I decided to make it politically correct to prevent criticism from social democrats ('liberals'), environmentalists, and feminists
Hello guys, What's up I like engaging in sexual intercourse with women Only if they consent to it first of course I make a lot of money But I pay my taxes so they can build the roads I like speeding in my luxury vehicle, But I make sure I use Hybrid/Electric cars, I also never go above the speed limit, When I do, however, I make sure I know my rights when I'm ticketed This is what I enjoy doing Making all the money, Well not all the money, that would be monopoly I like smoking marijuana, Only for medicinal purposes of course I like having sex with promiscuous women that engage in consensual sexual activities for money, But I make sure to stay safe by using condoms, If they get pregnant, I pay for their abortions I consume alcohol in moderation, But not on election day, that's when I'm voting for Obama
~Quiz Khalifa (Awesome31312)
Please donate if you like it 12vARzQRPwUf19sCGUNUYasBK1kYu3F3xw
|
|
|
You guys don't even know what "troll" means
We know what a troll is! This is a troll!!! That was a terrible game
|
|
|
Thanks for your super constructive post? Damn it, learning stuff from CryptcoMiner?
You're welcome. You're welcome? Your posts will most likely be self-moderated & deleted since it's considered spam...has nothing to do with our site nor with this thread. Just pure trolling. We'll have to wait until niothor logs in So, reminding the viewers of CryptcoMiner is considered spamming or trolling? Alright then, delete my posts. But keep in mind that your posts will have to at least be edited to further keep the investors in the dark about how HYIPs work.
|
|
|
I forgot to say, conservative anti-science religious claims don't count
CENSORSHIP counts What are you talking about
|
|
|
I prefer
1. Find a good ponzi 2. Don't advertise it in your signature 3. Tell anyone who thinks it is real why it is an obvious ponzi. 4. Enjoy good karma.
More like, enjoy having your signature for your own private use
|
|
|
Thanks for your super constructive post? Damn it, learning stuff from CryptcoMiner?
You're welcome.
|
|
|
I forgot to say, conservative anti-science religious claims don't count
|
|
|
Let's bring the discussion back to CryptcoMiner, and not get distracted talking about niothor What is there to discuss, it's a known scam and it's over. What have we learned?! This is what I have learned 1. Find a good ponzi 2. Advertise it in your signature 3. ? ? ? 4. profit
1. Find a good ponzi 2. Advertise it in your signature 3. DON'T INVEST IN PONZI YOURSELF4. profit FIX'D! Yes, good learning, that is indeed something to learn. I thought you would say it's important to get out before anyone else, but the way you put it, there is no risk... "100% RISKY FREE" ~Ony Obo, the Nigerian Prince
|
|
|
Let's bring the discussion back to CryptcoMiner, and not get distracted talking about niothor What is there to discuss, it's a known scam and it's over. What have we learned?! This is what I have learned 1. Find a good ponzi 2. Advertise it in your signature 3. ? ? ? 4. profit
1. Find a good ponzi 2. Advertise it in your signature 3. DON'T INVEST IN PONZI YOURSELF4. profit FIX'D!
|
|
|
What are your thoughts on microchip implants? Do you think they will positively contribute to society?
Here is what I think.
We already use smartphones, they have become our own personal identification. We have the forced National ID, which we are required to possess at all times and may get in serious trouble if found without one. We could abolish the National ID and have optional, not mandatory implants. I think they'll allow us to easily combat human trafficking. If we can integrate GPS tracking in such a chip, a missing child can not only be found easily, but we can eliminate the chances of such a tragedy happening. We could also devise a way to pay using Bitcoin by scanning it, similar to the QR code method we have.
Of course, we are many many years behind such a thing to ever be released. The technology exists alright, but not in an implantable form due to public opinion (See: Google Glass, SmartWatch, for wearable devices)
|
|
|
You guys don't even know what "troll" means
|
|
|
Let's bring the discussion back to CryptcoMiner, and not get distracted talking about niothor
|
|
|
Damn it, learning stuff from CryptcoMiner?
|
|
|
Simple. First create the account from a public, anonymous internet connection like a public library or a Starbucks. Then only use Tor for accessing the account in the future. Also, make sure you wear your Guy Fawkes mask at the library or Starbucks so you can't be identified on surveillance cameras. This is probably the best idea And I'm not worried about surveillance cameras watching my Bitcointalk account because they're looking out for property theft and I'd appear to just be a regular user
|
|
|
I'll use it to arrange daily $300 dates with my gf
Might as well just give her the money. She probably deserves it. No because, it's about delivery, HOW I spend it. I'll use it to arrange daily $300 dates with my gf
I would be careful of thinking like that. $300 dates would become normal and then you would want to give her more / she would expect more. It's the whole internal stimulus - when we get addicted to stuff we crave more and more of it If I had 1,000,000 Bitcoins, I'm pretty sure she'd know I am capable of spending $300 on dates, it would be more difficult to be a cheap bastard.
|
|
|
You could probably just post it here if you wanted to make it public, but if not theymos and/or Badbear would be your best bet.
Based on the other accusations that I have seen of people "abusing" the trust system, I would say there is a very good chance that the trust system is not actually being abused as the OP alleges. I have also seen people claim that other are being "extorted" and "blackmailed" under the threat of negative trust when this was really not true as they did not understand the meaning of either. This is something that should be made public if it is legit so the people who are making such "threats" can be called out if appropriate. Don't assume things, I haven't even made my statement yet.
|
|
|
Those who say "Oh, it's not 'real' Christianity", need to look up what the "No true Scotsman fallacy" is
Not applicable. Almost every Christian adheres to (... or rather, is supposed to) an explicit ruleset created in the New Testament along with some additional axioms carried over from the Old Testament. Each denomination has specific interpretations (by man) providing a strict ruleset, but obviously, there can be only one truth with regards to God's and Christ's intentions, and most denominations declare their ruleset follows that intent. For example, some denominations have rules where phrasing that last sentence as "God's and Christ's" would be blasphemy, and there would be no room for interpretation because their men have interpreted the intent of God's and Christ's intent in that way. -But most denominations have liberalized over the years, some even becoming secular/"non-denominational," conceding morality in exchange for a larger member base accepting a vague, flexible - useless - ruleset. As I was raised, a Catholic wouldn't be considered a true Christian because of their repeat violations both explicitly in their laws and implicitly by actions done in the name of Christ (rather, the Pope and, in older times, government controlling the pope). They've scrubbed Christ's words for their own ends and functioned as an authoritarian, militant government with some ridiculous claim that they have the authority to kill people before living through their natural life and possessing all opportunities to accept their obligations as was intended by God. They're considered idolaters who insist on putting decadent false prophets before Christ, and are necessarily disconnected from the message of Christ. I mean -- forget Muslims, Jews, Sikhs, Confucians, and Buddhists, because these Catholics are running around like wolves in sheep's clothing who all need to be explicitly excommunicated - at least everyone else has a different ruleset. -but I was raised Baptist (really, Anabaptist) with a strong iconoclast sentiment pounded into us where a church owning property is itself a sinful act. It's not "no true Christian," it's "here're the rules you've institutionalized violation of, thus becoming a puppet of the devil." There wasn't some exhaustive text on what kind of ideas and rules you had to accept to be a Scot, but there are exhaustive texts on what you need to accept to be a Christian. Incidentally, I haven't fully shaken Baptism from my own code. I found myself mildly offended when a great-aunt-in-law "baptized" my daughter when she was an infant (she didn't realize she was seen), not because my daughter was being involuntarily associated with stupid Christian rituals with absolutely zero effect, but because it made a statement to God that she accepted Christ and His ruleset without her being able to declare it herself. It's like a government forcing someone to be a citizen because they were born in a certain location. -Like, she can't even speak and you violated her sacred obligation as a creation of God (which, by God, only she has liberty to reject or accept) -- the very idea that a Catholic implies they have God-given authority over my daughter's soul offended me, as well as being offended on God's behalf since I was raised to be very sure this was an explicit rule violation. I know it's dumb as Hell, but it initially struck me as a rule violation which'd piss God off, because now if she wants to make a commitment to adhere to Christianity, she has to reject the Catholic soul-fascism at her real baptism, which means I have to talk to her about why her great aunt is an unwitting agent of Satan. Part of that "rule-set" is to kill your son if he is caught listening to hip hop Most Bible Old Testament law was for Israel/Jews only. Love for God above all things, and love for your fellow human being as yourself is for everyone. The rules for non-Israel/non-Jews are: 1. abstain from food polluted by idols; 2. abstain from sexual immorality; 3. abstain from eating the meat of strangled animals; 4. abstain from eating blood. Your choice is one of the 2 positions above... be a Jew or don't be one. If you don't follow loving God above all things, and your fellow human being as yourself, you are lost. If you die without changing, you will be lost permanently. If you accept being a Jew, follow all the Jewish laws. If you don't want to be a Jew, then follow the 4 that are listed. Everyone is required to love God above all things, and to love fellow human beings as himself/herself. All this stuff about how God is requiring ridiculous stuff from everyone, is itself ridiculous. Follow what I have written here, and you will be just fine. The only other thing for eternal life is to believe in Jesus, that He will raise you from the dead to life. Get off all this nonsensical bickering about how bad Jewish laws were for the Jews. If you are not a Jew, they don't apply to you, no matter what the churches say. Remember, church leaders go into training. And a lot of the training is in what the Jews believed. So, they can't help it when they tell you to do like Jews even though you are not Jews. Matthew 5:17 - "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. Are you saying the OT is obsolete? Does that mean incest is okay by God's command, since you know, the NT does not prohibit that anywhere?
|
|
|
1. Find a good ponzi 2. Advertise it in your signature 3. ? ? ? 4. profit
Glad to see someone's caught on
|
|
|
Problem was solved
Too bad they don't let you delete your threads, what a shame.
|
|
|
|