Compering Lauda with escrow.ms is only viable with the feedback of their trust page. I don't think the OP was talking about only the feedback page but the whole escrow.ms thing. Lauda banned herself and wanted to disappear with her own will. If she would not decide to disappear then she would still thrive.
Lauda asked to be banned after he was exposed for plagiarism that ruined his reputation, and he is a male but you can call him it if you want. Punishment for multiple cases of plagiarism is permaban so he decided to perform hara-kiri. May be I messed up my memory but as far as I remember the plagiarism thing happened a long time ago and after discovering it we also passed long years. When Lauda asked for banning herself, at that time there were nothing existed, she was doing well and the good bye thread came just suddenly. Again I may messed up my memory, after all I am ageing 🤣 Lauda male or female or shemale (😉) still is a mystery. But she was a cat for sure. |
|
|
|
It's not only you, me, and almost part of gamblers same think like you. According to the psychology of science, A habit like this comes purpose to return back the lost money. Nothing wrong when gambling things like this, But the problem will come getting bigger if he sells property and wealth to deposit and repeat it again.
No way, I have been there before although I did not need to sell property but it was not any better too. Going back to there make no sense. I did in betnomi, but I have a bit of control if I lost the amount of money to close the laptop until tomorrow.
I accepted the loss. When you accept something it become easier to handle. |
|
|
|
too bad, I missed the event that has passed, now I can't wait for the next event that will be held by 4CryptoBet.  Those events, I have no idea how they play but still when you have only two options to pick then why not pick one and take chance. It worked once for me LOL but I was not able to fill up the condition of 15x wager requirement. Played some bets with my deposits and withdraw. With the bonus I think I made something around $350 from $150 before started losing all. Let's wait for another promo, in-fact from last few weeks I activated the notification for the games and rounds section for freebies. It's fun 🤣 |
|
|
|
Was out (am still out but en route to a tv) and was able to check around 10 mins left to see it was 2-2. Thought that was it. A bit unlike Arsenal to fire home late goals so emphatically (or was one an own goal or something) but damn, that was close.
Arsenal are doing pretty good in this season. The team is positive but in the last match against City they did not seem much in the match. I was expecting them to win against City. Finally, I decided to go against Liverpool and there we go. It's a good win. I should continue doing the same and let us win? Not sure what to make of it as I watched first half
I did not bother to watch the match. Saw the result on flashscores because I was just curious to check the score. |
|
|
|
|
Well I am done with Betnomi, fucked up and lost all deposits. The only way now to go back if I am receiving any free bets 🤣
My usual gambling habit seems still there. When losing few slips then I get too much frustrated and make a double or three fold slip but eventually lose it. And the day was bad too for favorite teams in Europa League on the last Tuesday.
|
|
|
|
I once tried to add BTCPay on one of my hobby project but later I abandoned the entire project. It did not look much harder for someone who have basic web scripting language knowledge. Someone with knowing basic php should be able to connect the codes easily for professional it should be a piece of cake. If you know the history of Bitpay then I don't think you will need to check any review about it. |
|
|
|
Let's ban KTChampions for rest of the matches of this round. I can bet he will still stay in number one. He is too good for others. When I get an exact score I check what he got and find he got it too. Fuck you KTChampions 😘
I agree with it! Tembolee that this scoundrel is in the lead not only in the pool of the Champions League. Yes. I will put together a DAO proposal to vote KTChampions out for the second leg. And also, we will investigate if he has made financial dealings in his personal account without disclosing it to us, and dock him 50 points. He will probably still end up winning anyway. Let's do something to create awareness against KTChampions and ban him for the 2nd leg. You, icopress, and me which makes total 3 votes. Who else is joining with us? 🤣 Is anyone else annoyed the legs are so far apart? I'm looking forward to meeting Real, but then we have to wait for March to see them again. I don't really remember having to wait that long. CL is always like that, isn't it? It's hard to take a side. I am personally happy that I stepped one ahead. Just need to continue some decent runs. |
|
|
|
I believe that these sticky topics created by authors with negative Trust should not be sticky anymore, as they do not offer credibility to the boards they belong, to the ones which read them and to the forum as a whole. It's a situation similar to the one related to DT2 users with negative Trust. However, if that situation is difficult to be solved, this one has real chances to be solved, if there is willing about doing so.
None does matter except the contents of the topic. The contents are still useful, still a good guide to report a scam accusation. So all seems good. Lauda also had negative trust even before he left the forum and got banned, other members found some cases when he did plagiarism in his early days, but I think we have several sticky topics from him.
Compering Lauda with escrow.ms is only viable with the feedback of their trust page. I don't think the OP was talking about only the feedback page but the whole escrow.ms thing. Lauda banned herself and wanted to disappear with her own will. If she would not decide to disappear then she would still thrive. After rewriting their topics, should the new OP credit the original author by mentioning their names or just plagiarize them?
I like how you leave troll questions. Good for you 🤣 No, we don't need to know each others, the answer you asked me in another thread. |
|
|
|
However to place the Betnomi freebets, you have to pick at least 2 matches with 1.6 odds or higher each. With @1.8 and @1.67 there is not much I can do and I don't think these picks were super unlikely.
It's hard to find a perfect match with the minimum odd, at least for me. My lucks are not going well this afternoon. Lost a bet of $20 in cricket. Left $10 on the account so went with a three fold one with PSL the bowling team to win, Barca match to have over 1.5 goals and Ajax match to have over 1.5 goals too. Have another two fold where Barca to win and Juventus to win. I know very well that one of the team will slip LOL. Hey @betnomi are there some more freebets for all time loosers?  Don't forget me 😉 |
|
|
|
is very god  and only 0.5% fee Thank god, god is good 😅 I will suggest to stay away from BitPay shit. They will manipulate the customer to use BCH, that's they shill. The hidden fees for CoinPayments sucks. BTCPay Server is the best option but like joniboini suggested it require some work. When you have an IT guy then it's not a big deal. |
|
|
|
Curses on KTChampions. I should lock my picks from Round of 16 and copy his for betting...
Let's ban KTChampions for rest of the matches of this round. I can bet he will still stay in number one. He is too good for others. When I get an exact score I check what he got and find he got it too. Fuck you KTChampions 😘 I would almost say the same with certainty but Mbappe apparently made a huge difference on his cameo and if he's back for the return leg, Bayern are going to find it difficult (will Mane be back by then though?).
It was difficult to go with Bayern yesterday considering Messi, Mbappe and Naymer in a team but looking at the match yesterday (if I do not consider the last 10 to 15 minutes) I am pretty sure, PSG is going to need another season to have their first CL title if they ever have it. Bayern was too good and in the next leg, in the home game, PSG have no chance. |
|
|
|
|
Is any of the site out of business?
In the gambling board if these two topics deserve a temp lock then I think most of other threads too. Show me an old gambling mega thread where users are not spamming. I am one of them (FTFS), are you not?
I am not against preventing spams but you can not lock a thread (may be you can just because mods have the access to do it) of a running business while others have the same elements to argue. Make it a fair playground to play not because lightlord said something some times ago.
|
|
|
|
Never mind, don't like the fact you are biased, judgmental. I was only stating a fact that multiple people have given you negative ratings. None of them mention hacking initiatives but extortion, involvement in Ponzi schemes, harassment, and stuff like that. That's what I see. I don't know you and you don't know me. All I know about you is what I can see on your trust page, nothing else. Like I said, if you want me to take this information about the allegedly lost 98 BTCs to Joe, you have to provide much more information. If not, this topic of conversation is over for me. Yeah, you are right, coming to think about it, those are some scary stuff, I used to shill for ponzis taking millions, managed to extort several thousands, even so, I did pretty much harass every single forum DT member. What I don't get, why do you think I was asking for your trust in me? On the contrary I was the one entrusting you with the information on how to get 98 easy bitcoins. Now I realize this could be considered as trolling deserving a ban, but I was wondering if Joe could hack the 100 BTC challenge and split the loot? 50% Joe, 40% You, 10% Me. See? How I managed to trust you without judging a book by it's cover. You are never going to learn your lessons and change from what you are. People changes but you are still the old digaran. But let's be positive. You need more time. Go to vacation again and come back after few more years. |
|
|
|
The article was insightful, but how did it go from " The North Korean hackers used Tornado Cash and Sinbad to launder the crypto they stole from Horizon" when blender was the mixer involved  have they already concluded the change of company names here and before you know it they express doubt in themselves " There are signs the same people might be behind Sinbad and Blender" quite confusing tbh??? That's what someone says when they have a hidden benefit from anything and clearly they are biased in their research statement and it's more like USA vs Russia agenda. Nice write up Elliptic or is it coindesk  Elliptic started, coindesk borrowed the idea. But whatever it is, blender.io was a nice mixer back in the time and it will be a good news for bitcoin ecosystem if they are back. Who cares about USA vs rest of the world as long as Bitcoin exists. |
|
|
|
You seem very patience with your legs, that 2nd match is after more 2 days. I am usually more into maximum next 24 hours event LOL It looks good. City is not at their best but against Nottingham Forest they should have an easy win. Nice odd you got there. The PSG vs Bayern match was unpredictable to me at least. I don't have much knowledge about teams other than Premier League teams. Last night I was feeling like to make some bets and balance were not much too. So I went with all in. That's what I do when my balance is low (lower than I expect) and finish with losing all but seems I was lucky not to loss them. didn't correctly predict the outcome in the Champions League pool, I had 1 - 0 for Inter which I got extremely lucky lol And collecting 1.5 points in Bayern was also a lucky shot. I didn't do much research as my knowledge on them were not much standard too. |
|
|
|
I've just noticed there's a handful of users over on Keybase who are still following Yogg. I can't give details just now as I'm out and about, but will do so later.
Hopefully these people will find out what he did. We can not do anything though on other platforms unless the admin of the platform are not aware and do something about it. |
|
|
|
Just received the 2nd half of my CL pool free bets. Thanks a lot @betnomi & @icopress.  Source: Betnomi, Sportbets Let's see how it goes.  Watford caused the damage for you. That's what happen with me too when I don't go for single but go for double or more. You are chasing the odds and on the way you get unlucky. Waste of the free amount you had. I had over 1 just before the half time at PSG match. Lucky that at least got the stake returned. |
|
|
|
In addition, Betnomi informed me that the following users were credited with free bets. ~
Username: KTChampions $40
~ minimum selection =2
minimum odds = 1.60
minimum total odds = 2.6
Any football event I didn't receive anything. Where can I see this free bet? Maybe I can't see it because I'm not familiar with Bethnomi's interface? And why 40 dollars? If it's a yellow cap freebet, shouldn't I get 50x2 = 100 (I won the yellow cap twice). Would love to hear from other members on how to take advantage of (or at least find) this free bet. Where is my freebies LOL? I mean why are the free bets? Although I have $40 on PSG - Bayern to score over 1 goal which means I need the match to have at least 1 goal to not to lose the stake and 2 goals means I will have around $53. Fingers crossed. I was not home, just got back half an hour ago. It's hard call to pick a winner but I was feeling like to have something to increase the excitement hence the bet. For the pool, I have 1 - 0 for Milan and 1 - 2 for Bayern. All are just random pick without giving much thoughts. Still the whole 2nd half to go. Let's see what we get. |
|
|
|
The live sports max bet issue has been resolved. Players can now wager more than 1$. (Live Sports will soon be available in bonus wagering markets due to this fix).
We apologize for the inconvenience this may have caused some players. And we hope you continue to enjoy your time on our platform.
Good to know it's fixed. It was a pain in the ass although because of this I lost my balance taking longer time but there were some events which I could maximize too. My focus is on with Betnomi, but I may get back to you again. Let's hope I have a good run again. |
|
|
|
Looking from the users profile, I am assuming he is an account seller. An account seller can not be trusted. Seeing he have no history on the forum, you really needed to use a trusted escrow for the deal. It could cost a little fee but you would not need to lose that $400 which was a good amount of money for you. However, you need to provide some evidence so that everyone can justify your case and leave a negative feedback for the user. Right now it's just some words you left for the accuser and asking everyone to believe you. Sorry to hear your loss if that's indeed happened. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
