Seriously, can we just make this man a merit source already? I don't know if there are some hidden criteria, but if Loyce can't achieve them, then there is zero hope for anybody else.

There is no split in the medical community on this case. The doctors on one side want to stop artificially prolonging his suffering. The doctors on the other side only want to continue life support to provide palliative care until he dies at a later date. You wouldn't subject a pet to this kind of pain and torture, why is ok to subject a child to the same when he has absolutely zero chance of recovery?

Your posts are as misinformed and downright stupid as the mob of protestors who tried to storm a hospital and attack doctors over this. Disgusting, low-life behaviour.

Will newbies EVER learn to use the search function? There is nothing in this thread that has not been discussed at length 100 times before. Can we please trash it?

ORGANIZED/ORGANIZES
REACTIONS
EQUATIONS

All these words fit, and all make some sense when linked with the clue "process", althought I suspect "algorithm" as has been previously suggested might be the correct answer.

I am an exception only that I don't spam ANN, Bounty and megathreads with the same old vacuous nonsense, like the vast majority of lower-level accounts. My individual posts are by no means exceptional - I simply add to the discussion by posting original thoughts in coherent English.

I just posted this in another thread about this Litecoin transaction. I will quote it here because it is relevant.


Litecoin is a good coin for a number of reasons, but it is not making Bitcoin obsolete as OP claims.

This transaction is worthless as a measure of it being a good coin. Just as big transactions are a worthless measure for all coins. How often do you think people are transferring $99 million? Exactly. I want to know how much the fees are when I pay $1 for a hamburger or $2 for a coffee. If the fee is still $0.40, then that's 20-40% of my payment, and your coin is useless.

We should be judging coins on their speed and cost for small transfers, not large ones. And I do like Litecoin for various reasons, but there are coins like Nano that have zero fees.

hello sir, i think that merit should spread around all members, many members working hard to rank up but no merit receiving even though good and helpful posts. i have many excellent posts with large information and would be grateful sir if you consider would give me some merit. i only like reputable currenices like marinecoin and bitcoincashgolddarkprivatediamond. i am new by the way.

---

Seriously though:

Certainly when I was brand new, I didn't feel like I had the knowledge or confidence to contribute in the technical boards, and so a lot of my early posts (and early merits) were in either Bitcoin or Altcoin Discussion. When I read/comment on those boards now, I sort by newest threads first (add ;sort=first_post;desc to the end of the url). The first few replies after a topic has started is where you are most likely to find original thoughts and not just endless repeats, and you can tell pretty quickly whether an actual discussion is forming or whether the threads is turning in to another shitposting megathread. Don't know if that's any help to you? YMMV.

I registered my account the same month that you did. I'm not a hero or legendary member, I don't personally know anyone on the forum, and I had the same starting disadvantage that you did. I continue to privately report scammers and spammers, and have never asked for or earned any merit by doing this, or by using giveaway threads. I have earned 150 merit, you have earned 2.

What's my point here? Two things. Firstly, your argument that merit penalises lower members is nonsense, as I was a "lower member" like you when it was introduced. Merit penalises shitposters. Which leads us on to my second point - the difference between you and me. The vast majority of your posts are shitposts in [ANN] Or [Bounty] threads. The reason you aren't being merited is because you don't deserve to be merited. You see merit as your right, and this forum as nothing more than a tool to earn money.

You are correct that his grammar isn't perfect (and neither is yours) but he is easily understood (and so are you), and that's the important point.

I will quite happily overlook some minor spelling and grammar mistakes if your post is worthwhile and I can read it at a normal speed and understand it first time. If, however, I have had to read the first line 4 times and still have no idea what you are trying to say, I'm not wasting any more of my time and you are probably going on ignore.

Agree, but not meta. Or create a separate meta for Juniors. The amount of merit spam in here, rehashing the same topic and replies 1000 times, is already ridiculous. Can you imagine how bad it would be if merit actually limits their posting too?

I think you should review the amount of negative trust you have and reevaluate your conclusion that community consensus is that we care about your endless and repetitive spamming.



What is unreasonable is for you to start multiple nonsense threads and derail multiple other threads all on to the topic of Lauda for your ridiculous personal vendetta, especially when everyone you are trying to rope in to your delusions is telling you kindly to STFU.

Of course, my mistake. Thanks for the correction.


If you go to their Github - Ripple - Releases, you can find the x86 version there. As I said, I've not had this problem so I can't guarantee this is a fix, but it seemed to work for the same issue for that user on reddit.

Trust isn't moderated, so that ain't gonna happen. Again, you would know this if you spent any time reading the forum, and not just spamming your shitposts. You might as well lock this thread.

You underestimate account farmers - there are some with 50+ accounts. With your proposal, you are now handing 300-800 or more merit a month (once they distribute it back and forth amongst their own accounts) to scammers. And you are then creating more work for DT members or mods (who already have more than enough to deal with) to find and weed out these scammers. All for the sake of "helping with faster distribution". Not worth it.

I've not had this issue myself, but with a quick Google search I found this reddit post that suggests it may be due to installing the x64 rather than the x86 version, or vice versa.

Then the scammers with multiple alt accounts will receive multiple merits to spread amongst their multiple alt accounts, rank up their multiple alt accounts, and therefore defeat the purpose of the entire system.

Threads like this give me a warm fuzzy feeling inside.

Spamming with alt accounts is pretty much universally condemned and known to be a red-taggable offence. You would know this if you spent any time reading the forum, and not just spamming your shitposts.

You will find no sympathy here.

I was going to ask if your code was open-source, because I can't find it on your site, which means you are likely trying to scam people. Then I visited your Google Play store link and saw that your app is a complete clone of Coinomi - literally all you have done is change the colours.

I would advise everyone to stay well away from this project.

There's a simple, money saving and life saving solution to this. Stop smoking.

I for one would likely never use a hardware wallet on my phone, because I do not see the point of carrying a hardware wallet around with me, and certainly not bringing it out in public to advertise the fact I'm carrying it around with me. I have a small amount of coins stored in a software wallet on my phone for daily use/payments as required, but my hardware wallet stays in a secure location most of the time.