Op just said that more countries now accept btc, that is why he believes that 100k is just around the corner. The adoption drastically increase because btc is now very exposed and people right now are depending too much on the digital payments because of the current situation, add in the fact that btc is still dumped so more people are going to fill their bags.

There is nothing wrong in predicting and predictions are not only good at a short period of time, that is why he is optimistic that btc can get out of the red zone soon and then finish its unfinished business of reaching 100k. It may only look hard but its possible mate, trust me.

Okay.. at international levels, yesterday the 2nd T20I between England and West Indies was really a nail biting one. Until the 19th over of West Indies innings, it seemed England was going to win easily but sudden heroics from Akeal Hosein who entered to at no:10 made a feel like things turned out in favor of West Indies still West Indies fell short of 1 run to win. West Indies scored 28 runs in last 6 balls but they needed 29 runs for a super over or 30 runs for a win. What a roller coaster match it was.

There are chances for missing out for India-Pakistan clash if these countries are not in same group hence the schedule is always in making sure of putting them into same group hence they will have at least one meet for high voltage hype to get all possible highest cricketing revenues. I am not expecting a different kind of fixture at any time soon on all ICC events.

No casino is beyond the reach of a wealthy person to crash them out. I mean obviously it would be very very hard to do something like that, but at the same time it is not impossible to happen neither. Aren't there any people who have billions of dollars? Yes there are, could they technically speaking gamble with max amounts? Or even go illegal and do multiple accounts on different places not to get caught (which they can afford since they have billions) and max bet on all of them? Hell they can hire 100 people or 10k people all around the world and max bet them all. Then all they have to do is hope that their bet wins, and that is how you can bankrupt a casino.

I am not saying that any sane person would do it, that is like just one super wealthy person hating stake for some reason to do that, and I doubt that would ever happen, I just meant "technically" it is not impossible for it to happen.

This can be quite annoying, I hate seeing all these copycats, and this one is obvious that they copied from shibainu. Even shibainu itself has been down as of recent, and the hype is over, no one is even talking about it anymore. Although I still see some meme coin fans who keep believing that meme coins will still have a come back this year, I know it is possible, but I’m not really taking it.

Anyone who is making an investment now should be very careful of the investment they make, and be sure that the assets that their money goes into is one that would be worth it this year. Meme coins are more volatile than their crypto counterparts, so it’s a huge risk.

That is a great approach, to both have money that is coming in constantly, and to also have the coins themselves. If you invest in any coin ever, it may go up or down, but if you invest into coins that you could stake, you have that AND you have passive income as well.

If you invest into bitcoin, you will not be taking advantage of the mining income, that is for miners, but if you invest into something like cake then you could make a profit for just holding it. Considering they could give anything between 10% to 100% (cake restaking has nearly 90%) then we could assume that on average you could make at least 20% yearly income.

From 1 million, that is 200k, even if we say 180k, that is 15k per month. So, not only you will make 15k per month, but also price could go up and that means your passive income will go up as well, so you will basically live forever with that money without ever needing to anything else. Only possible problem would be if these coins go down in price a lot and stay there and never go back up.

Estimating the profits, or trying to justify your investment is not an easy thing to do. Many people will come up with some coins or tokens to shill, but logically speaking it is not really up to us to decide that. Sometimes great projects become nothing, and sometimes idiotic projects go up.

I have always said that doge was an idiotic project, we all know that it was a joke thing that started and it was never meant to be a good investment project, just for laughing. What happened in 2021 to doge was unaccounted for and it was shocking for many veteran investors like me. So, we should not try to predict what will happen because we can't really do that with any set logic we can use.

I feel like security is not really "cared" as much because people think that it should be given. I mean without security all else fails, so it is not even a discussion that one should have a great security. However, some of the other things are a bit can live without levels. Like variety of currencies is something you can live without, would it be nice to gamble in a place with 100 coins option? Sure that would be great, would it be too important to leave if they don't? Of course not. Because of that things like responsiveness is at the top, because without security you are gone, but without proper support, you could be hurt but not gone totally.

Wall was never a great shooter, he was always a bad one outside of the arc, he is basically what Westbrook was before Westbrook, and to be fair he was super fast when he played, like fastest in the league probably at one point, and his vision of the court was awesome. However when you put all of this together, it doesn't really make it a better team, we are talking about a replacement for Westbrook basically and not a different style.

Westbrook is 100% not the problem, but also a bit of the problem. Not because he is a bad player, it just that when you have Lebron who is known to be a beast and go inside with ease and either score or pass out, then having another star that does the same thing makes no sense. You need a shooter there, not a passer, you already have Lebron, so get a target for Lebron and not someone who does the same thing.

A player like Curry would be the most ideal of course, but Curry is ideal for every team, so you just need another player like him, Dame would be awesome but he is too big name too, just another shooter at PG basically, nothing else.

I didn't mean it doesn't worth anything, I am sorry for my wrong wording of the situation. I just meant that just because they are dominating in the league, doesn't mean they will dominate UCL as well. That is why I gave Chelsea example, because last season City dominated the league and then lost to Chelsea, which is why I feel like that's the type of situation City "may" find themselves in all over again.

Obviously it may not be like that, they may end up winning as well, what I am trying to say is not that they will lose, all I wanted to say is that there is a chance they may lose. I mean how many teams are leading a big league? Bayern with Bundesliga, PSG with ligue 1, Real Madrid with La Liga, City with EPL. We all know that eventually one of them will be eliminated, and maybe some team who doesn't even lead their league may end up winning as well.

It is really a pathetic display from India and I remember the last tour of India to South Africa where India dominated the host in all departments and won the ODI series as well as Yuzvendra Chahal and Kuldeep Yadav were peak in their form at those times. Now, India is struggling under new coach and captain and I guess it would be too blender mistake from India management to change both of these role at a same time as transition is becoming too hard unnecessarily.

Another thing, India need to address immediately is, hectic schedule of matches. India must be the only country, I guess keeps on playing since last T20 WC and in next 2 months, IPL will start again and not sure what are series are scheduled in between for those 2 months of time as revenue is the only goal for BCCI and performance is only next to that, it seems.

Lakers managed to beat Orlando but we have to remember that Orlando is literally at the bottom of the league with only 8 wins. So, it was always expected of Lakers to win against Orlando and for some reason people are acting like that is a big win. On top of that they are shopping Westbrook now, or at least that is what was talked about on Reddit, and Rockets were interested in him.

A Wall for Westbrook trade could realistically happen and that would be even worse for Lakers as well. Lakers just need to find a way to play Westbrook better, they haven't done that all year and they are acting like Westbrook is the problem. They should have gotten a better player to start off with, he just doesn't fit the system, but if they really want to change something then it should be their head coach and not westbrook, I am not his big fan but at least he is working hard.

Champions league is a different beast, City has been doing as well as hoped and still lost last year. I mean if you asked 100 people, 90+ would say that City would beat Chelsea but we know how it turned out. Champions league is elimination level and just because of that, it becomes a bit of a problem for teams like City. They could be great teams, they could be awesome in a league format, but when it comes to elimination games, they could lose some games.

We have seen this with Liverpool before as well, while becoming champions in their league, they were horrible at champions league and lost. So, it is not really easy to achieve it all at the same time, sometimes it takes a bit of a time. Maybe this is their year and they will be good, or maybe this is once again another year where they will realize being great in the league means nothing.

There are two different type of superstitions that you could have, and one of them is not a problem or even good whereas the other could be a problem and you would be right. If the one you have is like "holding this special coin in my hand while trading" then you are basically still trading like you normally would without the coin but just holding a coin meanwhile and that would not change anything and it would not hurt you at all and that is not a problem at all.

However, if it is like "I have to buy at even numbers" or something that changes the way you gamble, then you could have a problem, like you are fine with selling at 37k or 35k but can't at 36? That could hurt you. So you need to know the difference between harmful and innocent versions.

I would say that it is not even about the fix, they can fix it and that could be done but the reality is that we can't always do this, we need to realize that we are not in a situation like that, we are talking about lightlord barely ever doing anything. The fact that he hasn't responded in months is a big proof of that.

Problems could happen, and zodiac mentioned that they are working on it and they will definitely fix it, they are good at development process of the business, but that is not enough. If zodiac is the new chief then we should know about it, he could be a high level staff as well and we need to know about it, that is very key right now.

That is why people ask for the team to doxx themselves in projects. The fact that if they scam you, at least you have their name and so forth matters, but at the same time it is not just for to make sure you won't be scammed, you could still be scammed and not be able to do anything about it. The main and biggest reason is that you could literally see them doing work before they started this one, and that matters.

If a person who is in charge or a project worked on another project for years, then it makes sense of him to start another project and that is a great deal, if that person is anonymous then how would we know if they did anything similar before? So, knowing who is in-charge of a project matters a lot when it comes to crypto, it allows you to know if you should trust them or not and without trust then there is nothing in crypto left to invest.

Okay so we have two possible outcomes, one is a bank running with your money, and the other is tether running with your money. Which one do you really think is more possible? I mean not like banks never collapse, they do, and I have seen it but it is such a rare occasion that it is not a common threat.

Plus, governments guarantee a certain amount of your money as well, which makes it easier for people to trust banks unless they have a huge amount. Whereas Tether is just a company and they are not even registered in most important places, last I remember they had like BAHAMAS registration or something. Which one looks more suspicious? I have to say even though I dislike fiat, I rather hold dollars than USDT (although I prefer crypto over dollars as well).

Everyone looks like they are losing money left and right and they are complaining about the drop and the doom/gloom of the market seems at all time high. This looks like the perfect time to get into crypto right now. I do not have too much money and I am looking into some investments but if it doesn't happen I am going 25% btc, 25% eth, 25% bnb, and lastly 25% ltc.

I will honestly do this with the money I have right now, it is definitely possible for these to increase a lot. Even if they do 2x, it will not be a huge amount for me, I am not rich, but no matter how much it increases, it is better than keep the money at same value, going higher even if it is a little amount still matters.

I both agree and disagree. I believe that KYC for withdrawal is definitely bad, there is no question about that, however I do not think that KYC for continue to gamble is not really fair neither. This is why if there will ever be a KYC situation then it should be either way before you start gambling, like when you sign up, so that you would not face that ever again, or it should never exist and should never be asked at all.

When you let people do what they want, and then suddenly ask for it, then you may let them get their money but then they have left you an account if they do not want to KYC. What happens if I only deposit and gamble and have like a very high VIP level account and then one day I get super lucky and win something big and I want to withdraw that and I am asked KYC. That would indicate I would end up leaving a high VIP level account if I do not want to continue, still not cool.

Right now, it seems this match is turning upside down. India suddenly took 2 quick wickets to make South Africa into back foot but in these modern days hitting at 5.2 run rate is not a big problem for any team with 7 wickets in hand. Still, if India will be able to keep chipping up wickets then I guess we are going to have this series alive at the end of the day.

Right now, Dussen and Markram are batting with ease as they do not need to rush for scoring below 6 per over. Venkatesh Iyer got ball today and it seems he may more over toward the end as Bhubaneshwar Kumar and Ashwin are too expensive today.

Moreover, I do see this kind of psychological thing; it is like I may hesitate to spend $10 cash but I am not have same time of feeling when spending using my bank card or bitcoins; I mean that by heart I am not getting the feeling of money handling while I do transact in bitcoins, honestly. I am sure this type of psychological approach must be the reason why and how bitcoin and other cryptocurrency based gambling boomed.

I am sure the next big thing in gambling industry definitely based on crypto based and not on fiat casinos. I mean when most people prefer the advanced one hence the innovations will happen on most preferred place and not in outdated ones.