Just think about what you would do in Ira's situation. If my brother died and sombody claims he had half of 1 million Bitcoins, I would certainly go to court and try to claim ownership of that money. Even if it looks like the money doesn't exist and the guy who is probably controlling these Bitcoins is a pathological liar. If the court rules that somebody owns me 500000 Bitcoins, it doesn't matter if he actually has the money to pay me right now.
i understand that psychology but ira isnt even asking for CSW to pay 410k coins(50% of 820k) ira is trying to get a judge to rule that there was a partnership, without proof.. end of the old game of 'lack of proof infers proof' game CSW has been playing for 4 years it would be different if iras team were asking for 50% of the assets to be handed to daves estate it would be different if iras team were asking for 410k coins it would be different if ira's team were asking CSW to buy out 50% it would be different if ira's team were asking for compensation but none of these apply the only request being made is to get a judgement that CSW&dave partnership owns bitcoin and IP and all other things involved .. see the difference Before the court can rule about the compensation, it is necessary to define the legal status of the partnership Dave Kleiman/CSW. Most people here know, that CSW used a regular font as Dave's signature, which would mean, that this contract about the partnership is NOT valid. This would be pretty easy to prove for Ira, but he has certainly no interest in proving that there was no partnership, because this would mean that CSW owns 100% of the Bitcoins and the case would be closed. Sure, these Bitcoins most likely are not under Craigs control, but how can Ira know this with certainty? And again: It is not in Ira's interest to prove that these Bitcoins are NOT controlled by CSW. Even if Craig now comes out and says he lied (the reason maybe autism) and never controlled those Bitcoins, the jugde might think, that this is just an obvious tactic to avoid paying Ira's share. |
|
|
|
|
Just think about what you would do in Ira's situation. If my brother died and sombody claims he had half of 1 million Bitcoins, I would certainly go to court and try to claim ownership of that money. Even if it looks like the money doesn't exist and the guy who is probably controlling these Bitcoins is a pathological liar. If the court rules that somebody owns me 500000 Bitcoins, it doesn't matter if he actually has the money to pay me right now.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it is either going up or down with a slight chance to not move at all. This TA is a 100% legit.
|
|
|
|
...snip...
Wait, people are actually “using” bitcoin? Hahaha.
Be ready to be leapfrogged and most likely a nice juicy 51 network attack too cause you guys can’t do even the most basic amount of research.
 Yes, this is very relevant.
It took me some time to finally crack this. If you think this riddle is hard to solve, imagine not having any hints, for the clues I'm giving you nearly solve the riddle, entirely.
"XBT had a Twin Brother, XIC; but the latter will murder his brother, in cold blood, and rob him of his crown and all his glory. The wicked Twin, rising from the sea - who will ruthlessly enslave and rule the world, is marked and will be recognized by all, according to his evil mark and number."
I'll leave it to everyone else to solve this fairly simple riddle. And please don't bother with all the 666 rhetoric, this is gonna require a bit more thinking, but it's there.
In solving this riddle you are likely to find the keys to great fortune; albeit, holding on to that fortune will prove a much greater and painful challenge.
*facepalm*  Craig Wright is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.May I complete this sentence: Craig Wright is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin and Ixcoin is a shitcoin. You're welcome. |
|
|
|
I didn't think that a link to the story was necessary, because 1. My question only relies on the picture and not the story and 2. The story is completly unrelated to cryptocurrencies. Only the picture might have some relation to crypto. |
|
|
|
Found this pic of a "server room", which was made after a german pedophile Adrian V. has been arrested. To me this looks like a mining operation. Can somebody of you name the equipment shown in this picture?  |
|
|
|
Ira Kleiman can now go and tell the court, that Craig Wright, who after 2020 controls the Tulip Trust coins, wants to spend some of his early Bitcoins and to spend his coins anonymously he signed a message to some early blocks, that is pointing away from himself.
He should be jailed to avoid further damage.
Not exactly, but I've been very close. Next step: Jail! https://cryptothenews.com/kleiman-legal-team-presents-new-evidence-of-craig-wrights-fabrication/...
Wright has the keys
While the new evidence was commented by many on Crypto Twitter as showing once and for all Wright is not Satoshi, that’s not the position of the Kleiman team.
They still think that he has access to significant BTC wealth and demand a share of it based on Wright’s alleged partnership with Dave Kleiman in mining the BTC. A week ago they stated that Wright has access to the Bitcoin holdings in question.
...
problem is .. ira and craig are not enemies. craig hired ira to be a 'frenemy' ira knows craig doesnt own anything. but craig bribed him to play along. they are both on the same side trying to delay and cause drama at the communities expense. all so they can out-time the statute of limitations deadline on the australian tax fraud case. ira has never intended to get any 'satoshi coins' ira knows there is no trust.. he is getting paid from craigs other scams cough investors cough. so whatever happens to the case craigs plan is to have it dismissed by his script or by ira's script. all just after the australian statute of limitation elapses. is just a game to both of them even with 100% proof craig never had any stash. Ira will either find another excuse to keep the drama alive for craig a bit longer. or when the date lapses. then dismiss the case what needs to be done is someone else try to do something to get craig locked up Interesting, but maybe someone else is paying Ira to destroy Craig's story. Do you have any info to backup your statement? |
|
|
|
Ira Kleiman can now go and tell the court, that Craig Wright, who after 2020 controls the Tulip Trust coins, wants to spend some of his early Bitcoins and to spend his coins anonymously he signed a message to some early blocks, that is pointing away from himself.
He should be jailed to avoid further damage.
Not exactly, but I've been very close. Next step: Jail! https://cryptothenews.com/kleiman-legal-team-presents-new-evidence-of-craig-wrights-fabrication/...
Wright has the keys
The Plaintiffs had already argued the list was a “forgery intended to deceive Plaintiffs and this Court, and that Wright created it to avoid sanctions pursuant to this Court’s Order.”
They said the new evidence further proves that the list is “not an accurate listing of Wright’s Bitcoin, and that he is still hiding the true list from Plaintiffs and the Court.”
“Said simply, Wright represented these 145 addresses were part of his Bitcoin holdings and were locked in an inaccessible encrypted file. This week, the person that actually controls the private keys to those addresses used those private keys … thus proving the addresses do not belong to Wright.”
While the new evidence was commented by many on Crypto Twitter as showing once and for all Wright is not Satoshi, that’s not the position of the Kleiman team.
They still think that he has access to significant BTC wealth and demand a share of it based on Wright’s alleged partnership with Dave Kleiman in mining the BTC. A week ago they stated that Wright has access to the Bitcoin holdings in question.
...
|
|
|
|
|
Ira Kleiman can now go and tell the court, that Craig Wright, who after 2020 controls the Tulip Trust coins, wants to spend some of his early Bitcoins and to spend his coins anonymously he signed a message to some early blocks, that is pointing away from himself.
He should be jailed to avoid further damage.
|
|
|
|
|
My strategy: Buy at 100$/BTC ..... ----> Sit and wait (aka HODL)
|
|
|
|
Did someone already throw in Andreas M. Antonopoulos as the domain name keeper?
If a domain name belonged to you, would you be wanting opinions from strangers on the internet when you haven't requested any assistance regarding who should receive your property? I'm sure if Cobra needed help making a decision, they would ask. Until then, it's not our place to say. Maybe he did and maybe you simply don't know. Maybe you should stop commenting things that you don't know about? Alternatively, if anyone knows of any individuals or organisations that would be good, feel free to suggest (either here, or privately -- just DM me on Twitter |
|
|
|
|
Did someone already throw in Andreas M. Antonopoulos as the domain name keeper?
|
|
|
|
|
Alcoholics tend to talk shit and some have hallucinations. I wouldn't give a fuck about what he says.
|
|
|
|
|
Bye Bruno. R.I.P. ... oh and ... FUCK TUMORS!
|
|
|
|
Then maybe the moderators here will decide to stop deleting my posts.  The forum rule is no posting twice in a row under 24 hours. If a fresh thought crosses that genius brain of yours and you have to let us know about it, just edit your last post if its the last post in the thread. If somebody else posts after your post, no need - you can make a new post - and it won't be deleted. I've explained that to hv_ at least 4 times but its more fun to pretend you are a victim of the Blockstream Conspiracy than actually acknowledge the rules of the forum. @Nutilda what happened to Bruno? |
|
|
|
|
It is up 2800$ from its 3800$ low despite the corona virus. Looks fine to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin is safe but trading markets are not. Not your keys, not your Bitcoins. Was that simple enough?
|
|
|
|
...
If they put a ban on purchasing and usage in the legal way the effects would be devastating, and if the penalties include jail time, who will risk it?
The rest of the world... Stompix obviously meant "who will risk it [in Russia]". And it's a valid concern, because businesses won't be using it, there won't be exchanges to safely buy coins, and p2p trading is full of scammers. Yes, on a global scale Russia is insignificant to Bitcoin, it was never a major adopter of it anyway, but sadly 150 million people will have to overcome significant obstacles if they'll ever try to use Bitcoin. And maybe some of Russia's neighbors will decide to do the same, just because smaller countries often follow the bigger countries in new policies. Can you imagine that I understood exactly what he meant? |
|
|
|
...
If they put a ban on purchasing and usage in the legal way the effects would be devastating, and if the penalties include jail time, who will risk it?
The rest of the world... |
|
|
|
OP. You can call Bitcoin whatever you want. Bitcoin couldn't care less. You sound like a guy who missed the oportunity to buy early and is butthurt ever since. No one here will take you and your anti Bitcoin rantings serious. You can stop it now.
Bitcoin is not a person so it cannot care by definition. Bitcoin is a number put into a database when you give your three-phased market products to an earlier investor and than hope that another investor will give you more three-phased products in the future in exchange for your two-phased number. You corrected the first part, but didn't correct the second. Additionally you forgot the option, that I can (and I do) buy goods directly with Bitcoin, which makes your 3 phase rubbish obsolete. There is no need to exchange into fiat money. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
