The domain of the crypto is extremely mobile, and things change with an impressive speed: what was true yesterday will not necessarily be true tomorrow, indeed it will most likely be the opposite.
It is an unexplored territory, and only those who constantly follow the sector can hope to make good profits.
Surely, no one can rest on their laurels.

Theoretically it is a good idea, but if there is really no expense, it becomes impossible to maintain the structure of the system: it is a service that has costs, and who offers it must be able to earn something, otherwise it fails.

The problem is that currently the entire altcoins sector is blocked: there are no really valid projects, and in any case the investors - after having lost large sums of money - have become much more cautious. We will see in the future, for the time being the bounties are only a waste of time.

Libra is the biggest scam put together by the system to block the real cryptocurrencies.
It is totally centralized, and - like your facebook account - it can be blocked without receiving any explanation.
But people are so stupid that they will be fooled.
How sad ...

Diversification is good, so there is some chance that at least one of the coins will sketch upwards.
I wish you great luck, because such a risk deserves to be rewarded.

Money is such a complex domain that not only cannot be explained technically, but even political vision alone is not enough: in large part we go into philosophy, and sometimes speaking of money we end up in metaphysics.

Scams are present in all sectors, and usually the scammed person is equally responsible for the scammer: he did not inform himself, he believed in fantastic promises, he was not careful.
Then, in the "normal" world the company tries to protect the stupid from their own stupidity, in the crypto world this is not possible.

The point is that - if you really succeeded in creating a district based only on cul crypto - you would probably create so many legal and fiscal problems that the authorities would stop you before.
Well, as they say, Good luck!

Hard to say if there is a cause / effect relationship, or the fall of the bitcoin (in fact of the whole crypto sector) it was just a coincidence. Of course it's something to think about.

As annoying as it may be to admit it, the idea of a society without taxes is a contradiction in terms: a society has by definition common parts, which interest everyone, and which must be maintained with the cooperation of all citizens.
With or without bitcoins.

I honestly don't see any possible relationship. And in any case, no superpower has any interest in favoring the development of a VERA cryptomoneta, which would be out of its control.
Instead, he will try to create a fake one.

If I could predict anything about the global economy, I would probably take the Nobel Prize and become a millionaire.
It is true that the forces at stake are practically unknown, all that is seen is only an electoral theater for an ignorant public.

Venezuela has very big problems, which have very deep roots. The fact that he has potrolio makes him interested in the eyes of speculators, and combining currency will certainly not help economic development.

Well, it could be positive, in the sense that bitcoin - with the impossibility of creating inflation - becomes the only safe haven, in addition to gold, or goes to zero because there will be nothing left to exchange it with. Certainly, something dramatic will happen.

Bitcoin has been given up dead for tens of times, and each time it is reborn by moving to a higher level. Eventually, what worries us is the low level of transactions, indicating a lack of dissemination among the public.

Well, in most cases they are safe (but be careful with your personal data...)
Btw, it's very unlikely that you'll have some kind of gain with airdrops, usually you lose your time.

Any innovation, if it is revolutionary, will find a small group of supporters and a large majority of people who are against it, because they are afraid of losing their position rents.
Europe is against Libra essentially because it has not understood what it is, as it has not yet understood bitcoin.

Since the world exists, the economy follows cycles of expansion and contraction, just as there are periods of peace and periods of war.
What is important is not to be caught unprepared, and take advantage of moments of growth to create reserves in times of crisis.
The capable people always make.

There are many predictions, some positive, others negative, and some concern a real recession, if not a global collapse of the economy.
But no one knows for sure what will happen, so - while it is important to use caution - it does not seem to me a good idea to be paralyzed and scared.

The negative interest - which is absurd from a historical and economic point of view - is ultimately nothing but a tax on deposits, therefore an invitation not to hold firm capital.
But I don't see any particular effects on bitcoins: no matter how high the negative interests may be, they cannot stand comparison with the volatility of the crypto world.