This is not true even for "WHAT IF". We are talking about martingale here, do you really think the chances of winning are likely to happen using that method even though we have a big capital for it? Even a whale will start at the very lowest possible amount to bet, double the bet for every loss will kill any bankroll no matter how much it is. They might win at maybe 4th, or 5th bet but the amount lost is much compared to winning at their whole session.

Actually, martingale is not the problem here but OP's mindset. Who will take the risk playing on dice where it's the only last few dollars remaining on his wallet.

He thinks that using martingale is a good decision and gambles his remaining money. OP overthinks too much thinking he will gain profit in return.

Not that actually hard for me because there's no way I will put money on Vargas whatever the odds. I even like Magsayo's odds to up more as even how good the challenger is, my money will be only to Magsayo. I will put away my bettor's side just to side with the bookies. Magsayo will win here and I'm sure of that.

If he failed to succeed on his first title defense, just imagine what's the effect for it for Magsayo. That's why I'm seeing him will do everything and even as a champion, he will be aggressive since there are lots of things that he will lose once he failed to win this fight.

It's good that we getting lots of views and opinions about the fight regardless if they are biased or not. It's still a good reference.

As long as their predictions and speculations are backed with good analysis and technical aspects, then we can say that was a good read and not totally pure biased. There are analysis that is just commenting on things out of their favoritism.

If predictions will be like for example, Stephen A. Smith in basketball where no analysis is involved and just predicting things, that was a total BS and can't help us with the analysis we are making before placing a bet.

Canelo winning in their rematch is not an advantage. How does it become an advantage for Canelo? If that was a dominant win by Canelo, no one will even bother to get this trilogy done. If it's a clean win, there should be no trilogy now but look at what happened?

This trilogy was being asked for several years now because that wasn't really a smooth win by Canelo. There are questions that needed to be answered and the trilogy will settle it all. It's always an advantage to Canelo that he's younger since I, II, and this upcoming III.

But watching those 2 previous fights, can we really say that Canelo has all the advantages? No.

No worries, that's unlikely won't happen. Just imagined how much the Warriors will spend to get Durant to re-sign to them. Not a good idea to get Durant involved in their Championship lineup. It's not that they don't need Durant, but salary-cap wisely, there's no need to spend more for another superstar.

They can use their remaining cap to acquire role players that can improve their second squad.

Lots of good prospects at the free agency that they can target instead of getting Kevin Durant's service that's now entering his post-prime period.

In reality, yes. There's no 100% way that a person can avoid gambling. Gambling-related stuff is everywhere and even just a simple listening to the radio, watching TV, browsing a Facebook news feed and Tiktok reels, there's a chance that someone can encounter gambling.

Gambling is already part of our society. It's good for me that these persons will encounter gambling as not all of them will be hooked on it. Trust me, it's not really on the environment but on how those people will react once they saw gambling.

Like here in our place, we are a gambling-friendly country and almost all gambling is here but in our circle of friends, I think only 2-3 out of 10+ people are hooked on gambling and those are not even addicted. I mean, I'm the most addicted lol.

See what I'm trying to picture out here? It's on people if they will gamble, not on anything.

If you are lucky, then you are lucky. In that story, that person didn't really become addicted to the process but take advantage of his luck.

Instead of pushing more, the money that came from the profit was used wisely.

We all have that luck moment in gambling but in most cases, we are being carried away instead of stopping. There's already a profit but since most people feel lucky, they will push more thinking they will grab more money. But what happened next? We already know that.

There's really a situation where gambling turned people's futures for good. It's just that, we should know when to stop once we reached that moment.

I can't remember a site that only features full slot games. I don't know if those sites exist. In casino gambling sites, it's not limited to slots as the only games available there. If you have a good time enjoying slots, why has it becomes a necessary thing to just try a site that only featured slots?

What's the difference between using usual casino sites and slot-only featured sites?

And besides, most popular gambling casino sites offer lots of variety of slot games. You have to try those sites rather than look for your preferred one.

Why the hell in the first place you will undergo a KYC to a site that's not even worthy to put some trust. Of course, to minimize the risks, only follow KYC procedures on a reputable site or those that are in the operation for a long already.

In most gambling sites, KYC is not a mandatory thing but it will just possibly ask depending on your account activity like in most cases when you won big or something fishy is happening on the site. Shouldn't be a bad idea to undergo KYC if we are talking about reputable sites.

Don't make things too much complicated.

That might be true but didn't you know that GGG is already in his post-prime when he fought against Canelo in their rematch? In that fight, Canelo was put on his limit and the result is even doubted by most boxing fans. GGG at around 40 years just crashed Murata with a Technical Knockout victory. On other hand, Canelo loses against a boxer that was in his same league which others don't expect.

When we talked about GGG, don't ever put age does matter as the main disadvantage. If he will lose here, it means Canelo just outbox him but that's not because of GGG's age. We can compare them in technical aspects but it doesn't mean all the advantages are on Canelo because he is much younger.

What if let's say GGG wins here, is that statement of yours about his age will now changed?

Loyalty wins. I think Kevon Looney is receiving a much good offer on other teams better than the $25M for 3 years term by the Golden State Warriors but he remains loyal to the team who drafted him. As the article pointed out, a contract extension is somehow a good appreciation of that said player.

The Warriors did a good job on retaining Looney as they have already given up some of their key players recently. It seems that the Warriors are now considering improving their inside strength on both offense and defense. I wonder if they will give up again another player that contributed to their championship run this year.

I think Moneyline odds are not that catchy for SMB in pre-game.

Handicap odds for SMB are just around 1.8 so if my thinking is correct, ML odds for SMB are playing at about 1.5-1.6, or who else able to place a bet on them?

Northport sucks. They destroy my handicap. They are able to make the game close the entire game until falls out and becomes not consistent in the 4th Quarter. They even have a chance to beat SMB even if JuneMar Fajardo is playing well if only they maintain that good performance until the end.

Did the gambling site put that auto bet feature for profit-getting purposes? Of course, no. It was a feature to provide convenience for their users. Is that a stupid thing to implement? Can you explain how it becomes a stupid thing?

If you think auto-bet is a profit-making tool, then it will become a stupid thing but for the real purpose, it's not.

Gambling sites obviously don't put that feature for that profit purpose and I don't understand why we should lead on thinking like that.

Donnie Nietes is one of the PH great boxers in the Bantamweight division. What do you think guys, is this might be his last fight regardless of the result? Time is catching up to him and at 40 years of age, he is now showing signs of slowing down although he still won a title match after being inactive for over 2 years.

Kazuto Ioka will surely want his revenge and quite an advantage for him is that the fight will be held in his home country. He actively fights year by year since he lost to Nietes in 2018 and never lost yet in his last 5 matches. This will be a good title defense for him.

Losing money is likely to get when gambling or participating in MLM schemes but the process is different.

MLM is more used in investing where getting referrals is the key to making profits.
In gambling, I think there's no need for any explanation. Do you have a gambling experience alreadY?

The good part is, if play right, you won't actually lose money at both. How to play it right? That's another need for a separate discussion.

What if these people are responsible even addicted? Is that wrong? Is that acceptable?

If it's all about hereditary then these type of people already knows the risks of gambling.

It's better to take care of those people who aren't like that instead of focusing our eyes on those people who have already been into gambling for a long or been influenced early because of that inherited thing pointing to gambling.

That's why I said I'm doing my best to win because it is more entertaining to win compared when losing. And do you really believe that those people who are gambling just for entertainment really don't bother when they lose in gambling? That is a hell big no for me.

Don't ever believe that someone will say gambling is for fun. They just say it but what's the reason they gamble in the first place? If everything is for fun, there are lots of ways to make fun but why do they choose to gamble? It's because they are also pursuing a win.


That's why I contradict what OP said that by following those instructions, he thinks we will be successful in gambling.

Where are those thoughts come from?

What does success in gambling means? Is there an exact definition for that?

Who's to blame that PBA is not balanced? Is it because of the dominance of SMC teams? MVP teams? I do not agree with that.

The problem is, that other teams are not even doing their best to become better teams. It's because of the inability to provide competitive salaries. CJ Perez, Terence Romeo, Matt-Ganuellas Rosser, Christian Standhardinger any other players that come from the bottom team, find good salaries at SMC or MVP teams. We can't blame these companies if they afford to offer a good contract to these players.

Players are for career enhancement. "PUSO" and loyalty are not applicable to most players as the goal is to make money out of their profession as that also serves as their source of income. Not all the time they can play basketball so as much as possible if there's an offer coming from big companies, they will consider accepting it right away.

Easier said than done. We are not in the place to say control things if we don't experience yet being a big whale like Phil Mickelson. These guys are capable of spending big on gambling that's why we will never know the feeling they dealt with during their gambling days. These whales are losing big every day but they won't feel it because they still have lots of resources. It's good that after losing millions in gambling on the process, they realized that something worst now happened.

What if they didn't have that experience of losing big? For sure they are still gambling up to today.

That losing experience leads them to stop that's why I don't find it regretful if they lose those big amounts since, in return, they have become a better person later on. Blessing in disguise that they suffer those losses rather than continue to enjoy gambling.

Chemistry is not a problem for the likes of John Wall. He doesn't have that struggling behavior when it comes to adjusting in terms of chemistry regardless of who's teammates he is paired with. He is no doubt one of the best front runners on the court in the league. However, the core problem of the Clippers signing John Wall is the risk that he might end up on the sideline for long period again. Both Paul George and Kawhi Leonard are already injury-prone and yet they will add another one who is far more injury-prone compared to those two.

If that John Wall scenario will happened for real, I'm sure there will be a time that these 3 stars will be injured at the same time leaving again those Clippers bench to do some adjustment. Instead of pushing for a revamp on their main cast, strengthening the backup players should be the main priority. The Clippers are not a bad team in the first place.