|
I'm pretty sure not a single price whether it'd be bitcoin vs some other coin or bitcoin vs fiat will be "fixed". Heck, even fiat values aren't fixed. They go up and down all the time depending on the country's economy. In the end, it's always supply and demand. You can never assume 1BTC = 5NEO because there might be days whereas there are lots of NEO buyers and there are days that there will be alot of sellers.
|
|
|
|
And the motive is not to be having your entire crypto bank on the case, but rather the amount which you will trade/exchange with daily.
MIGHT be a good idea, but I personally don't know anyone who does their trading on a mobile phone honestly. I'm pretty sure there are a few that trade on their phones though, but take note that your target demographic here is very small. |
|
|
|
Yeah its good, need to have some understanding of TA technical terms if you want to configure the bot yourself or you can just use default settings.
I do have a good understanding of TA so are you saying its perfect for me? Some people do TA differently; I think there's literally no way of finding out if it's good for you if you don't try it yourself. |
|
|
|
|
On your video: "hardware wallets cannot be used on mobile devices to make day to day transactions". This is incorrect. You can make transactions using your Ledger Nano S on mobile(not sure for Trezor). It's just a hassle due to you needing to use a usb cable to connect the devices.
The concept is nice though, but I wouldn't personally store my sort of "crypto bank" on this device, as I'd definitely prefer my main hardware wallet at home at a safety box rather than on my pocket everytime.
|
|
|
|
|
Ohwell. There's always going to be greedy people running investment scams masquerading as some legit investment and there's always going to be Darwin's award-winning delusional people believing and investing in these kinds of things. Another bad publicity for bitcoin I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
The BCH developers increased the blocksize to 8mb. The BCH community pretty much dislikes the concept of Segwit hence they forked legacy bitcoin in to a separate cryptocurrency(BCH). So yes, raising the blocksize doesn't need segwit as the BCH community obviously achieved this.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't know how to reply or post here on bitcointalk, but you already have a signature campaign. Really. If you don't know how to use a basic online forum such as bitcointalk, forget earning through signature campaigns or whatever bounties. You're really not going anywhere when you always focus on the money first.
|
|
|
|
|
It's simply because it's probably not good or sort of "in-depth" enough. Also remember that generic posts/replies don't usually get merits. sMerits are limited, so people who have it are probably saving them up for those better quality replies.
|
|
|
|
Its the best investment ever. No fraud and Theft and also based on blockchain with much security.
As much as I love investing in bitcoin or cryptocurrencies in general I'll have to disagree with your statement. Cryptocurrencies is the most riskiest(if not the riskiest) investment there is. Though bitcoin wouldn't die if ever bans would happen, a single government ban by a single powerhouse country like the USA could lose you 60-90% of your investment. |
|
|
|
Honestly, the short answer is No, unless you really know what you are talking about and to the point. And then you become a full member and the exposure is a lot greater.
I'm pretty sure rank discrimination isn't a thing here on bitcointalk. Sure, people might trust the replies or posts of higher ranks, but it doesn't necessarily mean that people wouldn't read newbie's and jr member's posts. Mostly the people who complain about their posts not getting exposure are the ones who doesn't post anything good. Makes you think why they couldn't earn merits in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe, maybe not. People should read it if your reply is not too generic and is somewhat helpful or at least contribute to the topic.
|
|
|
|
I am not using any wallet for keeping my bitcoins. My holdings are scattered over different exchanges so as to increase the security.
Really not a good idea. You're taking unnecessary risks here. Sure, the likeliness of an exchange locking up your account or getting hacked in general isn't too high, but storing your funds on multiple exchanges increases the chance of you losing some of your funds. Purchase a hardware wallet; I can't stress this enough. |
|
|
|
I personally use a Ledger Nano S[1]. No regrets on this purchase whatsoever. Security should always be a priority. I really don't suggest using Coinbase as a wallet. Only use Coinbase as a way of buying btc/eth/ltc using FIAT money, nothing else. If Coinbase decides to lock up your account or if ever they get hacked(hopefully not though), you're screwed.
[1] https://ledgerwallet.com/ |
|
|
|
Its strange that they added an old coin like Digibyte. Is development still alive over there? I dont mean anything bad by it. Its good that old coins are still getting some attention but why DGB?
Huh. Come to think of it, I just checked their GitHub repository[1] and the last commit was 16 days ago. Eh just probably a break from the developers but I don't know. I also thought why they didn't add the bigger marketcap coins instead. But it's probably just because Digibyte is easy to implement into their system.
[1] https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/commits/master |
|
|
|
A company did an interesting social media experiment on people's acceptance of cryptocurrency as a method of payment for salary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcGUeDlnLU&t=30sLooks as though it could possibly have been staged by the company (I don't think so??), but the results seemed similar to what I would expect if it was genuine. And I think it is actually a clever way of promoting their token sale, more potential to go viral than other promotional videos I've seen. Anyway, personally I think I would be happy to take cryptocurrency as at least part payment for salary, and depending on circumstances, the whole amount. No, I think it is not a good idea. many people dont know about bitcoin and every country has currency. It is imposible, we cannt to fulfill our needs with it. Why is it not a good idea? It's not like you're forced to accept it in cryptocurrencies anyway. Companies/sites/organizations would probably just make it an option anyway; it's very unlikely for them to make you accept bitcoin mandatorily. If you didn't want to accept crypto then you're pretty much unaffected anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Personally, if I had the chance to be paid with crypto, I'd only accept bitcoin. Though I wouldn't want it to be 100% in bitcoin as I really just cant use bitcoin for purchases in the country I'm in as pretty much no one accepts it. Hopefully in the future though. I'd probably accept 50% in bitcoin and 50% in fiat; but this also completely depends on how much the salary is.
|
|
|
|
Ayy. Thanks again for the contribution. I just checked the list just now. Out of 16 users and 16 posts from the list, only 2/16 users have been banned( cryptocurency08 and kelum86) and only 6/16 topics/replies have been deleted quite unfortunately. I'm really unsure how the mods/admins decide whether to just delete the post or ban the user completely. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
