This stands to prove the same point; that sports isn't about too many experiences, -- very many times, the experience you've had will only make you reselect invalid games with bigger odds..or sometimes you might assume that games with smaller odd stands a bigger Chance to bring winnings -- when the final whistle is blown, it becomes a different story.
I think it's much preferred if someone could get ideas from a couple of peeps in a social group or something -- not about those gold diggers/ bloggers that would quickly make shabby analysis just to rip you off your cash-- NO
On the other hand, sometimes it's good to listen to yourself and follow your insight, Just the way you understand best -- it all depends

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

It's something sweet to bet on but it's somewhat impossible to set that up -- Cus who's gonna play against who? Or better still, it could be arranged in a way the bettor wagers and play -- out of his built-in passion for the game in question -- with another bettor,....when any of them gets to loose eventually, no one gets the blame....lol
Employing AIs to play against themselves would also be a good option as goldking proposed... Another important thing to consider is; how often would bettors get to win on this?? Since it's pretty obvious that the whole thing would be programmed?? ... secondly, if it were to happen (cus I know we're merely assuming), don't you think the casino that'll have this options for it gamblers would also suffer the risk of running a business over a huge uncertainty?? Just being curious though

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

I'd also prefer sports on a serious note, though I don't gamble..
I see sports as an open game that's not determined by some programmed analysis; it's played by real people and you could easily wager on a club with the best form... meanwhile, slots and roulettes only gets to remitt winnings based on the percentage difference -- between their immediate gains and losses -- that's already programmed, so sometimes whatever you wager doesn't matter, as long as there isn't some percentage to engulf your games, then that's just a waste. Casinos are controlled.... I'd even wager as much in sport games that seems viable.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

We've got alot of factors though -- as much as I know...
The main thing is the interest; I rarely see peeps with zero interest on sports issues and roulette getting addicted to gambling -- ofcourse, we've got alot of divisions on diver's casinos but, it's totally or partially entailed with soccer, athletics or systematically programmed domain ( which is the virtual games etc...) The point is -- anyone without interest doesn't get addicted to anything in the first place -- but pulling out too much on it could cause addiction, denying the fact that you don't lose anything when you wager and loose eventually could also cause addiction ( cus at some point, anything you keep doing consistently becomes a part of you)

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

Is this supposed to mean that you're just another troll like the former from CW's case?? Like..wtf is your problem?? Are we supposed to have genuine members becoming rivals at some point ?? We've heard enough of your erroneous illustrations but have you got proves for them?...
I've been following this thread for a day or two now .... It' doesn't make any sense when you get registered just to take issues too personal, on a site you know nothing about -- plus, the fact that you get too obsessed on public affairs like this -- Cus alot aren't really complaining and you wanna take the pain and get a sip from a goat's bile? Just so impossible as you can't sue BTT without valid evidence

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

Lizarder, it's funny sometimes what your username sounds like, and... how you got inspired to coin 'em?? Lol... Just by the way though

I know alot of peeps in here have planned on this; spreading the love to places where they're needed the most which is exactly why I encouraged everyone ( pon' the BTT Christmas celebration thread).. I guess you had a nice clue on that, though I wasn't expecting you to have conceived the sane plans too, kudos dude!
I dunno why, but I believe this dude isn't a billionaire like most of us in here -- that's to let everyone understand that if we think we truly LOVE without GIVING, it ain't worth the stress at all. Secondly, it's not about how much anyone has -- I've been running several voluntarily projects that involves alot of cash on my own expense for strange people I don't even know... I know alot of peeps have been doing same too ; I believe in the impact we make, not how much we've made.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

I honestly dunno why you got registered in here in the first place -- isn't these purpose amongst your main interest In here? When I got registered, honestly I knew a little about Bitcoin but it wasn't enough to help me out lest I got beguiled by some ponsi schemers -- that's majorly what any regular beginner would come across on the net...I'm proud to say that I've learnt alot including -- having some fringe ideas on technical matters; I wouldn't get that if I wasn't registered in here. OP, I believe you'd get whatever orientation you need in here to begin your crypto journey -- just look out for where you've got some complexities and let anyone help you out with 'em.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

This has obviously explained that you haven't read through the rules and the sticky notes on each and every board-- including this one....no you haven't, if you have then you won't be asking a question like this.
Merit is very important to achieve a rank in here, AFAIK... You've been seeing alot of peeps with different merit count; that's not just fancied anyways, it's really something anyone should get if you must rank up in here. It's been happening way back; when peeps only needed few or much activity ratio to rank up, it's pretty different now as everyone new in here -- after the merit system had to pass through the same process... Earning merit is a different ball game entirely.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

I won't believe that you'd bring your ass in here just to illustrate some lame point about something you won't even care to ask questions for proper understanding?? What's the point in your appraisal?? I don't even like participating in discussions like this cus it's not productive in anyway; who knows if you're not one of these usual trolls that shows up everytime? Hmm... The forum has been a victim of this malicious attack (DDOS) and AFAIK, Theymos is been trying alot on his effort to ensure SAFETY in here and that's the only way out.. you shouldn't complain if you've not got a malicious intensions as that can't be dis-engaged.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

Yunno what? Everything the OP wrote is something any regular motivator would prolly advice, or say -- anyone would simply have in their reservoir, as the year begins .... As a matter of fact, no one would feel so dumb to the point of "not having any plans for the new year" - that'll prolly the most stupidest decisions to make( NOT having any plans is a CHOICE yunno?)?
I'm happy that you've decided to motivate and encourage alot that started the year without a plan; or atleast those that had different plans, but weren't sure 'bout putting out any effort to materialize it. It's inspired me, same to the rest of the thousand...

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

I'm happy that we've got alot of peeps beginning the year with some wonderful legacies...to improve, motivate and teach the LEARNED and the ROOKIES too( no one is above the learning process,yeah) ... It's been a while I saw something as refreshing as this on META and it's worth the time and protocols, Kudos dude!!
We all have different areas of specialization/discipline in here; alot got registered in here and -- right from time they came, they began to STRONGLY kick against any form for FRAUDULENCE$ SPAM -- those set of users grow to become users like LOVESMAY and JOLLYGOOD,(everyone does, but these guys are watching even when everyone else is tired and feels nothing is happening) pretty simple. I'd encourage the OP -- go ahead with your good works -- as long we have the same goal, which is fulfilling the PURPOSE of the forum.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

I'd say NO and YES.
No -- in the sense that I dunno how much you're Worth and the way you're presenting it, it seems You've got some cash Capital and you're confused on what to take up, so you wanted to know if cryptocurrencies could pay off more than establishing a business ??
Yes -- Cus you could have much on you and still decide to have an extra investments -- in this case, you could take up the idea of investing in cryptocurrencies at ease. Don't put In your cash Capital on some lame coins that'll simply depreciate after few months -- Bitcoin should be an explicit option for a case like yours.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

Sorry but I can't help laughing 😂
It's a pretty fair analysis -- and a little wild, witty appraisal to begin the year with..... quite satisfying but seems you're exaggerating too much for a start in turns -- or atleast for a new year resolution.
Why don't you just keep calm and observe the reaction of the market towards the new year? That'd really help as you'll be able to figure out whether or not to BUY... What if the market switches by tomorrow?? You see the point... HODL as much BTCs as you wish, that's cool but I'm not really a party to altcoins( be it worthless or not).

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

Can you imagine the level of chaos that this development would cause?? Lmao.. what's gonna be the percentage differences between the ranks??  How would the members evaluate the payments schedule? Having that a casino could require limited slots?? RANKS ARE JUST NOT GONNA BE VALUED ANYMORE.... Cus anyone could just get registered and Begin to earn -- as much they make 'em post...lol.
Well, I'm not really having anything in mind  to be implemented; that doesn't mean Theymos hasn't got some plans undercovers -- I believe whatever he's implementing would give rise to the wellbeing of the forum -- as at next year, so I'll stick to that.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

I dunno why a player like lewandoski should be signed to FCB; the man is  aged and should be thinking of enjoying retirement right from his stay in Bayern ... How long do you think he's got to play?? That's economic waste, believe me. Plus, he's need to be given some time to adjust to the Spanish system and game play -- which is the reason he's not really performing as expected -- that while could even take a whole season. Isn't that exactly what happened in LEO's case?? When he was moved to the french league, it became almost impossible for him to score a goal until became familiarized. I won't conclude that Xavi is a flop but he thinks that most players that's made PAST legacies could still function effectively today -- that's impossible.
The progress was supposed to be planned and subscribed during the world cup break as you Said; if nothing was done, then they're finna lose woefully... No big deals

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

It's been over a decade and more, Arsenal hasn't got much to brag about when it comes to the premier leagues. I'm seeing a different turnout this time around as they've succeeded in winning a nice spot at the top; AFAIK, things usually turn out bad many other times when a devalued team is above the TITANS, but I can't say Arsenal is devalued at this point, with the recent mind-blowing form, No!
I'm feeling it might happen again, aside from the happenings from the past 15 years or so; the fixtures are getting tough and I guess this is where the club's intelligence is required the most...lol . Brighton isn't a huge problem for them now though ..... M.City, Chelsea and leciester remains a hard nut to crack.
Edit: I dunno but I'm just seeing it for them, but they'll need not to relax on it.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

It'll rather sound like a good idea though, but it's just another means of enslaving gamblers as every transactions will be monitored; a good plan cus it's gonna curtail the rate of laundering and some other menial cheating tricks but it's the worst plan cus it's just gonna enslave everyone and ofcourse -- they've got alot of reasons to Which they conceived an idea like that in the first place -- so I think every other hidden reason could turn out to disrupt the liberal purpose of gambling... They'd even mount takes on every wagered game and that'll increase the Least STANDARD wager amount which, in turns becomes a problem. I don't think I support the motion.NO!

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

I think it's rather " the higher the stakes, the higher the gains -- that's if it cuts ... What's this RISK you're talking about?? I'd love some specificities on that -- cus I feel that wagering on any game is risky already, so what's the risk? I'm even seeing it more risky when you're staking high on a single game point with a good odd... E.g, wagering 1k dolls on a single 9 odd or something, It sometimes seems to be the easiest way to win on it and it's Also the riskiest....it's that simple. I feel it differs based on individual differences as another gambler would prefer a combo on that.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

Gatafe is really struggling and that's pretty much clearer this season. The laliga would prolly be far from their glimpse since they've refused to improve their team performances and gameplay.
They only succeeded in pushing Sevilla and celta Vigo into the relagation and relagation zone respectively, that's appalling!! I won't believe they'll struggle just to loose at the end against GUADALAJARA,... I see alot of players that should be replaced; one amongst them is this MITROVIĆ guy....that dude isn't functioning anymore and that's what's killing them. They've got alot more of them though

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

It got more and more inveigling for me , especially when I knew someone that won 5 multiplayer odds... and also for the reasons that I've had a pre-knowledge about gaming; infact, that' was the reason why I refused to give in Cus I don't even know how long he played to get 'em claims as of late....lol... I won't try that though.
Imagine what happened in your case; when a single game with barely two odds ruined the whole thing for you... It's pretty hard to make predictions dude, and the worst of what you get is -- when you think you're sure of the games you wagered, but it turns out the wrong way....so disappointing!

Sandra 🧑‍🦰