Status raised a lot of money
Status raised about or even over $100M, which is a huge amount although way less than Tezos did. Still, it is a lot of money to raise. |
|
|
|
Very interesting comments from you. Thanks for the input.
So you said you spent every penny you had buying up bitcoin in 2011. They might be around 333 bitcoin per $100 back then (give or take a few), so how many do you still hold and how many was the maximum you held before you (or if you) sold them?
Thanks for the civil reply! That is how adults should act on the internet. To answer your questions, the number of Bitcoins I own is private, but the MTGOX logs were leaked at some point and my entire transaction history with that exchange leaked along with it. It showed that I only bought, never sold, and that went on for years. My first wire to Mtgox was for $25K when they were less than $1 each. Unfortunately Mtgox didn't credit my wire until they were over $1 each. I suspect they actually front ran my order. Maybe someone else can dig up the rest of those logs. I still own millions of dollars worth of Bitcoin today. Far far more than all of my alt coin holdings combined. That alone should be proof that I'm doing exactly what I think is best for the future of Bitcoin. This is unlike most of the core and small block supporters who came to bitcoin much later, and don't understand the characteristics that made bitcoin come to be used as money. By their own admission, most of them hardly use Bitcoin at all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdyIJ-BUPaUhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JarEszFY1WYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOIoWgBIpQYSorry for missing your reply thus not replying earlier. I heard many stories about MtGox and others like them but it seems you got your coins out before they went under. Imagine having all those coins, bitcoin and alike but losing them because they were held on an exchange. I have just realised you are Roger Ver. First of all, thank you for replying and explaining you seem to be doing what you think is best for bitcoin. I disagree with you when you say you seem to have a better knowledge of how bitcoin came to be used as money rather than investors or supporters that arrived on the scene later but nevertheless I appreciate your honest post and am sure it will be appreciated by whoever reads it. From what you say this seems to about practicality, usability and longevity of bitcoin rather than about one individual that wishes to change the system because of the number of coins he owns and influence he can have. It also seems that this process is not because you want to double your coins accross wallets (albeit temporarily) either. I wish you success with your coins, well done for spotting a potential blockbuster investment all those years ago when many had not heard of bitcoin. I do not know if that $25k you invested initially was a punt in the dark or a calculated risk but it set you on a path to great riches. If you would like me to remove the thread title indicating you own 300k bitcoin then please let me know and I will do it as you mentioned the number you own is private. So is the fork definitely going ahead on 1st August 2017? To get various exchanges onboard would be a task in itself but according to the links in the opening post there are plenty that are looking forward to the fork so there is a degree of concensus but it goes both ways there are arguments for the split and and against the split. If it goes ahead I hope it does not cause disruption or uncertainty for investors and merchants. |
|
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ver would also have 300k BU if BTC splits, correct? The way it seems explained in the links is that there is a way that coin holders can double their coins, same amount on both BTC and BTU. If he has 300k now he will end up with 600k but there is speculation that this Roger Ver bloke has used up a lot of that 300k bitcoin to invest in to other projects. Having re-read a post I will reply to in a few minutes it seems Roger Ver is here... |
|
|
|
Please buy it on coinexchange or yobit. Just 5 or 6 days ago you had a very generic yet stereotypical and non-pleasant view of Indians but now you are pushing for this coin.. what changed your mind to back it? |
|
|
|
you can use tokenmarket is the best ico management software
in there all in service escrow, ico siste systeme, promotion, announcement thread and campaign manager in bounty campaign Thank you. On their website they have not advertised their fee structure. |
|
|
|
software developers are no economist. Software devs might be no more or no less economists than a refuse collector or supermarket checkout cashier. Likewise, economists might be no more or no less economists than a refuse collector or supermarket checkout cashier... Surely it does not have to be an 'either or' situation |
|
|
|
|
Now trading at $0.741876 and listed at #165 on CoinMartketCap
|
|
|
|
|
All quiet on the Monaco Card front? No updates from dev, again?
Now trading at $0.742504 and listed at #163 on CoinMatketCap
|
|
|
|
Not to flame here, but should you start an ICO if you don't have guys that can do that for you? You should hire those experts and have them on payroll, not outsource to those sites herein recommended. Not that I believe they have a poor service, but if you want to start an ico and don't know how to set up same services internally, it's like starting a bakery, not knowing how to make the dough.
If a good dev/ico experienced guy see your plan and like it, you can pay most of the cost in tokens, like stock optios for key personnel doing an IPO.
Just my 2 cents. Thanks for posting. The idea was to have a project team that will handle the nodes and blockchain etc and whole set up but still the ICO needs to be managed as funds will be coming in, they need to be exchanged for tokens and they need to be released too once the ICO has ended. The idea of the thread was to bounce ideas of each other to find out which is the best software or website out there and how their UI varies along with its fees and so on. I started the thread with two hoping others would give inputs and list their recommended ones too. |
|
|
|
Thank you!
Yes, we have all-in-one-setup-solution:
-landing page integration
-crowdseller account with token issuing
-buyer/investor account with order payments
-destribution on blockchain wallts (Waves, Bitshares, Omni, NXT)
-node for coin hosting
-escrow srevice
On request, not included in price:
-custom technical solutions of hosting (on client's servers or in cloud)
-takeing payments by Visa/MasterCard and Wire Transfer
-converting bitcoins to fiat money for investing in company.
PS things you are mentioned also fixed on site. Thank you! You guys are very proactive. Good to see and thank you. |
|
|
|
Requested Loan Amount: 7500 BTC Collateral To Be Provided: My Word Is My (James) Bond Proposed Repayment Date: 1st April 2185 Reason For Loan: Polygamy Support & Travel The World BTC Address: 123456789abcdefghijklmnABCDEFGHIJKLMN Fishbones78 this is a good opportunity for you to widen your business horizons. Please do not say 'no' or I just might have to take my business and reputation elsewhere 
|
|
|
|
Hi! We updated our web-site https://www.startico.net Now we have Team and current projects. Links on social media will coming soon. We appriciate if you correct your review above Thank you! A very big thumbs up to you guys. You took a little constructive criticism, embraced it and made the changes... So here is an update... startico.net have removed all social media links but have added an about us/the team page. It gives some background in to real people but does not explain the name of the entity/company any project team will enter in to a contract with for an ICO. Startico.net still needs to clarify their legal status (individual, group, shareholder, LLC, LTD, PLC) and also which jurisdiction they fall under (Russia or Ireland) because they list both. These are all things for potential ICO project teams to look at before deciding who to choose or to go it alone. Does startico have the same all-in-one-setup-solution as ICO2GO where nodes, blockchains, token and everything else is taken care of? Then they need to elaborate on it a little more, highlight it a little more on their website. |
|
|
|
There you go. It was taken 5 mins ago so is the latest update.  |
|
|
|
Now valued at $0.705525 and listed at #164 on CoinMarketCap
It is sinking..
yet they blame ethereum for this  It started out as $3 ICO and now is worth just around 23% of its ICO value  |
|
|
|
|
Now valued at $0.705525 and listed at #164 on CoinMarketCap
It is sinking..
|
|
|
|
How much collected so far? Can't see on the website   which website are you checking check it here - at the top: https://www.ico.suretly.com/Raised $1.393.966 usd 159 6039 893 12545 Bitcoin Ether Litecoin Waves the smae website charges the ICO 10% in commission fees ! |
|
|
|
Are there any? Yes there are a few but they do not ooze confidence but ICO2GO certainly does have most of the pieces of the jigsaw in place. With just a little more work they could be ideal for all ICOs. Here are two listed below but there are a few more: ico2go.comThe Good: Very nice UI, easy to understand and user friendly when logged in to the dashboard. All tokens, nodes, blockchain, escrow (literally everything is taken care of) as they do it all for you. Seems very professional. SURETLY are using them for their ICO. I will be keeping an eye on it to see how it goes. The Bad: The pricing needs to be restructed. Paying a staggering 10% commission on all tokens created and also when removing your incoming funds in order to sell them means project team pays twice. No 'About Us' or 'The Team' page. There is no re-course if they steal the funds and vanish like Paul Vernon a la Cryptsy. Who are ICO2Go? No real company or director/individual details are on their website. No information on who your project team makes an ICO contract with such as an LLC, LTD, shareholder name, address etc therefore who can you try to take to court if they steal from the ICO? The Pricing:Option#1: FREE upfront cost and you must pay 10% comission for outgoing transactions (must display ico2go logo) Option#2: 3 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to BTC/ETH. You must pay 10% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect) Option#3: 10 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to 20 cryptocurrencies. You must pay 5% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect) Option#4: 25 BTC upfront cost. Accept funding in up to 20 cryptocurrencies. You must pay 2% comission for outgoing transactions (ico2go logo removed - whitelabel effect) https://www.startico.netThe Good: The licence free pricing structure is acceptable if is a one way transaction, not charging the project team twice (once when receiving funds and once when withdrawing) The Bad: All links to their social media are diverted to free website company 'Wix'. No 'About Us' or 'The Team' page. Who are Startico? No real company or director/individual details are on their website. No information on who your project team makes an ICO contract with such as an LLC, LTD, shareholder name, address etc therefore who can you try to take to court if they steal from the ICO? Does not look a professional company at all. The Pricing: Option#1: Use for free and pay only 0.2% per transactions Option#2: Buy a license for $6 000 or 2.5 BTC 0% transaction fees |
|
|
|
|
With all the pros & cons which would be the ICO companies/websites/software you recommend for a new project launch?
Ease of use and reputation are as important as is getting FIAT transferred to a bank account after the ICO ends.
|
|
|
|
Do you mean you had to pay for GAS? Could you provide us with transaction ID? I mentioned the company that is ICO is taking place with |
|
|
|
Can any of the "Partners" verify that they are actually part of this project? Clickatel is a bulk SMS provider, having that as a partner will bring no benefit to the project |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
