The thread was started in 2008. It's cached on Google.
Further proof that there really is a Masonic community there and it's not just a fake they used to trick bitrebel. Wow just saw the post in Google cached, this is starting to get JUICY! *POPCORN* |
|
|
|
I've been told by an anonymous source that a large freemason community actually does exist on SA and it's not just bitrebel being crazy. They said they were terrified of the information being traced back to them, so they censored most of it in order to cause less of an uproar among the masters.  Wish I could read that thread without having to pay $10, You guys should start taking Bitcoin.. Or people with Bitcoins should just trade them for dollars and then pay $10, saving the admins the hassle. It would take two seconds to start accepting Bitcoin on their site. http://walletbit.com offer's payment solutions. The reason why most people never cash out their Bitcoins, is honestly because there really isn't an easy way to do it. The fastest thing we have right now is Bitcoin to Exchange ,Exchange to Dwolla, and last Dwolla to Bank-Wire. So it's a huge process, compared to them making an account at walletbit.com. And copy and pasting a script, to their already existing payment system. |
|
|
|
I've been told by an anonymous source that a large freemason community actually does exist on SA and it's not just bitrebel being crazy. They said they were terrified of the information being traced back to them, so they censored most of it in order to cause less of an uproar among the masters. Wish I could read that thread without having to pay $10, You guys should start taking Bitcoin.. |
|
|
|
I dont think you troll's are going to be able to take Bruce down.  He will be back on his show as soon as he gets back to New York, with his ratings trippled from the publicity you numb nuts gave him for FREE. |
|
|
|
"Solidcoin contains malware" ... again a Lie posted as a Fact.
It's only a lie if the poster has deliberate intent to deceive. You can't be sure of the posters intent and it's highly likely that solidcoin does trigger anti-virus alerts seeing as bitcoin does too. Its pretty obvious from his reply that that was his intent. Are you blind  I LOL'D HARD when I saw your sig.  |
|
|
|
|
If we added demurrage to Solidcoin we wouldn't even have to charge fees. One flat fee that is pre-programmed & that sucks a tiny amount of lost/stored coins and injects them right into the mining population! This right here would mean mining forever (which is the best approach imho), and a constant psychological pressure to spend/invest your coins which Bitcoin simply does not have. I would be willing to send all my Solidcoins & Bitcoins to a system like that.
|
|
|
|
"Solidcoin contains malware" ... again a Lie posted as a Fact.
Are you stupid or just desperate to damage the Reputation of Solidcoin ?
Both  Atleast you're being honest . |
|
|
|
Deliberately hurting the private investments of thousands is not illegal?
LOL. By that logic everyone who sells their coins and causes the price to drop is doing so illegally. +1 lol Smoothie you are like a circus clown. I have no respect for you. And I care about you having no respect for me because why? LOL "You can't do that it's illegal to exploit a bug in an open-source piece of software. Deliberately hurting the private investments of thousands is not illegal?" What you gonna do to ArtForz put him in solidcoin prison? BWAHAHAHAHA LOL It's a bug in the Bitcoin client that you choose to sweep under the rug. But it doesn't matter, the spamming stopped with 1.03. We are now moving forward, and anticipating the release of 1.04 which should be out tomorrow. As of right now I advise anyone to take advantage of the ultra low difficulty that just dropped! http://solidcoin.kicks-ass.org/graphs/graphs.html |
|
|
|
Deliberately hurting the private investments of thousands is not illegal?
LOL. By that logic everyone who sells their coins and causes the price to drop is doing so illegally. There is a big difference between trying to "manipulate" the market by selling your coins, and sending thousands of miniature transactions from a node, simply with the intention to CAUSE HARM to EVERYONE. |
|
|
|
so you decided to expose this vulnerability which effects all chains by taking down the solidcoin network?
That's pretty dickish and probably illegal. Its one thing to prove it exists, it is another to enact on it.
I wonder if anyone has contacted the authorities, at least we have the perp admitting it in the forums.
Oh, you're referring to ArtForz? I thought you were talking about CoinHunter. CoinHunter is the one that actually killed the network by putting out a bad "manditory" update. The network isn't dead moron. http://solidcoin.kicks-ass.org/graphs/graphs.htmlIt's actually MORE than alive and kicking... And the price has barley moved since this entire "debacle" started. It has been blown way out of proportion by Solidcoin haters who have some sort of personal vendetta against it's supporters and the currency itself. |
|
|
|
"investments" ?
What is SolidCoin recognized as? Is the value of it regulated in any way?
Is the value of Bitcoin regulated in anyway? The value is given by how much people are willing to pay for it, and thousands of people have put their money in to make a new/tested product and someone is using illegal practices to try to kill it. I'm pretty sure if there was a group of attackers attacking the Bitcoin network, there would be many people up in arms rushing to sue... EDIT: It's not a smart thing to do, especially when the same exact flaw exists in Bitcoin... |
|
|
|
The guy did a dick move, but I don't think it is illegal.
Deliberately hurting the private investments of thousands is not illegal? |
|
|
|
|
I think it's hilarious reading these comments of people talking crap about this "vulnerability" , when the SAME EXACT THING can happen on the Bitcoin network... Only difference is that the Bitcoin network is "to big to fail" and the SC network is just getting started leaving it vulnerable to spam attacks.
|
|
|
|
When I hear "Bitcoin Pride" I picture a bunch of fat hairy nerds in rainbow outfits marching down the street to Donna Summers songs. Might want to rethink that.
Good point is that better? Looks really good, FlipPro! Thank you very much Phinn! Regards |
|
|
|
Maybe I would do it. It would be for my profit and for the greater good of the community.
Please explain the greater good part. Full disclosure, I like SolidCoins, I like Bitcoins, but if I am missing something about SolidCoin in an overall scheme of things, I am not catching it. a) Just look at this issue that ArtForz brought up. b) It seems that coinhunter develops everything "in house". doublec updates the git repo afterwards. so in essence coinhunter can code in whatever he thinks, which in the best case leads to things like (a). having the coding centralized in one single developer, I have to say I rather trust paypal. c) bitcoin works like this: code -> test -> fix -> test -> release. solidcoin: take bitcoin test version -> release -> daily mandatory bugfix d) think about the implications if solidcoin would make it to the average joe, and only then "we" (or some black hat Vladimir  ) exploits all those bugs: it could destroy bitcoin as a collateral on its way down, as average joe/media does not see any differences between Bitcoin and solidcoin. I am pretty sure one could add a lot more points to this list how those half-backed "improvements" could eventually affect the bitcoin community in a bad way. With this model he positions himself to be able to take down all unprotected bitcoin wallets residing on the same computer as shitcoin code. "Beware greeks bearing gifts". And never ever have such software on the same computer as bitcoin wallet. or on the same network for that matter. Do not tell me later that you guys were not warned. You really think Coinhunter is the one out to get us, when ArtFroz is the attacker? WTF? |
|
|
|
When I hear "Bitcoin Pride" I picture a bunch of fat hairy nerds in rainbow outfits marching down the street to Donna Summers songs. Might want to rethink that.
Good point is that better? |
|
|
|
Define "hoarding". Do you simply mean "amass money or valued objects and store away", and is it bad? Corporations are hoarding their record profits. Collectivity they have enough money to invest and bring the unemployment rate down to 5%... That is the truth.. Again, please define what you mean by "hoard". How is it different an saving? So you think when over 20% of the population is out of work (counting underemployed), and everything is at the cheapest it has been in over 50 years, your advice is to SAVE? No, my advice is to invest. Do you think SPENDING will fix everything? Are you going to answer the question about how you define hoarding? That's EXACTLY what the President want's to do! The President has said tirelessly that he wants a new bill that would fund trillions in new high tech infrastructure projects. You know how many jobs could be created with just one bill of this magnitude? I will give you a brief example and peg it to this forum since it's an IT oriented community. If the President is able to get an investment bill through the Republican congress (doubtful unless we rise together), that would mean tons of brand new state of the art schools will be built. These schools will all heavily revolve around technology, and they will need tech guys like us at all levels to wire/connect/repair/diagnose these brand new schools, the will be good paying jobs for us. Our classrooms are crowded, kids are being stuffed into rooms like chickens in cages, and not only that, the schools are crumbling right underneath them. This is just one sector of the economy that an investment bill would positively affect. But we need to be realistic, the money isn't going to fall from the sky, and we can't keep cutting till there's no social security or medicare left. There needs to be progressive change, but Republicans won't allow it, and people like you facilitate them by being completely unrealistic to the situations around us. We need to close tax loop wholes for corporations. That alone will solve massive problems. But Republicans? They won't even accept 10-1 cuts to revenue increases. http://soullfire.xanga.com/754006530/republican-prez-candidates-reject-101-spending-cuts-to-tax-increase-ratio/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKzGZj32LYc&feature=player_embedded |
|
|
|
And this wasn't an "attack" , it was a bunch of trolls sending out tiny amounts of transactions to try to slow down the network...
There's not much point in even doing a real attack. It's good to counter the ridiculous propaganda, and generally caution people about putting money into these alternate blockchains, but other than that SolidCoin seems to be dying on its own. How can you kill something that can't die? I mean that in all seriousness. |
|
|
|
Yes, it's not really an attack just an annoyance done by those who are fearful of what SolidCoin represents. The new version (1.04) is going to blow away Bitcoin though as it has more features, will be faster and new developer stuff! Good times ahead.
Why doesn't BitCoin have mandatory updates like these? Even the really old clients still work. Oh yes, their development goes: plan -> code -> test -> release. Yours goes: hack code you don't fully understand -> release -> find bugs you should have noticed before releasing -> force mandatory update. It's just a matter of time until someone finds a really nasty bug in one of the hacks you have made and uses it to either crash or rob the entire SolidCoin network. That's because not much has changed since it's inception. And this wasn't an "attack" , it was a bunch of trolls sending out tiny amounts of transactions to try to slow down the network... |
|
|
|
Define "hoarding". Do you simply mean "amass money or valued objects and store away", and is it bad? Corporations are hoarding their record profits. Collectivity they have enough money to invest and bring the unemployment rate down to 5%... That is the truth.. Again, please define what you mean by "hoard". How is it different an saving? So you think when over 20% of the population is out of work (counting underemployed), and everything is at the cheapest it has been in over 50 years, your advice is to SAVE? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
