May I kindly ask you, mighty Olipro, to patch bitcoin 0.3.1 or may be 0.3.2? There were some issues in 0.3

Check for this: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=246.0

I wasn't able to respond for a while.

Satoshi, your are fast ! Thanks for fixing this!

I know it's not the smartest move to name my user account using non-latin characters. Anyway, 0.2 has no problems with this.

Verified as follows... created a 'normal' new user and 0.3 opened the data folder. Created new, fresh data folder and copied it to the non-standard user - 0.3 fails with DB_RUN_RECOVERY.

Win7 Pro 64-Bit
Radeon HD4350

My apologies, apparently it was just a ~12 hour period of connectivity problems. Bitcoin gold rush paranoia I guess 

Am I the only one seeing minuscule generation lately? It was decent until around 20:00 GMT February 21st, but after that my machine (4 core I7) produced only one block for entire >12 hours. And there isn't even a clue for new difficulty hike in the debug log.

Here are my possible scenarios:

1. Some big BC bot came along.

2. Someone is trying some kind of DoSing the system.

3. Someone built a bitcoin mod with GPGPU (CUDA or sorts) support.

4. Some kind of growth problem (i.g. we reached first of a kind network size and there is problem with that).

Ideas?

It would be difficult to explain... here is an example

I would like to be able to see all of my orders and to be able to edit/cancel them. Also, a 'market depth' view would be nice.

I still owe an explanation... here it is...

A quote from BC FAQs, 'So your wealth is determined by...':

There's a constant average rate of new Bitcoins created, and that amount is divided among the nodes by the CPU power they use.

User X as a sole participant in the system generates coins with rate R bitcoins/hour. This is the global rate. If another participant Y joins the system now both participants are generating with the same (global) rate. If their CPU power is equal they will generate (R/2)/hour bitcoins each. With every new participant the price of bitcoin generation will go higher and higher. So high eventually that...

The easier way to gain a lot of wealth would be trading goods.

NLS, your methodology is right when used to evaluate the price at which you are generating your bitcoins. I'm trying to say that price of generation is not equal to the actual market price. For evaluation of the market price you need a market.

You can easily create a ฿/$ exchange service. Just provide a place where anyone is able to post bid/ask prices. Whenever there are corresponding bid and ask a deal would take place. A classical market.

I am just seeking your opinion on some thoughts I had recently. NLS states that he/she calculates how much energy is spent for daily BC production. If more and more BC users are involved in generation, the number of BC NLS produces will go down, for the same amount of energy spent. Hence, the price is bound to go up.

I mean, NLS methodology is wrong