go back and read when they made a claim about something I said. If they are to make a claim about something I said they should make sure they are correct with what they're saying. Thanks for being a little more understanding. I am still a bit confused - you seem upset that BB has offered to provide proof (and he's actually done so, see below), but say you don't actually want or need it either way. If you don't care about proof, why are you concerned that none has been provided? If what both of you are saying is true, that you don't need proof and that BB can provide more if someone can indicate what they would like to see, then we have no issue here and that part of the discussion can be dropped. I'm going to respond to your other questions in a different post, one sec... P.S. Here is the proof that was provided by BB of being Doing earlier in the thread. I make no claims to the authenticity or quality of this proof, I just want it in a place everyone can see.  Apparently, I missed this post. You are correct, i did not see that. "If you don't care about proof, why are you concerned that none has been provided?" Because it was offered. No reason to even offer it. Just post it and say "there". So much more convincing than "I could post it, it's easy, but I'm too busy right now. Not too busy to talk to you, but too busy to press 'print screen'". Other than that, yeah, dropped it already. I never did see the picture until right before I wrote this message. I mean, would you really expect me to put any effort into looking for a picture I never felt the need to see? It's sad, the world we live in, but it's the way it is. We can't even trust video evidence anymore. Every one who was here yesterday saw I needed help posting pictures. So it was not like you say that "I was too busy to press print screen". You typed for 8 pages that my proof was not good enough and only when a member put it in your face now you claim "you missed it". So is it not good enough or did you miss it? Because if you missed it all a normal person would do is say. "Ooops sorry about that Bitbobb". But instead you continue hyper commenting that "why did I offer to post proof instead of just posting it". Answer: because it was not yet an issue on this forum. I had just snapped the screen shot on yobit. This all happened within seconds. I am having a hard time believing you are innocent despite my willingness. You are a bit to pro on your spelling and psychology. But for the record apology accepted. Thanks for finally noticing my proof. Let me know if I can do anything more for you and how you would like it done. And if I am ever wrong you will be the first to have my apology, okay? |
|
|
|
Bitbobb the point being whether you were bitbobb or not isn't the topic
The topic is however you as the Treasurer
You being the treasurer will do more harm to this coin than good
But for me that's a good thing as the coin won't survive too long in your hands
Second request for proof of claim! |
|
|
|
Having read through all the new pages, here's my analysis:
Perryl, I believe that your intentions here are sincere and you are looking to disseminate and receive the most up to date and accurate information possible. However, I'm not sure anymore exactly what it is you would like to see - you have repeatedly asked Bitbobb for proof you yourself say he cannot provide (can't prove a negative). Can you please, for my sake and others, sum up what it is specifically you would like to see, what your concerns are, and how you would prefer to see them addressed? I know you've asked people to just go back and read, but the truth is your posts are mixed in with a lot of controversy and FUD that makes it difficult to tease out your place in all this.
Thank you, my original intention was to let people know, from my perspective, because I was the person siege heard the flirting thing from. It was a comment about someone else in passing, but it seriously shouldn't affect his qualifications. Missing meetings, well, that's another thing entirely. Anyways. I've never asked for proof, he's offered it yet not provided it. There is definitely a difference. I don't care what he proves. I don't care if he really is that Bitbobb, but I can see why Trumpcoin would/should. Does he need to prove anything to me? No. Not at all. I have said that multiple times too. He's running for a position, he claims someone is impersonating him, I have done nothing but play devil's advocate. Call it fud if you wish, but it makes no difference to me either way. I may buy Trumps, and I am still on this thread because I am asking specific questions about the coin itself. This issue, is behind me, and is honestly a waste of my time. Which is actually quite valuable. Not just to me, but to hundreds of other people. So, to sum it up. I don't need proof. He offered it and didn't fulfill his own offer. Even though I have said several times that I don't need proof, don't want proof, don't care, and everything in between. I think I only asked someone to go back and read when they made a claim about something I said. If they are to make a claim about something I said they should make sure they are correct with what they're saying. Thanks for being a little more understanding. I am still a bit confused - you seem upset that BB has offered to provide proof (and he's actually done so, see below), but say you don't actually want or need it either way. If you don't care about proof, why are you concerned that none has been provided? If what both of you are saying is true, that you don't need proof and that BB can provide more if someone can indicate what they would like to see, then we have no issue here and that part of the discussion can be dropped. I'm going to respond to your other questions in a different post, one sec... P.S. Here is the proof that was provided by BB of being Doing earlier in the thread. I make no claims to the authenticity or quality of this proof, I just want it in a place everyone can see. Apparently, I missed this post. You are correct, i did not see that. "If you don't care about proof, why are you concerned that none has been provided?" Because it was offered. No reason to even offer it. Just post it and say "there". So much more convincing than "I could post it, it's easy, but I'm too busy right now. Not too busy to talk to you, but too busy to press 'print screen'". Other than that, yeah, dropped it already. I never did see the picture until right before I wrote this message. I mean, would you really expect me to put any effort into looking for a picture I never felt the need to see? It's sad, the world we live in, but it's the way it is. We can't even trust video evidence anymore. Your comments make sense now that you say you never saw my post called Proof: I accept your apoligy...yes it is a crazy world. Just so you know there are 100% no hard feelings I know the world is crazy. I hope you see it was worth for me to be here in stead of my meetings this morning because of this moment right now. You see now I can make shirts with a good feeling about life instead of being upset.. Thank you for posting! |
|
|
|
I am responding to things that are on page 34 and the thread is on page 38. This is not going to eat my whole day no way folks. I am done.
I do not care some person in a troll box is demanding screen shots. Where were you yesterday when depredation was kind enough to post my pictures for me because I do not yet know how? I am truly sorry that I cannot comply with your demands of me this Sunday morning. I did not planned to get trolled to HH. So in the meantime if you are sad it is not me then sorry or IDK. But I will check back later. Bye for now God bless Donald J. Trump!
I can help you with posting screenshots, not necessarily of this, but in general. I've already tried... You posted an app for me to download. Tell me how to post in this forum and I will say "Thank you!" I know how to snap the image then what? I was going to look it up later since I will have more photos I want to share anyway. Oh, sure.  Sec, they don't accept lightshot. I'll help you really quickly here, just refresh this page in like a minute. So, to do that, upload an image to imgur and then right click the image and "copy link location", then paste it in that insert image tab on the submit message page. Thank you! |
|
|
|
No what you are doing is causing the controversy.
My appointments were rescheduled. obviously. What am I needing to explain everything to you? So that is what this is all about. Someone is very afraid I may get a role in this coin and they do not want that? I think you just gave away your position. My god you really do have a lot of points that are N/A. And I take slander seriously. If you cared about this coin and your name and left for a meeting you would have criticisms for me for that we all see what you are doing here. Good job on warning us all. Now how can I help you what proof will you accept? what method would you like it? Oh now you do not care about proof? So then I am not needed here. So signing off now for the tenth time for real good bye till later.
As we've been asked to take this to PM, I'm going to drop this here. I have told you, repeatedly, I do not need nor want proof. You're the one running for a position. I have determined, based on this stupid argument over nothing. That I would not vote for you. That is all that really matters at this point. My interest in this coin has been perked by the non-fud. Aside that, if you want help with Lightshot then please PM me. Please, do not PM me otherwise. I have no interest in this argument. I do, however, have interest in seeing a coin becoming a superpac. That's super interesting to me. I do, in the event that I decide to buy Trumps, care about this coin, enough, to care about who is handling the funds, and how they handle themselves. Now, I have other things to do. We'll talk again, I'm sure, and hopefully in the future we can forget about this. Regardless who the real Bitbobb is. I think, it's also important to raise awareness if there is some question as to whether Bitbobb on the exchange represents you. That's going to cause more confusion. Perryl, Bitbobb, PLEASE can you contain your posts in Private Messages? There is no need for so much spam in this thread.
Edit: Yes, Signal7 has big plans to make this coin successful!
I'm done. I won't respond to future posts from Bitbobb regarding this issue. I do not think with the time line you gave me I could ever give you the proof you needed to support me since you did not tell me what proof you will accept. And you rejected the proof I offered before you ever asked for any. Further, I think a mountain of proof would not be enough for you since you may be here to try and knock me out of the running because I am a threat to Hillary. Very simple. I hope I am wrong of course |
|
|
|
Ok, so that's great I will show screen shots later today of my login for yobit and whatever else is required of me. But I have missed several meetings this morning because of this. So while it is very impressive that guys hit on you and that you are holding trumps can I please leave the computer now and salvage what I can of this beautiful day outside? Thank you I know about burden of proof. I also am well aware of impatient people making demands and how they are usually N/A
I don't need screenshots, idc either way, told you that enough. Why would you miss meetings for a forum thread??? Maybe not a good thing to say publicly while running for treasurer? I don't hold Trumps.. lol. You miss the point as much as the Bitbobb from yobit. Starting to think I would be surprised if you weren't one and the same. I think, there is a vote, right? Well. There are two other people that don't have so much controversy surrounding them, right? I think that's what's going on. I'm not really too up-to-date with what's going on here. I'm just pointing out that a guy that would miss meetings to not provide proof to claims being made against him is probably not the guy I would want as treasurer. One of those other two people is voting for me because they believe I will do a better job. And both of them have no objection to me serving this coin. I think Hillary does not want it. I am sure she would like to have my talents but they go to Trump! Please stop trying to hurt this coin! BB, be that as it may, what has happened here speaks to my concerns over your public perception if you are a steward of the fund going forward that I expressed to you on Yobit a few days ago. Do you remember what I said, and is it making a little more sense now? Do you understand that someone has impersonated me and that is who Bitbobb on yobit is . My Handle is "Doing" and I almost never post and nobody ever responds to me anyway. Never have I have a conversation at all with anyone except this morning when I told "bitbobb" he was not the real bitbobb and a few other things after that. This is getting old |
|
|
|
Ok, so that's great I will show screen shots later today of my login for yobit and whatever else is required of me. But I have missed several meetings this morning because of this. So while it is very impressive that guys hit on you and that you are holding trumps can I please leave the computer now and salvage what I can of this beautiful day outside? Thank you I know about burden of proof. I also am well aware of impatient people making demands and how they are usually N/A
I don't need screenshots, idc either way, told you that enough. Why would you miss meetings for a forum thread??? Maybe not a good thing to say publicly while running for treasurer? I don't hold Trumps.. lol. You miss the point as much as the Bitbobb from yobit. Starting to think I would be surprised if you weren't one and the same. I think, there is a vote, right? Well. There are two other people that don't have so much controversy surrounding them, right? I think that's what's going on. I'm not really too up-to-date with what's going on here. I'm just pointing out that a guy that would miss meetings to not provide proof to claims being made against him is probably not the guy I would want as treasurer. One of those other two people is voting for me because they believe I will do a better job. And both of them have no objection to me serving this coin. I think Hillary does not want it. I am sure she would like to have my talents but they go to Trump! Please stop trying to hurt this coin! BB, be that as it may, what has happened here speaks to my concerns over your public perception if you are a steward of the fund going forward that I expressed to you on Yobit a few days ago. Do you remember what I said, and is it making a little more sense now? I never spoke to you on yobit |
|
|
|
Having read through all the new pages, here's my analysis:
Perryl, I believe that your intentions here are sincere and you are looking to disseminate and receive the most up to date and accurate information possible. However, I'm not sure anymore exactly what it is you would like to see - you have repeatedly asked Bitbobb for proof you yourself say he cannot provide (can't prove a negative). Can you please, for my sake and others, sum up what it is specifically you would like to see, what your concerns are, and how you would prefer to see them addressed? I know you've asked people to just go back and read, but the truth is your posts are mixed in with a lot of controversy and FUD that makes it difficult to tease out your place in all this.
Thank you, my original intention was to let people know, from my perspective, because I was the person siege heard the flirting thing from. It was a comment about someone else in passing, but it seriously shouldn't affect his qualifications. Missing meetings, well, that's another thing entirely. Anyways. I've never asked for proof, he's offered it yet not provided it. There is definitely a difference. I don't care what he proves. I don't care if he really is that Bitbobb, but I can see why Trumpcoin would/should. Does he need to prove anything to me? No. Not at all. I have said that multiple times too. He's running for a position, he claims someone is impersonating him, I have done nothing but play devil's advocate. Call it fud if you wish, but it makes no difference to me either way. I may buy Trumps, and I am still on this thread because I am asking specific questions about the coin itself. This issue, is behind me, and is honestly a waste of my time. Which is actually quite valuable. Not just to me, but to hundreds of other people. So, to sum it up. I don't need proof. He offered it and didn't fulfill his own offer. Even though I have said several times that I don't need proof, don't want proof, don't care, and everything in between. I think I only asked someone to go back and read when they made a claim about something I said. If they are to make a claim about something I said they should make sure they are correct with what they're saying. Thanks for being a little more understanding. I am still a bit confused - you seem upset that BB has offered to provide proof (and he's actually done so, see below), but say you don't actually want or need it either way. If you don't care about proof, why are you concerned that none has been provided? If what both of you are saying is true, that you don't need proof and that BB can provide more if someone can indicate what they would like to see, then we have no issue here and that part of the discussion can be dropped. I'm going to respond to your other questions in a different post, one sec... P.S. Here is the proof that was provided by BB of being Doing earlier in the thread. I make no claims to the authenticity or quality of this proof, I just want it in a place everyone can see. Doogjy, Thank you so much for this post. |
|
|
|
Ok, so that's great I will show screen shots later today of my login for yobit and whatever else is required of me. But I have missed several meetings this morning because of this. So while it is very impressive that guys hit on you and that you are holding trumps can I please leave the computer now and salvage what I can of this beautiful day outside? Thank you I know about burden of proof. I also am well aware of impatient people making demands and how they are usually N/A
I don't need screenshots, idc either way, told you that enough. Why would you miss meetings for a forum thread??? Maybe not a good thing to say publicly while running for treasurer? I don't hold Trumps.. lol. You miss the point as much as the Bitbobb from yobit. Starting to think I would be surprised if you weren't one and the same. I think, there is a vote, right? Well. There are two other people that don't have so much controversy surrounding them, right? I think that's what's going on. I'm not really too up-to-date with what's going on here. I'm just pointing out that a guy that would miss meetings to not provide proof to claims being made against him is probably not the guy I would want as treasurer. "Why would you miss meetings for a forum thread??? " because the investors come first.Thank you for noticing this sir! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
