I did not mean about ways to bypass the ban, but I wanted to give an example of a country that banned a software wallet.


I do not know, but in the end developers are human beings, no matter how much they love decentralization or privacy, many have families and friends and will not try to continue developing illegal ideas, see what happened with Wasabi wallet or mining pools that have ban US blacklists bitcoin addresses or even theymos and mixing services.

Staking is not linked to your wallet, meaning that if you move your coin from one wallet to another, you will enjoy this feature, but rather it is linked to the currency. If it works with the Proof of Stake algorithm, then any wallet that supports staking will be sufficient to fulfill the purpose, otherwise you risk your money with a third party, that third party manages it in exchange for giving you a fixed return.

It is closer to what happens in bank deposits, but here there are no regulators that guarantee your assets.

instead of trust wallet https://www.stakingrewards.com is the best option and binance staking is the worst option

They are not related to a specific software or wallet, but rather to standard.
Here are some of the forum members' efforts:

Bitcoin Message Tool - command-line signer & verifier
Sign and verify easily with BitcoinMessageTools Github: https://github.com/shadowy-pycoder/BitcoinMessageTools

Warning, use the above tools at your own risk and make sure that the private key does not contain any bitcoins.

You can sign/verify bitcoin messages using Sign using RFC6979 standard or Electrum standard

I have always described people who promise you that you will get a guaranteed profit using a certain method, as scammer.

The market is difficult to trade, and everyone who gives you advice expresses his own analysis of the market and disclaims any responsibility or guarantee because you will get a profit, and he will not tell you that your profit is guaranteed.

Why don't you use this method by yourself, the only reason you don't do it is if you're looking for fame, you use a forum that promotes privacy and you haven't published your personal photo or private data.

If third-party analysis and stricter regulatory restrictions happen, Justin won't be the only one in prison, CZ will be first on that list.
People should learn that investing in these stablecoins is dangerous, let alone a currency that is managed by someone who has a long history of scam activities.

This is an additional reason to stay away from investing in that currency, imagine this is the way he deals with his wallet.

Why the hell is this board, does Justin Sun have a Bitcointalk account?

OR Scam Accusations

The reason that makes those coins or solutions are worthless is that they are cosmetic solutions to a future problem for Bitcoin, since most of hard forks were focused on increasing the block size to 16 or 32 megabytes, reducing the average time between each block, Algorithms, or coin distribution.

In the past, people used to invest in these forks because they believed that they would be valuable if Bitcoin failed, or the possibility of mining without ASCI devices, but these options have been absent in recent years due to proof-of-stake coins and the difficulty in believing the possibility of Bitcoin failure.

私の友人の一人に、この取引を行うことができるかどうか尋ねてから、ここにログインしてあなたに手紙を書くように依頼します.

Unless these fees are unreasonable, such as some cases in which the user made a mistake by reflecting the value of the transaction and fees An unknown transferer has just paid around $47K in fees to make a $194 Bitcoin transaction. Oops!, the possibilities are many.

Some factors due to user ignorance:
Using old addresses as Legacy (P2PKH) address, using a wallet that has poor programming or doesn't allow you to adjust fees.

Some compulsory factors:
Wants the transaction in the next block.
RBF or CPFP (Child-Pays-For-Parent) transaction.

In very rare cases, paying extremely high fees may be a method of money laundering or tax evasion.

When you say staking, this indicates two things, that the currency works on the principle of proof of stake, or that there is a service that gives you a return from the deposit.

POS coins lose their value in the long run. It is true that money increases by a certain percentage, but its value after the increase is less than its real value, and therefore you lose the value of your money.

The services that give you a return from the deposit are good, but they are central and you need to trust them, as it is possible and in an instant to lose your capital without compensation.

If you are looking for value, you will definitely stay away from all staking coins and services.

Congratulations, I thought it was 10,000 posts but 1000 posts is still a tough number.
Why is your experience limited to campaign signatures, it is a small part of the forum, try to visit more boards and you will discover more information.

I do not rule out that we will soon hear, you must verify your identity to download bitcoin wallet, and although regulations are not the reason, you cannot download Bitcoin-core in UK, so what is the most that governments can and cannot do?


Can they stop SPV wallets servers?
Track developers of open source code or block access to it.
Issuing a law that prevents employees from downloading these applications, just as it happens with Tik Tok.
That the taxes be valid from a specific wallet.

Or are all these solutions useless

I do not think so, otherwise the growth in the size of the blockchain would be linear and not in this way.

The reason for this is that during 2017, SegWit softfork which theoretically allowed the block size to expand to 4 million weight units even though we kept the block capacity at 1MB.
Therefore, theoretically, the block limits are 1 megabyte, but the data inside is of a larger size.

And with upgrades like the Schnorr Signature, I think we'll get to 1 terabyte before 2030.

If we compare Block Block 1000 size only 0.216 KB and Block 787719 size is 2123.675 KB

77
77
77

新しい MacOS マルウェアがインターネット上で拡散しています。



https://twitter.com/phd_phuc/status/1651001139750420480

このウイルスは、暗号ウォレットを含む次の情報に影響を与えます。

デスクトップ暗号通貨ウォレット:

• Electrum
• Exodus
• Atomic
• Coinomi

Windows や Chromium ベースをターゲットにするなど、多くのオペレーティング システムで実行されています。

(英語): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5450471.0

The methodology undertaken by El Salvador was very hasty, which led to a bad impression of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin is still in its early stages of becoming a global reserve currency, but it is a small leap in the direction of changing the global reserve currency and replacing it from the dollar to another currency.

Bitcoin will not be mostly that currency, but it will be a currency for international trade, as the acceptability of Bitcoin, ease of conducting transactions and high transparency is suitable for it to be a currency of international trade.

Will it be accepted by all countries? Yes, but for international trade.

When you sign the message, you give the second party, the bitcoin address, the message, and the signature, and therefore there is no encrypted content, as the goal is to prove ownership of the account, while in PGP the goal is to hide the message so that the second party cannot read it.


The main differences could be:

• Bitcoin Sign/Verify Messages can be made and verified offline.
• In PGP you need to send it or fetch it from any keyserver.

• Bitcoin Sign/Verify Messages isn't to send an encryption message it is public data.
• in PGP you need to send it privately.

I think the only problem is that signing a message using Bech32 addresses or bc1 addresses does not follow a specific standard, and therefore you may encounter problems verifying messages if you do not specify the software.

I browsed some data on the first page and the distribution of products is very random, as the products that appeared to me are:
Male perfume to BMW replacement Tire to Spare breaks (NISSAN)
What is the relationship between all these products or why do they appear in this order?
The design needs a lot of work and you need a good marketing campaign to get more offers.

It works fine with me, I'm using Tor browser.

インターネット上のページが日本語に翻訳されていない場合、またはコンテンツが日本語である場合、ここに投稿する利点は何ですか
ページの読み込みが非常に遅い。
ゲームをプレイするだけでお金を稼ぐという考えは古く、もはやホットな話題ではありません。
個人データを匿名のチームに送信する必要があるのはなぜですか

I am surprised that there are more than 20 responses above that did not mention non-signature campaigns boards such as Serious discussion and Ivory Tower

I will use Bitcointalk Merit Dashboard Link https://public.tableau.com/profile/ddmrddmr#!/vizhome/BitcointalkMeritDashboard/GlobalSummary to give a general overview.

Thanks @DdmrDdmr and you can share with us more analytical data.



If you compare this data with any other board, you will find that by removing signature campaigns, the number of content in the forum will decrease by an estimated percentage, and 95% of accounts may stop posting.

Comparing the activity between these boards and any other board will show you the difference.

https://twitter.com/TrustWallet/status/1649699428733947906?cxt=HHwWhMDQvfq49OQtAAAA

https://community.trustwallet.com/t/wasm-vulnerability-incident-update-and-recommended-actions/750786


In short they say, Old accounts are still vulnerable to this hack.