|
I like ISP. Initial Sucker Pump. It's way more accurate than either of the alternatives.
|
|
|
|
|
Second thread of the sort in a month. Don't think people are willing to part with their hard earned bitcoin for soiled panties. They've probably only seen the underside of a computer nerd's male ass anyway.
|
|
|
|
You assume you're educating me because you assume you're the only one who's heard of logical fallacies and you're not. What you are is a dick and you've just proved that. Again.
So you claim to know what a logical fallacy is but choose to employ them as the basis for your response anyway? Intellectual honesty fail. Maybe if you didn't confuse my argument with someone else's you'd realize I'm stating an opinion, which is that you're a dick and you are attempting to cow members here under what you think is the enormous weight of your intellect. Unbecoming behavior for someone on default trust. Also a bit delusional but that's another story. |
|
|
|
Imo the red should be in permanent red ink. Otherwise this can and will be used as a way to "clean" accounts. I understand injust's POV but that's how I feel.
A lot of this happens often, why I am hesitant removing a Negative, even if a "loan" is repaid later. Yeah and the risks outweigh the benefits in this case. I think when you buy a negative rated account it's probably not with the best of intentions. Account sales are sketchy as it is. |
|
|
|
Well, this is the first time I've ever heard of someone offering a discount for paying with bitcoin. I've seen it talked about in the past, but never practically implemented. Hopefully more businesses will follow this site.
Provident has offered a bitcoin discount for a while now, and I've used them in the past. I have yet to check out JM but I will soon. |
|
|
|
The thing about Ponzi's is you know what you get when you use them. It's VERY clear. PM's I have received prove that you cannot know that everybody who participates understands what a ponzi is so, therefore, your assertion is false. Posting in a ponzi thread is not scamming Posting support in a ponzi thread implies legitimacy, especially from established forum members. This is what the ponzi scammers need you to do and, by doing so, you encourage other people to deposit which is pretty much the reason why you do it. Don't pretend you're too stupid to understand even that basic principal. This means you are intentionally helping scumbags run a scheme which *will* result in people having their money stolen. He's out of control. I keep hearing you lot use that phrase. I do not think that phrase means what you think it means. Please, go ahead, define 'out of control' for me. Surely, for me to be 'out of control' you would be able to offer up evidence of how I am on a rampage of abusive and outrageously unfair issuing of negative rating to users? Surely, on the basis of just how frequently you muppets and puppets employ that phrase, you'd actually have some fucking evidence to support it? No? And you sound like you've spent a lot of time on the jref forum, but you can save it because those tedious rebuttals I've heard so many times before. It's your attitude that makes you an asshole and someone on DT ought not try to bully others the way you're doing. And of course I don't expect you to ever agree with me or to see this behavior in yourself and so I'm not going to cite references for you. Your present behavior is proof enough that you're "out of control" for someone on DT. |
|
|
|
At least I didn't join this forum, buy an account and start off as a hero.
Lutpin you are more abrasive than Mexxer and most others on DT so I was trying to be delicate. As I said, I've nothing against you and you've done good on the forum. My only gripe, which is not with you personally, is that anyone can bust scams and bust spam, but it's dealings with bitcoin that make you trusted or not. In my eyes. And I confess I'm ignorant of any deals you may have made, so I'll shut up now. Abrasive? cmon now, it's okay to call people salty. It doesn't take a day to figure out that you're saying Lutpin is salty and you don't trust him. I don't know lutpin enough to trust or not trust him, but I have a little advice for him: If anything, I think lutpin should ease back on the "abrasiveness" and be a little calmer. We all should. It's uncomfortable for me to call anybody salty, but I just had to post that. It was too much to resist. Sure, OP was raging and basically raised his middle finger in all of your faces, but being "abrasive" to someone doesn't make a situation better. BSM is just running out of things to say and he's basically given up on his account and he's basically said screw it, this acc is dead anyways. Better just call people dumb and be salty now. You are stuffing my mouth full of words, sir. I didn't say any of that. I did not mean to imply that I don't trust Lutpin. I'm neutral. |
|
|
|
|
Imo the red should be in permanent red ink. Otherwise this can and will be used as a way to "clean" accounts. I understand injust's POV but that's how I feel.
|
|
|
|
|
Dash definitely, I hear it constantly and Im not surprised at the poll results. I still like it as a coin though.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah there was another scam accusation against him a while back and definitely next time be more careful. Good thing it was only $1.50.
|
|
|
|
I don't have a dog in this fight but you do come off as kind of a douche at times and did in this thread, definitely. So you defend a fallacious tone complaint (please, ffs, will you lot look up what logical fallacies are), by making a tone complaint? Amazingly, however, you appear utterly incapable of acknowledging that, outside of tone complaints, slippery-slope, straw-man, red-herring, false equivalence, appeal to motive, reductio ad absurdem and 'Godwin', those who oppose the move to hold people to account for their dishonest behaviour, haven't actually presented a single fucking reasoned rebuttal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight_and_Crooked_ThinkingNow, why don't you take a minute to think how fucking irritating it must be to have to constantly rebut the dishonest arguments of these scamming scumbags (because, let's be honest here, the only people who resent being held to account for their actions are those for whom being evidently dishonest is an inherent part of their psyche) repeatedly posting vapid nonsense complaints and refusing to offer up anything of actual substance. Multiply those arseholes to the power of 'sock' and you might accept that having to do this over and over again, to the same dishonest scumbags, is pretty fucking tiresome. So, no, I won't accept your attempted defence of tone complaint. Blah blah blah. You assume you're educating me because you assume you're the only one who's heard of logical fallacies and you're not. What you are is a dick and you've just proved that. Again. |
|
|
|
I'll buy a little as it hits two dollar, what'd ya think?
Rather buy sub 2 dollars, it's never going back to 0.03 or even what it is now. it's dead. Nigative, sir. We are in a little dip and I suspect we'll recover. I don't have much skin in the game anyway so I'm kinda just a spectator. It is interesting, I'll tell you that. |
|
|
|
|
If I may be so bold, sir, what was the value of the position you liquidated?
I don't necessarily agree with your position. I think we could definitely go to $700 and beyond but it seems to me that a lot of interest in crypto is headed toward things like ETH and all of this 2.0 stuff. But I think bitcoin is a good way to store value. It's a horrible currency and I think people are realizing this, but $700 is on the horizon.
|
|
|
|
|
What is 10,000 Mojo worth? I've never heard of it--I assume it's an altcoin?
You basically have to come up with collateral worth about 120% of what you're asking for. Take a look at the stickies in the beginning of this section. And you're a noob so most people won't take a chance with you unless you put up good collateral.
Edit: You're not a noob, sorry. I'm reading way too fast.
|
|
|
|
Firstly don't blame other people for your own inadequacies. Secondly if you read the website and still don't understand nor appreciate the vast potential in Ethereum then I suggest you stay away from it until a Dummies Guide is published. When the Internet and email first came out the dumb people questioned why they'd need it. Today these very same individuals post dumb selfies on Instagram and mind numbing liked on Facebook. Sometimes you need the vision and intelligence to look behind the organ grinders curtain.
Goddamn somebody didn't get laid last night. I can't say I understand ETH either, nor any of the other cryptocurrencies but I'm not a big investor either and I don't need a PhD in cryptography to use bitcoin. As I said in the other thread I will watch TPTB's predictions closely even without understanding fully his arguments. I am not that smart. |
|
|
|
At least I didn't join this forum, buy an account and start off as a hero.
Lutpin you are more abrasive than Mexxer and most others on DT so I was trying to be delicate. As I said, I've nothing against you and you've done good on the forum. My only gripe, which is not with you personally, is that anyone can bust scams and bust spam, but it's dealings with bitcoin that make you trusted or not. In my eyes. And I confess I'm ignorant of any deals you may have made, so I'll shut up now. |
|
|
|
|
Dude, you have no idea where we are on the curve, the ETH price vs. time curve. And that's because you can't see into the future and neither can I, and neither can anyone else. So we don't know 0.03 is the bubble. It could explode to 0.1 tomorrow for all we know and everything on your little poll would be nonsense.
I'm interested in TPTB's claims because that level of arrogance demands scrutiny.
|
|
|
|
|
I think if bitcoin ever gets that high, it's going to be years from now. We're at a pretty good price right now but sentiment is all over the place and we'd have to get reaaaallly bullish to shoot up to $1000. Not that it couldn't happen but it seems like a lot of crypto investors are looking into ETH and others.
|
|
|
|
|
This has happened before and I thought it had been resolved that the minor wouldn't be charged with an offense like that. I could be totally wrong, and if I am then the law is idiotic. And it wouldn't surprise me in the least.
|
|
|
|
So please tell me, Oh Lord, how to make a politically correct post that please your highness in the marked section without getting red trust.
Assholes like you that want to limit peoples free speech needs to be called out. You are making the reputation system worthless.
I'm guessing you are searching for any post I made there to give it red trust. I have never posted there and this is the only account I have so good luck
scamming people is not equal free speech. Posting in a ponzi thread is not scamming I agree with this and I don't agree with YPII much. He's out of control. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
