in100, вот вывод scaninput сделанный почти месяц назад: {
"nout" : 1,
"hash" : "000007c91b7055e36e875e43fce335e4aa4fb19477ebe0b93d045fe2c11b6cb2",
"time" : "2016-05-05 00:24:38 UTC"
},
{
"nout" : 1,
"hash" : "000008b6a42806c27a922ae68061ad1d7720a1fcd0a54443e677869f94d9ef82",
"time" : "2016-05-15 00:29:50 UTC"
},
{
"nout" : 1,
"hash" : "0000005056aa49457fe1bd73459004215dc7e734487e296efae0f0cd7a1f4fa7",
"time" : "2016-05-16 07:09:34 UTC"
}и вот сейчас сделал: {
"nout" : 1,
"hash" : "000008b6a42806c27a922ae68061ad1d7720a1fcd0a54443e677869f94d9ef82",
"time" : "2016-05-15 00:29:50 UTC"
},
{
"nout" : 1,
"hash" : "0000005056aa49457fe1bd73459004215dc7e734487e296efae0f0cd7a1f4fa7",
"time" : "2016-05-16 07:09:34 UTC"
}получается сложность ни причем, раз прогноз совпадает с точностью до секунды. Есть еще идеи? Вообще-то, результат и должен совпадать, потому что сложность на хэш никак не влияет. Она влияет лишь на то, подойдет он или нет. А потому с ростом сложности перестают подходить какие-то из ранее "запланированных" решений, с падением же начинают подходить те, на которые раньше и не обращали внимания. |
|
|
|
https://www.rt.com/business/341892-far-east-land-infrastructure/President Vladimir Putin has ordered free land handouts in Russia’s Far East should be provided with minimal infrastructure. On Monday, he signed a law offering land plots of 1 hectare (2.5 acres) to citizens for free. “We should work with regional authorities, so that land plots are allocated in areas with at least minimal infrastructure,” Putin said on Wednesday while meeting with Russia's Far East Development Minister Alexander Galushka. According to the minister, the infrastructure could be provided to a group of twenty land owners. He said that since the ministry has announced the idea of land development, people have started applying. They suggest cooperation of about 200-300 people, said Galushka, adding that then the provision of infrastructure becomes possible, even if it’s not a highly-developed one. The Minister also said that the Cabinet is preparing a bill on lowering electricity prices in the Far East to the average cost in Russia. The idea of a so-called ‘Russian Homestead Act’ was first proposed in early 2015 by the presidential envoy to the Far East Federal District, Yury Trutnev, who suggested offering large plots of land for free to anyone willing to resettle to the Russian Far East to start a farm or business. The program is one of the initiatives aimed at boosting the economy in the region. Anyone is entitled to apply for up to hectare of land in the Kamchatka, Primorye, Khabarovsk, Amur, Magadan and Sakhalin regions, the republic of Sakha, or the Jewish and Chukotka autonomous districts. The land can be used for any lawful purpose but can only be rented, sold, or given away after an initial five-year period. Foreigners are also allowed to use the land, and the registration of full property rights is only possible after the naturalization of potential owners.
|
|
|
|
That's horrible! Comedians should have the right to say whatever they want, I think even in ancient Rome and in Russia during the reign of the one of the darkest czars in its history they had the right.
Death toll of St. Bartholomew's Day massacre: From 5,000 to 30,000; Results of Ivan IV's policy: ~3,000 executed and ~10,000 died from the plague. So, these "darkest czars" were innocent children in comparison with catholic monarchs. Ancient Rome and Medieval Russia were more democratic than the most of european countries ever will be. |
|
|
|
|
Похоже, кто-то опять нарушает режим приёма нейролептиков.
|
|
|
|
Speaking about pics...  |
|
|
|
German comedian says Merkel 'served me up for tea' to TurkeyBERLIN (Reuters) - A German comedian under investigation by prosecutors for mocking Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan accused Chancellor Angela Merkel on Tuesday of "filleting" him and serving him to a despot for tea in his first public comments since the row broke. Merkel drew heavy criticism for allowing German prosecutors to pursue a case against satirist Jan Boehmermann after he recited a poem on television in March suggesting Erdogan engaged in bestiality and watched child pornography. Erdogan, a crucial partner for Merkel in tackling Europe's migrant crisis, had demanded Germany press charges against Boehmermann. Erdogan is known for his sensitivity to criticism and Turkish prosecutors have opened over 1,800 cases against people for insulting him since he became president in 2014. Under Germany's criminal code, insults against foreign leaders are not allowed but the government can decide whether to authorize prosecutors to go ahead. After weeks of silence, Boehmermann pulled no punches in an interview released in part on Tuesday by Die Zeit weekly. "The chancellor must not wobble when it's a matter of freedom of opinion," he told Die Zeit in the interview, which will be published in full on Wednesday. "But instead, she filleted me, served me for tea to a highly strung despot and made me into a German Ai Weiwei," he said, referring to the Chinese dissident artist. The affair, which turned into a diplomatic spat, was a headache for Merkel as it made her vulnerable to accusations she was getting too cozy with Erdogan over a controversial European Union deal with Turkey to stem the flow of refugees into Europe. Critics had already accused her of ignoring human rights violations and press freedoms in Turkey, a candidate for EU membership, in order to win its cooperation over the migrants. Merkel is widely seen as causing the problem in the first place because she described the poem to Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu as "deliberately insulting", something she herself has said was "in retrospect a mistake". Prosecutors in the western German city of Mainz who are dealing with the Boehmermann case said it was unclear when a decision would be made on whether to go ahead with the case. https://www.yahoo.com/news/german-comedian-says-merkel-served-tea-turkey-134251302.html?ref=gs-------------------------------------------- Merkel's Comedy Club! Germans getting raped and comedians risking their freedom...  <Merkel mode>Note that "rape" verb is politically incorrect. You should learn how to use "surprise sex" instead.</Merkel mode> |
|
|
|
Сразу видно, что есть проблемы с реализацией:
- если засылать как обычные транзакции, то блокчейн распухнет ненужными данными
- т.е. нужен новый вид транзакции, которая уничтожается спустя короткое время и не пишется в блокчейн
- нужна какая-то защита от спама, что б не положили всю сеть такими транзакциями
Что скажете, реализуемо такое? Может быть востребовано?
А зачем слать транзакции, если сайт сразу может выдать зашифрованную строку или QR код с этими данными? Или даже по СМС их прислать... С точки зрения безопасности абсолютно не принципиально, каким образом пользователь получит зашифрованные данные. |
|
|
|
CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY включился, но на данный момент это актуально лишь для обычных транзакций.
Можно пример какой-нибудь, как заморозить скажем произвольный инпут? Накидаю несколько примеров попозже. |
|
|
|
No one is obliged to testify against himself. You are not obliged to disclose any details about your hardware and software, it is their work to find out such functionality before going to try anything.
Are you sure about that? Not exactly the same but for example in the uk you have to give passwords and encryption keys if they ask. For anything they think is encrypted even if it is not. Or face years in jail. Yep, I remember that UK is a land of contradictions... These guys are preaching a lot about freedom, while their own state is run by a totalitarian regime under the guise of faked parliamentarism, without any kind of legal protection of privacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitutionhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_ConstitutionIn fact, any civilized country has very similar legal framework, which protects its citizen from any attempts of forced self-incrimination. Fortunately, I'm not the UK citizen, here in Russia nobody is obliged to testify against himself, the same is correct for the US as well. |
|
|
|
|
Generally, verification of either fingerprint or iris is nothing but additional method of authentication. Samsung Galaxy, for example, doesn't allow you to log in through fingerprint verification in case if you have mistaken few times, or if you haven't used it for longer than 24 hours. Password will be requested in these situations.
So, access to copies of the biometric data is not enough, you also need either password or an exclusive access to internal details about hardware. Which is unavailable for US branches of Samsung, HTC, ... themselves, since they have no idea how these chips are working. Unfortunately for clowns in the government, these chips weren't made in the USA.
|
|
|
|
You need to share with us that neat trick and on what OS this would work. That can be a problem due to lack of public access to hardware specifications. But I won't be surprised to see such functionality in the custom firmware for android devices. I wouldn't expect that for samsung devices due to their copyright policy, but it's possible for less restrictive phones such as HTC production. https://plus.google.com/+ParanoidAndroidCorner/postsAlso if they know you've destroyed evidence that would be a criminal act in America, not sure about Russia.
No one is obliged to testify against himself. You are not obliged to disclose any details about your hardware and software, it is their work to find out such functionality before going to try anything. They're paid from your taxes to do so. So, you haven't destroyed anything, it was all their fault. It's funny but you can issue a lawsuit against them, in order to compensate your moral and financial damage. |
|
|
|
|
It won't go too far since these fools can be tricked to destroy the data, because they don't know which finger exactly you are using to unlock your phone. For example, middle finger can be used for real unlocking while thumb will only simulate successful unlocking through revealing some false data set and destroying all the real data without giving any messages.
|
|
|
|
Erdogan receives funds from the GCC nations such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait (a reward for his Islamization policies in Turkey). He also receives weapons from Israel and the United States. There is no real opposition in Turkey, as most of the rival leaders are behind bars. I don't think what happened to Saddam and Gaddhafi will happen to Erdogan.
Saudi Arabia and Israel supporting the same leader? Something wrong here? Saudi Arabia does not even recognize Israel.  I guess you didn't understand him quite well. If you think that they're supporting Erdogan due to some sort Israeli-Saudi partnership, then there is a mistake. It's Erdogan who have made few careful deals with Israeli and Saudi leaders, avoiding direct interaction between these two factions. P.S. When it comes to business, saudis are no worse than israelis. If it's profitable in the short-term, then they're ready to forget about their agenda and make another contradictory alliance. In fact, there is nothing wrong with that. |
|
|
|
Someone quote me for that idiot to read.
So polite, you must be one of these new-breed europeans, truly civilized ones. I learn fast from my russian comrades  My honorable little brother, you've touched my heart with your eloquent speech. Yeah, you're ready to become a member of civilized society. |
|
|
|
Someone quote me for that idiot to read.
So polite, you must be one of these new-breed europeans, truly civilized ones. |
|
|
|
Pastafarianism  |
|
|
|
Дело не в учебе, а клавиатуре. На украинской раскладке нет буквы Ы, из-за этого так и пишут. По произношению украинская И и русская Ы обычно эквивалентны, поэтому такая замена оправдана. В тему не так уж давнего разговора об алгоритмах хэширования, провел простой сравнительный тест пары функций на блоках разного размера: Architecture: 64 bit
CPU-Frequency: 2400 MHz
=== Symmetric (144 B) ===
SHA256Managed
3.56 us / 281138 per second / 8537 cycles
Average 3.92 us, Median 3.4 us, min 3.4, max 315.7
80% within +5.88% average 3.56 | 50% within +5.88% average 3.56
40.48 MB/s / 59.28 cycles/byte
SHA256Cng
4.87 us / 205402 per second / 11684 cycles
Average 5.22 us, Median 5.1 us, min 4.2, max 600.3
80% within +8.82% average 4.87 | 50% within +4.9% average 4.82
29.58 MB/s / 81.14 cycles/byte
SHA256CSP
49.24 us / 20307 per second / 118187 cycles
Average 50.1 us, Median 49 us, min 48.2, max 567
80% within +2.14% average 49.24 | 50% within +0.92% average 49.22
2.92 MB/s / 820.74 cycles/byte
SHA512Managed
6.71 us / 149026 per second / 16105 cycles
Average 6.79 us, Median 6.8 us, min 6.4, max 262.4
80% within +5.88% average 6.71 | 50% within +2.94% average 6.64
21.46 MB/s / 111.84 cycles/byte
SHA512Cng
4.66 us / 214424 per second / 11193 cycles
Average 5.54 us, Median 4.6 us, min 4.2, max 6628.1
80% within +5.43% average 4.66 | 50% within +0% average 4.6
30.88 MB/s / 77.73 cycles/byte
SHA512CSP
49.52 us / 20195 per second / 118842 cycles
Average 50.43 us, Median 49.4 us, min 48.6, max 471
80% within +1.72% average 49.52 | 50% within +0.91% average 49.32
2.91 MB/s / 825.29 cycles/byte
Blake2B-256
1.39 us / 719122 per second / 3337 cycles
Average 3.33 us, Median 1.2 us, min 1.2, max 18294.1
80% within +20.83% average 1.39 | 50% within +20.83% average 1.39
103.55 MB/s / 23.18 cycles/byte
Blake2B-512
1.33 us / 751177 per second / 3195 cycles
Average 1.44 us, Median 1.2 us, min 1.2, max 348.1
80% within +20.83% average 1.33 | 50% within +20.83% average 1.33
108.17 MB/s / 22.19 cycles/byte
=== Symmetric (1000 B) ===
SHA256Managed
17.02 us / 58744 per second / 40855 cycles
Average 17.06 us, Median 17 us, min 16.6, max 81.4
80% within +1.18% average 17.02 | 50% within +0% average 17
58.74 MB/s / 40.85 cycles/byte
SHA256Cng
10.84 us / 92266 per second / 26012 cycles
Average 11.71 us, Median 10.6 us, min 10.2, max 3576
80% within +4.25% average 10.84 | 50% within +1.89% average 10.73
92.27 MB/s / 26.01 cycles/byte
SHA256CSP
55.68 us / 17959 per second / 133637 cycles
Average 59.67 us, Median 55.4 us, min 54.1, max 17246.2
80% within +1.9% average 55.68 | 50% within +1.17% average 55.5
17.96 MB/s / 133.64 cycles/byte
SHA512Managed
25.12 us / 39814 per second / 60280 cycles
Average 25.17 us, Median 25.1 us, min 24.7, max 77.2
80% within +1.79% average 25.12 | 50% within +0% average 25.1
39.81 MB/s / 60.28 cycles/byte
SHA512Cng
8.01 us / 124829 per second / 19226 cycles
Average 8.92 us, Median 8.1 us, min 7.6, max 3524
80% within +5.56% average 8.01 | 50% within +3.09% average 7.92
124.83 MB/s / 19.23 cycles/byte
SHA512CSP
53.13 us / 18820 per second / 127522 cycles
Average 57.07 us, Median 52.9 us, min 51.6, max 16346.8
80% within +2.08% average 53.13 | 50% within +1.23% average 52.95
18.82 MB/s / 127.52 cycles/byte
Blake2B-256
4.31 us / 232104 per second / 10340 cycles
Average 4.39 us, Median 4.2 us, min 4.2, max 70.8
80% within +4.76% average 4.31 | 50% within +4.76% average 4.31
232.1 MB/s / 10.34 cycles/byte
Blake2B-512
4.26 us / 234826 per second / 10220 cycles
Average 4.33 us, Median 4.2 us, min 4.2, max 69.1
80% within +4.76% average 4.26 | 50% within +0% average 4.2
234.83 MB/s / 10.22 cycles/byte
=== Symmetric (2048 B) ===
SHA256Managed
34.56 us / 28933 per second / 82950 cycles
Average 34.65 us, Median 34.5 us, min 34.1, max 83.6
80% within +0.58% average 34.56 | 50% within +0% average 34.5
59.25 MB/s / 40.5 cycles/byte
SHA256Cng
18.27 us / 54739 per second / 43844 cycles
Average 19.41 us, Median 18.3 us, min 17.4, max 2252.9
80% within +4.92% average 18.27 | 50% within +2.19% average 18.31
112.11 MB/s / 21.41 cycles/byte
SHA256CSP
63.13 us / 15840 per second / 151518 cycles
Average 66.3 us, Median 63.1 us, min 61, max 8838.8
80% within +2.06% average 63.13 | 50% within +0.63% average 63.08
32.44 MB/s / 73.98 cycles/byte
SHA512Managed
52.81 us / 18936 per second / 126746 cycles
Average 52.97 us, Median 52.9 us, min 52.4, max 135.2
80% within +0.85% average 52.81 | 50% within +0.47% average 52.74
38.78 MB/s / 61.89 cycles/byte
SHA512Cng
12.84 us / 77870 per second / 30820 cycles
Average 13.86 us, Median 12.8 us, min 12.3, max 2251.6
80% within +5.08% average 12.84 | 50% within +3.52% average 12.76
159.48 MB/s / 15.05 cycles/byte
SHA512CSP
58.3 us / 17154 per second / 139909 cycles
Average 62.53 us, Median 58.4 us, min 56.7, max 9998.5
80% within +1.8% average 58.3 | 50% within +1.03% average 58.14
35.13 MB/s / 68.31 cycles/byte
Blake2B-256
8.37 us / 119466 per second / 20089 cycles
Average 8.4 us, Median 8.5 us, min 8.1, max 73.3
80% within +4.71% average 8.37 | 50% within +2.35% average 8.32
244.67 MB/s / 9.81 cycles/byte
Blake2B-512
8.27 us / 120918 per second / 19848 cycles
Average 8.35 us, Median 8.1 us, min 8.1, max 73.3
80% within +2.47% average 8.27 | 50% within +2.47% average 8.27
247.64 MB/s / 9.69 cycles/byte
=== Symmetric (4 KiB) ===
SHA256Managed
67.66 us / 14779 per second / 162393 cycles
Average 67.77 us, Median 67.8 us, min 66.9, max 122
80% within +0.59% average 67.66 | 50% within +0.29% average 67.58
60.53 MB/s / 39.65 cycles/byte
SHA256Cng
32.52 us / 30753 per second / 78042 cycles
Average 33.68 us, Median 32.4 us, min 31.1, max 1367.5
80% within +4.01% average 32.52 | 50% within +2.62% average 32.64
125.96 MB/s / 19.05 cycles/byte
SHA256CSP
77.76 us / 12860 per second / 186632 cycles
Average 81.8 us, Median 77.6 us, min 75.5, max 5220.5
80% within +2.45% average 77.76 | 50% within +0.84% average 77.58
52.67 MB/s / 45.56 cycles/byte
SHA512Managed
102.09 us / 9796 per second / 245007 cycles
Average 102.17 us, Median 101.9 us, min 101.1, max 197.1
80% within +0.44% average 102.09 | 50% within +0.25% average 101.97
40.12 MB/s / 59.82 cycles/byte
SHA512Cng
21.42 us / 46693 per second / 51399 cycles
Average 22.5 us, Median 21.7 us, min 20.4, max 1341
80% within +2.76% average 21.42 | 50% within +1.84% average 21.35
191.26 MB/s / 12.55 cycles/byte
SHA512CSP
67.05 us / 14914 per second / 160923 cycles
Average 71.21 us, Median 66.9 us, min 65.2, max 5599.8
80% within +1.87% average 67.05 | 50% within +0.97% average 67.05
61.09 MB/s / 39.29 cycles/byte
Blake2B-256
16.39 us / 61026 per second / 39328 cycles
Average 16.43 us, Median 16.2 us, min 16.2, max 81.4
80% within +2.47% average 16.39 | 50% within +1.23% average 16.34
249.96 MB/s / 9.6 cycles/byte
Blake2B-512
16.31 us / 61299 per second / 39152 cycles
Average 16.4 us, Median 16.2 us, min 15.7, max 81.4
80% within +1.23% average 16.31 | 50% within +1.23% average 16.31
251.08 MB/s / 9.56 cycles/byte
=== Symmetric (8 KiB) ===
SHA256Managed
133.92 us / 7467 per second / 321398 cycles
Average 133.96 us, Median 133.9 us, min 132.6, max 245.3
80% within +0.49% average 133.92 | 50% within +0.34% average 133.83
61.17 MB/s / 39.23 cycles/byte
SHA256Cng
59.85 us / 16708 per second / 143646 cycles
Average 61 us, Median 59.3 us, min 58.4, max 835
80% within +4.72% average 59.85 | 50% within +0.76% average 59.17
136.87 MB/s / 17.53 cycles/byte
SHA256CSP
105.51 us / 9478 per second / 253221 cycles
Average 109.51 us, Median 104.9 us, min 103.6, max 2753.4
80% within +2.62% average 105.51 | 50% within +0.81% average 105.03
77.64 MB/s / 30.91 cycles/byte
SHA512Managed
200.53 us / 4987 per second / 481284 cycles
Average 200.72 us, Median 200.5 us, min 199.2, max 374.2
80% within +0.3% average 200.53 | 50% within +0.2% average 200.45
40.85 MB/s / 58.75 cycles/byte
SHA512Cng
38.5 us / 25974 per second / 92400 cycles
Average 39.6 us, Median 38.4 us, min 37.9, max 850.3
80% within +2.21% average 38.5 | 50% within +0.52% average 38.48
212.78 MB/s / 11.28 cycles/byte
SHA512CSP
84.67 us / 11811 per second / 203208 cycles
Average 88.61 us, Median 84.4 us, min 83.2, max 2765.3
80% within +1.54% average 84.67 | 50% within +0.77% average 84.43
96.75 MB/s / 24.81 cycles/byte
Blake2B-256
32.36 us / 30905 per second / 77658 cycles
Average 32.49 us, Median 32.4 us, min 32, max 111.7
80% within +1.23% average 32.36 | 50% within +0% average 32.4
253.17 MB/s / 9.48 cycles/byte
Blake2B-512
32.32 us / 30937 per second / 77578 cycles
Average 32.37 us, Median 32.4 us, min 32, max 97.7
80% within +1.23% average 32.32 | 50% within +0.62% average 32.27
253.43 MB/s / 9.47 cycles/byte
=== Symmetric (15 KiB) ===
SHA256Managed
261.95 us / 3818 per second / 628674 cycles
Average 262.25 us, Median 261.9 us, min 260.2, max 413.4
80% within +0.4% average 261.95 | 50% within +0.25% average 262.06
61.63 MB/s / 38.94 cycles/byte
SHA256Cng
111.91 us / 8936 per second / 268577 cycles
Average 113.94 us, Median 111.7 us, min 110.9, max 597.7
80% within +2.51% average 111.91 | 50% within +0.4% average 111.52
144.26 MB/s / 16.64 cycles/byte
SHA256CSP
158.64 us / 6303 per second / 380747 cycles
Average 163.05 us, Median 158.3 us, min 156.1, max 1603.4
80% within +3.38% average 158.64 | 50% within +0.66% average 158.11
101.76 MB/s / 23.58 cycles/byte
SHA512Managed
391.28 us / 2556 per second / 939062 cycles
Average 391.49 us, Median 391.2 us, min 388.7, max 691.2
80% within +0.17% average 391.28 | 50% within +0.1% average 391.19
41.26 MB/s / 58.17 cycles/byte
SHA512Cng
71.63 us / 13961 per second / 171906 cycles
Average 72.76 us, Median 71.2 us, min 70.4, max 532.9
80% within +2.11% average 71.63 | 50% within +0.63% average 71.36
225.39 MB/s / 10.65 cycles/byte
SHA512CSP
117.91 us / 8481 per second / 282973 cycles
Average 121.85 us, Median 117.7 us, min 116, max 1577
80% within +1.44% average 117.91 | 50% within +0.55% average 117.72
136.92 MB/s / 17.53 cycles/byte
Blake2B-256
63.9 us / 15651 per second / 153349 cycles
Average 64.02 us, Median 64 us, min 63.1, max 167.2
80% within +0.7% average 63.9 | 50% within +0.39% average 63.81
252.66 MB/s / 9.5 cycles/byte
Blake2B-512
63.9 us / 15649 per second / 153364 cycles
Average 64.04 us, Median 64 us, min 63.1, max 174.9
80% within +0.7% average 63.9 | 50% within +0.39% average 63.81
252.64 MB/s / 9.5 cycles/byte
Видя то, как нативные реализации SHA2 проигрывают managed реализации Blake2 во столько раз, я бы сказал что тугодумному SHA2 пора в историю. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
