What you are missing is that not everyone who makes money from crypto is someone who trades, there are people who "works" and earns crypto as well. People who have crypto salaries and those people do not really risk by trading or anything, they are not risking anything, they do regular work, some of them do developer job, some do design, some do something else.

Basically, it is all about you doing whatever you normally would in a regular job and instead of fiat you get crypto. These people still have troubles as well, like for example if the price goes down too much then they would be earning less, or if they signed a contract based on a crypto amount payment and then started working, they can't back out and it would cost them a lot. All in all there would be some sort of problems when you are a crypto worker, and it is different from traders.

Ten years back if you were being told about the things you’re seeing now you would have doubted over half of them But today it’s all happening and that’s just it. That is the same thing that we are seeing now, you don’t know what the future holds and you don’t know what  idea is waiting to be unveiled next and when it comes, it would become the next trend and nobody would be talking about the ones we have now.

Metaverse is the new trend, but there was a time something else was trending in the market and it wasn’t metaverse and a lot of people were rushing. After metaverse might have trended for quite some time, something else can still come up.

Money does matter, I do not think that money would actually be a loss of interest for him, if you give someone millions then you could change their mood very easily. I feel like Mike wasn't offered enough money for something this silly. His fight against Roy Jones JR made sense a bit because it was 2 older fighters doing it one last time, and that was fun.

It wasn't some exhibition by some youtuber who wanted to do something that is "just for fun". In that case you have to offer Tyson a lot more money, there is no honour in that fight and it is just for the views. Roy Jones one at least made sense in a respectful way where the fight wasn't as good as they used to be but at least between to old fighters and not some cringy youtuber kid who decided to go on a boxing career after he did a horrible thing. Sure Logan "could be" more mature now, but he still doesn't deserve respect in a boxing arena from Mike freaking Tyson.

Thing is, when bitcoin is going up like this, I do not think that it means something normal. Reversal or not, it is definitely a change in pace and momentum which means that something bigger is about to happen. I do not know if it will be up or down but I know that it is definitely not something regular. When something regular is not going on in the market then I try to stay away from it as much as I can.

I already made my bet, already bought bitcoin for this month as well, lower than the current price thankfully, so I am in profit for the month of February so far, but even more in profit over all if you look at since I started. I am fine about the situation but I can't guarantee it will go like this, only thing I know right now is that it will go up a lot or it will go down a lot.

What type of investment you are making is definitely a good reason for people to have different results. I mean just because I should buy at this price doesn't mean you should buy at this price neither, they change from one to another. So, this means we are talking about different approaches as well as being in different positions. For example, if you have all of your money in cash and you did not invested in anything so far, then you should use some of your money to buy some bitcoins right now.

If you already bought a lot of bitcoins but do not have anything else and just some cash then you should get some good altcoins (like eth or something not bad memecoins), if you have all of them and have no cash left then you could not get anything more. Basically it depends on your situation and your strategy so everyone has different answers to this question.

I would guess that if you are really that much in trouble and worried, you could handle it with someone outside of your nation? You could even handle it from someone here? I mean if you trust the person here, or use some escrow to do it, then they could send you the money and you could withdraw it and then they could do whatever they want, even if they do a chargeback then it is fine.

If you want to, you could do gift cards as well, most of them would be hard to cash out, but there are some cash cards as well, or debit cards as well with money filled in them that you could spend. All in all, it is a very bad situation but it is not end of your crypto life if your nation bans crypto.

You could still continue, lose a bit of money to percentage while using, and still go on without too much problem or anyone stopping you. I did that back in the day and it was fine, not great, not like right now, a bit of useless work required but still not stopped.

I do not believe this, I do not really believe that players are born with talents. Obviously your body matters, like in basketball you can't be some 170cm tall 100kg person who could be a great basketball player, same goes with tennis, your lateral movement matters and some of that is from your birth, but it is not really THAT much difference. What matters is how much you practice and how great of a practice you are getting.

If you get the greatest coach whose ever lived, enough money to survive you and your family for 20 years until you are professionally making a ton, and you could spend 15 hours a day training (breaks included of course) then you will be like Nadal too. Obviously hard work doesn't mean everything, it is required, you have to work harder than everyone else, but money and early education until you are ready matters a lot as well.

Same with bitcoin being illegal because a government cannot own it but they can still get some benefits with it if they accept it same goes with gambling where they can file a tax on those gambling casinos. Are the countries on the list dont want to make money anymore? But, I think I understand because countries on the list rich already except maybe to Cambodia.

I have seen videos on Cambodia before were their living is very simple. Were people work on are farms and fishing areas but I wonder why they do not allow gambling when gambling can improve their country, same with other more poorer countries where most gambling companies are allowed.

When you said "he faced Athletico Madrid", I thought the game played already and I was confused, he WILL face ATM, we still do not know how the game will go. We do not even know if he will be playing as a starter to be honest maybe he will be in the bench for the first few games and only come out of bench as a sub for late game period?

After all, everyone gets tired and when you sub your striker out and get a fresh leg new one, the new striker could run a lot better and defence will be tired, so the other team would have to either sub their defence and get a new one and lose hope for scoring, or they will sub in their own striker as well and hope that their defence can hang on until their new striker scores. That is how football is a lot like chess, and I believe Xavi could beat anyone in this chess game which is why they are doing this well.

That is why I hope that we do not have only people who are staff and can't do much in the future again. Lightlord is doing something better to get this done, he is also focusing more on his other projects as well so he might be actually coming back with a bang and he could be doing a lot better in the future.

However, in any case, I feel like maybe there could be some sort of situation where we could see him absent again and staff is not enough for it anymore. In any case, it is at least better to see it going nice for now and the time being, we could still complain in the future if anything goes wrong but right now things are looking nice at least.

Once again we are seeing the luck part being involved in this situation. People are acting as if this part is not really that important and the odds matter a lot whenever it comes down to their dice gaming (or hi/lo in this case) like how improbable should not happen, but we keep seeing it happening in the lottery.

Some guy with 53 tickets, which is literally 53 satoshi if you wanted to buy that much, ended up winning 0.005, whereas someone with 1.2+ million tickets ended up below that person. This is the proof that we should not be really expecting this situation to be common, but it is also not rare neither, it is quite understandable to see stuff like this.

I do not think that all new projects are seen as shitcoins. At one point SOL was a new coin, Avax was a new coin, ADA is very old but even that was new at one point, even ETH was a "new" coin at one time. If we look at only the "new" new ones, Axie could be considered new, dot and matic doesn't seem too old or at least I heard about them recently, shiba is as new as it gets and yes it is a shitcoin if you ask me but it has seen high levels.

So, we are talking about many projects being new and then reaching to close to top 10 or even be in top 10. Which shows that we do not really consider all new projects as shitcoins. Only the shit ones are called shitcoins because they are shitty.

We have seen Europe getting together and building euro, and they are all using that right now so we could say that it is not impossible. If places like China and Russia get together and create a new currency, even if just those two, I am sure that they will convince some other nations as well, not a lot, not as powerful as USA or Europe, but at least it would be a good start. Just imagine only Russia and China using the same currency, that alone is scary though for Europe and definitely for the USA.

This is why it would be wiser move from them but they are too nationalistic to do something like that, both will want their own currency to be accepted by the other nation.

The fact that you could withdraw if you do not want to is the key part here. Like for example if you want to gamble somewhere else, they will force you to do KYC or they won't allow you to get your money back. They will act like you have scammed them somehow and then keep your money and say that if you want your money back then you would have to do KYC otherwise you accept being guilty.

In that scenario either you have to let them have your money and be scammed, or you have to give your KYC which I am not even sure if they will use for good, someone who blackmails people like that could end up also not doing something decent with your KYC as well, like sell it on black market. Stake is not like that, they do not ask for your KYC at all when you first start, and in case if there is something wrong they allow you to take away your money without a problem if you do not want to.

That’s for sure but some would never learn. The greed is everyone but you have to learn to control it. There are lots of people who lack control over their feelings and behaviour towards the outcome of the market.

Some people just feel greed and even at the wrong time when they know that their strategy wouldn’t work in the market condition, they still tend to give themselves hope that it is going to work out for them, while the best option at the moment would be for them to quit. Due to this mentality, they have, they end up deceiving themselves and losing their money.

Accepting wide range of altcoins might be a problem for casinos as number of new coins and tokens are very huge. For example, we did not hear about what is solona some 10 month back but now many gamblers are requesting it in most casinos and similarly lots of casinos started accepting BCH but that coin is almost dying these days hence they need to go for delisting procedure for this coin.

Honestly I am not looking for "free withdraw" to choose my bookie to bet on sports but the better odds. Not sure how many gamblers are following similar criteria but depositing and withdrawing is not happening for me very frequently hence I am not bothering fees associated with these.

IPL seems like a different beast in this regard due to its followerbase. I am not sure that ICC is scheduling their calendar for any other league except IPL. Due to the massive revenues being generated by IPL, its promotions and marketing also high in intense. I am not saying that any other league that will equal or beat IPL in terms of revenue or followerbase but India's population must be the core reason for all these and any cricket playing nation wants to compete or host a league like IPL then they should first focus on having massive followers then only they could think about anything like IPL.

I guess if three or more cricket paying countries plan for a combined league with selected teams from their own T20 league then I guess that might be more interesting and might become a big one like IPL.

Yes, they all have a relationship with Bitcoin’s price fluctuation, coins like Ethereum, Litecoin and a lot of them relates with the price of Bitcoin. That’s why you would see almost all the alternative cryptocurrencies you would find in the market going down when Bitcoin is going down and also when bitcoin starts to be bullish, they start being bullish.

It’s called price correlation and the level at which a coin correlates with Bitcoin varies, there are some of them that correlates 100% with Bitcoin, such as Wrapped Bitcoin, it has hundred percent correlation and always maintains the same price with Bitcoin. There are also coins that don’t have much or no correlation at all.

It is like when we say diversify your portfolio so that when one does not play well, we can expect something better on the other. The risks can also depend not only on the strategy that you are using but also to the capital that you put in or to the frequency of your trades. We can share the strategy that works for us to the op but he must understand that it might not automatically work on him. It is still best if we are the ones that will figure out if what strategy fits us the most.

@OP that was totally normal because you are still learning but I suggest do not use real funds first when your practicing. We have platforms that offers demo trading.

Stake was always a known and liked casino, however it became so much more known and used in 2021, and teaching staff to work is not an easy task. Even if you hire 1000 new staff (which would be stupid, why would you?), then it takes a while before you could actually teach them how to do the work, and that is why people end up with not really knowing what to do when they grow this big and stake had the same problem.

After all, it is not about just spending enough money and getting new people, the pace of growing userbase is faster than the learning curve for a staff, which makes it slower. While the website grows every single day, staff could be interviewed, pick a good candidate, get them and teach them and let them be working alone and sometimes not even be a good one, all of which takes a long time. This is why it could be slower at times and we should be understanding.