-snip- Thanks for the link. As suspected, 50% of 18-34 year olds are interested in crypto, with 14% planning to buy or mine within the next 12 months. This age group is the future of crypto - bullish news indeed. |
|
|
|
|
I'd be more interested to know the break down in to different age groups. I suspect it would be heavily skewed towards the younger generation, but it would give a little insight in to the future of crypto.
|
|
|
|
and also find out if the person given the merits deserves it.
Well, how good was the sex? |
|
|
|
So if i have no merit i don't get laid? What is the world becoming to...sad day already...and it's just begun.
"How do i tell my wife i have no merit" Tell your wife that I've got loads.  |
|
|
|
|
Justin Sun claims a lot of things. Tron is built on plagiarized code with a plagiarized whitepaper. It can't handle any transactions per second because it doesn't have a Mainnet yet.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know of any specific services offering this, but you could easily set up bookmarks for all your public keys, and then group all the bookmarks together in to one folder. That way, you can load them all with just one click - might save you some time.
|
|
|
|
I'm not entirely sure Nice (with the capital) is a word in English it looks more French or something to me. Oh yeah, my bad. It's a French city with a French name, so that one doesn't count. |
|
|
|
|
Reading the city is pronounced Red-ing, and Nice as in nephew and niece.
|
|
|
|
Bingo! And yes it's the only one. What about the other 3 examples I gave...? |
|
|
|
I would strongly suggest you look inward instead of lashing out at people here. He has a flat Earther approach to discussion - he's the only one who is right, everyone else is wrong, and no amount of evidence will change his mind. Good to see that the only thing that has changed in 3 weeks since I first pointed this out is that he now has even more negative trust. Any hope that he would change his ways is long gone. He seems intent on burning every bridge he can find. |
|
|
|
I think if we join the bounty managed by ico team itself is too risky because they only have a newbie account and still have little trust, I better join the famous bounty manager because they will be responsible if something goes wrong
This is incorrect. Being employed by a team to run a bounty for them does not make the bounty manager responsible for anything that goes wrong with the ICO. They are simply running the marketing - they have nothing to do with the ICO itself. |
|
|
|
I agree. These is the strategy of the popular investors nowadays. They will spread FUD just to make the price lower then they will buy lots of Bitcoin on a cheaper price. A good strategy for them. The best we should do is ride with them. Every time the price becomes cheaper because of the FUD they spread, let's accumulate more coins. Exactly. They are counting on the FUD causing weak hands to sell, so they can buy your coins cheaply. If you've only invested what you can afford to lose (as you should have), then just hold. If you can, accumulate more. |
|
|
|
|
I might be misunderstanding the question, but the answer is no.
Transactions you make on exchanges are made "off-chain". The balances in your exchange wallets are updated from the exchange's database without bitcoin (or altcoin) being moved or transferred. This means that there is no bitcoin address associated with each transaction. It is only when you deposit or withdraw coins that you will use an address.
|
|
|
|
So i have a list of altcoins on blockfolio program that i use where i put down the coins to watch etc because many posters spoke so great about these coins. Many posters spoke great about Bitconnect, despite it being an obvious ponzi. Many posters are currently speaking great about Verge, despite it being a scam that is constantly being hacked. People just shill whatever they are holding because they want the price to go up. DYOR and don't listen to what people shill you. |
|
|
|
Why the user who blackmailed me then does not give me the negative trust? Because he admitted he's also a scammer. His negative trust is worthless. Why the guy who blackmailed me used a "disposable" telegram account if he did not give me the negative trust? Because he probably does this a lot and his account gets reported and banned. Why did both users use the same link? See my reply here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4452379.msg39826636#msg39826636Why the negative trust came right after my rejection on telegram? Maybe the telegram user alerted DT members to your scam, or maybe it's coincidence. Either way, irrelevant. |
|
|
|
if you say that the one in the chat is not him, how would you explain that the link is the same? Black magic? Because if you go to that archive site ( http://archive.li/), and enter the URL of the post you made ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4450787.0), it tells you someone else has already archived that page and redirects you to the same link. That's how. |
|
|
|
|
It is widely known that account selling/buying/trading will receive immediate red-trust. You have also admitted to leaving nonsense retaliatory feedback.
You can kick up a fuss about this as much as you want, but you only need to look at all the other threads complaining about the same thing to know that your feedback is only going to get worse.
|
|
|
|
|
Nano was WAY overly hyped at the end of last year. Couple that with the general bullrun, means it's peak price was much higher than it should have been. It has also been hit harder than other coins in this bear market because of the Bitgrail scam as OP pointed out.
Having said all that, I am still holding some Nano. Having played around with it and sent it between addresses, it is phenomenally quick (and free). It has all the makings of a true currency coin - it just needs adoption.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
