It depends on your hardware. It will take somewhere between a few hours and a few days.

If he should share this, it then mean that he has disclose the particular coin because by the time elimination started applying on the coins listed, it won't be long before someone finds out which coin they are planning to develop and it simply means creation wealth for someone else. @Op you need to also be careful in disclosing to all of the intending developers because some people would indicate their interest in other to get the information then act on it to rip off the market because based on the little information you have disclosed the getting hands on the particular coin before being made public is nothing short of Inside Information.

Can you share the shortlist of coins?

Can you tell us more about the coin? Is it POS/POW with masternode or only POS? I'm interested but i want to know more about the coin first.

Cheers.

You should take a look at the following websites (more chances of finding a job):

1. XBTFreelancer
2. WorkingForBitcoins
3. cryptogrind
4. Coinality
5. Jobs4Bitcoins
6. BitGigs
7. Digiwave

Take note: Can't vouch for them (since I haven't used them).

---

I think "coupable" is referring to having your own "resume / CV".

If I may add, those Lutherans was just confined around Germany, Austria (if my memory serves me right) and didn't gain enough traction from the Catholic community, maybe they swayed a few but Catholics remain the dominant religious group throughout centuries and Lutherans didn't took off as expected.

Similar to what we are seeing today, after the split there was an attempt by BCH fanboys to overthrow Bitcoin, with negative attacks and spamming the bitcoin network, but they didn't succeed. Community knows better who are behind Bitcoin Cash, all greedy individuals who are trying to portray Bitcoin Cash as the new Bitcoin, but what happened? no support from our community. Just like what we have witnessed during the religious schism in the 15th-16th century.

I believe Gunthar means nastymining, take a look here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1783328.0

P.s : if you want to join it then like any other projects in the crypto world, do your search, study the project, ask trusted members that joined it then take your decision.

Exchanges will not become irrelevant anytime soon.

Instant swap sites have 2-5% margin. They are good for small amounts or one-time deals. But it's impossible to use it for daily trading. You can't compare 2%-5% with exchanges commission of 0%-0.2%.

Not even sure donators funds are needed anymore: sent Theymos a PM months ago to donate and got ignored.
I then decided to support some members of this forum and their projects like OGNasty Tesla PowerWall and other projects. Great stuff.
Besides the "forum" itself there is the community behind it that worths other people support as well.

The more you think about it, the more appropriate it becomes as an analogy. Both sides are rather zealous in their representations that they and only they are the true adherents to the original vision of the idea (either Christianity in this example, or the concept of Bitcoin and Satoshi's original vision where Satoshi is practically a prophet), and both sides spend a great deal of time and energy trying to convert people to their side and vilifying the other side as heretics who are corrupting a pure idea for their own gain. In Christianity, it was the Catholic Church that lost its way and was corrupted and in crypto, it's Bitcoin's Board that refuses to address the block size. The spam attack on the BTC blockchain to try and make it unusable is practically a holy war to try and force people into converting to BCH. The way people behave in both religion and the crypto schism between BTC and BCH, from the self-righteous attitudes they take in regards to the other side to the vilifying or attempts to harm the other system, are strikingly similar.

Many cryptobank projects now working on instant exchange using utility token for crypto-crypto and crypto-fiat exchange
The most anticipated one is Crypterium
I think in the near future, exchange will be used like traditional stock/forex exchange to get profit (speculation), while cryptobank apps used for daily transaction

The point, as far as I understand it, was to make a more functional version of Bitcoin. Remember, the community was paralyzed with unreasonable transaction fees for over a year and there was consistently a backlog of hundreds of thousands of unconfirmed transactions. The block size was increasingly being viewed as inadequate to scale Bitcoin to an expanding user base (and probably still isn't, btw), and the people behind the split were seeking to address this rather than continue in the malaise since it was becoming increasingly clear that Bitcoin's leadership was unwilling or unable (and same difference, really) to institute changes that would keep Bitcoin competitive in the crypto space. It very much felt like the first mover advantage was being squandered and that Bitcoin could eventually fade to irrelevance, and the splitters sought to take corrective action. Whether or not any of that was accomplished or the motives remained pure after the split is another discussion entirely, but at the point of the split, there were entirely logical reasons for it.

What I find interesting is that the split parallels the religious split of the Lutherans from the Catholics (to use a somewhat obscure in this context but totally relevant historical analogy). The Lutherans believed the Catholic church was rife with corruption and special interests for selling indulgences to forgive sins, and believed that splitting from the church and creating their own version of the religion that was more pure and true to the original point of the church was the only way to save their own souls. Essentially, Bitcoin Cash was making the same argument- that splitting and adhering to Satoshi's original vision (which included increasing the block size) was the only way to save Bitcoin. To put it another way, Lutherans were the first hard fork.

Bitcoin is always best as compared to  Bitcoin cash.In a year, we can expect huge raise in the price of bitcoin cash.Bitcoin had good support in the crypto currency market.Now the price of bitcoin cash is on the second place next to bitcoin.

I completely agree, it's funny how people get so tied up on the price of something thinking that only the price and market movements of a coin justify its usefulness.  Have you ever tried to develop or use a dApp?  If not I would research how too first before I would put any money into it so you could see the use case yourself. ... If you yourself can't justify using it, what makes you think it would have any value to anyone else you personally know?
Edit: I think this is more suitable for altcoin discussion sections

It really depends on for what purpose do you need your tokens. Because with ethereum you have many people that have built the infrastructure with many smart contracts and dapps and it might be better in a sense that you can find a lot more information, ask many more people for help etc.Although ETH has it's own decentralized exchanges which other people have built such as EtherDelta.

On waves it is much easier to deploy your tokens as you can do it with simple GUI and thus it makes it faster to deploy tokens. On the other side Waves might be cheaper. Waves might be better in a sense of volume, because there is only one DEX where most of the people trade, where as within ethereum you have different exchanges with different volumes.

I guess that's what makes crypto "unique" at the moment with it's unregulated nature. A group of people can create new coins if they have "ideological" differences. It was the same with ETH coming to rival Bitcoin. But with BTC and BCH, I think it was just an opportunity for more money grabbing, as compared to ETH which was for actually product development.