I'm trying to sell 1188.99424661 Freicoins. Accepting BTC and LTC. Please make me some offers  Edit: Please write the offers in this thread instead of via PM, so other people can see them and outbid them if they want. Thanks! 32ltc Deal! Since I have been on this forum for longer I'd like you to go first. Using a trusted Escrow is also fine by me. If you are fine with going first, then please send the LTC to this address: LcqWuEN7hUTwL37z5hA6WKSR466cyurgrw And post your Freicoin address so I can send you the Freicoins. If not, please have a trusted escrow post here, and I will send the Freicoins to the escrow. Thanks 状态：0/未确认，同过 16 节点组广播 日期：2013/4/23 23:44 到：LcqWuEN7hUTwL37z5hA6WKSR466cyurgrw 支出-32.00 LTC 网络金额： -32.00 LTC 交易ID： 99b73c0a78f5003bd2eabe89943b53435f186ceafa2a6589a4c3bfe2a6d984be my fc address：6o1HYrb7Hf8dE7jY8oV5QLawCFzynLH8E5 Received, thanks! That address you posted isn't a valid Freicoin address though. I think you've posted a Feathercoin address. Could you please give me the correct address? Oh，I'sorry！I REGARD IT AS Feathercoin .CAN YOU GIVE ME MY LTC BACK? lTC ADDRESS:LULBEyQzLmcqRC1hWKKtxzgKr72A1UenoE JUST 31 IS OK!NO NEED 32. No need to keep 1 LTC over a honest mistake Returned the 32 (minus the default fee) Status:0/onbevestigd, uitgezonden naar 6 nodes Datum:23-4-2013 17:58 Aan:LULBEyQzLmcqRC1hWKKtxzgKr72A1UenoE Af:-31.90 LTC Transactiekosten:-0.10 LTC Netto bedrag:-32.00 LTC Transactie-ID: a57a0bdf42ca039e5667fe1ac30411e609125e9db97a4064cc6ec1adf3b9cad8 |
|
|
|
lol I think he thought you were selling feathercoins.
Hmmm, maybe. If that's the case, please let me know and I'll return the LTC! |
|
|
|
I'm trying to sell 1188.99424661 Freicoins. Accepting BTC and LTC. Please make me some offers Edit: Please write the offers in this thread instead of via PM, so other people can see them and outbid them if they want. Thanks! 32ltc Deal! Since I have been on this forum for longer I'd like you to go first. Using a trusted Escrow is also fine by me. If you are fine with going first, then please send the LTC to this address: LcqWuEN7hUTwL37z5hA6WKSR466cyurgrw And post your Freicoin address so I can send you the Freicoins. If not, please have a trusted escrow post here, and I will send the Freicoins to the escrow. Thanks 状态：0/未确认，同过 16 节点组广播 日期：2013/4/23 23:44 到：LcqWuEN7hUTwL37z5hA6WKSR466cyurgrw 支出-32.00 LTC 网络金额： -32.00 LTC 交易ID： 99b73c0a78f5003bd2eabe89943b53435f186ceafa2a6589a4c3bfe2a6d984be my fc address：6o1HYrb7Hf8dE7jY8oV5QLawCFzynLH8E5 Received, thanks! That address you posted isn't a valid Freicoin address though. I think you've posted a Feathercoin address. Could you please give me the correct address? |
|
|
|
I'm trying to sell 1188.99424661 Freicoins. Accepting BTC and LTC. Please make me some offers Edit: Please write the offers in this thread instead of via PM, so other people can see them and outbid them if they want. Thanks! 32ltc Deal! Since I have been on this forum for longer I'd like you to go first. Using a trusted Escrow is also fine by me. If you are fine with going first, then please send the LTC to this address: LcqWuEN7hUTwL37z5hA6WKSR466cyurgrw And post your Freicoin address so I can send you the Freicoins. If not, please have a trusted escrow post here, and I will send the Freicoins to the escrow. Thanks |
|
|
|
Mtgox supports google authenticator just like blockchain.info, so there's no reason at all not to use 2-FA for Mtgox. I'm sorry for your loss  |
|
|
|
I'm trying to sell 1188.99424661 Freicoins. Accepting BTC and LTC. Please make me some offers Edit: Please write the offers in this thread instead of via PM, so other people can see them and outbid them if they want. Thanks! |
|
|
|
When i click TRC/BTC i see BTC/USD 110$
When i click BTC/USD it goes to 68$ O.o
You need to be logged in for pages to be accurate, or alternatively, you could refresh (F5) pages that look inaccurate. Something to do with their aggressive DDOS protection settings, I think. |
|
|
|
|
Has this been changed yet? Or is it still possible to place unfunded orders? Lag is much better than before, but I still think these levels of lag are unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
Rocket Refuel - Check
All systems prepare for liftoff
Exactly. Insane amounts of fiat popping up on Gox's orderbook, far more than the amount of fiat when we were > 200 per coin, and still going up fast. |
|
|
|
My intuition says this topic is relevant again  |
|
|
|
SierraChart now provide an official datafeed for MtGox USDBTC via their own servers and access is built into the program.
Can you give me some pointers on how to use that? Is that possible with the free version? I'm not sure if it's enabled on the free one, probably not. Here's how you choose the feed anyway : Click 'Global Settings' / 'Data/Trade Service Settings' In the drop down menu select 'Bitcoin Data [data]' - it's right at the end. You will probably have to upgrade it if you didn't download in the last few days - I needed to get a subscription to do this. Once you have the data source setup click on the 'FS' button/icon just below the 'File' drop down menu. You'll be able to find the BTCUSD sumbol under the 'Other' selection. Then click 'Open Intraday Chart' and you have a chart to start working with. Thanks for the instructions! Unfortunately, I'm getting: Downloads are not enabled. Your current service package does not support this function. Select Help >> Purchase to upgrade your package. | 2013-04-17 19:48:16 So anyone wanna have a look at the the patch and fix the syntax errors? |
|
|
|
SierraChart now provide an official datafeed for MtGox USDBTC via their own servers and access is built into the program.
Can you give me some pointers on how to use that? Is that possible with the free version? |
|
|
|
Startup with no history has gotten extremely unreliable, so I took a whack at adding a while loop to chunk up the download 1 week at a time instead of grabbing the whole dataset. Unfortunately I don't have time to test it right now, but if anyone wants to try it out, please let me know if it helps. https://github.com/scryb3/sierrachartfeedThanks, Scrybe Anyone that wants to help me out in fixing the Syntax errors in Scrybe's patch? I've never programmed in Python before, so I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing right now =P |
|
|
|
I'm 99% sure, I had the exact same problem 3 days ago Well let's think about this. The dummy plug will just simulate having a monitor there, so either way would work? True, but the problem is actually having too many monitors connected, as can be seen in the error message: "There is possibly more than one display attached to a gpu" Still, you've already bought the plugs and resistors, so it's worth a shot. Unless you can still return them, in which case I would test my solution first. Let us know if you manage to get it fixed. |
|
|
|
You don't need the dummy plugs. It's actually complaining that there are _more_ displays attached. Depending on which protocol/program you use to remotely control the PC, sometimes the remote session can be seen as an "extra display", hence giving you that error. Try starting CGminer without a remote session (by physically operating the computer) and see if the error disappears (with only 1 monitor connected). Good luck!
Well shit. I wish you'd told me this a bit earlier. I've just gone and bought £12 worth of dvi-vga adaptors and 68ohm resistors :/ Are you completely sure about this? Because a couple of people have already said this error is down to it needing a monitor attached to it, or dummy plugs. I'm 99% sure, I had the exact same problem 3 days ago |
|
|
|
|
You don't need the dummy plugs. It's actually complaining that there are _more_ displays attached. Depending on which protocol/program you use to remotely control the PC, sometimes the remote session can be seen as an "extra display", hence giving you that error. Try starting CGminer without a remote session (by physically operating the computer) and see if the error disappears (with only 1 monitor connected). Good luck!
|
|
|
|
New Bitcoin wallet?
He has made some prediction and hashed it. That way it cannot be self fulfilling prophecy. When the prediction happens, he will reveal it. Or if it doesn't come true, he lets the thread die and no one remembers it after a week. Like they say, if you're going to forecast, forecast often. This is just a smarter way of covering your ass from ridicule. I will play your game: If I don't provide the info contained within 7 days, I will quit this forum for good. 1 day remaining |
|
|
|
SDK 2.1 is incompatible with any driver after 12.3 anyway.
Hmmm, that's too bad. Is it possible to either: -Install an old driver with 2.1 SDK and compiling the .bin, and then using that .bin while running the latest driver? That should give 2.1 performance if it works right? or -Manually moving the correct .dll files from the 2.1 SDK to the correct locations. Thanks for all the information, and for your wonderful mining program |
|
|
|
|
Try the -g 1 switch, could help in using higher values of thread concurrency
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
