TO THOSE OF YOU NOT LOGGED ON INTO BITCOINTALK, 85% OF THE PROFILE YOU SEE CHATTING WITH EACH OTHER ON THIS THREAD HAS A NEGATIVE TRUST, THAT MEANS ITS BEEN DEEM A PROFILE UTILIZED FOR SCAM AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. YOU HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON IN OTHER TO SEE THE RED NEGATIVE TRUST, SO PLZ DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CONVERSATION BTW ACCOUNTS, THAT MIGHT CREATE AN ILLUSION THAT THEIR IS INTEREST IN THIS ICO. 65-70% OF THE POST ON THIS THREAD IS ORCHESTRATED BY SOMEONE USING STOLEN ACCOUNTS TO CHAT BTW DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. THE PROOF IS ON A THREAD BELOW THIS BANNER.  DO A DILIGENT RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOUR MONEY.

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

TO THOSE OF YOU NOT LOGGED ON INTO BITCOINTALK, 85% OF THE PROFILE YOU SEE CHATTING WITH EACH OTHER ON THIS THREAD HAS A NEGATIVE TRUST, THAT MEANS ITS BEEN DEEM A PROFILE UTILIZED FOR SCAM AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. YOU HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON IN OTHER TO SEE THE RED NEGATIVE TRUST, SP PLZ DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CONVERSATION BTW ACCOUNTS, THAT MIGHT CREATE AN ILLUSION THAT THEIR IS INTEREST IN THIS ICO. 65-70% OF THE POST ON THIS THREAD IS ORCHESTRATED BY A SOMEONE USING STOLEN ACCOUNTS TO CHAT BTW DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. THE PROOF IS ON A THREAD BELOW THIS BANNER.  DO A DILIGENT RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOU MONEY.

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

Well, am yet to see this questions asked, so i figured, i will lay it out, and an admin can answer at their leisure.

So, with reference to ownership stake, how is that claim post ico?  Is it attached to the ETH Wallet that you used for the ICO or is there a formal registration that includes submitting/verification of ID cards etc.

In the event that someone loses their ETH wallet, will they be able submit a substitute wallet for the dividend? and if so, what steps will be taken to verify ownership?

Finally, will the amount of dividend paid to a founding investors(i.e contributed in the ico) differ from dividend paid to investors that purchased of the market.

How many fucking accounts did you hack. SMH. Readers please do yourself a favor and check out the thread under this banner.


The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake








 

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

It goes without saying that every property will be insured against man made/ natural disasters. If you can think of it, there is an insurance for it. And to the other poster, no singular individual owns the building. Every structure is owned by every one who participated in the ico, you share in the ownership is deteremined according to how much you invested. This has been answered multiple times on this thread.

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

Damn! Nova choose the wrong time to have wallet issues. i wold love to get in on the action,  stack more coins. Sucks. price probably be back up by the time i wake up tomorrow.

 Oh how soon they forget. I see some prior whiners all of a sudden praising mne again. Smh.Anywayd i will repeat the same thing i said yesterday. for those That sold at 1.50 all i have to say is 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 told you so.

good luck.

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

Love it. Thanks.

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
 Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.







A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake

The is with this "The reward is meant not only for the one who makes the best jokes, the craziest figures, breaking news, shocking twitter posts, and the most noise (attention). The reward is also meant for the one who has something trustworthy and useful to say. And: the more benefit content creates, the more it may be rewarded"  is that  what is deemed trustworthy, useful and beneficial varies among various demographic and is speculative. A middle aged individual might hear someone discussing the potential of a new currency and why it should be adopted by the federal govt on c-span, influencing them to buy the currency  before a projected increase in price. A teenager might see a crazy meme referring a meme card and buy the aforementioned card. Let say in both instance the coin and card has a 200% increase in value, would you deem the c-span new more rewarding cos it targeted a certain demographic.
 I read the proposed idea to utilize block chain platform to enables the placing, unbundling and re-bundling of content in a totally open and free way. That Seem interesting but the fact remains that quality work will inadvertently cost money, That's why a situation like BAT might be useful cos rather than a singular corp getting all the money, its somewhat shared with the public. Sure it would be ideal to have access to all content for free without having to worry about my privacy been invaded/ dealing with constant  advisement but the problem with free access is been able to acquire quality work. Sure publishers will be offered readcoin for producing quality work but then again we are in a free market and ppl tend to go whomever that's paying the most. The idea is noble indeed, just seem like it has a tremendous uphill battle ahead.

Now ease of finding prostitutes is a different argument. Your prior argument was how LUST would eliminate pimp and how LUST is putting the power back into the girl's hand, when   that's not so, cos the girls will be paying lust, thus making lust a pimp