When Liverpool were a goal down, I was confident that they will come back. Tried $50 on double chance and what a waste! The odd for them to qualify in CL next round should go back to 1/30 or even more. One match you humiliate one of the top team and in the next match you help a team who were waiting for relegation LOL
By the way, what was the odds for double chance? Basically it was the right choice, probably if I was online I would have made a live bet on Liverpool to win after Bournemouth took the lead. If Salah had not missed from the penalty spot, then Liverpool would have been able to put the squeeze on Bournemouth. Too lazy to look for the bet slip but it was something 1.56 when I get it. In general, I liked the joke about the fact that Liverpool gave points to Bournemouth in order for Everton to relegated from Premier League We are becoming generous lately LOL By the way, the pool is not working for me right now. I can not remember when I had an exact score in both EPL and UCL pool. Not happening from last few weeks. Is there any black magic of something LOL. Considering the rank on UCL pool, if I could manage to get some exact scores then I could have a better position than now.
|
|
|
You won't know how people's ignorance leads to even these days with lots information online regarding this kind of scam on how to know and to avoid them.
Telegram is a safe heaven for these type of scammers. These kind of websites are not going to rank in search engine. Possibility is Google advertising but I wonder does it pay the investment? As long as they are using free methods, they have nothing to lose but time that is investing to pull such scams.
|
|
|
You are an ALT account, digging others post history to make a name for you, throwing mud on the wall hoping something to stickmore. All because you are one of those users who wants to have a space in DT so that whatever desire you have, you can fulfill. One of those typical DT and merit hunters. I don't trust these type of members. Hence you are in my distrust list. Are you any better than him? You created 25 topics in the last year, half of which are related to the Reputation topic, and the other half to the Meta or DT topic. It looks like you are not interested in cryptocurrencies on this forum, since you only like to discuss the work of the forum, DT or the behavior of other users. On this you decided to make a name for yourself? But your behavior is, of course, not digging in dirty laundry, like Solosanz, it is something else, not in the name of bearing a signature and does not merit, you are our people's fighter for justice, unselfish. You dug into my posts, looking for material for your next topic in reputation, and you are trying to tell someone else there for digging into other people's posts. I immediately apologize for my crooked English, otherwise you will suddenly think that I wrote this English text with my own hand and decide to mark it with a tag in my trust. The point is I have a history of long eight years. Not a cheap dog who are going away by scamming others. If I have business or anything bad in mind with the account then I would not hang here for the long period. I would farm trust in a few months or years and you would never discover me because you would have been none existed. May be I could do the bad thing twice before you entered in the forum. And by now I would had third pull and working on the fourth LOL I don't see anything bad to create one after another reputation topic against everyone but I have problem if that is an account who joined few months or years ago and doing it to farm trust, doing it to earn quick reputation and ranking up, making it a day job. Only they know what will they do with it but you can not deny the possibility that they will use the opportunity and rob someone when they get opportunity. Don't we have many examples so far? Should I give some names?
|
|
|
Italy 🇮🇹: serial A Spezia vs Inter Milano away to win full-time A-2 1.40 odds Portugal 🇵🇹: Liga 1 Porto vs Estoril home to win full-time H-1 1.20 odds [Kazakhstan 🇰🇿: premier league Atyrau vs Kaisar kyzylorda home win or draw full-time H-1x 1.35 odds
Spezia vs Inter Milano away to win full-time A-2 1.40 odds: Lost Porto vs Estoril home to win full-time H-1 1.20 odds: Won Atyrau vs Kaisar kyzylorda home win or draw full-time H-1x 1.35 odds: Won What is the difference when I go for odds and pick the favs or least risky options like win or draw, draw no bet. You lost one, won two. It's very regular result. I was expecting something special, may be going against the favs or exact score of the match where odds will be higher and winning ratio is higher too.
|
|
|
I doubt they'll do that. In first place, i doubt we and @SeedChecker have similar definition of open source.
I am wondering how in the earth someone thought to spend at least few hours to be honest few days to write pieces of codes, gather together, make a program and expect people are going to buy such stupid idea? These generation do anything they want with their time, they don't mind wasting it on social media and writing useless codes. The world is in a dead-end 😉
|
|
|
If you or anyone could help me with understanding where to input what I would appreciate it This is the formula theyve given me... https://postimg.cc/56v934d2And this is the seed to the 230x I got paid for (b0ec60c7a0de7749bd0c004df27bd758) Im just not sure where to input anything... Ive never dealt with any coding so this is another language to me... Ridiculous that they make it so difficult to verify a bet as opposed to other sites like Stake the results already ran for you. I also asked support what data I needed to input and they replied: "The user seed should be the only required input. The server secret is already included in the example code" Why don't you copy the server seed, client seed or any seed information you have, paste here. Someone will be able to verify it for you. I am assuming none of these seeds need to keep private. I wish I knew the process.
|
|
|
he should carry on with hopes that winnings will start creeping in someday gradually?
That's what gambling does to you. You lose and chase the loss. It's like a carrot hanged in front of a Donkey and you are riding it. In the Donkey case it does not lose anything but the master gets what he wants. But in gambling you lose your hard earned money, bookies get what they want. Gambling is for donkeys unless you are paying for the fun knowingly like you pay to watch a sport.
|
|
|
What happened: This is a scam exchange platform that has spread recently. The team of this platform sends the victims promo codes to activate them to receive cryptocurrencies. Still, they cannot withdraw before they deposit funds in the scam platform and after verifying their accounts and passing the KYC. Reference Link: http://blatenbit.com/ It's a very old scam strategy that may worked long ago but I doubt these days it works anymore. People know they are fake. A legit business is not going to ask to deposit money to withdraw whatever money you earned free on a site.
|
|
|
Hmm... I constantly write that despite the local success of Liverpool, they have a disastrous season, there is no stability and they are not suitable for betting, but yesterday for some reason I added them to my multibet Apparently 1-0 is the final result of the game and Liverpool again becomes the underdog for the fight for the top 4. What a day to start the weekend games, so Liverpool missed a penalty which should have put them on the score sheet and that left them without a single goal after a solid performance the other weekend that also humiliated an in form Manchester United... Am just not sure what voodoo goes on with scoring too many goes in one game and following match a guaranteed flop follows When Liverpool were a goal down, I was confident that they will come back. Tried $50 on double chance and what a waste! The odd for them to qualify in CL next round should go back to 1/30 or even more. One match you humiliate one of the top team and in the next match you help a team who were waiting for relegation LOL
|
|
|
I didn't get a response, even though I saw the account online when I sent the PM. But this does not mean anything; I never said that this account violated something. There was a question: "Bitzizzix: Changed hands or not? Answer: Yes, I changed it. Otherwise, if Bitzizzix wants to prove otherwise, he can answer me. Further, since the change was made a long time ago, there are no claims against the owner. The topic can be closed.
Why a changed hands account didn't receive negative feedback? changed hands is changed hands, I've check many accounts were get negative feedback due to changed hands. Assuming it's true the account changed hands, then why the person didn't create his own account? there's should be a reason behind this. If changed hands isn't a matter and doesn't deserve to get negative feedback, I think the unofficial rule about account sales should be changed. So it will be helpful for many users including me for not discuss about changed hands anymore. 18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.
Do some better things instead of doing negative things. Since you like scanning members history, find the users who are changed hand and received negative tag long ago but even after long time they are still loyal to the system. Their positive contribution is helping the community. They deserves a chance. Since they did not scam anyone even with the hardship, they are likely not to do negative deed. Help them, create a positive campaign. The trends always changes. Just because an account changed hand (may be) 5 long years ago but for long 5 years contributing in the forum positively, they are better asset than you with an alt account. If they are at risk to someone to scam then what makes it different for you?
|
|
|
So what exactly is the problem here?
I was trying to show @_BlackStar that the address he may have quoted was posted after change of activity. Did I suggest anywhere that @bitzizzix should be tagged? Take a breather.
No problem here. I was not telling you are suggesting a tag but it was OP without any doubt in mind. Did he specifically said it? No, but his motive is close to that. I sent a PM to this account in Russian. I assume he can answer in his own language.
He should be, it's a pretty smart thing you did. But my questions remains, what is the point? Did the account evaded ban? Has he joined in a campaign with his main account, did it plagiarize? Have he broken any rule of the forum at all? Further more, if indeed the account is changed hand, it happened more than 5 years ago which means everything on the account is from the current owner. What changed?
|
|
|
29th August 2017 was way after the change in account activity which happened around 1st April 2017, so I wouldn't be suprised if the Bitcoin address posted after 1st April 2017 is still in control of the current owner.
Somebody give me more catch-up 🤣 You have a point but as you said there are still no concert evidence even if there were, still we need to find other things like if they cheated to any campaign and things like that. In the year 2023, 6 years fast forward form anything that might happened, are we still tagging accounts just for changing hand?
|
|
|
That's how I like my McDonald's too LOL Now what is OP going to do? Delete the topic and apologize to bitzizzix? While he can not remove the history but he can obviously write a Pm to bitzizzix and ask for forgiveness for disrespecting him openly on the community. People these days! Not a year or two in the forum and starts harassing others who are here grinding from ages.
|
|
|
Hi fellas! For a long time tomahawk9 hasn't been active on the forum. And I realized today that they didn't make any prediction in the CL pool despite doing good there. Is there anyone who knows about their condition? I hope they don't have any problem.
Hope he is well. I am not ready to hear another news that will shake the heart again. Tomahawk9 give us a shout brother. No goal yet in both match. I am expecting a few goals in Bayern vs PSG though. In the other match I have draw (I don't go for it always LOL) so even with no scoring, I will be happy.
|
|
|
Can you guys suggest any advice thanks a lot!
You seem still hanging for advice 😉 Eat it! Be a scam buster LOL Sinuously, go check everyone's profile, police them and open reputation thread for them, ask others to help you to find evidence. Go to altcoin announcement board check every project that are launching their ANN. Look for plagiarism, or missing team members. You don't need to even look for anything. Start just by saying the domain registered a month or week ago. 🤣 You can also look for bounty cheaters. Link the addresses they posts and accuse them for bounty cheating. Another one is to find alt accounts. You don't need much thing to do. Just tell that they are changed hand. Quote few posts and booyah! You will become a hero. Or just go and speak against the sportsbook that is hated by a specific group of people LOL
|
|
|
Oh my! So you people have right to ask anyone to response you when someone thinks x, y, z?
Sure. That used to happen quite a lot a couple of years ago when account sales were rampant. If you're not familiar with how damaging it can be when an account (especially if it's high-ranked and/or highly trusted) changes hands, then you haven't seen people fall for scams based on their assumption that they're dealing with the original owner of an account. It's happened before and I have no doubt it'll happen again if it isn't right now somewhere on the forum. And in addition to that risk, there's also shitposters who buy accounts to make more money in campaigns or bounties, and they usually end up decreasing the quality of discussion rather than improving it. Having said that, this guy doesn't have to come here and defend himself, but I don't fault OP for sniffing out something that might be off. When members suddenly start posting in a language they've never written in before (especially after a break when no posts are made), that's a huge red flag. Earning from signature campaign and such things are not bad considering the forum ecosystem. I do not see anything bad there, sorry if you are I are not on the same page regarding the earnings. But I agree, there are red flags when an account is changed hand however it does not allow us to poke people on their buttocks and accuse them without any sorts of breaking forum rules eventually an insult. What if they are indeed not changed hand. When someone is disrespecting others without having a solid proof then it looks odd. This is a community where brotherhood comes before anything else [I am afraid these days it faded a lot]. If a change hand forum account has risk to scam others then an alternative account which has no mention for their main account also have the same risk. If they scam then no trace left. The OP could be such an example. If the topic was posted by a user who is on the forum from ages, no need for merit, no need for asking to include them in DT, no intention to gain anything from it then I would not judge him but OP with such activity raise flags for me. May be he is building another account to gain from forum ecosystem but who knows if he will not pull a scam in the future. Until now there are nothing to lose for him. He can build up another account just like this if anything happen to the current account. Who knows he is someone who already defaulted a loan or scammed huge amount from someone else and left that account. Haven't we seen those theyoungmillionaire kind of users? You see it is easy to bust scams, policing others because it earns quick merit and reputation. A lot of the members these days made it a full time job, why would we only blame them? They saw it works, there are many examples in front of their eyes that worked.
|
|
|
@bitzizzix should probably also be invited on this thread to clarify.
Oh my! So you people have right to ask anyone to response you when someone thinks x, y, z? OP, did he break any rules like, joining signature campaign with alt accounts or joined in a bounty campaign where manager said no alts are allowed or even joined in a forum event where it was said no alts are allowed. If not then lock the thread and stop insulting people out of nothing just because you think there is something. You yourself is an alt account frankly speaking and you never dared to tell which was your main account.
|
|
|
That win against Utd has shaken the bookies too. Still we need to manage 4 goals margin to qualify.
haha Just give up now don't let the 7-0 win against United give you false optimism; the damage was done at Anfield, and it was a mistake to allow them to score that many goals at home. There is no way Real Madrid will lose 4-0 to Liverpool at home in the Champions League. Real Madrid are currently having a bad run of games, which offers Liverpool a little advantage to win but not qualify. I bet for Liverpool to win 1-3, but that wont be enough. No doubt Liverpool will play the match to qualify but I also doubt if they will be able to do so. They will win which has better possibility than to qualify. But again in football it seems nothing is impossible. Have any of us thought Utd will concede 7 goals and not score a single one? I was even siding for Utd to win by 1 - 2, see how much doubt I had against my own team? If Liverpool manage to even win on the 23rd then I will be happy but you never know by any chance if they qualify then we are back in the track. We will be one of the team who will have major chance to win the CL again. By the way, 23rd is a long time, many things can change. Let's focus on the match against Bournemouth.
|
|
|
3 - 1 for Benfica, 3 - 0 now and 2 - 1 for Chelsea, we have 1 - 0. I need a few exact scores in the round. In UCL I am not that unlucky like I am in EPL this season. Benfica, STOP now LOL Fingers crossed. 30/1 was as high as odds got for Liverpool to qualify, I only managed 24/1 because I took it as soon as we lost at Anfield haha... but odds are now back to a "Reasonable" 22/1.
That win against Utd has shaken the bookies too. Still we need to manage 4 goals margin to qualify.
|
|
|
|