One thing that makes Engineer.ai different from other ICO, is the vast experience they have in the industry before starting the project.
Yes that what I also read, the CEO is a well known in this industry and this is already a established platform and this I think will be the edge over the others. Engineer.ai will become the new approach to software development. After a collection of $ 29.5 Million, it has already got enough confidence to get into the list of top ICO(s) . You should subscribe to their announcement channel : TELEGRAM ANN CHANNELMaybe it could be much better if you can provide us a link to this claim like a deposit address maybe? because oftentimes, other ICO's had unsupported claims of huge funds generated from their own ICO which is quite the norm these days in order to further attract investors to the project. So you think Engineer.ai is hiring for no reason? If you google, you will get a lot of such stories! https://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/engineer-ai-raises-usd-29-5-mn-from-softbank-s-deepcore-and-others-118111901336_1.htmlThere are lots of projects claiming to have huge funds collected during their pre sales but turned out to be false and in the end the project grew cold and the team members cannot be contacted anymore and since its easy to have paid publishing, I guess the community would not be fully satisfied and are getting tired with just mere words of huge funds collected to attract investors unless otherwise a concrete proof is shown to the public.
|
|
|
This is wise decision by the team since we are in a bear period and doing an ICO these days could yield unfortunate results and could force a project to pack up and discontinue just like the others. how long will ITO TrustED be postponed? I think the market will improve early next year. because the long delay is not good to project, so I hope Trusted ITO delay isn't too long. What is certain is that all of them also hope that, hopefully, at the beginning of the next year the market will be able to improve again, and most importantly, for now, we better follow the development Well, just like the case of other project's postponing their ICO, they've stated that they will continue its development which could be ideal in that sense in order not to lose its momentum.
|
|
|
This is wise decision by the team since we are in a bear period and doing an ICO these days could yield unfortunate results and could force a project to pack up and discontinue just like the others.
|
|
|
Any updates about this project? especially on the status of its pending patents. Im positive the devs will be kind enough to share some relevant info about this project to the community.
I haven't seen any admins on this thread for some reason, maybe they prefer to answer via email. I think that's strange approach for pr from them but everyone has got their own style. It would be a great mistake to abandon this thread since others are relying on this forum to convey and receive information and doing such might also have negative impact on this project.
|
|
|
One thing that makes Engineer.ai different from other ICO, is the vast experience they have in the industry before starting the project.
Yes that what I also read, the CEO is a well known in this industry and this is already a established platform and this I think will be the edge over the others. Engineer.ai will become the new approach to software development. After a collection of $ 29.5 Million, it has already got enough confidence to get into the list of top ICO(s) . You should subscribe to their announcement channel : TELEGRAM ANN CHANNELMaybe it could be much better if you can provide us a link to this claim like a deposit address maybe? because oftentimes, other ICO's had unsupported claims of huge funds generated from their own ICO which is quite the norm these days in order to further attract investors to the project.
|
|
|
Seems like ICObench does not have any idea about the potential of this ico, else it might have been rated above 4 out of 5 . I strongly feel that this one has been under rated .
There have been several ratings in the past on that website which didn't make a whole lot of sense. What matters most is the delivery of a working platform rather than a half cooked ICO rating which most investors often disregarding it.
|
|
|
Any updates about this project? especially on the status of its pending patents. Im positive the devs will be kind enough to share some relevant info about this project to the community.
|
|
|
It seems it will be hard to pick this token under 20 satoshi my orders are still there. This rally is moving towards the moon and it getting more value gradually and this process looking really healthy.
With this promising project, I could even buy those tokens a little higher and I'm optimistic its value will surely appreciate over the next few months and be not worried about it.
|
|
|
Yes, seems that Datum is still working, had my doubts because earliert they posted regularly news and updates. But I've seen that Roger is active in their telegram channel and is answering questions of the community.
Although there is no significant news from Datum, I am happy with the datum team because they are responsive in responding to the questions of their supporters. It could be more cool if they are regularly interacting with the community in this thread besides other communication channels. In this way, it could give an impression that the team are sincere and serious in making this project more successful.
|
|
|
When the marketplace platform launch? As far as I remember they going to start selling watches on their platform in this year already or Im wrong?
Our launch is planned in Q1 2019. We will launch our pilot project for our partners and we start stelling all these watches on the platform. So you still have to wait one more month ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Launch planned for January? What name of this brand ( I mean watches) ? This is some known company? How much their yearly profit from watches selling? ⭐️ PARTNERSHIPS ⭐️ SOMA is acquiring new corporate partners every week for our marketplace launch. See https://soma.co/blockchain-ecommerce-platform-launch/ to keep up with our progress! Partners acquired so far: 🇫🇮 Sipilän Kello, Savot, Rajamäen Kellotehdas 🇺🇸 Diefendorff, Seals 🇨🇭 DWISS 🇦🇺 Bausele 🇸🇪 Belos 🇩🇰 LAB by Miang Copenhagen 🇫🇷 Project O Concept 🇳🇴 ÁIGI 🇬🇧 Wessex 🇸🇬 Advisor Watches More in negotiations. 🎉 This is a great step towards mainstream adoption of the platform and I think SOMA is getting more bigger by the day by partnering with these merchants and it as become more promising than before.
|
|
|
Is there a mechanism or option to revoke academic credentials in the blockchain? I hope they will have that feature in this project.
Interesting. The point is that a block-chain can keep an uncompromising history of data. Can you give an example, why this function may be needed? This mechanism can be prove to be helpful if in case there is a mistake or error in an Academic credential but it should be used with caution. You are right, such a mechanism may be needed. And you are right, that it need to use with caution. Otherwise, it is to give the possibility of the appearance of corruption, which completely discredits this service. Even Vitalik Buterin was featured in an article discussing this kind of technology. Kindly check this link - https://cryptocoinspy.com/vitalik-buterin-co-founder-of-ethereum-eth-tweetstorms-about-blockchain/
|
|
|
Is there a mechanism or option to revoke academic credentials in the blockchain? I hope they will have that feature in this project.
Interesting. The point is that a block-chain can keep an uncompromising history of data. Can you give an example, why this function may be needed? This mechanism can be prove to be helpful if in case there is a mistake or error in an Academic credential but it should be used with caution.
|
|
|
I hope that in the near future will are we gonna see other products besides watches as partners with SOMA which could make the platform more attractive to the community.
There will be. We are now focussing on this niche luxury industry during our pilot program. We want to start with one nich market before adding other markets. First focus is to get our pilot launch for our partners, gathering feedback and keep working on the platform. After the pilot we are ready for the full platform launch! Good to hear that! and it can only mean that SOMA platform will one day become a one stop hub marketplace and I will be looking forward with that being realized in the near future.
|
|
|
I hope that in the near future will are we gonna see other products besides watches as partners with SOMA which could make the platform more attractive to the community.
|
|
|
Is there a mechanism or option to revoke academic credentials in the blockchain? I hope they will have that feature in this project.
|
|
|
Seems like ICObench does not have any idea about the potential of this ico, else it might have been rated above 4 out of 5 . I strongly feel that this one has been under rated .
I actually don't give a damn care for ico ratings, all we know they're just been paid to rate other icos in 5 out of 5. And investors now knew this ang lose trust to ico ratings, as long as we got a good product here and good team, engineer.ai will dominate the AI industry. I really don't care about ICO ratings, I investigate the projects myself and Engineer.ai is one project with great potential. Maybe ICO rating sites had a tarnished reputation but let us not forget that some projects are clearly being shilled up to the point that newbie bot accounts render the thread as almost incomprehensible with garbage posts and we should all be aware of that.
|
|
|
I've just clicked on the link to their website but there was a message that states "Hosting service is suspended". I hope somebody from the team could resolve this asap? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Yes you are right there is still same message appearing it seems they didn't paid the hosting fee. I also have hope soon they will make it restore and it will keep running without any issue in future. I am afraid it must have been overlooked and its just a minor issue and will be resolved promptly but I hoped it will not be repeated again as it could be an object of ridicule by the community.
|
|
|
This is not time to sell but buy more if there is further drop somehow. Module is full of potential and those can't distinguish among projects and don't value the potential and teams they really don't deserve them. I don't think that majority will sell because what can you do with small or money while waiting will be worth much more. Letting people to valuate the projects based on their own knowledge and understanding is good.
There is a minimal chance that token holders will sell their tokens at a cheaper price when they know exactly that this project is of a high potential. so i guess everybody not are quite hesitant to sell their tokens at a much cheaper price.
|
|
|
BuilderCare operates a warranty service that allows customers to get updates to their bespoke software as third-party libraries (Facebook API’s for example) decay over time and support to ensure their projects keep running after delivery. So there is no issues with the bug stuff .
I don''t believe that there will be no issues with regards to bugs as there are no system that is 100 percent perfect, hence the need for updates and support as you've stated. This just reminds me of Murphys Law. I guess it will be better for you to wait the software to roll out and see it for yourself. I mean it's better to work silently than make some hype thus in the end of the day it will be worth nothing. Seemingly, you're interested here so better to watch out here. Had you already subscribe to their TG channels? I bet you should. https://t.me/Engineer_ai_Officialhttps://t.me/engineeraiannouncementsYeah I guess you're right. If I could see a remarkable platform that is performing according to what its supposed to do, then I think I could change my position and fully support this project. Imho.
|
|
|
Datum, your not the first people to make a S3 API to a Data store, there's been many many over the years and many many failed, I've seen many fail, do your research and know why, otherwise your just doing work for no reason.
I think it would be better if you could provide the community with a factual data about your allegations otherwise it could be interpreted that you are just in to make fud on this project.
|
|
|
|