|
Boring indeed. That was my favorite TV show.
|
|
|
|
More for my Litecoin hatred https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOCKm4aEIXELitecoin is the second decentralized, peer to peer currency, that was created by the Bitcoin community. No! It wasn't the second, and it's not by the "Bitcoin community"! YARG! |
|
|
|
|
Isn't a downward triangle bearish?
|
|
|
|
I sold with tiny profits. I still can buy, but I don't see it going over 165$.. Tomorrow interesting day for sure.
Inb4 I use the low volume to bring the price to $165 to troll you.  |
|
|
|
|
There's no relation between the waiting list and the price.
If I just wired $10k to MtGox and the price is tanking, I will wait before doing anything.
You could have millions of dollars in MtGox and the price could still go to $10.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, tried that once.
Outside is overrated.
|
|
|
|
|
That total lack of action is killing me.
|
|
|
|
Really enjoyed the podcast! If you really are going to talk about alt-coins next week, could you mention that some Bitcoin users (me, for example) hate Litecoin? I can't stand the pump & dump attitude related to it: Litecoin (...), that's going to be the Facebook to Bitcoin's Myspace We could see the Bitcoin market completely tank and move over to Litecoin in a day https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2u3BNiANVAHowever I'm all in favor of alt-coins with new features, such as Namecoin. Disclaimer: I don't own any Namecoin |
|
|
|
|
Did they bring some friends, or did they immediately die on the battlefield?
|
|
|
|
Are you pointing at $40 as a bottom, or do you simply not have the space to go further down?  |
|
|
|
However best if you don't say to the police both on the same day because you will confuse them.
Yeah, they get angry when they don't understand something. |
|
|
|
|
I know they are not interested, that's the whole point.
The initial argument was that we shouldn't bash on them because they don't have a choice.
They DO have a choice AND they have the resources to defend it.
|
|
|
|
Since Google likes money, and doesn't like getting on the wrong side of the law, they're going to want to do as America wants.
So Google doesn't have to, it simply chooses to comply in order to have the path of least resistance. Imagine if Google was in Sweden. I'm pretty sure they would have an army of lawyers ready to eat up any legal threats from the US. |
|
|
|
Also, I did write to them about licensing and they did respond. *shrugs*
Well, would you be so kind as to give us the information? What is on the website is minimal, at best. |
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2mdYX1nF_Y"The one thing that's missing, but that will soon be developed, it's a reliable e-cash. A method where buying on the internet you can transfer funds from A to B, without A knowing B or B knowing A. The way in wich I can take a 20 dollar bill and hand it over to you and there's no record of where it came from. And you may get that without knowing who I am. That kind of thing will develop on the Internet." This man was a genius.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoins are hotter than ever. I don't think what happened in 2011 can really apply to what's going on now.
This time it's different. |
|
|
|
YouTube is only doing that because it has to.
Does it? Shouldn't be that hard for Google to move some of its servers in another jurisdiction... Or even to create another corporation, if needed. |
|
|
|
I sooooo want one! Unfortunately, I still haven't received any answer from my inquiries.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
