Bitcoin Forum
July 07, 2024, 01:55:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 141 »
1601  Economy / Securities / Re: charitable fund to promote BTC/LTC/NMC + other btc accepting charities on: August 17, 2012, 10:25:30 PM
yeah, he spammed me about this, i was not pleased Sad  



One private message to you and my first and only ever private message to you and that's spam is it  Huh  As the investment fund would have been buying lot's of shares in your securities I thought it made sense to offer you a postion as patron.


90% of the funds profits will be reinvested (to be reviewed as the fund grows in proportion to the exchange market) while the rest will be donated 50:50 between BTC/LTC/NMC promotion and development, and the other 50% to tech charities that accept bitcoin donations that could help proliferate the bitcoin network.   Such as The Freedom Box Foundation - http://freedomboxfoundation.org/goals/index.en.html - and - The Free Network Foundation - http://freenetworkfoundation.org/?page_id=772 -  

A free, open and uncensored internet is vital to bitcoins survival and growth.  So having an investment fund to feed suitable movements is very important but large donations never came.  Maybe people don't think I'm suitable for the project although I'm happy for anyone else who feels qualified to come on board to help manage and direct the charity and/or investment fund.  
1602  Economy / Securities / Re: Red Star Mining - 40MH/s a share(0.20btc) or 1GH/s for 5BTC post - post ASIC on: August 17, 2012, 09:24:04 PM
I've updated the accounts spreedsheet to make it a bit easier to read and added some new sections - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ap02rO_j4NLvdDB2cFRTS0ctVGRHRE5yQ2RfNUZFcUE

Total hardware and wallet assets = ~$2,500+~BTC32.00  | Total shares distributed 1836
1603  Economy / Securities / Re: Red Star Mining - 40MH/s a share(0.20btc) or 1GH/s for 5BTC post - post ASIC on: August 17, 2012, 08:47:33 PM
I've updated the accounts spreedsheet to make it a bit easier to read and added some new sections - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ap02rO_j4NLvdDB2cFRTS0ctVGRHRE5yQ2RfNUZFcUE
1604  Economy / Speculation / Re: lol - if you are watching live right now on: August 17, 2012, 08:06:47 PM
It's just more manipulation by Pirate trying to make more money to pay back his deposits.

Quote

After much consideration, I’ve decided to close down Bitcoin Savings & Trust. 

Why?
The decision was based on the general size and overall time required to manage the transactions.  As the fund grew there were larger and larger coin movements which put strain on my reserve accounts and ultimately caused delays on withdraws and the inability to fund orders within my system.  On the 14th I made a final attempt to relieve pressure off the system by reducing the rates I offered for deposits.  In a perfect world this would allow me to hold more coins in reserve outside the system, but instead it only exponentially increased the amount of withdrawals overnight causing mass panic from many of my lenders.

So now what?
I’ve spoken with my clients over the last week and come to an agreement that would allow me to close down my operation within a week.  Currently my reserve (operating wallets) are drained from fulfilling the withdraw spree that happened after the rate drop announcement.  All withdraws at this point will be delayed until Monday when the shutdown process begins.. 

At this point I will no longer accept deposits.  Any coins sent into the system as of now will be returned immediately.

When will I get my coins?
Starting Monday I’ll begin systematically closing and withdrawing accounts as coins are transferred.  I don't expect the entire process to last longer than a week. The moment your account is closed you’ll receive your coins plus any interest accrued up to the hour it was sent.

Thanks
I’d like to thank all of my lenders and PPT operators that were a key element in making Bitcoin Savings & Trust a success.  Bitcoin has grown a lot since I started this and want you to know that you were a vital part in helping it grow.

Now, I have a lot of work to do. Stay Tuned

-pirate

BTW, this is all bitlane’s fault.  (j/k you nut)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=50822.msg605957#msg605957
1605  Economy / Securities / Re: Red Star Mining - 40MH/s a share or 1GH/s for 5.00BTC post ASIC on: August 17, 2012, 07:23:52 PM
RSM offer is being lowered to BTC0.20 in light of bitcoins increase in value.  So 2650 new shares need to be created to take us to 200GH/s post ASIC and 40MH/s a share or 1GH/s for BTC5.00.  This will takes us to 4950 shares in total over five*40GH/s ASIC.  I'm only going to create the new shares in rounded numbers as needed per unit.  So 500 new shares created meaning we now have 2,800 shares in total.  We have 1969 issued with 939 on offer at BTC0.20 which is more than enough at current exchange rates for the 40GH/s ASIC plus 20% import tax with the rest saved to ASIC #3.

Update on our ModMiner FPGA delivery tracking info

Date           Time           Location                   Tracking Event
16-08-2012  21:42   International Hub   Awaiting Customs Charging
07-08-2012   10:27   International Hub   Awaiting Customs clearance
07-08-2012   10:24   International Hub   Received in destination country
03-08-2012   05:35   Delivery Agent -        CHICAGO   Forwarded for export
01-08-2012   15:26   Delivery Agent -        UNITED STATES AMERICA   Collected from customer


With the Atom board and ModMiner electricty costs should be under £4.00/£6.28/€5.09 a week.  With the board making around BTC2.57@800MH/s.  Tho the boards firmware should be upgraded soon to 840MH/s meaning BTC2.70 a week at current difficulty.  Then ET's new bitstream should come on board taking the ModMiner to over 1GH/s or over BTC3.21 a week at current difficulty.  Tho all profits are being saved for the ASIC import import tax at the moment which could be up to $300/£180/€230.  Tho we do have over BTC31.00 saved but this depends on customs charges on the ModMiner.  Once we have enough to cover the import taxers 90% of profits will be saved until we are operating at or over 40GH/s a share.  When a motion will be held to lower it to possibly as low as 50% of profits.  With the other 50% being kept for perpetual growth and expansion of RSM's portfolio of mining hardware.  
1606  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Should bitcoin lower the transaction fee? on: August 17, 2012, 02:26:41 PM
Transaction fees will be very important towards miners fee's in the future.

Once again.  The mandatory fee will likely be completely irrelevant in the future.  It isn't designed for revenue.  Never was, never will be.  Competition will cause users to pay a much much higher fee for fast processing than the mandatory fee (which is only designed to mark denial of service attacks prohibitively expensive).

Case in point even now satoshi dice pays a tx fee roughly 5x higher than the mandatory fee and they pay it on tx which don't even require the mandatory fee.  In the future it won't matter much if the mandatory fee is 0.0005 btc but your client advised you that to have a good chance of being include in the next 20 blocks will require a fee of 10x that. 

I use blockchain.info/MyWallet to send amounts down to just BTC1.00 that I have often only just received so have to pay the recommended "default" BTC0.0005 like satoshi dice.  So once btc/usd>$100 that's $0.05 on even a $1 transaction or 5% fee.  I understand the need to stop blockchain spam but wouldn't having the lowest fees possible help the adoption of bitcoin by people transacting sub $1.00 amounts often as btc value rises. 



Before I left for vacation, I submitted a pull request that makes the default policy for miners "more fees == more likely to get into a block."  That will be in the 0.7 release (the policy before was mostly "higher priority == more likely to get into a block"), and I've been encouraging the big mining pool operators to implement something similar if they have their own transaction-selection code.

When I get back from vacation I plan on writing code to watch the transactions that do or do not make it into blocks to derive an estimate of the average miners' fee policy, and use that to recommend a reasonable fee to the user.

Those changes will let fees float naturally-- users and miners will form a market and fees will rise or fall based on what users are willing to pay and what miners are willing to accept. I don't like the arbitrary, centralized setting of fees that we've had up until now.


Sounds interesting.
1607  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Should bitcoin lower the transaction fee? on: August 16, 2012, 11:45:39 PM
The wording of your question implies it hasn't already been done.  The fee was lowered to its current value when Bitcoin exceeded $20 USD per BTC.   At this point there is no reason to lower the fee further.  Maybe when 1 BTC = $100 then cutting the minimum fee by 80% would make it equivalent to the prior cut.

Still the min fee is likely going to be less and less important in the future.  I already pay about 5x the min fee (still a fraction of a cent).  The min fee doubling or being cut in half wouldn't change anything for me.

I know the transaction fee has changed before.  Transaction fees will be very important towards miners fee's in the future.
1608  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Should bitcoin lower the transaction fee? on: August 16, 2012, 11:39:52 PM
Should bitcoin lower the transaction fee  Huh

*edit: transaction fee's will be important to miners in the future and it could help condense the bloating blockchain size by having a "high" transaction fee.  But standard wallets like the default wallet-qt and blockchain.info/mywallet require a transaction fee before sending coin unless it's a larger amount of coin sent after a longer amount of in wallet idle of time.  So miners incomes and blockchain size vrs free(cheap) open micro-transactions which could help fuel adoption and growth.
1609  Economy / Speculation / Re: Summer Bubble on: August 16, 2012, 12:12:53 PM
Its only summer on half the globe.

Yeah the vastly mostly populated half.
1610  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What is the third most popular cryptocurrency? on: August 15, 2012, 02:23:28 PM
Probably Bitcoin>litecoin>namecoin

+1

NMC can be bought, sold, traded and transferred.  Sounds like a store of value and a means of exchange to me.  Even if it can do more than that as well.
1611  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Introducing the ModMiner Quad 840Mhash @ 40 Watts http://www.BTCFPGA.com on: August 15, 2012, 02:11:54 PM
My board has been in UK customs now for eight days  Angry  When there supposed to deliver it within 48hrs of it landing in the UK.  I have emailed Royal Mail with the tracking number to find out what's going on.  Last time the board arrived much quicker.
1612  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / New Blockchain.info graph for total transaction fees per day in $/€/£ ??? on: August 14, 2012, 01:09:37 AM
I couldn't find the relevant contact info so thought best to ask here for the graph of total transaction fees per day in $/€/£ on the Blockchain.info charts.  I know there is a "Total Transaction Fees" valued in btc but with btc current rises in value I think this graph would be good for miners.
1613  Economy / Economics / Re: Is it possible that bitcoin will become unaffordable to use for micropayments? on: August 14, 2012, 12:59:05 AM
I think bitcoin would be better off with a very low price but a very high value.  Moving the decimal place would help that.

Settings > Options > Display > Unit to show amounts in > µBTC

Problem solved.

I don't use the default bitcoin wallet and neither will new adopters or the masses.  Calling them micro/milliBitcoins and working in different values requires more effort and thought for new adopters.  Just having a single simple unit that is easy to correlate with the $/€/£ would be simpler and ease adoption plus use.   

We do have a single simple unit that is easy to correlate with the $/€/£. it is the BTC.
Currently the exchange rates are:
1BTC =
1BTC =
1BTC =

Tell me what wallet application you use, and I may be able to provide the steps necessary to achieve your goal in your application.

Yeah how to get a blockchain.info/MyWallet to permanently stay in GBP  Huh
1614  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Changing the miners transfer fee and amount of coins? on: August 13, 2012, 03:47:09 PM
If the bitcoin value keeps rising over the coming months to up to and over $20.00 a coin then each BTC0.0005 transfer fee would equal $0.01 and above.  Talking about bitcoin having free or very low transfer fees wouldn't it be best to move the decimal place and make a bitcoin instead of worth $20.00 a coin but to $2.00 a coin keep the transfer fee BTC0.0005 and have 210,000,000 coins in total instead of 21,000,000 coins.
You're crazy.

Inflation simply to avoid changing a soft-coded fee?

It's not inflation as the bitcoin market capitalisation stays the same.   
1615  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Introducing the ModMiner Quad 840Mhash @ 40 Watts http://www.BTCFPGA.com on: August 12, 2012, 03:39:46 PM
I have an old broken PC where the PSU still works I have unplugged the CPU and other components.  Can I plug in any molex connector to the ModMiner that fits or are some different voltages?  If so how do I know which molex connector from the old PSU to use?  Thanks.
1616  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Flexcoin? on: August 11, 2012, 03:52:13 PM
Hey guys, remember Flexcoin?  http://flexcoin.com/

I remembered about it today.  I went to withdraw my account balances that were still there.  It worked.

Does anyone else still use this?  I love the concept of the vanity account names that act as intra-systemic addresses.  I sort of hoped I would have been hearing more about this by now.

Yes I use the service tho it seems a bit archaic now with the likes of MyWallet.  It needs some innovation to make it more attractive.
1617  Other / Off-topic / Re: Banks, Seeds and a ranting Drakahn >.> on: August 11, 2012, 03:26:00 PM
TL;DR = Don't store money in banks, buy "Things" that store value.
There isn't enough value in the world to pay back all of the debt in the world, and debt is added faster than value.
The imaginary currency the world is addicted to now can only end badly, and the longer it is allowed to go on the more people it is bad for. If you have savings, it should not be in any government currency, history shows that, put it in to things, things will always be worth something.

Gold(real gold, not bonds or certificates, other rare/used metals as well, they tend to adjust for inflation so should stay close to the same value (more money))

Self sufficient technology (things that make things, generators, hydro gardens, normal gardens, water tanks, water purifiers, solar/wind power, food preservers, even 'normal' tools, etc.), the 'thing' itself will go down in value, but the 'things' it makes won't, also covers you in case of world going to shit

Seeds (if the world goes to shit, food will be worth more than gold, and seeds make food, if the world doesn't go to shit, your seeds will be worth close to the same as they are now, and making your own food would work out cheaper and healthier in the long run),

If you must store money, use a credit union, not a bank, storing cash means losing value over time, at least interest partly accounts for inflation (Australia has had an average of 5.6%/year inflation since 1966, 2.9% since 2001)

Security - against thieves, (including the government), store the things in safes (plural, one safe means losing everything at once if you lose that safe), keep things the government would steal separate (gold, cash, probably even the seeds, anything they could claim they needed for the good of the country that would hurt you to lose) - this one isn't really going to increase in value or anything, but if it does its job once its paid for itself...

Art - The right art tends to always have a market, so works as savings, in a perfect world the only thing worth "money" would be art and unique creations,  instead of money ending, it just becomes frivolous, one vision is because robots do every job so how can people make money? - the problem I see with this is if robots do every job, the people that own the robots would have no use for billions of people sucking up resources... so it would probably end badly, still, having art could end up being a way to get a foot in the door to the robot owners "not being slaughtered" club

If you are feeling adventurous bitcoins will exist for as long as the internet and are deflationary. so as government money is made to be worth less (worthless) bitcoins are worth more, I say adventurous because they are only three and a half years old and it is a very young economy, my prediction is that they will be worth many times more in the future, but I’m not a psychic... you can also keep your bitcoins on a usb stick or in a physical form (the key printed on paper/metal/etc.) in a safe, done properly those coins will be there until you want them).

Bitcoins are better than money for a few reasons, there is no one in charge, the rules on currency creation were set at the beginning and can't be changed, there will only ever be 21 million of them (infinitely divisible). Fee's are set by the “miners” and currently at 0.0005btc ($0.0055) per average transaction. They can be “mined” that is, currency creation is done by the people that secure the network, by pointing your hardware (ATI graphics cards or specialist hardware) at the network it performs maths that verify the transactions on the network are real and that the coins being spent are owned by the person spending them, once verified you build a block (like a page in a ledger) and get paid some 'new' coins for the service, This can be seen as paying for bitcoins with electricity instead of money.

A note on the internet, the internet will exist through everything, if the government blocks it we will rebuild it, see Egypt, if the government filters it we will unlock it, see TOR, if the world goes to shit and all the isp's close down, we (well whoever planned and has electricity and wifi equipment) will build a worldwide wireless meshnet and enjoy free unfiltered "internet"(well, meshnet, but still)...we should do this now anyway...  

A note on me, I am not a writer, psychic or an economic adviser, this is a rant based on my hatred of money and my feelings, if you have any information that shows I am wrong I would love to hear it.



... I started this on facebook, it got kind of long and got to bitcoin, I also finished four drinks before getting to the bitcoin part - >.> does it make sense? and ring true? anything I should add to it?

Having a free uncensored internet is vital to bitcoin survival unless bitcoin moves within the I2P or Tor networks (and that's if they arn't blocked successfully like in China).  I tried starting a charitable trust investment fund to support The Freedom Box Foundation - http://freedomboxfoundation.org/goals/index.en.html - and - The Free Network Foundation - http://freenetworkfoundation.org/?page_id=772 - but it has not really taken off. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=92754.0
1618  Other / Meta / Re: Gathering Opinions: Stickies in Lending on: August 11, 2012, 03:00:15 PM
Hi guys,

As some of you may know, I'm the main person in charge of stickies in the Lending forum along with John. Our current policy is to sticky major lenders in order to separate them out from all of the lending requests. I believe that this is reasonable, since there are far fewer lenders than lendees, and when people go to the lending board for the first time, chances are that they are looking for a loan, so making them be stickies makes sense.

However, what has happened is that many of these lenders have started taking out loans of their own in the form of deposit programs and they are advertising them through their sticky, giving them an unfair advantage over all of the other loan requests. In fact, just this last week I had to yell at BurtW for converting his sticky into ONLY the deposit program. As a result, I took about a week to reevaluate the sticky requirements in the Lending board, and I think I have a solution that I want to hear the community's opinion on.

I propose that after giving the current sticky holders a few days of notice, no current sticky in the Lending board other than the Who Pays What? sticky can even mention a deposit program in the first post of the sticky. The only exceptions to this would be for mentions that are part of the company name and the user's signature. No other mention would be allowed in the first post of the sticky, and any other mention would most likely be considered off-topic and subject to deletion as per standard moderation rules. As such, I will likely request that the users make a whole new thread to replace the current sticky, and one of us will swap the two threads out.

Let me know what you guys think.

There is a board for bitcoin "securities" to help those businesses so why can't we have a child board for bitcoin banking/deposits.
1619  Economy / Economics / Re: Is it possible that bitcoin will become unaffordable to use for micropayments? on: August 10, 2012, 11:20:18 PM
I think bitcoin would be better off with a very low price but a very high value.  Moving the decimal place would help that.

Settings > Options > Display > Unit to show amounts in > µBTC

Problem solved.

I don't use the default bitcoin wallet and neither will new adopters or the masses.  Calling them micro/milliBitcoins and working in different values requires more effort and thought for new adopters.  Just having a single simple unit that is easy to correlate with the $/€/£ would be simpler and ease adoption plus use.   
1620  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What do you do with a litecoin? on: August 10, 2012, 11:05:54 PM
I'm a total newbie and non-techie/non-gamer.  Love the idea of cryptocurrencies. 

Please excuse my ignorance, but why does anyone want litecoins?  I know you can sell them for bitcoins, which is what I plan to do.  But who would want to buy my coins and why?

Thanks in advance for info.



Bitcoin address:   115stzbruWvMSsVFo4JgumMR7KUziMaQer
Litecoin address:  LbdvgPAmdUDz8qhuseGdaa5CtCZBK4P3KA

You could argue the same about bitcoin.  Bitcoin is just a more mature and more used alternative to litecoin.  Yes more merchants accept bitcoin but litecoin proliferation is growing and it's still under one year old. 
Pages: « 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 141 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!