and the downside?
Andrew Yang becomes president, gives everyone on earth $1000 a month simply for existing, and the cost of bread is $100 per loaf. |
|
|
|
Some of the least convincing analysis one way or another I've ever seen lol. Comparing vertical cliff face rises in an artificial pump and dump with sideways noise movement then pretending there is any type of data that can be extrapolated here... |
|
|
|
and perhaps that would be because some BIGGER players
Word on the street is that JayJuanGee alias "mouthpanties" is one of the biggest players of all:  |
|
|
|
I don't know much either... but I have the feeling that nowadays isolated countries do much worse than unions. Just a feeling.
Then why are all the richest countries in the world all small with a few million people and not in the EU? 'Democracy' doesn't scale. Only waste, inefficiency, fraud, and Ponzi scams do. |
|
|
|
In the word "marriage",
you won't find the letter "I",
but you will find "us".
Trollgoossen's life in 2 years:  |
|
|
|
|
Can't wait for them to try and shift blame from decades of Jewish fraud to Brexit for economic collapse and then their faces when nobody buys their explanation. Also, wasn't Last of the V8's a Brexit remainer? (lol)
|
|
|
|
If you ever plan to cash out some hundreds of thousands dollars or even just a few tens of thousands you better be able to prove the legal origin of it (if/when required to do so). Bonus if you can prove and track the entire history of it.
It's basically the same with EVERY asset. Ie: Suppose your father has some expensive Van Gogh. He, instead of donating you some (huge) money decides to just give it to you so that you can sell it for a huge amount of banking fiat in a Sotheby's auction and set you for life. But neither of you two declare the donation not pay the taxes (obviously). -> REKT!
Well, the same happens with Bitcoin. You need to prove how you obtained them, and when. You need to prove you didn't sold them previously and not pay due taxes. You need to pay your taxes.
And it is the same with cash.... it is just that in small quantities you can just USE it for daily expenses, etc... But you can't go use it to buy a home, a car, or anything "expensive" without having to prove the full trace of it.
For small quantities there's not much need to care though.
This is why Ibian lives on a shrimp boat and Elwar on a floating piece of styrofoam. |
|
|
|
Where's Last of the V8s? What have you done with him?
He's upset Basel III regulations cemented physical metals as the base of Exter's pyramid and not a word was spoken about imaginary, valueless, digital shitcoins that day. |
|
|
|
Carbon credits are an Enron scam.  |
|
|
|
Assuming it’s all completely innocent, we still end up in the same place. Bitmex does not have an acceptable level of liquidity to support market orders. Which is kinda important.
Why are you even pretending bucketshops aren't scams BY DEFINITION. "Support market orders"  It's not a fucking market. It's like a guy standing in an alleyway with 3 cups telling people to guess which one the ball is underneath. The Dow and Comex are scam bucketshops too. |
|
|
|
I honestly prefer chalkboard, if the chalk is good.
You cannot be a rational or logical person and prefer chalk over whiteboard. There's an inherent dirtiness to chalk. The board represents forward evolution in the form of leveraging the mind in order to create tools that allow a mastery over the environment. The chalk is the antithesis of said phenomenon. It embodies the spirit of a wild plains negro rolling around in the dirt. The environment is defeating you instead. Have you actually used a whiteboard and chalkboard for any significant periods of time? Whiteboards are fucking annoying. Pens always run out. You always get that shitty marker on your hands that is hard to wash off. It feels unpleasant to write on it. You can't as easily correct minor mistakes. Markers always leave residue. Chalkboards on the other hand feel satisfying to write on. You can quickly erase minor mistake and then just wash your fucking hands with no residue. And when you're cleaning the board all it takes is two swipes with a window wiper to clear and dry the board without residue. There's just no argument here, and anyone I know who actually has to write anything during lectures agrees. The only ones disagreeing are degenerate social "scientists" who read pleb tier power point presentations. Are you a degenerate social scientist? Do you advocate for full blown socialism? I would say from the sociological perspective the only function of a tribe/village/city-state/nation is a grouping of common genetics/ancestry utilizing a decision making process based around the greater good of said group. In this manner, any type of grouping whether it's humans or animals is always going to technically be socialist in nature to some extent. In terms of humans, any organizational structure not operating under a form of ethnocentric nationalism would be the unsustainable outlier doomed for implosion and reversion back to the norm of ethnocentrism (aka some technicality of socialism). For instance, this is why the socialist mandate of breaking up of monopolies exists. Or tariffs, another ethnocentric, socialist trait. The modern (Jewish occupied) west is crumbling because it pushes all the negative aspects of socialism while rejecting the only positive ones such as the breaking up of monopolies and tariffs. A real world civilization requires some capitalist and some technically socialist traits to not implode. If you were to not break up any monopolies, things like a Comcast or Amazon monopoly would eventually be your new tyrannical, all-powerful dictator by default. Humans in the aggregate will enforce ethnocentrism just like they do in prison, but if your new dictator through business monopoly doesn't, you have left the natural order and are once again doomed for implosion. Woops, it looks like those pesky Natzees were onto something. |
|
|
|
I honestly prefer chalkboard, if the chalk is good.
You cannot be a rational or logical person and prefer chalk over whiteboard. There's an inherent dirtiness to chalk. The board represents forward evolution in the form of leveraging the mind in order to create tools that allow a mastery over the environment. The chalk is the antithesis of said phenomenon. It embodies the spirit of a wild plains negro rolling around in the dirt. The environment is defeating you instead. |
|
|
|
|
What kind of moron uses a chalkboard instead of a whiteboard in the year 2019. Better yet, why do you need an interpreter who is doing a half ass and inefficient job just reading shit out of a book and writing it on a board when you can just read the book yourself?
|
|
|
|
|
I like how the Google engineers made JayJuanGee spell "ratt" incorrectly in every post to make him seem more human.
|
|
|
|
Every tradingview analyst are always right in hindsight. But is there someone you believe in based on past performance?
Can't learn to trade without trial by fire and having been both in the red and in the black on margin. Until both of those things have happened several times, you will always be crap. It's not possible to learn risk management without ever having risked anything. |
|
|
|
Holy freaking shit what a freaking shitshow did I miss? Wasn’t planning to see the annoying $3xxx again... arrrgh
I'm not sure how much more obvious they can make it that bitcoin is entirely ESF controlled than by attempting to rig gold, silver, platinum, AND bitcoin downwards all at the exact same millisecond. The false narrative they're attempting to portray is that the Jewish federal reserve scam note is somehow the base of Exter's pyramid and everything else is a derivative. When it's this obvious the ESF is manipulating the bitcoin market along with metals, the real thing you should be questioning is why they allowed bitcoin to go from $200 to $20,000 but continue to supress metals 24/7. And you should also be questioning just how much of that $200 to $20,000 move was artificial ESF involvement since it's retardedly obvious they are involved in these markets. And the vast hoard of In-Q-Tel coins they acquired at like $2 a piece. Do they still exist or were they all dumped at $20,000 to fund their pizzagate parties? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
