I hope the police caught the guys who stole from OP. What can I say, my house is very secure and there was not a single break in attempt. It's good to live in a neighborhood where people have dogs and cameras everywhere. My most expensive single win was close to 300 on blackjack in one day of playing. I bought myself a bottle of Jack (somehow felt like it matches the theme), got drunk and eventually gambled away the rest of the money  I've never bought anything big for myself from gambling. Investing is another thing. I bought a lot of stuff for BTC. Perhaps your neighborhood can afford high-technology for security, but I think the burglar knew that OP was out of town for quite some time that's why the burglar decide to break into the house and stole his PS5 and other valuable items. I believe that our house will remain safe if there will be dogs living on it and the house won't have days that it's unattended so that the burglar won't have time breaking in. |
|
|
|
I DONT BOTHER to read anything posted by stake puppets can you even read what you post? how do you expect people to believe something you post when you don't want to post proof? what exactly are you complaining about? you know? because in this thread you say that Stake and primedice are scam, but they are scam why? what did they do to you to accuse them? you can't say clearly and post evidence. think about the following: if you go out on the street right now and someone out of the blue accuses you of a scam, do you think that people who are close to you on the street will believe that person who is accusing you of a scam without showing proof? on the contrary, people will look at him and accuse him of being crazy. you know that, so do you have something to complain about? post evidence, that's simple Without solid evidence and expressing hatred towards Stake this might be likened to the actions of stupid. Op has 3 times received negative tags for making ridiculous accusations without solid evidence. Stake is the largest gambling platform today and has millions of players around the world and has an advantage in terms of security that is quite good for its users. the service is always active and there is always a response or answer if there are complaints from the players. I'm not surprised if there are some people here who act ridiculous by giving incomplete arguments. I don't know what's the take of the OP on why he's really eager to tag Stake with negative remarks, if that's really true then he should provide more solid evidence rather than just ranting because in the end, he's the one who will have a negative tags and not the Stake because of accusations that he cannot prove. Stake is one of the most trusted and reputable casinos these days, yes they are not perfect but they try to provide quality experience and tries to resolve the case faster. Stake won't be known if they're not that good though. |
|
|
|
That is also possible, right? But I don't think he forgot the risks entailed with it and now he should be jailed for the money that was spent in gambling activities. He should just ask the bank directly about the money that was mistakenly sent to his account rather than just throwing his life because of what the did. It's also unfortunate for that bank teller who made the mistake and I believe he/she was already jobless now.
I'm sure he knows that risk and due to his gambling problem he take that risk and gamble all the money till he losses everything, In terms of the teller, Not sure if he/she should be sanctions since he just processing the transfer and it's the senders mistake both sides are the liable with this and not the bank, my personal take though. Bank serves as medium for transaction and tellers are just processing the request between sender and receiver. So who should be blamed in the bank's side? I'm pretty sure that they are looking in their side who would take the blame so that the bank won't be heavily blamed and it will result in a human error. About the man who gambled the funds, I'm sure he's now getting dumped in the prison and who knows that man is already living in hell because the government is putting pressure on the warden (some instances these will happen). |
|
|
|
Same here, his KO ratio is actually decent so a victory by KO is totally possible with Magsayo especially now that he's learning a thing or two from coach Freddie Roach, he just needs to find that right pace and timing to extend his power left to make it happen. I expect a close bout in the early rounds so yeah, KO will probably happen somwhere from 6th - 10th round.
Yes, it's possible to happen. Magsayo is growing and improving while he progresses. He is learning from every of his win which makes his confidence boost more. Under Freddie Roach's assistance, he is turning Magsayo into a much better fighter as they continue to move forward. Although Vargas is a good challenger, Magsayo can surely outmatch him. A knockout win is what I'm looking forward to Magsayo to make his name become popular more. Indeed, Magsayo really benefited from those wins he got in the previous years, he's the type of boxer that doesn't bark a lot and keeps his head low to have more grasp on the situation. Now that he's training with Freddie Roach, he has more advantages and has helped him to have more IQ in the ring against Vargas. |
|
|
|
In my case nothing special. I've already gambled to help my family to pay monthly bills and thank God I achieved success on that.
In other situations, I've ordered some pizza or restaurant food and bought virtual games. But usually what I most like doing with gambling profit is to save it and invest to keep growing crypto holdings.
That still counts as you managed to spend it to help your family from paying those monthly bills and bought something with it that you could use on like daily-weekly basis. In my case, I usually got small winnings and I haven't won big enough to consider buying expensive things but if I'm lucky enough then I'd surely spend it wisely and buy something that could be useful and invest the rest in my existing portfolio. |
|
|
|
It's been observed that gamblers prefer to play on casino which do not enforce KYC. Well, let's discuss what are the main reasons that they do not want to show their identity and gamble anonymously.
They don't trust the casino as the casino might misuse the kyc documents or the gamblers want to gamble without telling anyone that they are the gamblers, gambling is illegal in their region or religion and they want to hide their identity or there could be any other solid reason?
I'm one of those who don't really like KYC, my only reason is that I don't want my identity to be exposed by the security forces in my country because gambling here (my country) is illegal and players can be sentenced to prison. so far it can be counted on the fingers on any exchange or gambling site I only do KYC and of course, the reputation of the platform must be good. That must be tough for you to gamble your identity in exchange for that KYC needed by the casino, I surely hope that you won't be exposed because the sentence could be heavy if you will get caught. You made the right choice for taking that risk in a reputable casino so that your information is not in a risky situation where it could be leaked if that casino gets hacked. |
|
|
|
I agree that as per fixed games, it will remain a rumor and a speculation unless there will be some people who will stand up for it and begin an investigation and as long as it's not proven then it's safe to assume that these things are actually rumor.
Locally, there are attempts to expose those kinds of activities but a magic hands coming from nowhere easily remove any rumor about it and the individuals who attempt to bring it out either stop the claim or being ignored. Fixed games will continue to run the business without any doubts, though again, it's tough to recognize and every speculation will remain at it is until something will be proven that the game is being manipulated. Nonetheless, only those who are involved will also continue to enjoy the luxury of keep sucking their winnings after settling the game. That is somehow expected to happen because they also have the right connection to make the rumor sounds nonsense to believe or else they will pay huge load of cash to those individuals who are going to expose them. But if those two scenarios stated won't suffice to stop that certain individual to expose them then I think they are also prepared to get in a messy way. We know that there's actually a business like that, so I expect that their circle is full of powerful people to make the job easy. |
|
|
|
I mean come on, it’s pretty obvious that it’s this Japanese man’s fault for not double checking as to why he was sent the extra money. That’s a whole lot of money being sent to someone by mistake. Not to mention it’s abundantly clear that this guy has major gambling issues. What a fool ! Lol
Right, that it was not his fault that someone sent him this much amount in his bank account but how can he use all these funds in gambling without investing where this money comes from. I am sure he has common sense and he did not believe that the bank sent him a bonus or extra money Not he will have to face the consequences of using funds that did not belong to him. There can be one possibility that he knew that these funds had come to him accidently and sooner or later the bank will ask him to return the amount. So perhaps he decided to gamble with the funds and hope that he could make good money from these funds and then return the original amount to the bank / owner. However, if this was the idea then i must say that it was extremely risky and he lost all in the end. That is also possible, right? But I don't think he forgot the risks entailed with it and now he should be jailed for the money that was spent in gambling activities. He should just ask the bank directly about the money that was mistakenly sent to his account rather than just throwing his life because of what the did. It's also unfortunate for that bank teller who made the mistake and I believe he/she was already jobless now. |
|
|
|
[snip]
Even if you avoid casinos that have KYC requirements, you should consider safe and legal casinos, as KYC requirements must be applied following UKGC requirements to get a license to operate.
Well that is the fact, --if you want to use a legitimate gambling casino is should be a licensed casino but the disadvantage of the licensed casino there is a corresponding KYC implementation. But at least we are always aware that a gambling casino will warrant us this anytime and that is the time we should read carefully the term of use so that we can avoid possible violations that we will face in the future. KYC is being a part nowadays, though there is the risk --we should choose and pick carefully the gambling casino that we use. When choosing casino that ask KYC most of the gamblers tend to use those well-known house that really comply with licenses casinos that gamblers are protected of certain laws, if you are willing to provide your personal info in submitting KYC, it's good to pick the house that also have corresponding identities. You can play and enjoy with lesser chance of being scam if the house are following the government laws, they are subject to everything once you file any accusations about the service, always make sure to read the terms and condition it serves as your main protections against the owners. One of the things which people fear about KYC is the misuse of the KYC identities and documents. Small unknown casino can sell our KYC related documents and we might be at the risk of big trouble. However, the trusted casino also does not guarantee anything but usually, we have peace of mind that since the casino is trusted they will not misuse our documents. No one can grantee anything once it comes to the kyc, but never perform your kyc in brand new or untrusted gambling sites. Indeed, there's still no guarantee at all even if we choose to play at those reputable and trusted casinos but the risk is somehow minimized because their license and name is on the line if ever (I hope not) there's some leakage of information because of that KYC we provided. Too risky for us to jump from one casino to another just to seek privacy because we could land in a much more dangerous platform than we had the last time. |
|
|
|
can he throw a ko punch on vargas?
He should and I'm looking forward to that. That KO win will give Magsayo an appreciation to the boxing community. I just found it unfair that even he is winning, people like a KO win to get the respect he get. Since PH community used to see KO win from Pacquiao, our other boxers are expected to do the same way. A good odds for a champion. Where can we see odds of an champion at over 1.8? Placing a bet for Magsayo is worth the risks. I think Magsayo will go for a KO, he has the power to do that so yeah, if given the chance and if he see the perfect opportunity to might throw a power left that will level Vargas in the canvass for good. The odd is good for him because Vargas is not that far behind, so still a good bet at ML although the best time is when the odds went out early with Magsayo as underdog at 2.x. (and I thought that he will remain the underdog, but Vargas leads quickly evaporate). Magsayo for KO, I think that's the best bet, or if we are not satisfied with Magsayo's performance in the past, then you can go for Vargas winning via decision as I don't see he could hurt Magsayo here. The odds are very competitive, so this fight might be a close fight, or if we see a KO, it should be in the later rounds. Same here, his KO ratio is actually decent so a victory by KO is totally possible with Magsayo especially now that he's learning a thing or two from coach Freddie Roach, he just needs to find that right pace and timing to extend his power left to make it happen. I expect a close bout in the early rounds so yeah, KO will probably happen somwhere from 6th - 10th round. |
|
|
|
Anyone experienced or suffered from this, whether from winning or from losing where a particular gambling session keeps staying in your mind and you'll having sleeplessness thinking about that particular session over and over again, the same bet keeps repeating over and over again and you keep asking yourself what if you do the opposite.
I'm glad I overcome this and I see to it now that whenever I'm login off to casinos I'm playing I will not think about it whether I lose or win.
Gambling is no exception, but when you win in gambling, your mind will be full of joy and when you lose, your mind will be full of depression. There are some risks behind any success so you have to gamble with the risk, then you will succeed or fail. Yep, that's just normal especially when you've had a chance to grab huge winnings but you didn't and eventually lose it all. Our mind will always paint that picture involuntarily for some days that's why we will get depressed sometimes because of that particular activity but eventually, we will forget it along the process, and winning along the road will make the process faster. |
|
|
|
KYC is useless unless it is the type of KYC that requires you to take a live selfie after you submitted your I.D. But most of the KYC that I've seen doesn't require a selfie to verify that the I.D you've submitted is really you, not your parents I.D or someone's I.D. For me, I don't really trust this process because you're at a disadvantage if you submitted a legitimate identification of yours, since you don't know where they are really going to use it.
That is still the same - they are collecting your ID/selfie in order to get verified which I really hate doing this. However, we do understand their stands as well as why they are asking those things aside from our basic information upon registration to combat abusers. Sadly, most of the casinos right now are asking for this, even known and trusted sites, I think we found no excuse as they will ask for it at the moment we use their platform. Even if we stand against it, we don't have that much choice because the majority of these trusted casinos are also asking KYC these days and I think it's best to submit what is needed if we still want to play on their platform but if we won't give and support what they want then I guess finding another casino will be our only option. Nevertheless, there's still always a risk of getting our information leaked if someday their platform will be hacked. |
|
|
|
The case of Italy vs. South Korea, in a World Cup, a totally biased referee made Italy win South Korea, the referee discovered that he was drunk, and later he was imprisoned because a drug shipment was passing, so these things They are the ones that still fight in sports so that it doesn't happen anymore.
But I seriously think that it was deeper than that, we may also have speculations about that case but we can't justify it but I feel that there were some strings pulled so that the result won't be complex enough and the referee will carry all the burden that's why the result says that he was just drunk that time and a drug shipment was found out too. These refs are more prone to be forced to make the game fixed because the minds behind the curtain are powerful enough to blackmail or threaten the referee. |
|
|
|
I mean come on, it’s pretty obvious that it’s this Japanese man’s fault for not double checking as to why he was sent the extra money. That’s a whole lot of money being sent to someone by mistake. Not to mention it’s abundantly clear that this guy has major gambling issues. What a fool ! Lol
Receiving such a huge amount of money which is unexpected is too alarming. He should double-check it in the first place or question it but it's his fault for using it to gamble intentionally. He really meant to spend it and he might actually have an idea that it was sent to him by mistake so he gambled it right away. I can't think of any possible reasons why he would gamble that large sum of money if he knows that it wasn't his money in the first place, he should contact his bank that the money was mistakenly sent to his account. Maybe if he had done that, he will be lucky enough to receive a reward but unfortunately, he did not so it's safe to say that he had it coming and he would really go to jail for that. |
|
|
|
The reason why many want to go for casinos that requires no kyc issues is because of the inconveniences they put gamblers through when trying to make withdrawals especially in dealing with a big win, it's not everybody that want to reveal their identity on third party websites just for security reasons while some don't mind loosing thier privacy, i will also go against kyc because it's needless as long as if it was not required at first place then it shouldn't be a thing of demand when making withdrawals for a winning.
That is why I don't really understand why there are some casinos that will suddenly require KYC if we win big and want to withdraw it, if they will just ask us about our details then they should've done that asking before we deposit some funds to their platform. I know that they are just following rules that were imposed by the government but I don't see that one as a reasonable thing either and I'm seeing it more as a trap to have them freeze our winnings if we won't give our details. |
|
|
|
When we talked about GGG, don't ever put age does matter as the main disadvantage. If he will lose here, it means Canelo just outbox him but that's not because of GGG's age. We can compare them in technical aspects but it doesn't mean all the advantages are on Canelo because he is much younger.
What if let's say GGG wins here, is that statement of yours about his age will now changed?
Actually the statement of ages factor is mostly correct since as we can see many good boxer often lose when he's already old, take an example of the recent fight of the rematch between Inoue vs Donaire. The first fight is really exiting and no boring since it's ended via decision, Donaire had an iron chin to survive for 12 rounds. But the rematch, we're disappointed to see Donaire can't hold his body to taking Inoue's punch and ended as TKO on the second rounds. The possible chance GGG will win the trilogy is below 30% IMO. It's different compared to the Donaire vs Inoue fight because in the first fight, Inoue won via unanimous decision, which means he dominated the fight, while in GGG vs Canelo, the last two fights were very controversial that's why fans are asking a trilogy and it's happening soon. Maybe age is really a big factor, a disadvantage of GGG in this fight, but GGG is not just an ordinary boxer, he is one of the greatest boxers and therefore I still believe that even if Canelo will win, it's not gonna be easy. |
|
|
|
The difference in this rematch is that 33-year old Ioka is now the defending champion. Nietes is now 40 years of age. And Ioka will defend his belt in his home turf in Japan.
I think it's a great meeting if Kazuto Ioka vs. Donnie Nietes, can meet in Tokyo next month, for the WBO title, this meeting I think will make a new story for Nietes in his boxing career this year, if he can beat Ioka. The question in my mind, what makes Kazuto Ioka and Nietes, want to box again, is it a direct challenge from Nietes or vice versa a challenging Ioka, even so I think this will be a new history for both of them. I saw, live interview by Nietes, looks like he is really excited to beat Ioka and wants to win the boxing title, this is interesting to watch and bet on. Nietes is not anymore a title holder while Kazuto Ioka is currently the WBO super flyweight champion https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/483786This should be a great fight, Nietes who had more experience over a younger champion should win the fight. 33 years old vs 40 years old, I hope age doesn't matter in this fight as I only see a few fighters with at least 40 years of age succeeded in a big fight. |
|
|
|
One of the major disadvantages of KYC is the fact that your data may be compromised or get licked or sold on the dark web and used to commit crimes, but aside from this the most agreed way to reduce crime and underage, gambling is through KYC and if the casino has strong security the users are good to go even with KYC in place.
Why the hell in the first place you will undergo a KYC to a site that's not even worthy to put some trust. Of course, to minimize the risks, only follow KYC procedures on a reputable site or those that are in the operation for a long already. In most gambling sites, KYC is not a mandatory thing but it will just possibly ask depending on your account activity like in most cases when you won big or something fishy is happening on the site. Shouldn't be a bad idea to undergo KYC if we are talking about reputable sites. Don't make things too much complicated. I like to know the reason why they have to require us a KYC if we win big? Is this even reasonable or they are just trying to investigate us so if they have a chance they will freeze our account and take our winnings? I just don't understand, because most gambling site promote anonymous gambling but they have the power to force us to comply with KYC if they want. |
|
|
|
Never that I use VPN in playing and that is the reason also why i keep gaining good bonuses and good treatment from the site ,
Good for you, VPNs are only for people who like to protect their privacy and for those who want to change their location so they will not be subjected to the ban, but without knowing the risk that the gambling site might block their account and take their money. As long as your country does not prohibit gambling, there's no reason on using a VPN service. |
|
|
|
Ixbit has a large selection of bets on live events. Does anyone know bookmakers with a large selection of top events in football?
You can try duelbets. Based on my personal experience, they have a variety of markets, so you have a lot of options when it comes to betting. Well, 1xbit has a large market, but are you willing to take the risk despite knowing their reputation? if your answer is yes, then go and good luck. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
