Как я понимаю, разработчики делают свой блокчейн с нуля. Мне кажется для данной платформы неплохо подошел бы блокчейн Эфириума. Можно было-бы сэкономить много времени на разработке.
Вы не совсем правы. Блокчейн должен быть одновременно доступным и в тоже время приватным. Чтобы можно было проверить информацию об учащихся и для того чтобы всегда сохранялась сохранность и достоверность данных |
|
|
|
|
Do not worry. Even if no one can answer your question, you can write it to the development team. I think that they will not be able to ignore the question
|
|
|
|
I think that with every stage of the project's development, a new version of it was coming out. That is, as soon as the development team came up with a platform - the first version, after the launch of the site and information resources - the second. As soon as the project began to take part in various presentations - the third stage began
It sounds reasonable, but it's unfortunately just the reasons. There is no exact information on the project in the past, and it's a little alarming, to be honest! I do not think that this is a big problem - the past of the project. The most important thing is that the team has gained experience and already today it is moving forward with its achievements and plans for the future |
|
|
|
Hi everyone!
I noticed that in white paper there is a note that now Araneobit already has version 3.0. Does anyone have information about the previous two versions of this resource?
Try to search on the forum previous thread of this project or read the comments above. This project has a very long history, judging by the comments |
|
|
|
|
Yes, I agree with both of you! Investors like big projects, especially when they are backed up by good bonuses. This is the key to the success of the site.
|
|
|
|
Rarely you can find now a project in which during the pre-sale collected almost all the funds that were pawned under this stage by the development team!
How many has project collected now? This information is on the site? or in the bitcointalk there is also a note about how soon the current stage will be completed? It's simple. The site has automatically updated information about how much investment this project has attracted. 13,881,310 CRYPTOSHARES DISTRIBUTED of 15,000,000 FOR PRE-SALE Wow, when calculating that 1 ether is 2500 LCS - this is a very large amount! Due to what the project has achieved such a popularity of investors? |
|
|
|
Rarely you can find now a project in which during the pre-sale collected almost all the funds that were pawned under this stage by the development team!
How many has project collected now? This information is on the site? or in the bitcointalk there is also a note about how soon the current stage will be completed? |
|
|
|
|
So what? when it comes to rating, what's the difference, what type of platform is used to implement a particular service?
|
|
|
|
For a project with a lending platform this is a huge performance. But I'm worried that they are not truthful ..
What do you think is the reason for such active growth?
People are attracted to the fact that they themselves determine the interest rate, I think. The question of customization is very acute for the modern world I do not agree with your statement, because now people are trying to simplify life. this is the issue that the service solves. In theory, there is nothing easier than negotiating with someone about a loan, to resolve the issue with interest if this issue is solved independently, by communicating two people at a distance, and if these people are not familiar, then there is a huge risk that they will deceive each other In the case of using this platform, I think people will also try to deceive their colleague in order to win from this their interest. Here it's either in interest rates, which can be higher or lower If it's only about interest rates, then there's no point in making a platform that will protect the transactions. I mean that all transactions can be challenged in different ways from different sides Who can challenge the transaction that the participants have concluded on this platform? It seems to me that the only thing this platform will offer for resolving conflict situations is the rating system |
|
|
|
For a project with a lending platform this is a huge performance. But I'm worried that they are not truthful ..
What do you think is the reason for such active growth?
People are attracted to the fact that they themselves determine the interest rate, I think. The question of customization is very acute for the modern world I do not agree with your statement, because now people are trying to simplify life. this is the issue that the service solves. In theory, there is nothing easier than negotiating with someone about a loan, to resolve the issue with interest interesting thoughts, guys! but it seems to me that it's all about reliability. People believe that it is this platform that can solve their problems with the greatest security |
|
|
|
Oh my God! huge indicators. It seems to me that these are twisted numbers, it can not be that the project has everything been so good. Now the project has just started pre-sale
This project did not have a pre-sale. Now, even pre-ICO has not even begun. I'm frightened by the fact that the road map has so little information about the past of the project, its development .. |
|
|
|
Wow, a huge amount of trading takes place on this platform in the last 24 hours. Do you see this?
What is the current trading situation? I do not know how things are in the market now, I took up my project a little and I did not have time for monitoring |
|
|
|
|
I'm confused. In the end, is the radius in this formula necessary, or not? Why was it necessary to divide the total number of tokens into parts?
|
|
|
|
r is the radius of the circle, being in this case the EOS.Pizza, but
can be of any size.
In the OGSI draft spec (page 5) it is suggested to use for r the
total distribution stake for the EOS.Pizza community. The Proof of Slice
factor is being amended for every donating member in the OGSI file.
Yes, I saw. But I'm still embarrassed by what's written there. "The radius can be any size." Well, what is this? that is, there is a randomizer, which at a particular stage assigns different values to the radius? |
|
|
|
Stop! Did you find the white paper and were surprised? what happens in you? Are you guys okay, or maybe help you with something else?
We are not just surprised to find a white paper (although I'm surprised to be honest). We are glad that now we will be able to find an answer to the question raised earlier |
|
|
|
friends, it seems I began to understand what the radius means in the formula that the developers came up with. Recently, in these comments, the question was raised that nothing is clear
Please continue! I participated in that discussion, we agreed that the white paper was written in a ridiculous manner and does not carry a semantic load |
|
|
|
By the way, who will check the quality of the translation? that is, the team already has people who will be able to masterfully master the subtleties of my translation for the use of true words?
Good question) it seems, I can not answer it .. But I'm more interested: why one participant can make only one translation? that is, if I know several languages in an ideal, then you need to choose only one? It seems to me that almost everyone knows English, and translation is needed in your native language. I know that there are countries where they speak simultaneously in several languages |
|
|
|
I have a question: why participants who use google translate are automatically disqualified from offset bounty program? That is, you can not even use a dictionary?
I think it's not so tough. Use a dictionary and use electronic resources in order to translate some words - I do not see anything wrong with this Yes, I wanted to say just that. If I use electronic dictionaries somewhere, will it also be considered a violation of the rules of the program bounty? In any case, who will control this moment? how to track which word is translated automatically, and which one is written by you? I think the project team is just not interested |
|
|
|
I have a question: why participants who use google translate are automatically disqualified from offset bounty program? That is, you can not even use a dictionary?
I think that if you translate through Google whole phrases, or paragraphs of text, then incorrect translation may occur, and developers require a clear translation |
|
|
|
The description is written as correctly as possible. This is the best bounty program that ever came across my eyes. It is very easy to read
I agree with you!! Excellent calculated distribution of incentives for project support between different sectors. Rarely when you can meet a similar |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
