on bitpoker.io there is 0.01 poker freeroll only 3 players have registered join and take that 0.01 prize (its starting in 22min)
|
|
|
Did someone say pizza ! :O?
|
|
|
When I bet on primedice, there is always one fellow who asks, "is it profitable to gamble?" Many time I see those questions, the answer is " no because there is a house edge"
What if a dice site had no house edge? Then would it be able to profit?
What if a dice site has a negative house edge? Will we (the gamblers) start making profit?
I don't think '' no hose edge or negative house edge '' can bring sure benefits to gamblers.Gambling is a sure way of getting nothing.It is gambling not house edge which make the gamblers loose their money.If someone says 0 house edge is good thing then I will say in reply even gambling is good in sense of profit but just for very few persons.Everyone can not win in gambling. Zero edge in standard casino games can potentially waste players time if you are forever at zero profit/loss long term, at least when you lose your money to a casino you can get on and do something else with your life ha, ironic. that theory is not standing sorry. then is there is positive house edge people just lose money forever sorry but 0 house edge would bring lot more players to try their luck It's not free to run servers and I doubt someone would spend a lot of time building and running the site expecting no return. but the casino would still profit, no matter what its a fact You are right even with zero house edge casinos or gambling sites still will earn profit from loosing hands.Let's say zero house edge will attract many players in this case. exactly thats my point
|
|
|
In theory 0% won't give you any profit or loss, since it's 0% But, in reality even the site give you 0% house edge. Most people will lose because greed
But, if a dice site has negative house edge, gamblers might start making profit. But, some of them will lose because greed
0% hourse edge is good but nothing to be won or lost either way long term, often sites cant even make as entertaining a site due to lack of profits. 0% or very tiny house rake with p2p games is where its at. i dont agree i think casino would still profit of course they would because there are a lot of gamblers that dont know how to play they either loose everything because of greed or they just do rage bets to recover the losses what leads into even bigger loose Is not because they dont know how to play (there is no strategy for dice anyways, its just luck) and its not because greed. A 0% house edge would profit because unless you bet the same amount every time to be at 0 profit you would end up loosing using any other "strategy" like martingale or whatever you want to use there also is a strategy to use for example its better to make much more smaller bets than one all in bet, without it there could be much more strategies and martingale would work for a while if the player wouldnt be greedy i will still stay with my theory a site with 0% house edge would profit enough for owner to make money and pay bills to keep it open i think you are right though there can be whale players who will try to beat the dice site what will lead to looses that is why there is max bet allowed let's say 0.1btc for start or something like that
|
|
|
In theory 0% won't give you any profit or loss, since it's 0% But, in reality even the site give you 0% house edge. Most people will lose because greed
But, if a dice site has negative house edge, gamblers might start making profit. But, some of them will lose because greed
0% hourse edge is good but nothing to be won or lost either way long term, often sites cant even make as entertaining a site due to lack of profits. 0% or very tiny house rake with p2p games is where its at. i dont agree i think casino would still profit of course they would because there are a lot of gamblers that dont know how to play they either loose everything because of greed or they just do rage bets to recover the losses what leads into even bigger loose Is not because they dont know how to play (there is no strategy for dice anyways, its just luck) and its not because greed. A 0% house edge would profit because unless you bet the same amount every time to be at 0 profit you would end up loosing using any other "strategy" like martingale or whatever you want to use there also is a strategy to use for example its better to make much more smaller bets than one all in bet, without it there could be much more strategies and martingale would work for a while if the player wouldnt be greedy i will still stay with my theory a site with 0% house edge would profit enough for owner to make money and pay bills to keep it open
|
|
|
well trust is first on a list then faucet and polite and helpfull support fast best are + too and then after all there should be some promotions
|
|
|
When I bet on primedice, there is always one fellow who asks, "is it profitable to gamble?" Many time I see those questions, the answer is " no because there is a house edge"
What if a dice site had no house edge? Then would it be able to profit?
What if a dice site has a negative house edge? Will we (the gamblers) start making profit?
I don't think '' no hose edge or negative house edge '' can bring sure benefits to gamblers.Gambling is a sure way of getting nothing.It is gambling not house edge which make the gamblers loose their money.If someone says 0 house edge is good thing then I will say in reply even gambling is good in sense of profit but just for very few persons.Everyone can not win in gambling. Zero edge in standard casino games can potentially waste players time if you are forever at zero profit/loss long term, at least when you lose your money to a casino you can get on and do something else with your life ha, ironic. that theory is not standing sorry. then is there is positive house edge people just lose money forever sorry but 0 house edge would bring lot more players to try their luck It's not free to run servers and I doubt someone would spend a lot of time building and running the site expecting no return. but the casino would still profit, no matter what its a fact well if all players would understand that they cant winn all casinos money and if they wouldnt bet all their balance at once or something like that i think people could beat the casino then that is not possible its in human nature that they are greedy and they want more and more
|
|
|
still on guys lowest rate ever!
|
|
|
When I bet on primedice, there is always one fellow who asks, "is it profitable to gamble?" Many time I see those questions, the answer is " no because there is a house edge"
What if a dice site had no house edge? Then would it be able to profit?
What if a dice site has a negative house edge? Will we (the gamblers) start making profit?
I don't think '' no hose edge or negative house edge '' can bring sure benefits to gamblers.Gambling is a sure way of getting nothing.It is gambling not house edge which make the gamblers loose their money.If someone says 0 house edge is good thing then I will say in reply even gambling is good in sense of profit but just for very few persons.Everyone can not win in gambling. Zero edge in standard casino games can potentially waste players time if you are forever at zero profit/loss long term, at least when you lose your money to a casino you can get on and do something else with your life ha, ironic. that theory is not standing sorry. then is there is positive house edge people just lose money forever sorry but 0 house edge would bring lot more players to try their luck It's not free to run servers and I doubt someone would spend a lot of time building and running the site expecting no return. but the casino would still profit, no matter what its a fact
|
|
|
When I bet on primedice, there is always one fellow who asks, "is it profitable to gamble?" Many time I see those questions, the answer is " no because there is a house edge"
What if a dice site had no house edge? Then would it be able to profit?
What if a dice site has a negative house edge? Will we (the gamblers) start making profit?
I don't think '' no hose edge or negative house edge '' can bring sure benefits to gamblers.Gambling is a sure way of getting nothing.It is gambling not house edge which make the gamblers loose their money.If someone says 0 house edge is good thing then I will say in reply even gambling is good in sense of profit but just for very few persons.Everyone can not win in gambling. Zero edge in standard casino games can potentially waste players time if you are forever at zero profit/loss long term, at least when you lose your money to a casino you can get on and do something else with your life ha, ironic. that theory is not standing sorry. then is there is positive house edge people just lose money forever sorry but 0 house edge would bring lot more players to try their luck
|
|
|
In theory 0% won't give you any profit or loss, since it's 0% But, in reality even the site give you 0% house edge. Most people will lose because greed
But, if a dice site has negative house edge, gamblers might start making profit. But, some of them will lose because greed
0% hourse edge is good but nothing to be won or lost either way long term, often sites cant even make as entertaining a site due to lack of profits. 0% or very tiny house rake with p2p games is where its at. i dont agree i think casino would still profit
|
|
|
no house edge is risky statisticly looking but based on people greed casino would still profit Statistically looking is not risky, is neutral. If you were to bet flat bets (say 0.01) without increasing the bet or the odds, statistically you would end up getting 0 profit, no loss no win. But if you use, lets say, martingale you would end up loosing anyways, statistically you would survive a little bit longer on average compared to a 1% house edge but the difference is not too significative nah its risky becuse you can win or you can lose. there is 50/50 chances. if players are not greedy that casino would be down soon. but people are too greedy what lead that casino to make money
|
|
|
no house edge is risky statisticly looking but based on people greed casino would still profit
|
|
|
i did research and found it already but thanks )
|
|
|
Moneypot is a good system can we still invest in the bankroll? Will new casinos on MP have tip bots and stuff?
Yup! It's an open bankroll, you can invest and divest at will. We provide the APIs to allow casinos to have tip bots on the chat server, but since we don't run the casinos it's not up to us But I do hope there are some interesting chat bots running soon ) where can i invest :O?
|
|
|
i think there should be tip option and rain option but its great game. and maybe you should add some sound like Busted when it crashes if thats possible
|
|
|
service is still on and running first customer from now gets 50% off this prices (if hes taking 3 or more then 3 devisions)! still on
|
|
|
Only thing I would ask is lower the amount of time per level on the freerolls and other tournies, it feels way too slow.
Please ignore this guy. He's confusing poker with another game: BINGO ... Sound like someone that lost to this gentleman, don't be sad if he really is a bingo player in the end that will show and you will win your few satoshi back won't you. i hate play against bingo players like kevin235r, it is wasting time to play with them, they are only know allin even with 27o, and finally they may win you. I love to play with that kind of players, even if they win!! POKER is about the odds and mistakes! The key is not to get on till, but Nearly every player gets on till when they get overdraw several times. all in always hihi
|
|
|
i think im going to buy some of this coin
|
|
|
Update: lova je sjela na racun, ali i dalje nema odgovora. Ja mislim, da su borze BTC super način za pranje novca kad ga imaš ali oni koji to rade ne beru ovaj forum, jer baš sada zarađuju i se ne glupiraju 300 eura plus ili minus. Tvoja frka je samo rezultat različitih financijskih kontrola koje pružaju porezni ured ili policija koja se bavi s financijskim kriminalom, prema borzama kao Bitstamp. Whuuutt
|
|
|
|