Did I really deny that I received payments from the faucet? Where is the evidence that I advertised Ponzi scheme?
CryptoMonitor was not a faucet, that thread was a deliberate ponzi pretending to cloud mine and duly shut down. You posted several times with "proof of payment" in that thread (you have since deleted those posts. Why is that?) Posting proof of payment in ponzi threads is seen as promoting, hence your negative trust feedback. You don't have to agree. End of story. No need to lie. What's this?  Where is your evidence that this ponzi scheme? |
|
|
|
Why invent? On my site, SCAMs are designated so that users are careful and do not trust them.
Sure, after you used referral links of said services to profit off the investors you were leading to these sites. despite apparently knowing they were or were going to be a scam? What cards are you still playing here exactly? That they weren't ponzi schemes? That you warned people they were a scam after the fact?  Or that you didn't promote them at all? Because you clearly did... Don't you read my posts at all? I wrote you everything in detail. Let's give a specific example of whom I brought in a ponzi scheme or is it just slander. |
|
|
|
Guess cryptodevil got his reasons why he left a feedback at you !
He busted a lot of scammers and spammers and it dosnt matters if that was years ago !
Also as others have asked why you care now for this ?
Was the account changed the owner ?
I already wrote that this was my account always. And I think he was just wrong. Why ask the same questions? There is everything in thread. |
|
|
|
Hacked/sold account or trying to play the innocent card:
You are mistaken, this is my account and it was all the time. I do not play anything, but I want to understand. |
|
|
|
More likely it was you made the mistake of thinking that, as it's accepted to promote ponzis in the Russian local/HYIP forum (which you do continually), you could therefore post support in the reference English main board thread of the scam cryptomonitordotnet and get away with it, despite cryptodevil leaving large font posts there saying that he would leave red trust to anyone doing so.
But you will no doubt say you haven't deleted that post.
I do not advertise Ponzi schemes on any forum. Do not mislead people. Or provide proof of this?
You deleted the posts of you making dozens of deposits on the site? That's uhhh, shady to say the least? (You're lying?) Perhaps you've grown up and aren't the same person you were 2 years ago, but then we find this exhibit;, you're also advertising http://hyipin.com in your profile. Mind explaining how that isn't promoting a ponzi? That site is like a collection of cancers that i wish to avoid in my lifetime. Did I really deny that I received payments from the faucet? Where is the evidence that I advertised Ponzi scheme? In my profile is my personal site. On it, I do not use any Ponzi schemes. |
|
|
|
More likely it was you made the mistake of thinking that, as it's accepted to promote ponzis in the Russian local/HYIP forum (which you do continually), you could therefore post support in the reference English main board thread of the scam cryptomonitordotnet and get away with it, despite cryptodevil leaving large font posts there saying that he would leave red trust to anyone doing so.
But you will no doubt say you haven't deleted that post.
I do not advertise Ponzi schemes on any forum. Do not mislead people. Or provide proof of this? |
|
|
|
cryptodevil marked my trust in red. I do not understand why he did it?
What part of Promoting HYIP ponzi scam do you not understand? He probably just made a mistake. |
|
|
|
That feedback is from about 2.5 years ago. Why are you now just starting to question it?
I don't know cryptodevil very well, but my guess is that he probably won't answer your PMs and if he's anything like a lot of other DT members he'll block them if you keep sending him messages. There's nothing anyone else can do about your feedback--not mods, not Theymos, no one besides cryptodevil himself. You did the only thing you can do if he's not replying to your PMs, which is to create a thread about it. Maybe he'll see it and clarify the feedback, but don't get your hopes up.
All this time I wrote him a private message. Now decided to create a theme here. I hope that someone will help. |
|
|
|
|
cryptodevil marked my trust in red. I do not understand why he did it? I wrote to him repeatedly, but he does not answer. Help me what to do?
|
|
|
|
What cryptoregulation are you talking about? This market is not regulated at all.
You have probably not followed the news in this area for several years. Legislative cryptoregulation in different countries began a long time ago. Americans, for example, could not participate in the ICO, but the Japanese have a cryptocurrency payment means and so on. |
|
|
|
this project has something to pay dividends on tokens, so this is very good. but until now it is still unclear whether this is a scam?
I do NOT see any reason to regard this project as fraudulent. The only negative is that it took more time to implement it than previously thought. The projects did not expect that bad market conditions would slow down the development process so much that everyone expected. Not everything is so simple in recognizing fraud, recently projects have difficulties for various reasons and it is not clear what to think. One of the main reasons for the difficulties of the projects is the collapsed market and cryptoregulation. |
|
|
|
Now crypto startups do everything possible to hold investors that they do not sell their tokens. And one of the way for it differen dividend programs, leasing programs that investors can get profit for token they hold.
If the project has something to pay dividends on a token, then this is very good. But it often happens that this is just a scam. |
|
|
|
The fact is that since ancient times most of the money came to a small number of people. According to the idea of cryptocurrency, funds should be distributed. But everything happens as usual.
Cryptocurrencies do not preclude the accumulation of capital, and in some cases even encourage it. |
|
|
|
Therefore, now some projects are listed on the exchanges not immediately after the ICO, but when the finished product is released, so that there is a need for tokens and their price is higher.
It is good that some have begun to understand this. But most want to sell as quickly as possible; others want to see their assets on the exchange as soon as possible to make sure that everything is in order with the project. In any case, this leads to a project asset dump. In this case, it is possible to buy project tokens at a more attractive price, if the project is really interesting. |
|
|
|
The history of cryptocurrency is repeated. Maybe there will be days like this with a possibility to earn big money quickly with minimal investment.... in few years  So often people believe in it. Many remain in cryptocurrencies only because they have heard enough stories about how others have become millionaires, having invested many years ago. The interest in cryptocurrencies is held partly by themes and profitable examples, for the sake of this we can wait a few years. People tend to notice good examples, ignoring bad ones. Even if the second is much more than the first. Therefore, the market attracts many people, most of whom are losing money. If someone lost money, then another has acquired. It is natural. In any case, its assets must be treated with great responsibility. |
|
|
|
The history of cryptocurrency is repeated. Maybe there will be days like this with a possibility to earn big money quickly with minimal investment.... in few years So often people believe in it. Many remain in cryptocurrencies only because they have heard enough stories about how others have become millionaires, having invested many years ago. |
|
|
|
Crypto market is very attractive. A big volatility of tokens is a good opportunity for traders. Even bitcoin has a big volatility.
Yes, now the previous volatility is returning to cryptocurrency. Some traders paid attention to this and returned to the market. |
|
|
|
I know that fraudsters have been and will be everywhere, they are not afraid of responsibility and imprisonment, there are no methods of struggle in "cryptomir" that is why everything looks so pitiable.
We just need to always be vigilant and carefully analyze each project. |
|
|
|
Suppose there is a more stringent legislation. The scammer will think: “oh, so scary” and ... nothing will change  . The fact of fraud is difficult not only to prove, but sometimes even qualify. It is necessary to create such an environment so that there is no place for scammers. Sometimes it seems that crypto was created for scammers. Do not exaggerate, there are fraudsters in all areas, especially popular financial areas. But the methods of struggle are really worth improving every day, but fraudsters also do not sit still. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
