What about the frequency? I've bought all mine used and they are running 700 frequency. Is it better to run them lower for longevity or is it more consistent?
These are underclocked on purpose - they pull less power at lower frequency. If I pumped it up to 700, it'd just be another S7 and i'd have to put the back fan back on and move it to my warehouse. Okay, I see. It was meeting a specific need. Just wondering, thanks! |
|
|
|
Out of curiosity, have you noticed a difference in hash rate versus temp at all? Mine are running at 59-60-59 degrees after some room manipulation. I wondered if it ever really mattered so long as it didn't overheat and shut down over 80. My next step is routing this ducting into the office area and shutting off the heaters. Right now they are venting into a cold warehouse.
Here's a snapshot of now, which is pretty much average for these S7s: https://i.imgur.com/tjKfxts.pngI keep the AC in my office to 60F, and the miner causes it to get up to 64 or so. For the rest of my farm, I keep them venting into an open warehouse just like you do. I haven't seen too much difference in hashrate as long as they're not running at shutdown temps. What about the frequency? I've bought all mine used and they are running 700 frequency. Is it better to run them lower for longevity or is it more consistent? |
|
|
|
This pool has the best community. I have one of Sidehack's hacked S7s (which used to be in Fuzzy's mine) running in my office again - at least another 3th/s to the pool! Running in one of phillipma's silencer boxes. https://i.imgur.com/kcA07t3.jpgYikes! What temp are those boards at with that box? 60c is the current chip temp, but they can get up to 70 or so. Interesting. You must have a good airflow setup. I would have thought that box would be trapping a ton of heat. Had a typo - its 69c up to 74. The box has two openings, so airflow is fine. Here's the back: https://i.imgur.com/i2HjjcC.jpgOut of curiosity, have you noticed a difference in hash rate versus temp at all? Mine are running at 59-60-59 degrees after some room manipulation. I wondered if it ever really mattered so long as it didn't overheat and shut down over 80. My next step is routing this ducting into the office area and shutting off the heaters. Right now they are venting into a cold warehouse. |
|
|
|
This pool has the best community. I have one of Sidehack's hacked S7s (which used to be in Fuzzy's mine) running in my office again - at least another 3th/s to the pool! Running in one of phillipma's silencer boxes. https://i.imgur.com/kcA07t3.jpgYikes! What temp are those boards at with that box? 60c is the current chip temp, but they can get up to 70 or so. Interesting. You must have a good airflow setup. I would have thought that box would be trapping a ton of heat. |
|
|
|
This pool has the best community. I have one of Sidehack's hacked S7s (which used to be in Fuzzy's mine) running in my office again - at least another 3th/s to the pool! Running in one of phillipma's silencer boxes. https://i.imgur.com/kcA07t3.jpgYikes! What temp are those boards at with that box? |
|
|
|
Hey guys can anyone please tell me what is the HS code for the Bitmain APW++ power supply for me to be able to import into USA? I want to buy 26 units but I don’t know the HS code.  Thanks! Anyone? I had just seen it yesterday at work. Importing one from Australia. I am of no help at the moment, but I can certainly find out if the answer has yet to be found by then. |
|
|
|
|
Okay, so after some reading and playing with several machines trying to get my hash rate up, I'm wondering if I'm wasting my time with monitoring it at all.
I don't think I've even got my rate ramped up yet anyway, so the accuracy is fuzzy.
So, in the meantime I figured I would ask this:
Does it make any difference from a work/share/difficulty point whether or not my Avalon machines are chained together or should I try to keep each machine on a different controller? Will my chances be ANY different at all or is it that completely random that they will operate exactly the same whether linked or on separate controllers?
|
|
|
|
confirmed by us on our next block, then payment goes in your wallet, UNLESS some other pool is nice to confirm it, but probably not since the Little bit of satoshi sent with that payment isn't enough for them to do it.
Also it has to mature, so that means 101 confirmations before it is even sent (with a tiny TX fee). As of typing, it has 41 more to go. Okay, I see that now, thank you. Still figuring this out so I can be a pro some day  |
|
|
|
|
On another note;
That last block reward..
Should I have received that in my Exodus wallet by now or is it not confirmed?
|
|
|
|
2 different controllers. They are supposed to be able to handle all machines on 1 controller, but they won't connect when more than 6 are on, so I am running two controllers to split them up. The ATX supply is only on 1 machine. If I unplug machines, the hash rate goes up. Some of them drop as low as 1900 gh/s. As soon as I restart CGMiner they jump up to 3588 gh/s each then fall off from there. https://imgur.com/MnoSdu0https://imgur.com/fI2oGAVLatest image of status chain of 6. No ATX supply. https://imgur.com/kIeaGacI know with the A7, you're not supposed to have more than 5 on a chain. Its possible that's an issue here too. You should be able to plug both your AUC2s to the same controller. You might want to make a thread in Mining Support - it'd get more visibility. 5 That's what I was wondering, so I split into 2 and 3rd is on the way, but the machines running 5 are dropping too. I will post in support. Thank you! Try running four, see if that still causes the problem. Ha! It happens when more than 1 is on the controller. I was just saying the controllers are supposedly able to do 10 is what Parallel Miner said as they only ship 1 controller per 10 units. With one A6 it will hash full speed. Once I connect a second, the hash average per machine added drops. That's what was making me think the controller maybe... |
|
|
|
I can't seem to figure out why I am dropping hash average when multiple A6 machines are chained. I have separated them into 2 controllers: 5 on one controller and 6 on the other. I have another controller on the way to split up even more. My hash rate is dropping to around 2800 gh/s when more than 1 machine is on the controller. I've seen as low as 1900 gh/s though. If I restart the machines, they start at 3580 gh/s and then drop from there, some going as high as 4200 gh/s I've updated firmware for all machines and still nothing. Here is a screen image from one of the controllers: https://imgur.com/kIeaGacupdated image: https://imgur.com/a/jD7Qo |
|
|
|
2 different controllers. They are supposed to be able to handle all machines on 1 controller, but they won't connect when more than 6 are on, so I am running two controllers to split them up. The ATX supply is only on 1 machine. If I unplug machines, the hash rate goes up. Some of them drop as low as 1900 gh/s. As soon as I restart CGMiner they jump up to 3588 gh/s each then fall off from there. https://imgur.com/MnoSdu0https://imgur.com/fI2oGAVLatest image of status chain of 6. No ATX supply. https://imgur.com/kIeaGacI know with the A7, you're not supposed to have more than 5 on a chain. Its possible that's an issue here too. You should be able to plug both your AUC2s to the same controller. You might want to make a thread in Mining Support - it'd get more visibility. 5 That's what I was wondering, so I split into 2 and 3rd is on the way, but the machines running 5 are dropping too. I will post in support. Thank you! |
|
|
|
You also have the one on an ATX psu. Maybe make that the last in the chain vs. the first - if that one drops, the whole chain could drop. What's the screen on your cgminer status look like? 2 different controllers. They are supposed to be able to handle all machines on 1 controller, but they won't connect when more than 6 are on, so I am running two controllers to split them up. The ATX supply is only on 1 machine. If I unplug machines, the hash rate goes up. Some of them drop as low as 1900 gh/s. As soon as I restart CGMiner they jump up to 3588 gh/s each then fall off from there. https://imgur.com/MnoSdu0https://imgur.com/fI2oGAVLatest image of status chain of 6. No ATX supply. https://imgur.com/kIeaGac |
|
|
|
Bear with me, I can get get it to post the images directly, only the link. I posted in between the image parameters.
If I reboot the machines, they hash at what they are supposed to then sort of slow down slowly from there.
New accounts can't post images. Just post the URL to the album. Hashrate drops like that can be caused by a lot of things, but typically it is PSU related. Try to run them at -2 voltage and see if it continues. What PSU are you using? They are 2400 watt PSU from Parallel Miner. Delta Electronics I will try the offset https://imgur.com/tWbnhVWhttps://imgur.com/36zcHOxhttps://imgur.com/ZtMx4vX |
|
|
|
I'm not sure how to do that.
I have the screenshots, but I can't add them to this reply for some reason.
Save them to an imgur.com album, and post the links - probably should go in Mining Support vs. here. Bear with me, I can get get it to post the images directly, only the link. I posted in between the image parameters. If I reboot the machines, they hash at what they are supposed to then sort of slow down slowly from there. |
|
|
|
I could use a little help in trying to understand these Avalon A6 miners.....
My 3 S7's are averaging around 4.7 TH
Yet my Avalons, which are "daisy chained" with 5 machines are one controller and 6 on the other are only averaging 5 TH and 10.7 TH.
Is something wrong? Are they competing or canceling out work? I though they should be combining a total hash of around 17.5 TH and 21 for a combined of 38.5 TH +/-
Like I said, the S7's seem to be doing what they are supposed to.
Do I need to split these up on another controller or what is going on here?
What is the voltage offset on your controller? Seems very low for the A6s, which should be around 3.5TH/s each. You should post a pic of the miner status screen from your controller. I'm not sure how to do that. I have the screenshots, but I can't add them to this reply for some reason.  |
|
|
|
|
I could use a little help in trying to understand these Avalon A6 miners.....
My 3 S7's are averaging around 4.7 TH
Yet my Avalons, which are "daisy chained" with 5 machines are one controller and 6 on the other are only averaging 5 TH and 10.7 TH.
Is something wrong? Are they competing or canceling out work? I though they should be combining a total hash of around 17.5 TH and 21 for a combined of 38.5 TH +/-
Like I said, the S7's seem to be doing what they are supposed to.
Do I need to split these up on another controller or what is going on here?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm wondering if there is any benefit either way for how the workers are configured.....
Does it make a difference having multiple workers for different machines or naming them all the same worker and combining all the hash into one? It seems that the combined hash rate doesn't represent what each machine is actually putting out.
(6) Avalon A6 on one controller averaging about------- 20 TH/s
(5) Avalon A6 on one controller averaging about------- 17 TH/s
(1) Antminer S7 averaging about---------------------- 4.6 TH/s
(1) Antminer S7 averaging about---------------------- 4.7 TH/s
2 more S7's on the way for now....
All connected to stratum 3333 but only totaling 34.72/36.34 on worker page.
Any insight?
|
|
|
|
...
Tell me more about this Seattle node.....I'm a couple hours away in Portland. Would this benefit me? Currently running one S7 until our wiring is complete, then it will be 6x s7's and 10 Avalon A6's for roughly 63.38 TH/s
Firstly, see the post above about ping times. Once you've got your hash rate up and running, and if it is a noticeable ping difference, email me from your pool account and we'll see what we can do  Yes, I see that post now. Thank you, no worries, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing out. I've a lot to learn and learning it fast so I expect to be in here more often. |
|
|
|
|
Is this still a thing?
Trying to help out a buddy with a stuck transaction.
Can you try acceleration this transaction?
22cebc86d716329866de10beccf7f06b8d5d178b9a659ef62e9ae79bffbe99a2
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
