If anyone's interested in optimizing their mining profits, is there a better offer around than 102.4% PPS? All shares get paid 102.4% of their expected value. Blocks being found do not matter. You could be the only miner in the pool with 1 MH/s, and get 102.4% of the expected output for that hashrate. http://elitehash.net (US) http://fairpool.eu |
|
|
|
Minersport.us just added Bitspace, and we've already found 2 blocks in just one hour! Got low fees and an active telegram group: https://t.me/joinchat/H1wSdFNkwHaKxI-xF6nkCwccminer settings: -a nist5 -o stratum+tcp://minersport.us:3833 -u WALLETADDRESS Welcome! EDIT: Well thanks nostromo, should have really read the big red warning this time after pressing post 
|
|
|
|
|
The pool didn't catch up as a normal proportional pool, but I'm now running a PPS pool that pays 102.4% (set the block reward to 3.2 BTX in code). Currently running at ~1.5 GH/s and paying out hourly. PM me for details!
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to join the campaign.
Bitcointalk username & UID: juhakall 34936
Current number of Posts: 457
Bitcore BTX address for payments: 134djff4mTc7ZW2eXmWyXGRiHpzMt8BFGk
Signature/Avatar/Both: Signature
|
|
|
|
|
I ran into a bug with the desktop wallet for Windows where the total sum of my transaction amounts isn't equal to my balance. I noticed the problem when my pool's payouts suddenly started showing as incoming transactions occasionally. The way I do payments is that whenever I send, I collect all my outputs, pay miners and send the change to address X. So yes, I really am receiving a big amount of BTX; but I'm also sending a slightly bigger amount, and previously the wallet showed this correctly! I also have a wallet with the same keys on Linux, and there the bug doesn't appear. And just to make it clear, it's only a cosmetic bug I'm talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm launching a Bitcore PPS pool, meaning it pays based on shares submitted, not blocks found. Payouts every hour for balances > 0.1, or a custom threshold if you wish. The pool has been running for some time and I just added a second node, so you can have a backup set too. Payout calculations are based on a 3.2 BTX block reward, which amounts to a PPS rate of 102.4%
PM me if interested; registration is manual for now.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought BTX was added to coinsmarkets recently, but the last trade was over a month ago. They even claim to pay airdrops to users. The exchange seemed to work when I soldan insignificant amount of random shitcoins there. What's going on there now?
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't given HitBTC a second chance but maybe I should. Has anyone had withdrawal problems there recently?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like bitcorepool.cc and omegapool.cc are operated by the same people, both have Gergely Meszaros listed in the WHOIS information. This wasn't really surprising considering how suddenly omegapool.cc became the new pool that's recommended to everyone (in the facebook group) and the similarities in the pools' design. Moving hashrate from bitcorepool.cc to omegapool.cc really doesn't help at all in decentralizing bitcore. This is a clever way of tricking people into ignoring a huge centralization problem and keep collecting massive fees.
|
|
|
|
|
I have implemented a time-based PPLNS system. It's set to look at the last 48 hours of shares when a block is found and pay based on that. I'm pretty sure the time window has to be tuned a bit, or even be changed to a difficulty based one. But at any setting, this should effectively neutralize any pool hopping attempts.
EDIT: This was switched back to proportional due to lack of interest on the pool. I'm currently mining BitSend on the same site, and proportional seems to work out better at this stage.
|
|
|
|
|
Reading the first and last page of this thread, I've come to the conclusion that the author is a scammer trying to promote Skycoin (or other shitcoins but currently it seems to be that)
|
|
|
|
I had missed claim of BTX on my BTC. Is there any way to claim now?
If you had BTC during the fork you received 0.5 BTX per BTC to the same address. |
|
|
|
|
I managed to calculate the earnings and get the block back on the list, but now it's stuck as immature. I'll see what can be done about it, wouldn't want to send this manually as I'm so close to keeping the stats intact too. After I get that sent we'll see how long the 3.225 BTX I sent to the pool lasts with a -1% fee. If it starts diminishing too quickly I'll adjust it a bit, staying in the negative.
EDIT: The block has now been paid out
|
|
|
|
I've been more active on the Facebook group than here, so I forgot to mention that block 119635 got completely remove from everyone's payouts because of my mistake. Fixing this is a good hands-on yiimp lesson to me, I'll try to be quick. I'll keep the -1% going for a bit longer too, 1 GH/s is just around the corner! EDIT: It literally happened while I was writing this post, 1.3 GH/s now. Thanks to all the new miners! |
|
|
|
I haven't tried using SegWit with Bitcore yet, other than enabling the setting on my pool as I know the coin supports it. However I find it really strange that my pool has generated one SegWit block among many normal blocks, without changing any settings. Take a look at http://psychedelic.fi/site/mining, block 118382. Can anyone guess why that single block happened to be a SegWit block? |
|
|
|
|
Cryptopia Bitcore wallet is stuck at block 119440, so deposits are not coming through :/
|
|
|
|
Terve Juha.
I am happily mining at your pool (hope we'll find some block soon:)).
However you have as well min payout chunks from 0,1 BTX each 7 minutes, or did I miss something? You mention that umine 0,1 is rather spammy:).
Ahem. That's true. I didn't think about it, but obviously the only thing preventing those 0.1 BTX payouts when it's the minimum is to have a large portion of the pools hashrate, like I had at first. Now my payouts are almost below 1. Until I manage to implement user settable thresholds, do you think I should increase the threshold to, say, 0.25 BTX? No problem, as you stated, with current pool hashrate power it's OK. I don't have much hashpower and it's moreless all the time 0,2+ BTX. When the hashrate will increase to some sufficient level (1Ghz+ ?) might be good to reconsider so it's really not spammy (untless there is user defined treshold). Actually one thing to consider as well - as the airdrops are on Mondays I would suggest to have autopay on each Sunday evening, but again it would come more handy when there is more hash power. Anyway thanks for your pool, it's much more fun to see and gamble when the block if found:), hope we'll get steady at least one a day. The pool has got two airdrops so far from immature blocks. That's very lucky actually. But I will use these airdrops to extend the period of negative fee. I calculated before that 5% airdrops could sustain a -0.125% fee. |
|
|
|
Terve Juha.
I am happily mining at your pool (hope we'll find some block soon:)).
However you have as well min payout chunks from 0,1 BTX each 7 minutes, or did I miss something? You mention that umine 0,1 is rather spammy:).
Ahem. That's true. I didn't think about it, but obviously the only thing preventing those 0.1 BTX payouts when it's the minimum is to have a large portion of the pools hashrate, like I had at first. Now my payouts are almost below 1. Until I manage to implement user settable thresholds, do you think I should increase the threshold to, say, 0.25 BTX? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
