Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 12:28:48 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 »
161  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 26, 2014, 10:50:13 AM
GTX 760 is an sm_30 GPU and the application only seems to work on GPUs with greater compute capability for now.
so is there a chance to get it fixed?
does skminer share the same code for each compute capability or are there different instructions that gets added depending on sm_?
if the latter it's just a matter of finding out where the bug is and fix it else it could be a cuda sdk bug that affects sm_30 and we're screwed...
i'm available for testing and debugging in case of you (or any other dev) not owning any sm_30 card.
thank you.

ps: could somebody tell if sm_30 cards are finding any block under windows?
162  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 26, 2014, 01:14:05 AM
still nothing here...
i'm running coinshield_prime, skminer and  coinshield-qt on the same box and both miners connect to wallet's port 9325, that's all right, isn't it?
i'm doubting because since skminer was started neither coinshield_prime did find any block... coincidence? bad luck?

edit: any debug flag i can add?

edit2: i guess i'm on the right chain: [METERS] 0 Block(s) ACC=0 REJ=0| Height = 27691 | Diff = 6.073475 | 00:45:51

Try running on testnet to verify that the software is working properly.
no blocks where found after running for half hour skminer alone on testnet... is there anything i can do to find out what's wrong with it?
i've also rebooted the box just in case of a driver crash, but didn't make any difference.
163  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 25, 2014, 11:01:33 PM

Cuda compilation tools, release 6.5, V6.5.12
Driver Version: 343.22
-gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"

OK, I am going to download and test with driver version 343.22


Tested with various display driver versions on Linux:
2 x GTX 780 Ti


[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 27515
80.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 27515 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:27
80.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 27515 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:38

                GeForce GTX 780 Ti (2)

******* BLOCK with 35 Leading Zero Bits FOUND *******

                Preparing for Block Submission...

Submitting Block...
[MASTER] Block Accepted By Coinshield Network.
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 27516
80.2 MH/s | 1 Blks ACC=1 REJ=0 | Height = 27516 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:50
80.3 MH/s | 1 Blks ACC=1 REJ=0 | Height = 27516 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:05:01

                GeForce GTX 780 Ti (2)

******* BLOCK with 35 Leading Zero Bits FOUND *******

                Preparing for Block Submission...

Submitting Block...
[MASTER] Block Accepted By Coinshield Network.
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 27517
80.1 MH/s | 2 Blks ACC=2 REJ=0 | Height = 27517 | Diff = 36 0-bits | 00:05:12

still nothing here...
i'm running coinshield_prime, skminer and  coinshield-qt on the same box and both miners connect to wallet's port 9325, that's all right, isn't it?
i'm doubting because since skminer was started neither coinshield_prime did find any block... coincidence? bad luck?

edit: any debug flag i can add?

edit2: i guess i'm on the right chain: [METERS] 0 Block(s) ACC=0 REJ=0| Height = 27691 | Diff = 6.073475 | 00:45:51
164  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 25, 2014, 07:10:38 PM
Did the developer ever make the source code public for this?

not yet

@supercomputing: are you still finding blocks under linux? still none here after ~8h...

Yes, I found 12 blocks in approximately 8 hours. What NVCC options did you use?

CUDA Toolkit: cuda_6.5.14_linux_64.run
CUDA Linux Driver: NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-340.46.run
NVCC Options: -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\"

Cuda compilation tools, release 6.5, V6.5.12
Driver Version: 343.22
-gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"
165  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 25, 2014, 05:31:25 PM
Did the developer ever make the source code public for this?

not yet

@supercomputing: are you still finding blocks under linux? still none here after ~8h...
166  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 25, 2014, 11:20:46 AM
thank you supercomputing, the miner compiles and works fine Smiley

        ***** skMiner for nVidia GPUs by djm34  *****
                     This is version v0.1
        based on ccMiner by Christian Buchner and Christian H. 2014 ***
                   and on primeminer by Videlicet
         Copyright 2014 djm34
          BTC donation address: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze

GPU 1 = GeForce GTX 660

Initializing Miner 127.0.0.1:9325 Threads = 1 Timeout = 30
Connected to 127.0.0.1:9325...
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26984
21.4 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26984 | Diff = 36 0-bits | 00:00:11
22.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26984 | Diff = 36 0-bits | 00:00:22
23.1 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26984 | Diff = 36 0-bits | 00:00:33
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26985
23.4 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26985 | Diff = 36 0-bits | 00:00:44
23.6 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26985 | Diff = 36 0-bits | 00:00:55
23.6 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26985 | Diff = 36 0-bits | 00:01:06
23.7 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26985 | Diff = 36 0-bits | 00:01:17
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26986
23.8 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26986 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:01:28
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26987
23.8 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26987 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:02:01
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26987 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:02:12
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26987 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:02:23
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26987 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:02:34
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26987 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:02:45
23.8 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26987 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:02:57
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26988
23.8 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:03:08
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:03:19
23.8 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:03:30
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:03:41
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:03:52
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:03
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:14
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:25
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:36
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:47
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26988 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:04:58
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26989
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26989 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:05:09
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26989 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:05:20
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26990
23.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26990 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:05:31
24.0 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26990 | Diff = 35 0-bits | 00:05:42

i wonder why my 660 with a small oc (100/200) is faster than your 750ti...  Shocked
167  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 25, 2014, 12:13:31 AM
do you mind to share how you fixed the sources for this linux build?

edit: ok, i didn't see the first line, so i reformulate the answer: any chance to participate in beta testing?  Smiley

OK, I will release the Linux makefiles in about two hours from now with no guarantees.
nevermind i won't last two hours it's 2:11am here, goodnight!  Kiss
168  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 24, 2014, 11:29:25 PM
The Linux NVidia makefiles will be released tomorrow after stability testing has been completed.

./skminer 10.0.0.2 9325

        ***** skMiner for nVidia GPUs by djm34  *****
                   This is version v0.1
      based on ccMiner by Christian Buchner and Christian H. 2014 ***
                   and on primeminer by Videlicet
       Copyright 2014 djm34
        BTC donation address: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze

GPU 1 = GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Initializing Miner 10.0.0.2:9325 Threads = 1 Timeout = 30
Connected to 10.0.0.2:9325...
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26301
19.1 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26301 | Diff = 208.192220 | 00:00:11
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26302
20.2 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26302 | Diff = 208.177305 | 00:00:22
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26303
20.6 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26303 | Diff = 208.162323 | 00:00:33
20.3 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26303 | Diff = 208.162323 | 00:00:45
20.5 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26303 | Diff = 208.162323 | 00:00:56
20.7 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26303 | Diff = 208.162323 | 00:01:07
20.8 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26303 | Diff = 208.162323 | 00:01:18
20.8 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26303 | Diff = 208.162323 | 00:01:29
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26304
20.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26304 | Diff = 208.148947 | 00:01:40
20.9 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26304 | Diff = 208.148947 | 00:01:51
21.0 MH/s | 0 Blks ACC=0 REJ=0 | Height = 26304 | Diff = 208.148947 | 00:02:02

GeForce GTX 750 Ti


******* BLOCK FOUND *******


Preparing for Block Submission...

Submitting Block...
[MASTER] Block Accepted By Coinshield Network.
[MASTER] Coinshield Network: New Block 26305
20.6 MH/s | 1 Blks ACC=1 REJ=0 | Height = 26305 | Diff = 208.137004 | 00:02:14

do you mind to share how you fixed the sources for this linux build?

edit: ok, i didn't see the first line, so i reformulate the answer: any chance to participate in beta testing?  Smiley
169  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 22, 2014, 01:20:48 PM
i've no idea how to correctly fix this but hopefully you've got a clue about what's the problem...

I think in the configure.ac you have to tell the autotools that you want to use c++ ,not just plain C
(use the AC_PROG_CXX macro)

then run aclocal && autoheader && automake && autoconf

and ./configure

Christian

could you please expand on this? i'm a sysadmin that doesn't understand c/c++ programming...  Undecided
170  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 22, 2014, 11:57:18 AM
did you make any changes to the makefile?
answering to myself: symlink cpu-miner.c to skminer.c
then i've got your same cstdlib error, so googling i've found out the error is due gcc != g++ and a possible solution is renaming the .c file to .cpp, but even after symlinking to skminer.cpp and replacing all instances of skminer.c with skminer.cpp into the makefile, i still get the same error:
Code:
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.     -g -O2 -MT skminer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/skminer.Tpo -c -o skminer.o skminer.c
In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp:14:0,
                 from util_llh.h:4,
                 from types.h:4,
                 from core.h:5,
                 from skminer.c:14:
/usr/include/boost/date_time/compiler_config.hpp:11:19: fatal error: cstdlib: No such file or directory
 #include <cstdlib>
i've no idea how to correctly fix this but hopefully you've got a clue about what's the problem...
171  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 22, 2014, 10:44:12 AM
I'm getting this...

Code:
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/skminer_source'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/skminer_source/compat'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/skminer_source/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/skminer_source/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/skminer_source/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/skminer_source'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -msse2  -fopenmp -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing  -DSCRYPT_KECCAK512 -DSCRYPT_CHACHA -DSCRYPT_CHOOSE_COMPILETIME   -O3 -MT ccminer-cpu-miner.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ccminer-cpu-miner.Tpo -c -o ccminer-cpu-miner.o `test -f 'cpu-miner.c' || echo './'`cpu-miner.c
In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp:14:0,
                 from util_llh.h:4,
                 from types.h:4,
                 from core.h:5,
                 from cpu-miner.c:14:
/usr/include/boost/date_time/compiler_config.hpp:11:19: fatal error: cstdlib: No such file or directory
 #include <cstdlib>
                   ^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [ccminer-cpu-miner.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/skminer_source'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/skminer_source'
make: *** [all] Error 2
did you make any changes to the makefile?
172  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 22, 2014, 10:15:38 AM
Can people report on the linux compilation ? (I don't have linux... so you might expect error and omission at that level)
Code:
[...]
checking whether we can compile AVX code... yes
checking whether we can compile XOP code... yes
checking whether we can compile AVX2 code... yes
checking for json_loads in -ljansson... yes
./configure: line 5847: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
./configure: line 5847: `))))'
removing that line configure script ends fine, but then make fails:
Code:
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/skunk/bitcoin/skminer_source'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/skunk/bitcoin/skminer_source/compat'
make[3]: Entering directory '/home/skunk/bitcoin/skminer_source/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/skunk/bitcoin/skminer_source/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/skunk/bitcoin/skminer_source/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/skunk/bitcoin/skminer_source'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'skminer.c', needed by 'skminer.o'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/skunk/bitcoin/skminer_source'
Makefile:417: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/skunk/bitcoin/skminer_source'
Makefile:291: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
173  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 22, 2014, 09:15:56 AM
Trying to compile now.
Meantime I have this problem: miner.h(17): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'curl/curl.h': No such file or directory
Working on resolving it. If somebody has a quick solution to this let me know.
install curl development package (something like curl-dev)
174  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 22, 2014, 09:01:21 AM
Send your debug.log file. I didn't code this miner so I need to start debugging at the node, I'll then work my way into the miner source to isolate where its issue resides. This will need to be tested by you as I do not have an Nvidia GPU.

Thank You,
Viz.


i'm available all the day for testing, just post here once you get it to compile correctly.
thank you
175  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 22, 2014, 08:45:31 AM
any good soul for fixing linux build scripts?
176  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 21, 2014, 06:22:48 PM
 Cry
177  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 21, 2014, 12:05:45 PM
hi viz, are gpu miners ready for tonight's channel launch?
178  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [TEK] TEKcoin High % Interest rate SuperStake in 30+ days on: October 17, 2014, 10:10:24 AM
lower difficulty ever was .00006103
179  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Independant Miners Alliance Official Launch Notification (IMACredit coin) on: October 15, 2014, 04:20:22 PM
as this coin already seems as good as dead, i've created an appeal for economy absorption:
http://coinshieldtalk.org/forum/coin-shield-talk/shitcoin-petitions/348-imacredit-coin
(sorry i forgot to create a poll on the petition, the site admin will add it in a few days for you to vote, meanwhile please post your arguments, thank you)
180  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |CPU Launched| GPU Launch Date Set on: October 11, 2014, 09:51:15 PM
thank you viz, i'm sure the posts above will contribute increase trust in this coin until the code will made public, meanwhile it would be a good idea to merge them into a faq (even expanding the qa at the end of the op would be fine) just for giving more value to the time spent by you answering and making answers more accessible...
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!