Yes, the wallet says "out of sync" if it has been a while since the last block. It doesn't mean you are "out of sync".

It's not "out of sync". The blocks are moving slow. The wallet looks "out of sync" when it's been a while since the last block.

Right now the network is a little fragmented, but it looks like trex is slowly finding the longest chain.

We'll see if trex can catch up tomorrow some time. This is all caused by the fact that some users haven't updated. There should be a way to get the latest client to ban those that haven't updated. That would fix the network.

Good afternoon. We have procured a few horned rim glasses wearing squares to build a block explorer.  Take that you hippies!

Pushed new source and uploaded a new windows wallet. Please re download.

This is because the dev changed the target spacing. The chain is going have big problems until this is straightened out. There is no way that a coin with an 8 hour maturity (original) should have problems moving the chain when it is already a week old. It's been 161 minutes since the last block.

I'm not trying to fud, only help. The dev looks legit here, but he butchered block validation on the last commit. It's not a hard fix. Just undo two lines from the last commit.

If any one thinks I am fudding this coin, then do this if you have the latest wallet. Look for the exact string "-> 100" in your debug.log files. That string will be found close to the word "misbehaving" and you may see something about "not enough proof of work". All together, that means your client is banning peers and rejecting blocks that it shouldn't be. New clients will never be able to sync a fresh chain because of this problem. That's going to kill adoption and will stop the rise of this coin in it's tracks.

I'm psyched about the road map, but the target spacing needs to be fixed.

Navajo Foundation Trust-  Bitcoin: 1JGXCDgLAvVFNDJETuLsA7obTgu4JThFfD

To become a member, the minimum donation of 0.05 BTC or more has to be made to the Navajo Coin Foundation Trust. You then have to PM the SUM2dev account with the Tx id, the amount sent, and the date.

MEMBERS LIST:

1. SUM2dev https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=346214 (Official Navajo Fund administrator)

Also all https://navajocoin.slack.com/messages/general/ invitations have been sent

Massive loses on Crave - Glad i'm with Navajocoin 

The foundation members received an update from the Development Team. If you have 100,000 Navajocoin then its in your best interest to receive all the good news.

0.05 is a small fee

https://navajocoin.slack.com/messages/foundation/

If you have more than 100, 000 Navajocoin it is critical you join the Navajocoin foundation to receive important updates from the Navajocoin Development Team

That is intentional. The percentage is adjustable and is still up for debate though, we do want it to be as small as possible.

The transaction fee is not designed for us to skim profit, it is simply to cover hosting costs since this is a community project, not a business.

The anon network consists of about a dozen server instances (which we've been paying for personally so far) that we need to have up and running for it all to work. None of these are free, so this transaction fee is how the network will cover its own costs.

5% is probably where it is going to start until the price and volume start to rise. As the volume grows, we will be able to scale back the transaction fee, probably down to about 2% or even 1% and still cover the server costs. Ideally we would survive on donations alone and scrap the fee all together, but we just have to see what balance will work out.

Make sense?