The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.  A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
|
Am willing to sell 25k out of my stash. 450sat you either pay for escrow or send btc first. The rule does not apply to sr members in good standing i.e (no negative trust) and up. Send PM
|
|
|
|
i don t think real estate is similar with any othere ico in my opinion is an original project,i hope you expand also in other countries...
I am sure that will depend on how much they get I can imagine if they reach hard cap it will be much easier to think about such expansion. I don't find it original. There are lots of similar real estate initial coin offerings and there is no sharp distinctive seperating them from each other. All are the product of the same idea. The sector needs something innovative and groundbreaking. To my understanding, no matter where you from, when you buy real estate, its the same process. The aforementioned process is transferred onto a block-chain, and enable multiple clients who might not be financially sound to own a properties. Am not sure how innovative and groundbreaking you expect a real estate purchase to be. Do you want a round trip around the world with each purchase, am kinda confused. Actually you can pay for that round trip with your dividends. So there you go. In a free economy, you bound to be presented with similar ideas. It's up to you to determine the group you feel the most secured with, and you anticipate delivering the maximum return on you investment. Therein lies the distinctive difference between similar ideas. |
|
|
|
No, except for jokes, if it's still not scammers, then everything looks very interesting. I'll even throw it in, but not much. 0.5 etherium is not as much as 100.
It's definitely an interesting/profitable idea under the right group. But these guys are utilizing fake accts to boost thread view, there is probably 10 pages of legit post on this thread and that's overeaching. plus the fake admins etc, so it all smells of scam and I don't see them delivering, they will just take your ether and run. I'll let myself take a chance. In the end, whoever does not take risks, he does not drink champagne. But thanks for the warning, let's see what will happen You welcome and good luck. |
|
|
|
Lol, my post is not meant for you Conier. My guess is you willing to wait it out. it's meant for those that aren't interested in waiting.
But yeah I paid 100sat before it hit the exchange. Now it's been delisted, and there is no exchange, so the price reverts back to what I was paying before it hit the exchange.
If it doesn't suit you. Cry me a river and hold, but for those that hold a large amount and don't feel like holding. I Can buy it off you. Anyway, I will do you a favor and make it all bold
Bravo! [ -- snip --]
[ -- snip --] [ -- snip --] At 0.000001 BTC. Again, good luck with that. 
And oh, you might want to work on your marketing skills. |
|
|
|
well thats it. This smells so fishy, even sharks would hesitate to take a bite.
Jumping off when i break even.
Adios bitch. |
|
|
|
No, except for jokes, if it's still not scammers, then everything looks very interesting. I'll even throw it in, but not much. 0.5 etherium is not as much as 100.
It's definitely an interesting/profitable idea under the right group. But these guys are utilizing fake accts to boost thread view, there is probably 10 pages of legit post on this thread and that's overeaching. plus the fake admins etc, so it all smells of scam and I don't see them delivering, they will just take your ether and run. |
|
|
|
How many have already collected?
16% 2% per day? Really? there's still a whole month ahead. Everything is fine I have no negative trust |
|
|
|
The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
How many have already collected?
16% 2% per day? Really? there's still a whole month ahead. Everything is fine |
|
|
|
So you guessed it, Joe.sixer is probably paid blogger working for bounties. Aimlessly chatting away about irrelevant things just to increase thread views. If this was a legit ICO they will have acknowledged/apologized on the first page for using a black hat trick to try an influence potential investors. Then cease with the paid bloggers/fake accts and let the project grow organically. But Cheats will always be a cheat. So be careful with your hard earned money. The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Just to clarify why we are adding ETH to the ICO, and why that is important:
1. We are discussing with partners for the ICO, these partners need to get paid. If we pay them in MNE this will create an incentive for them to sell MNE and therefore it will be bad for the MNE ecosystem as lots of MNE will be in few hands.
2. While Minereum launch was an isolated announcement on bitcointalk, Artemine will be much bigger than that, and with bigger audience we need to facilitate the way people can join, for new comers ETH is the option in (all) ICOs.
3. By adding ETH it doesn't mean at all that it's bad for MNE, for the contrary:
First, there is more likely wood for new people to join Artemine, and new people that know about Artemine will also know about Minereum for the first time.
And second, All received MNEs will be burned in any case, so the more MNE join Artemine, the less supply there will be in Minereum which is good for the ecosystem.
4. In Artemine, we are allowing users to put their Genesis Addresses for Sale (Automatically), that means, if you are a MNE holder you will have the option to create one (or more) Artemine Addresses, and if you convert your MNE into ART, you will not only get ART but you will also get access to this new market we are trying to create.
About the conversion of Genesis Addresses:
- Users will be able get Artemine by participating with MNE, this includes Genesis Address Holders. They will be able to send the (available) coins from their address and convert into Artemine.
I hope it clarifies, we know it's not easy to please everyone but after the long discussions we had in our team this is what was decided.
So what will the exchange rate be for purchasing ART with MNE? From the whitepaper it says, "For example assuming the exchange rate between ETH and ART is 1 to 1000, users contributing 1 ETH will get 1000 ART in their Genesis Address. This amount will then be automatically mined for X amount of years. ( The same applies for MNE contributions)" Does that mean 1 MNE is also worth 1000 ART  ? The way it's worded makes it seem that way, that's a big deal if so. It would be much better to buy MNE for ART than to use ETH in that case. I believe a price hasn't been set yet. That was just an example Yeah, but the most important question we should be asking is what the exchange rate will be (and it should be heavily in our favor, especially since people bought at $10+). To promote MNE, we should in that example be able to get more using MNE than ETH. People can still get ART using ETH, but it should be better to get it through MNE. If that's not the case then everyone should be rather pissed off and it'll look like the developer never really had MNE interest at heart. Example of what I'd expect (not these exact numbers but conversion rate wise being in our favor): 1 ETH = 1000 ART OR 5 MNE = 1000 ART Yeah that sounds about right and would be nice. |
|
|
|
I hope everyone feels better now. You got your post. Now go read the whitepaper and chill the fuck out.
Well Donkey, how do you feel about ETH being suddenly brought in the ICO? You should have an opinion right? Anxious to hear your feedback on this? Still 100% sure about the reliability?
Sure in a way it's a middle finger to MNE as a whole, but hopefully, the decrease in MNE supply will increase the price.
Also, if someone decides to utilize MNE tech to create a token that's not a joke i.e 300 token ( yeah the vid was super funny) That will improve the value and supply will be scarce.
Am hoping for a bitcoindark-komodo situation. I know the tech is not the same but am using it as an analogy. |
|
|
|
Hi All,
Just to clarify why we are adding ETH to the ICO, and why that is important:
1. We are discussing with partners for the ICO, these partners need to get paid. If we pay them in MNE this will create an incentive for them to sell MNE and therefore it will be bad for the MNE ecosystem as lots of MNE will be in few hands.
2. While Minereum launch was an isolated announcement on bitcointalk, Artemine will be much bigger than that, and with bigger audience we need to facilitate the way people can join, for new comers ETH is the option in (all) ICOs.
3. By adding ETH it doesn't mean at all that it's bad for MNE, for the contrary:
First, there is more likely wood for new people to join Artemine, and new people that know about Artemine will also know about Minereum for the first time.
And second, All received MNEs will be burned in any case, so the more MNE join Artemine, the less supply there will be in Minereum which is good for the ecosystem.
4. In Artemine, we are allowing users to put their Genesis Addresses for Sale (Automatically), that means, if you are a MNE holder you will have the option to create one (or more) Artemine Addresses, and if you convert your MNE into ART, you will not only get ART but you will also get access to this new market we are trying to create.
About the conversion of Genesis Addresses:
- Users will be able get Artemine by participating with MNE, this includes Genesis Address Holders. They will be able to send the (available) coins from their address and convert into Artemine.
I hope it clarifies, we know it's not easy to please everyone but after the long discussions we had in our team this is what was decided.
So what will the exchange rate be for purchasing ART with MNE? From the whitepaper it says, "For example assuming the exchange rate between ETH and ART is 1 to 1000, users contributing 1 ETH will get 1000 ART in their Genesis Address. This amount will then be automatically mined for X amount of years. ( The same applies for MNE contributions)" Does that mean 1 MNE is also worth 1000 ART ? The way it's worded makes it seem that way, that's a big deal if so. It would be much better to buy MNE for ART than to use ETH in that case. I believe a price hasn't been set yet. That was just an example |
|
|
|
So you guessed it, Joe.sixer and Givedusty is probably paid bloggers working for bounties. Aimlessly chatting away about irrelevant things just to increase thread views. If this was a legit ICO they will have acknowledged/apologized on the first page for using a black hat trick to try an influence potential investors. Then cease with the paid bloggers/fake accts and let the project grow organically. But Cheats will always be a cheat. So be careful with your hard earned money. The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
Willing to sell 12,500 TME for 2.08 ETH. You can use the 0x smart contract to trade securely, http://[Suspicious link removed] / 2uVHgdr
Well am willing to sell 125000 for 15 ETH. You get a better deal or you can have 12,500 for 1 ETH |
|
|
|
|
Lol, my post is not meant for you Conier. My guess is you willing to wait it out. it's meant for those that aren't interested in waiting.
But yeah I paid 100sat before it hit the exchange. Now it's been delisted, and there is no exchange, so the price reverts back to what I was paying before it hit the exchange.
If it doesn't suit you. Cry me a river and hold, but for those that hold a large amount and don't feel like holding. I Can buy it off you. Anyway, I will do you a favor and make it all bold
|
|
|
|
So you guessed it, Joe.sixer and Givedusty is probably paid bloggers working for bounties. Aimlessly chatting away about irrelevant things just to increase thread views. If this was a legit ICO they will have acknowledged/apologized on the first page for using a black hat trick to try an influence potential investors. Then cease with the paid bloggers/fake accts and let the project grow organically. But Cheats will always be a cheat. So be careful with your hard earned money. The thread view count is fake, there is not that much interest in this ico, it's just fake accts chatting with each other to boost up the page number. hopefully, potential investors will visit the thread under the poster and make educative guess
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
