|
how is RTL secured? is there a password prompt when you access the site? if not - everyone who knows your domain (and port) can access your node or did i miss something?
|
|
|
|
i suggest not using windows...
I suggest learning how to keep your computer safe regardless of which operating system you use. All OSs vulnerable, and even more so if you're unfamiliar with it. if you want to make your life on purpose harder - go for it |
|
|
|
It is a fact that every #FUD related to Bitcoin,Crypto comes from China.
i dont know your definition of facts, but what you say is not a fact. there is fud everywhere, doesn't matter which country. but at the same there there also always some brave people who will die for bitcoin |
|
|
|
~snip~
Btc dormant address would increase so as to keep it normal we need to sell off at some point.
Yep, because the volatility will never stop. Prices go up prices down there will always be. So I think holding on forever is not right. I have analysis with my ruler, I have pegged some increase and some decrease when the target comes I have to do that strategy. Although not accurate but at least I have assets that continue to grow. Also with my technique I can feel more at ease with the total amount of assets I have in USDT because the movement is not like bitcoin. i have a hart time understanding what you are saying here. is your argument, that because it is volatile, you will not hold forever and sell? you could also see it this way: prices go up and prices go down (measured in bitcoin) - but bitcoin always keeps the same - 1 BTC=1 BTC |
|
|
|
Habe gestern auch die 1m BTC gewonnen, und werde einfach Heute auf Dänemark setzen (x5,55) oder das genaue Ergebnis mit 1:2 (x15), welches ich von den beiden nehme weiß ich noch nicht aber so habe ich die 1m BTC wieder verzockt oder bei beidem genug zur Auszahlung  . Vermutlich (weil's Wurst is) nehme ich die zweite risikoreichere Wette. ich guck selten fussball, aber so bei em oder wm gucke ich dann doch manchmal. deine wette wird mir das spiel heute abend auf jeden fall noch etwas versüssen  ich drück dir die daumen |
|
|
|
I am pleased to announce that I and ndalliard are (probably) the first bitcointalk members to open a dual-funded channel  it was basically: 1. adding a string to the config 2. restarting the node 3. entering two commands (now that i think about it, maybe the first command wouldn't be necessary if my node would be "older"/ better connected)so easy - everyone can do it? probably not, but the experience was pleasant. now comes the harder part on my end. i want to understand what i did there. i did it this time without understand because we wanted to use the nearly empty mempool to save some precious sats |
|
|
|
More and more people are seeing the importance of Bitcoin and are now into buying Bitcoin and not doing trading. We have all these talks with the crypto community in our place and almost all of them are saying the same thing and that is to buy and buy Bitcoin and not to sell it. If you trust the crypto currency then you should be able to invest all of your money and wait for the best payday after many years. I want to be sure that we can also pass this over to many people here. I seldom give my opinions but Bitcoin is a good cryptocurrency.
i stopped using words like cryptocurrency and crypto community, i think they are misleading something else about this discussion: are we talking about selling fiat when we buy a house, food or a car? i mean technically it is selling, but i guess in this context selling is meant to exchange it for dirty fiat. and if this is the case my answer is pretty clear: i will never sell my BTC |
|
|
|
BIP-118: SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT - anyprevout.xyzand BIP-300/301: Drivechain - drivechain.xyzare two proposals i am interested in, but i am only scratching the surface |
|
|
|
Another small problem is the confirmation timing and some merchants require 3-confirmations which wastes a lot of time. I cannot imagine going to a shop making my purchase, paying with bitcoins and waiting needlessly for an hour for 3-6 confirmations. Maybe this can be solved by the altcoins payment option in such places where the queue is long and people cannot wait.
i do think you don't have the problem you mention if the merchants would use the lightning network (based on bitcoin) - there is no need to use altcoins for that |
|
|
|
Der Thread wurde mittlerweile geflaggt. Anscheinend aufgrund der negativen Trust des OP. Halte ich in diesem Fall aber für etwas übertrieben, schließlich hat man nicht viel zu verlieren außer ggf. ein paar Merits, die man dem OP zukommen lässt. Mal abwarten, was dabei herumkommt.
Wo kann ich das denn sehen, dass dieser Thread geflaggt wurde? Und vor allen Dingen, was heißt das denn überhaupt? Also was heißt das für den Threadersteller und was heißt das für die User, die dort mitmachen? Über dem Thread steht folgende Meldung: Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. (Check their trust page to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
These warning banners will disappear when you have 7 days of login time. You should familiarize yourself with the trust system before then. wobei btc_all vermutlich mehr als 7 tage "login time" hat und gerade deswegen die meldung nicht sieht, ich denke es geht darum, dass da beim trust vom OP eine rote -1 steht (war glaub ich gestern noch höher) |
|
|
|
No matter how adopted lightning network is, it will not be good for large amount of Bitcoin. People won't be buying cars or houses through LN. I don't get that. Why wouldn't it be good for large amounts? Let's say that I have 1000 BTC in an address. Why would it be bad to open a channel depositing 100 BTC and use it for buying cars, houses etc? It's designed for micro-payments, but I'll avoid the mining fees whether I deposit 0.01 or 100 BTC. Someone may want to send and receive huge amounts everyday. He'll find it cheaper if he uses the LN to avoid the mining fees. the problem is right here and here v v blackhat [100btc><0.1btc] partner [0.1btc><0.1btc] friend [0.1btc><0.1btc] car dealer they cant push 100btc to the car dealership via routing from you.. because partner and his friend dont have 100btc for them to be used as a go-between LN only works if everyone had more balance than the payment needing to be routed LN is promoted for "great for coffees" ($4) when average balance of routers in-line is over $4 to allow the payment oh and then there is this issue richguy [2btc><0.1btc] blackhat [100btc><0.1btc] partner [0.1btc><0.1btc] friend [0.1btc><0.1btc] car dealerrichguy decides he wants to pay 'partner' 2btc minutes before you want to buy a car richguy [0btc><2.1btc] blackhat [98btc><2.1btc] partner [0.1btc><0.1btc] friend [0.1btc><0.1btc] car dealernow you dont have 100btc for your own 100btc payment via 'partner' friend to car dealer aren't payments in lightning split (or can be split)? |
|
|
|
this sounds like proof of work without the work  |
|
|
|
|
congrats on the achievement
90 - ndalliard
|
|
|
|
Long term run and if the timing is right, earning from bitcoin investment is very possible. Buy with low value then
wait for some time and sell it with good amount of profits.
i don't understand why someone would sell the best money to "take profits" (not talking about selling to pay for bills, a house or whatever). also if the timing is right, that is a big if - not worth it imo |
|
|
|
the rewards will get smaller, but even if the rewards are small in the future, a bitcoin will be much more valuable than today (if everything goes as "planned"). This is a very false thought. The whole system shouldn't rely on the belief that it'll have a greater value in the future. It's important to know what will happen if the value remained the same. well, you will not know until it happens - and imo it is highly unlikely the value will remain the same every system "relies" on the unpredictable future Are you running a LN node yourself? No, but I'm planning to work on it. It seems very interesting. get in touch if you want to open a channel |
|
|
|
Man sieht aber auch ab und zu zwei Posts hintereinander von dem gleichen User, allerdings liegt zwischen diesen dann ein größerer Zeitraum dazwischen (Tage, Wochen, Monate..) - Dann wird meistens ein Auge zugedrückt denke ich.. (bitte steinige mich nicht mole!!!!  ) Das macht wahrscheinlich Sinn, dass da ein Auge zugedrückt wird, da mWn bei einem Edit der Thread nicht mit neuen Antworten markiert wird - wenn mehrere Tage zwischen den Aktualisierungen vergangen sind, würde man aber im Normalfall annehmen, dass es sich um eine echte Aktualisierung handelt und nicht nur um ein "Postanzahl sammeln" - die würde aber kaum wer mitbekommen, wenn nur editiert wird. Bitte sagen, falls ich mich mit der Funktionalität irre... ja sehe das auch so, ich verlasse mich auf die benachrichtungen via email und wenn editiert wird, dann kriege ich das glaube ich gar nicht mit, denn ich kriege in der email selbst nur den ersten stand von der nachricht (korrigiert mich wenn ich da falsch liege). ausser natürlich ich schaue dann im forum wirklich vorbei, aber wenn ich z.b. nichts zu sagen habe, dann gehe ich nicht extra ins forum |
|
|
|
I know it sounds complicated. I am working on a thread which will explain it in a more understandable way.
thanks a lot for explaining it. yes it is kinda hard, i try to wrap my head around it, i just need some time to digest that all, it's fascinating - i looked for a save button here, i guess there is none and i just save the url i am looking forward to the thread - it will be a good one |
|
|
|
was meinst du damit? ich glaube ich habe keinen alten account hier
Dann hatte ich das hier: ich hab mich hier auch vor einiger zeit registriert, dann ein paar beiträge gemacht und irgendwann aus den augen verloren, kann passieren.
wohl falsch verstanden  Wollte dir nur den Weg zum recovery Team zeigen... aber wenn das so ist benötgist du ihn ja nicht. Alles gut achso, oder ich habe mich schlecht oder ungünstig ausgedrückt - mir ist lieber ich brauche das recovery team nicht, aber gut zu wissen, dass es da eines gibt - apropos, ich hätte gerne den benutzernamen nathanael gehabt, ich gehe mal stark davon aus, dass das unmöglich ist (weil zwar inaktiv aber halt registriert, hat 2 posts gemacht...) |
|
|
|
So long as the narrative around bitcoin is a digital store of value, HODLing super long term would the preferred strategy.
look into the history of money, is has to be first store of value an then it can transition to medium of exchange Well, the thing here is, I really do not care how others would deal with their Bitcoins. If they HODL it then go ahead, let them be. I will not interfere nor tell them not to do it. Let them sell it, let them hold it, let them give it away to their girlfriends. You should not be forcing your opinions to the others if that is what they want and if that is what they need to do with their Bitcoins, after all of the factors that they can consider, it gave them that decision to do so on their coins then by all means. Most of those advocating for HODL doesn't really care about the other users. They are just afraid that if a lot of the users sell their coins, then the exchange rates may fall. And the same people who are advocating for HODL will dump their coins at the first opportunity, if there is a need. Personally I would go for an ideal mix of profit booking and long term holding. There needs to be a good balance between these two. In such cases, you will not incur big losses if Bitcoin suddenly becomes worthless, and at the same time you will be left with enough coins in case Bitcoin appreciates by 10x or 20x in the future. that's not what i experience - i pay and earn in bitcoin and i don't care what you do beeing normal, keeping the balance, sounds boring edit: typo |
|
|
|
the wording here is a little bit off imo. i guess you are not talking about the lightning technology used on another network than bitcoin. that means the lightning network it is clearly dependent on the bitcoin network and also i would say, that both networks have an impact on each other. i agree with the last part, that no one is force to use neither networks (some say people in el salvador are now force to use it, but that is another topic)
I get your point. I should mention that there is a possible risk of flooding the network if a large number of channels is closed at once. Uncooperative channel close results in 2 on-chain transactions, so that's how someone could do even more damage. yes i think changing that would be a good idea - lightning is intertwined with bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
