EDIT: or someone make some sort of automatic script and send coins from one wallet to another and back, to hold network live and functioning.
If you look at blockchain, there is only 1 or 2 transaction in every block
please learn how staking works.... the first transaction in a block is a pow tx (mined X coins), or a "null" tx (unknown output + 0 coin) => this inform the wallet, that the second tx is a stake tx. in the stake tx, wallet "spent" your coins (one or more) to yourself with +0.5 added value. sometimes the output is split into 2 pieces.
|
|
|
it's a staking wallet, no magic.
|
|
|
Thanks for this. Would it be possible to open an issue directly for the repo, so it can be investigated through the proper channel? That will mean it absolutely gets technical insight and response. It's a bit hard, if the issue feature is disabled in github....
|
|
|
Feel free to build and benchmark Decred's cgminer fork. Could use some data on hardware performance. Testnet and miner binaries will be out tomorrow morning! I reviewed the changes. Can you/dev explain why was this changed? from uint32_t tmp_hash7, Htarg = le32toh(((const uint32_t *)ptarget)[7]); to uint32_t tmp_hash7, Htarg = le32toh(((const uint32_t *)ptarget)[29]); I read the spec and hash still 32 bytes (=8 integer) long, so the target last integer index is still 7.
|
|
|
I have 980GTX and 960GTX. My local Blakecoin hashrate 4.8Ghash, on pool accepted hashrate is 4.6 Mhash!!!!!! (no rejects). It is no good...
Display issue, if you remove the unit, values are almost the same (4.8 vs 4.6).
|
|
|
sorry i am new miner. i come to you today from nicehash. i have some rigs at 280x gigabyte. i started your example.bat make only change in intency and wallet adress. its all i have to do? what means 3ed row in percent i dont understand, because nicehash and another mine programs give mhash and for 280x on x11 its about 4200. now a have 78%/85% for example on any rigs. no 100%/100%... its normal or not? and payments everyday to my wallet? thanks a lot
% is a compared value to a AMD R9 290 gpu: AMD R9 290 achieves roughly 100% without overclocking. R9 280X is about 85%. R9 290X is around 110%. R9 270X is 50%.
|
|
|
What's the point of this then? Why the people are renting power if there's no profit?
You rent hashpower to mine a (selected by you) shitcoin, and sell it when it pumped. You can make +100%-150% profits (or more). risky? yes. You can loss money? yes. This is such a game, "without risk there is no victory"
|
|
|
Or alternatively, is there a maximum length to the password string that is confusing the switch to scrypt? (which really is ASIC territory)
my password string looks like this. d=XXXXX,c=BTC,x11=8.7,x13=6.7,x15=6.1,c11=8.7,qubit=15.0,quark=12.3,lyra2v2=3.8,groestl=23.9,blake=624.5,blakecoin=978.7,myr-gr=42.2,scrypt=1
AFAIK, it should allow up to 1024... so still a ways to go for this passwd even ccminer: limit 127 charscpuminer no limit sgminer: no password limit, but mining.authorize message is 8192 max (so password can be ~7.5k len)
|
|
|
http://hashpower.co/argon2 multipool -a Argon2 -p d=4 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5533 -u BTC_address diff = 4 is too high for a cpu core, can you reduce the limit to 0.02-0.05?
|
|
|
Thank you for the explanation. That worked. Got a VIA payement, but it was halved and there has be no readjustment to for over 6 hours. Pool says 30.5 VIA payed, only 21 received. I hope crackfoo can resolve this issue soon. i think the pool calculated, you get 30.5 via, but the pool has only 21 spendable coins. you will receive the remainder coins after the pool got the imature coins.
|
|
|
So what is happening to these blocks with high immature figures?
Name Time Height Amount Status Difficulty Found Diff Blockhash Via (VIA) 11m ago 1908544 5.05565642 Immature (15) 2567.110563 2982.323637 adb8ef481dc1ac6607f8d47b3fc7088184eb9e18ba3179f5c71d64fec3e35417 Via (VIA) 3h ago 1908029 5 Immature (530) 2491.220645 3853.759533 27a81c987ca113f6ebd24b91b426008cc04bf1006dc5ef164c2345e42e7eb6d1 Via (VIA) 6h ago 1907632 5 Immature (927) 2541.459737 3807.011811 a6c368f58917a6c3bde0f5a067f2662cee729c382f1312590a5c1c299129bdbd Via (VIA) 6h ago 1907580 5 Immature (979) 2441.891745 4158.812042 e795d04853ad2f008ca1566e91afd4c233f1e7d4e3dced72a8ea67c6d42b22c3 Via (VIA) 7h ago 1907470 5 Immature (1089) 2591.277037 3172.329944 195e4c4531e17167e6780be05787ec78c01a01191554c8e5e157cff4fb55cfb8 Via (VIA) 7h ago 1907404 5 Immature (1155) 2940.680268 3998.638564 256f61910985400a115c5152cbb6d365abe806090cc91a8011765f8541ea10b6 Via (VIA) 9h ago 1907144 0 Orphan 2699.102997 4432.864163 dfb2c4f7ae13c6bfa24af0ee949224017e5d54ad5525770b826461f2287c558f Via (VIA) 22h ago 1905253 5 Immature (3306) 2397.713417 16734.983315 95c8bf0d0648e91f951fe3b1ad889ca85fb0b7bda06796ba96b719a632a0ee3b Via (VIA) 25h ago 1904819 5 Confirmed 3032.619417 5077.98337 9175307546dfec407ac91d9ffe09b144cbf1717cc1ed573316fa60af584776da
Via coin has 3600 block maturity: https://github.com/viacoin/viacoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L77block time is 24 sec, so pool need to wait 1 day to spend the mined coins.
|
|
|
We definitely find that dumping huge amounts of hash, isn't profitable like it is if you rent low/modest amounts of hash. The reason is because with a large amount of hash, it causes the coins to jump way up in difficulty, lowering your overall luck. Now it's not as much of a problem when there are lots of coins to choose from, but still better to go low and slowly increase.
Yes, thats right. For miners, it's better, if he rent hash with smaller hashs at the same time as large hash, because yimmp spread the miners between the coins. If there is a 5x5T hash, pool sw can mine 5 coins with 5T(/coin). with this, the coins difficulty is not jump high, because just a "small" hashrate are in one coin. For this, the pool owner sould add coins as much he can, because the yiimp sw can choose the good profitable coins for miners. Elbandi ps: you can disable the bitcoin, 30T hashpower is very few to find a block, it's waste of hash if pool switch to btc.
|
|
|
do you plan to merge this pool to zpool?
|
|
|
I've already figured outworkaround: listtransactions "*" 1000 0 instead of listtransactions "" 1000 0
in this case it works as expected
it doesnt work for me. $ callrpc listtransactions "" 99999999 0 |wc -l 36767 $ callrpclisttransactions "*" 99999999 0 |wc -l 1067733
|
|
|
Pending is dropped ~0.05 btc but balance is not incremented. what's happening?
|
|
|
I mined Digibyte (skein alghorithm) on Mining Pool Hub. This pool stole my coins. Yesterday I had about 65,000 coins, now I have 45,538 coins. Where my coins? Over 4,4 days, I earned only 45,538 coins on 4 amd 280x.
Are you functionally illiterate or what? pool owner wrote the issue about digibyte. read it!
|
|
|
|