No, it should be easier. You won't have to bother with creating your own token. You will just have to send quite a few transactions to addresses you generate. Each transaction might cost you 226 satoshi depending on the type of addresses you use and the fee rate (1 sat/byte assumption here). It will be much cheaper if you fund all stamps in one transaction.


It will go through. Take a look at the ecommended fee at this website. The fees have been really low for a long time now. 1 sat/byte transactions usually confirm within 24 hours if there is a sudden spike.

The Lightning Network won't be useful in this case. It is supposed to be used mostly for micro-transactions, but it also requires a specific setup to work. If you want to 'fund a stamp' with some coins then sending an on-chain transaction with the lowest possible fee (1 sat/byte) is the only reasonable choice right now.

How did you set up the other two accounts? You should create two separate Electrum wallets for them. Plug-in your Trezor and create a new wallet by selecting 'Use a hardware device'. You should be prompted to enter a passphrase if the plugged in device has this feature turned on. You will have to switch between wallets if you need to use a specific account, so name them properly.

No, there isn't a minimum amount of coins needed to start a node. You can run a Lightning Network node without any channels (no coins used) as long as you have available resources on your server. The Lightning Network node without any channels doesn't do anything at all. The node has its own on-chain address from which coins are taken when one wants to fund a channel. One can't open a big Lightning Network channel and split it later into smaller ones.

Versions older than 3.3.4 are vulnerable to the phising method you mentioned, so you should be safe. You might get a notification about the update if you enabled it in the settings earlier. Update Electrum by downloading it manually from the official website. Don't forget to verify the signature.

They run their own Lightning Network nodes and open new channels to people who want to rent inbound capacity from them. For example, Bitrefill charges 0.00005700 BTC for a 0.005 BTC channel. That's how they profit from locking up their coins for some time. Note that they also need to have inbound capacity if they want to route payments properly.

The only company that comes to my mind is Trezor. It's fairly easy to get in touch with the founders. They usually reply to messages in the official Telegram channel. They promised to port Trezor T software to Trezor One and they are working on it. Note that Trezor devices are completely different. They don't support as many altcoins as Ledger devices do. They don't use Secure Element, but both hardware and software are completely open-source. Thanks to that, someone even created a hardware wallet which is basically a Trezor One in a different chassis.

That's weird because the latest version is 3.3.8. I would suggest you uninstalling this version and downloading the latest one from the official website just to be sure.


Does your outgoing transaction appear as unconfirmed in the History tab? Can you check if the destination address is the same as it should be?

What version of Electrum do you have right now? Old versions did not notify users of available updates. They are also vulnerable to a phising attack which tricks user to download a fake version of Electrum. Are there any entries in the History tab? Was the transaction to Exodus sent without any errors?

Thanks for drawing my attention to these questions. I will rephrase the answers in a moment. LND is the only implementation that supports neutrino, so you have to run a full node on the others.


As long as you don't have any coins on your side, yes. However, you won't be able to send transactions over the Lightning Network in such a case.

Take a look at his post again. He claims that he has written down his mnemonic phrase on a paper notepad. If that's the case then either someone managed to find it and stole the coins or his computer was infected with malware from the very beginning. We still don't know what version of Electrum he has and where he downloaded it from.

There is a much easier way. You can send all of your funds from BitStamp to your nested SegWit address. Generate a native SegWit address in the Ledger Live and transfer your coins there from your nested SegWit address. You don't have to move them to BitStamp again. While transfering coins between your addresses, you can set a low fee (1 sat/byte).

Ledger Blue is terrible. Ledger barely supports it and you can't even buy it from the official website anymore. I have already explained why it is bad in this post.


As far as I remember, Ledger Blue has slightly more memory, but it supports less coins. If you don't want to bother with reinstalling apps and want to have a functioning Bluetooth then Nano X is a better choice.

If the other party forcefully closes the channel with an old state while you are offline, the closing transaction will be able to be confirmed after 2 weeks. You have 2 weeks to come back online. If you manage to do it, Eclair Mobile will publish a penalty transaction for you. Note that it will only happen if the other party has a malicious intent. I have never experienced it despite having many opened channels.

However, if you were to close the channel, you would have to wait only 720 blocks (~5 days). These are the default values negotiated by Eclair Mobile before the channel is funded.

At least a year and a half judging by this Github issue.


KeepKey is far behind Trezor and Ledger, so you can guess what the answer is. It looks like Ledger does not support it either, but you can see such an option on one of the preview images. The only way is to pair all of these hardware wallets with Electrum. What a shame.

Bitcoin Core nodes used to drop transactions after 72 hours, but it has been extended to 2 weeks. Keep in mind that these are the default values and some nodes might keep transactions for a longer or shorter periods of time. -zapwallettxes parameter can be used to forget the unconfirmed transaction locally which allows you to create a new one. Technically, transactions never expire once you sign them. They become invalid once you spend previously signed inputs.


Unfortunately, they are not. I am sure that Trezor team is well aware of this since there is a wiki entry about it.

Electrum does not rebroadcast transactions automatically. Nodes will keep the transaction for a couple of days and eventually drop it. All transactions are now marked as replacable by default if you use Electrum 3.1 or newer.

Może warto by było skontaktować się z yahoo i zaproponować takie rozwiązanie? Raczej nie należy do osób, które zignorują sensownie napisaną prywatną wiadomość. Wprowadzenie nowego wymagania do kampanii nie powinno być dla niego problem, skoro na bieżąco zapisuje kto ile zdobył merita w ciągu tygodnia.

Niektórzy mogą zwrócić uwagę, że merity nie są rozdawane w podobnych ilościach we wszystkich sekcjach. Trudno, żeby ktoś czytał wypowiedzi znajdujące się na czwartej czy piątej stronie w Gambling Discussion czy w jakimkolwiek dziale związanym z altcoinami.

SegWit is a protocol upgrade. Nested SegWit is a type of address which starts from 3 and offers full compatibility while providing some benefits of the native SegWit. Native SegWit is also referred to as the bech32 address (it starts from bc1).


Oh, you're right. It's weird that they don't allow sending to bech32 addresses while generating nested SegWit ones. Choose a nested SegWit address then. It should start with 3 and it will be completely compatible with all services. I am sorry for confusing you.

Since BitStamp supports SegWit, I would recommend you choosing a native SegWit address in the Ledger Live. Nested SegWit ensures 100% compatibility with services which don't support SegWit yet, but you will save a bit less on fees in the future if you choose it.