|
gethashespersec Returns a recent hashes per second performance measurement while generating.
Bitcoin clients haven't had ability to "generate" (CPU Mine) since ver 0.3.2.1. So this is meaningless for solo mining. My Solo mining setup returns a 0 as well and I am definitely mining as my hash rate, WU: and Best share: show.
|
|
|
|
gethashespersec is 0 so bitcoin-qt doesn't mine
I don't know what that is supposed to mean. But this from your OP says differently Avg. Hash Rate - 315 Gh/s
WU - 4658
Difficulty Accepted - 0
It says you are mining as you have a hash rate and a Worker Utility. The Difficulty Accepted will be 0 until you find a share that meets or exceeds current difficulty which would be a block finding share. What is your Best Share: ? |
|
|
|
|
I'm sure you'll much better help in the Alt Coin forums. Virtually nobody is using GPU's for Bitcoin anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got 4 BE's on solopool right now. I'm trying not to look at it.
|
|
|
|
How can I solve this?
Solve what? |
|
|
|
are vga still supported?
New release: Version 3.8.1, 10th November 2013
GPU mining in any form is gone. Long live GPU mining (see previous post). New hardware support in this release and massive change with removal of GPU mining, but only bugfixes to the remainder of the code so to existing users this should be a safe upgrade, in keeping with even number releases sounding more stable.
|
|
|
|
|
And when the fee paying transactions become more common place block finding entities will increase their ability to process those transactions to capture more fees.
How difficult would it be for a pool to dynamically/on the fly adjust their block size according to how many transactions are available to process? That seems like it would have a great value to all concerned.
|
|
|
|
Just can't have too many threads on this subject. At least this one is a question as opposed to a demand.
To be fair, at least this one is also asking about a value under 1MB as well. All the others are either asking for the full megabyte, or trying to urge us to hardfork to > 1MB. It also made me realize that only ~50% of the network is doing blocks over 250KB apparently. I thought more pools had at the very least moved to 400-600, if not the full meg. Supply and demand should be the regulating factor in block size. If everyone increases their block size to the max then the supply of block space is devalued. Demand should be gauged by the amount of transactions fee's people are willing to pay to get their transaction processed and not by demanding that pools increase the size of their blocks so that they can have a free ride. Still the last 7 blocks only had two over the 250k default and most of the remainder where way under 250k. So it seems to me that there is plenty of block space available for transactions right now. |
|
|
|
...hard to compete with a pool that personally controls roughly 20% of the network hash rate in their private farm.
And has 0% fee with merged mining. And that raises no red flags with anyone? But a pool that charges a reasonable fee gets inundated with demands to start kicking off paying customers. Seems like an unfair double standard to me. |
|
|
|
|
Just can't have too many threads on this subject. At least this one is a question as opposed to a demand.
|
|
|
|
When I log in I always see Please wait
Site is temporarily down for maintenance. why? How can I log in? It is like that for months and I stopped mining but have some btcs there and judging from the other posts here it seems like there is no downtime and no maintenance! I haven't had any trouble logging in. What URL are you using? |
|
|
|
I am mining now at Deepbit for 2 days.
My shares are going up, as it should be.
But my balance hasn't changed in these 2 days.
Sounds like your using the proportional payout? If that is so then you won't see a balance until a block is solved. Deepbit hasn't solved a block going on three weeks now. |
|
|
|
Maybe I should release it without any instructions at all?
What, and sacrifice the joy of telling people to RTFM! |
|
|
|
I have 0.00995301 BTC  So I only need 0.00004699BTC more, which equals 1272.87 PPS shares. Do you know how long that would take with 7970 (600MH/s)? About 4.5 hours with one Block Erupter. Your 7970 probably does more than 4.7 shares per minute I would guess. |
|
|
|
|
OoC,
It seems there is a need to post the minimum withdrawal amount that pools will allow a miner to cash out with. Would it be possible to add that? Or would it be too much to add another column to the list? And would Pool Ops want that information published?
Thanks,
Sam
|
|
|
|
remove the minimum 0,01 btc withdraw limit. difficulty is increasing insanely, and 0,01btc now is like 1000 btc before.
i know u like to keep miners bitcoins , but this is pure theft.
how many users are you blocking this way? no wonder this pool got from no.1 to no.99999 , ure destroying it with your greed
I'm trying to keep quiet, I really am, but you guys are just being plain ridiculous and childish! Bitcoin was NEVER .8 Cents US, since it had a monetary value. Only ONE pools pays out less than .01 BTC and that pools charges YOU the transaction fee to get it processed. And rightfully so. |
|
|
|
a friend of mine lost access to his wallet address and email address. he wanted to change his wallet address on deepbit. he could not cause he did not have access to his email address. he emailed and PM'd both deepbit and tyco to help him change his information. neither one of them responded. he now has BTC stuck in his deepbit account and cant get any support. i dont recommend using deepbit.
And how would that be different on ANY other pool or any institution like a bank, for that matter? You absolutely have to keep control of your email address and bitcoin addresses/wallet. His loosing that is hardly the fault of any pool. There is just no way to verify identity and ownership of past accounts. All pools make that abundantly clear. Otherwise everyone would be getting their pool accounts compromised. Miners need to take some responsibility. |
|
|
|
Another reason why people should just move to a better pool and let this one die gracefully.
Timely customer support is a must have and by the looks of it it is almost non-existent here.
You've made your point more times than need be. Find some other thread to troll, preferably one I don't monitor. |
|
|
|
What does
hex2bin scan failed
mean? Using 3.8.3 with my Jalapeno.
Sam
That's bad, mmkay. Some code screw up on my part. Got some more output so I can figure out where the fuckage happened? Well here's a screen capture. I had moved the Jalapeno to an old low power machine and got this. On my normal rig it works fine. So I'm not sure it's not a problem on my old machine. cgminer version 3.8.3 - Started: [2013-11-23 22:47:12]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:9 WU:0.0/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 23 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to stratum.btcguild.com diff 4 with stratum as user os2sam_Jalape
Block: 6eb3b7ad... Diff:609M Started: [22:47:12] Best share: 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
BAJ 0: max 25C 3.49V | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:9 WU:0.0/m
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2013-11-23 22:47:02] Started cgminer 3.8.3
[2013-11-23 22:47:10] Probing for an alive pool
[2013-11-23 22:47:12] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 2
[2013-11-23 22:47:12] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 4
[2013-11-23 22:47:12] Network diff set to 609M
[2013-11-23 22:47:13] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:13] Pool 2 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid
[2013-11-23 22:47:14] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:15] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:15] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:16] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:17] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:17] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:18] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:19] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:22] BAJ0: empty result (INPROCESS:10x0aCOUNT:20x0a9FF7FB8
A5F26106934BA7BA68FEB1F1D693B8B1`636DD791B2F53AAAE3CEDB,FEA0DFDF529185321907
,00x0a57C7A36DC1291`574DA63990BBCC160x00) ignored
[2013-11-23 22:47:31] BAJ0: empty result (INPROCESS:00x0aCOUN0x00) ignored
[2013-11-23 22:47:39] BAJ0: empty result (INPROCESS:00x0aCOUN0x00) ignored Ah I see. The BAJ should only respond with text data that is in hexadecimal form and is sending back corrupted data that is not so it can't decipher the messages. Might happen on startup with an indeterminate device state with old data or with usb corruption. So it sounds like it's not a CGMiner problem then. So I'll just keep it on my regular rig until I build a newer, more current machine. Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
What does
hex2bin scan failed
mean? Using 3.8.3 with my Jalapeno.
Sam
That's bad, mmkay. Some code screw up on my part. Got some more output so I can figure out where the fuckage happened? Well here's a screen capture. I had moved the Jalapeno to an old low power machine and got this. On my normal rig it works fine. So I'm not sure it's not a problem on my old machine. cgminer version 3.8.3 - Started: [2013-11-23 22:47:12]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:9 WU:0.0/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 23 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to stratum.btcguild.com diff 4 with stratum as user os2sam_Jalape
Block: 6eb3b7ad... Diff:609M Started: [22:47:12] Best share: 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
BAJ 0: max 25C 3.49V | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:9 WU:0.0/m
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2013-11-23 22:47:02] Started cgminer 3.8.3
[2013-11-23 22:47:10] Probing for an alive pool
[2013-11-23 22:47:12] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 2
[2013-11-23 22:47:12] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 4
[2013-11-23 22:47:12] Network diff set to 609M
[2013-11-23 22:47:13] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:13] Pool 2 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid
[2013-11-23 22:47:14] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:15] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:15] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:16] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:17] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:17] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:18] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:19] hex2bin scan failed
[2013-11-23 22:47:22] BAJ0: empty result (INPROCESS:10x0aCOUNT:20x0a9FF7FB8
A5F26106934BA7BA68FEB1F1D693B8B1`636DD791B2F53AAAE3CEDB,FEA0DFDF529185321907
,00x0a57C7A36DC1291`574DA63990BBCC160x00) ignored
[2013-11-23 22:47:31] BAJ0: empty result (INPROCESS:00x0aCOUN0x00) ignored
[2013-11-23 22:47:39] BAJ0: empty result (INPROCESS:00x0aCOUN0x00) ignored |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
